Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-24-2018, 11:21 AM
Kale_M's Avatar
Kale_M Kale_M is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 816
Default

Look up Bill C-46

This tactic no longer works. They have passed legislation to close up this loophole.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-24-2018, 12:01 PM
Ken07AOVette's Avatar
Ken07AOVette Ken07AOVette is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 24,072
Default

this?

Exception
(4) No person commits an offence under subsection (3) if
(a) they consumed the drug or the alcohol or both after ceasing to operate a motor vehicle or vessel, or after ceasing to operate or assist in the operation of an aircraft or railway equipment or after ceasing to have the care or control of a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment; and
(b) after ceasing the activities described in paragraph (a), they had no reasonable expectation that they would be required to provide a sample of a bodily substance.

'butt offisher, i dint think i would cause i started drinking affer the crash to calm my nerves'
__________________
Only dead fish go with the flow. The rest use their brains in life.


Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck
I wasn't thinking far enough ahead for an outcome, I was ranting. By definition, a rant doesn't imply much forethought.....
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-24-2018, 02:09 PM
Kale_M's Avatar
Kale_M Kale_M is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
this?

Exception
(4) No person commits an offence under subsection (3) if
(a) they consumed the drug or the alcohol or both after ceasing to operate a motor vehicle or vessel, or after ceasing to operate or assist in the operation of an aircraft or railway equipment or after ceasing to have the care or control of a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment; and
(b) after ceasing the activities described in paragraph (a), they had no reasonable expectation that they would be required to provide a sample of a bodily substance.

'butt offisher, i dint think i would cause i started drinking affer the crash to calm my nerves'
Alcohol on site at the Scene off the accident is reasonable grounds to believe he was drinking prior to the accident. He is ****ed
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-24-2018, 02:24 PM
stuckincity stuckincity is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kale_M View Post
Look up Bill C-46

This tactic no longer works. They have passed legislation to close up this loophole.
GOOD!




I have my own Draconian ideas about drunk drivers, but I better not post 'em here because I'll get in trouble.
They aren't exactly "politically correct" or "tolerant".
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-24-2018, 03:24 PM
Twisted Canuck's Avatar
Twisted Canuck Twisted Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GP AB
Posts: 16,208
Default

It's too bad that somebody didn't accidentally push him into the traffic, accidentally like.

Then slip him back into his driver's seat and say, 'wow, those airbags worked too good!!'.
__________________
'Once the monkeys learn they can vote themselves a banana, they'll never climb another tree.'. Robert Heinlein

'You can accomplish a lot more with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.' Al Capone
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.