|
|
04-19-2010, 08:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,195
|
|
Berger Target vs Berger Hunting
Anyone know the difference between the Berger Target VLD bullet and the Berger Hunting VLD? Anyone know of a source for 6.5mm 130 grain Hunting VLD's?
Bobby B.
__________________
Logic never lies.
|
04-19-2010, 09:40 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 622
|
|
I'm not sure what the difference is. The VLD's were being used as hunting bullets by some people and evidently the effects were devestating on game. This find was an accident, they got lucky, because target bullets are not known for reliable performance on game. None the less, the practice of using the Bergers was irresponsible.
I suspect that Berger has done some tests and looked for ways to ensure that the performance was more consistant. Although standard VLDs will still work, the ones marked for hunting are most likely better suited for hunting.
|
04-19-2010, 09:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby B.
Anyone know the difference between the Berger Target VLD bullet and the Berger Hunting VLD? Anyone know of a source for 6.5mm 130 grain Hunting VLD's?
Bobby B.
|
dad took a doe for meat last fall useing a 168 grain berger hunting bullet and she dropped in her Tracks. thats all I can tell you besides that berger's hunting bullets are as accurate as there target bullets,we do shoot both!
as long as you dont shoot them barnes TSX\TTSX,full metal Jacket,copper,100% weight Retention Junk,While hunting you'll do fine!!! broadheads tare deer apart more than Barnes Bullets.
__________________
|
04-19-2010, 10:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,658
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie
as long as you dont shoot them barnes TSX\TTSX,full metal Jacket,copper,100% weight Retention Junk,While hunting you'll do fine!!! broadheads tare deer apart more than Barnes Bullets.
|
Glad to see your back trolling.
Also glad to see the majority here have you figured out.
Have fun Tyler.
|
04-19-2010, 10:23 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie
dad took a doe for meat last fall useing a 168 grain berger hunting bullet and she dropped in her Tracks. thats all I can tell you besides that berger's hunting bullets are as accurate as there target bullets,we do shoot both!
as long as you dont shoot them barnes TSX\TTSX,full metal Jacket,copper,100% weight Retention Junk,While hunting you'll do fine!!! broadheads tare deer apart more than Barnes Bullets.
|
Good luck bud. I had my fun on that one got me suspended.Keep out of trouble.
|
04-19-2010, 10:24 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowtown guy
Glad to see your back trolling.
Also glad to see the majority here have you figured out.
Have fun Tyler.
|
Cowtown define what trolling is for me please.
|
04-19-2010, 10:28 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowtown guy
Glad to see your back trolling.
Also glad to see the majority here have you figured out.
Have fun Tyler.
|
LOL...I missed his edit...guess he wasn't happy just answering the question....decided the board had been too quiet for a while. Despite your little attempt at trolling whitetail junkie, I don't think I'll bite either.....
|
04-19-2010, 10:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 98
|
|
as long as you dont shoot them barnes TSX\TTSX,full metal Jacket,copper,100% weight Retention Junk,While hunting you'll do fine!!! broadheads tare deer apart more than Barnes Bullets.[/QUOTE]
Not sure what your taking about, I use Barnes all the time. They work great. Used them on moose, deer, bears etc. No issues.
|
04-19-2010, 10:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
|
|
We need that troll smiley from CGN here.
trda, it ain't worth it.
|
04-19-2010, 10:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,658
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinC
Cowtown define what trolling is for me please.
|
After 600 posts I suspect you are doing the same.
Posting something to elicit a comment which will turn into a free-for-all, something just plain rude or simply non-factual just to start an argument.
Don't bother replying to me, I'm done with this one.
|
04-19-2010, 10:41 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L.
We need that troll smiley from CGN here.
trda, it ain't worth it.
|
How about this one!
|
04-19-2010, 10:42 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
|
|
So back to the thread. The jacket thickness is the different between the two. Target bullets are not to be used for hunting as they might not exspand as needed to do a proper kill.
|
04-19-2010, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 98
|
|
Sorry guy's.
|
04-19-2010, 10:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinC
Good luck bud. I had my fun on that one got me suspended.Keep out of trouble.
|
Welcome back,I saw that you got suspended(lol) along with a few other guys got banned!!!,I guess like me,your not part of the Clique.Mind you i've never got anything yet except a warning 9 months ago for swearing?? cant remember.
What did you say to get punted for a week?
__________________
|
04-19-2010, 10:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowtown guy
Glad to see your back trolling.
Also glad to see the majority here have you figured out.
Have fun Tyler.
|
The only thing I Troll for is Pike, I was Just stateing a Fact about Barnes bullets.
__________________
|
04-19-2010, 10:49 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie
Welcome back,I saw that you got suspended(lol) along with a few other guys got banned!!!,I guess like me,your not part of the Clique.Mind you i've never got anything yet except a warning 9 months ago for swearing?? cant remember.
What did you say to get punted for a week?
|
Thought you'd try a new lure?
|
04-19-2010, 10:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
|
no honestley,he is a buddy,its an honest question.!!! Guess i could of sent him a PM,but why hide what you have to say!!!
__________________
|
04-19-2010, 11:13 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
How about this one!
|
That's the one!
|
04-19-2010, 11:19 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,580
|
|
B B
I shot the 140gr Berger in my Steyr 6.5x55 with Re 22 and it was an exceptional combo. I have heard good thing about the Accubond in 130gr, I may give them a try next. FS
|
04-20-2010, 07:08 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,195
|
|
Guys,
Just to clarify, I've already killed some game with the 168 VLD out of my 7RM and am now wanting to load 130 VLDs in my 260 Rem. I know of sources for the 130 Target bullet but not for the 130 Hunting bullet so I want to hear from someone who KNOWS if there is a difference and what that difference is. I did request an explanation from Berger, but am still waiting for a reply.
Bobby B.
__________________
Logic never lies.
|
04-20-2010, 07:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby B.
Guys,
Just to clarify, I've already killed some game with the 168 VLD out of my 7RM and am now wanting to load 130 VLDs in my 260 Rem. I know of sources for the 130 Target bullet but not for the 130 Hunting bullet so I want to hear from someone who KNOWS if there is a difference and what that difference is. I did request an explanation from Berger, but am still waiting for a reply.
Bobby B.
|
The hunting bullet has a slightly thicker jacket but mostly the jacket isn't interior turned to the same tolerances as the match bullet. Still highly accurate but a small difference.
|
04-20-2010, 08:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: "Hatchet City"
Posts: 101
|
|
I've used the 90 grain Berger match bullet with my .243 Win, and the weight retention was poor, the recovered bullet was 30 grains. It did imact bone, and left an incredible wound channel. The bullet(what was left of it) was under the hide on the far side. I should add, it was a beaver that I shot with the match bullet. For my game, I will be using copper bullets.
|
04-20-2010, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rollo
I've used the 90 grain Berger match bullet with my .243 Win, and the weight retention was poor, the recovered bullet was 30 grains. It did imact bone, and left an incredible wound channel. The bullet(what was left of it) was under the hide on the far side. I should add, it was a beaver that I shot with the match bullet. For my game, I will be using copper bullets.
|
what animal did you shoot with the 90 grain berger bullet? I bought the same bullets for my 240 wby,they were good on paper,but I hav'nt shot nothing with them yet.have you shot alot of animals with your .243? i'm curious to try out my new .24 cal this fall! I think i'm also abit nervous because i've never hunted with nothing smaller than a .257wby mag,and hope the .24 cal is enough to take down a big bodied muledeer\whitetail?
__________________
|
04-20-2010, 10:06 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie
what animal did you shoot with the 90 grain berger bullet? I bought the same bullets for my 240 wby,they were good on paper,but I hav'nt shot nothing with them yet.have you shot alot of animals with your .243? i'm curious to try out my new .24 cal this fall! I think i'm also abit nervous because i've never hunted with nothing smaller than a .257wby mag,and hope the .24 cal is enough to take down a big bodied muledeer\whitetail?
|
It was a beaver that he shot. Dont worry about the bullet I have shot lots with a 6mm and the kill everything.The bullets will work as you know.
|
04-20-2010, 10:09 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rollo
it was a beaver that I shot with the match bullet. For my game, I will be using copper bullets.
|
Beaver Eh!!! guess I should of read more closeley,sorry for the dumb question!
__________________
|
04-20-2010, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinC
It was a beaver that he shot. Dont worry about the bullet I have shot lots with a 6mm and the kill everything.The bullets will work as you know.
|
Right on,thats good to know!!! I've been reloading with the nosler balistic silvertip's,which my 240 wby loves,plus I've killed them dead with them bullets before!
__________________
|
04-20-2010, 01:23 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Elk Point, Alberta
Posts: 929
|
|
From the opposite perspective, I'm using Berger "hunting" 180 VLDs in my long-range gun, and they shoot very well, though I can't compare them with the "target" bullets 'cause I can't find any.....
|
04-20-2010, 06:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,195
|
|
Hi Bob,
Likes like you had a nice plains hunt in Africa congratulations. I can not relate to the lot number but the box should have a part number on it and that will tell me which bullet it is. The difference between the bullets is the jacket. The target bullet has a thicker jacket than the hunting bullet so it can with stand the the abuse the long range high power shooters expose them to. We do not recommend them for hunting as they may not expand in the manner the thinner jackets do and pencil on through some of the animals.
I would not recommend the 6.5 target bullet in a 260 Rem for a deer application. Velocity will not be excessively high and some of the deer rather small and they may not expand the way the hunting bullet does. Load data should be the same for both bullets use the target bullets to get your 260 Rem shooting and pick up some hunting bullets before next season would be my recommendation.
Walt Berger
Berger Bullets
Technical Advisor
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Boychuk <bobscobra@shaw.ca>
To: bergerltd@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Apr 19, 2010 7:12 am
Subject: 6.5 VLD
Hi Walt,
The bullet I've been using on game so far is the VLD 7MM 168 GRAIN MATCH GRADE Lot# 1408. This bullet has proven very effective on our big bodied Alberta deer, a moose, kudu, gemsbok, red hartebeest, zebra, black wildebeest, blue wildebeest, etc. I don't believe this bullet to be the MATCH HUNTING but don't know for certain.
Currently, I'm in the process of building a .260 Rem for deer hunting. The only bullet I can find up here is the 6.5MM TARGET VLD, not the 6.5MM MATCH HUNTING VLD. Is there a difference bewteen the tow and, if so, what is it? Also, can the TARGET bullet be used on deer?
Bob Boychuk
__________________
Logic never lies.
|
04-20-2010, 06:27 PM
|
|
The thicker jackets translate into lower BCs. Not a good thing. Less density.
I think Berger is also using harder jackets... at least according to a discussion with wild cat bullets...
Apparently the folks in the USA are using hunting bullets again for target shooting... not all (LOL) but many.
I wonder what the jacket thickness was on the early target bullets (pre hunting bullet hype). Probably thin.... When I was at the shot show, I was a small meeting with Glen Harrison from Nesika, a few others and the Berger promoter... at that time they targets and hunting were the same.
|
04-20-2010, 08:07 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,195
|
|
According to the Berger website, the BC for the TARGET bullet and the HUNTING bullet are the same, at least for the 6.5 130 grain and th 7mm 168 grain.
The BC is dictated by the shape of the outside of the bullet. A thicker jacket would result in more copper covering less lead. Afterall, for a given bullet weight, if more jacket is present, then less lead must result. Therefore, if there is more jacket and less lead, then the dimensions of the bullet must increase to equate to the same bullet weight. Since the bullet cannot be of a greater diameter as this is solely dictated by the caliber, then a greater length must be the result. As a general rule, all else being equal, the greater the bullet length for a given caliber, the greater the BC. It would follow that a thicker jacket would increase the BC, not decrease it. However, the measurable difference would be very slight to the point of debatable consequence.
As stated by Walt Berger of Berger Bullets, it is the TARGET bullet that possesses the thicker jacket not the HUNTING bullet. He clearly recommends the thinner jacketed HUNTING bullet for deer as the thicker jacket of the TARGET bullet might fail to properly expand.
Bobby B.
__________________
Logic never lies.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:32 AM.
|