|
10-14-2014, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Kootenays, B.C.
Posts: 445
|
|
Too many elk in SE Alberta?
Hope the link came through....
Most of us would give our left n@t to hunt elk on the base
http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=466925
|
10-14-2014, 10:57 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 6,433
|
|
I would rather see them give out a 1000 cow tags and increase some bull tags than to setup a high fence to capture and kill the "excess elk"
|
10-14-2014, 11:02 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iron River
Posts: 5,158
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_W
I would rather see them give out a 1000 cow tags and increase some bull tags than to setup a high fence to capture and kill the "excess elk"
|
I'd rather see them reintroduced to former elk range in the northern green zone of the province.
|
10-14-2014, 12:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Forgotten Corner
Posts: 786
|
|
They are RATS and they do not belong. Ofcourse this is just my ******* opinion.
|
10-14-2014, 12:43 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 349
|
|
Start relocating them to the porkies especially ad then everywhere else in need.... lol
|
10-14-2014, 12:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,784
|
|
Wild elk aren't exactly easily "transported" they don't do especially well getting trailered not to mention with head gear....they aren't hamsters or budgies....
LC
__________________
|
10-14-2014, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 834
|
|
They won't move the elk back west, some may have CWD now form being out east and they won't risk any spreading of the disease.
|
10-14-2014, 01:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,650
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cacty
They are RATS and they do not belong. Ofcourse this is just my ******* opinion.
|
Obviously your not an opportunist and live in this area From the threads and discussions on this subject, most are all for opportunity and really don't understand a darn thing about this herd and the effects on the area.
To think they would round these up and slaughter for the public is asinine, or relocate to other areas... Who is going to pay for this ?
I have said all along, this particular situation is the storm providing an avenue for "paid" hunting in Alberta.. We are getting close, now we have issuing "land owner" tags to military personal who don't own these lands nor should they be put in the front of the line.. This can of worms is just a start really to something larger in the making..
How do you think the effected land owners feel about this step to issue this tag to the military personal ?
Earlier this year when the area was flown for a count, rumor has it the count was stopped at 7500 animals... Most who reside in this area have the 10 thousand mark currently in this area..
I found out this year there are 3500 head of cattle now grazing the area, this will only create more future problems IMO.
I'm all for opportunity, but this situation is an utter failure and worst case of mismanagement and finger pointing I have ever seen in our province...
When the Southern part of our province experiences a bad winter and heavy snow fall, well there will be dead elk everywhere.....
|
10-14-2014, 01:29 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 430
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck
Wild elk aren't exactly easily "transported" they don't do especially well getting trailered not to mention with head gear....they aren't hamsters or budgies....
LC
|
So, out of the 200 or so originally transplanted to Suffield, how many died during the process? How many of the 150 or so elk annually removed from Elk Island die during transport / relocation process?
|
10-14-2014, 01:31 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bazeau County East side
Posts: 4,196
|
|
Is it a general season in WMU's around the base or is it draw?
|
10-14-2014, 02:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: bonnyville,ab
Posts: 167
|
|
Send them here we will takem all , i wish. Funny relocating them there in the first place was no problem so why is it now? many northern/eastern/western areas would be glad to have them. maybe the problem is to many grazing cows? lol
|
10-14-2014, 02:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 956
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmcbride
Is it a general season in WMU's around the base or is it draw?
|
Oh boy here we go!!
|
10-14-2014, 04:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 380
|
|
Not likley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledhead71
Obviously your not an opportunist and live in this area From the threads and discussions on this subject, most are all for opportunity and really don't understand a darn thing about this herd and the effects on the area.
To think they would round these up and slaughter for the public is asinine, or relocate to other areas... Who is going to pay for this ?
I have said all along, this particular situation is the storm providing an avenue for "paid" hunting in Alberta.. We are getting close, now we have issuing "land owner" tags to military personal who don't own these lands nor should they be put in the front of the line.. This can of worms is just a start really to something larger in the making..
How do you think the effected land owners feel about this step to issue this tag to the military personal ?
Earlier this year when the area was flown for a count, rumor has it the count was stopped at 7500 animals... Most who reside in this area have the 10 thousand mark currently in this area..
I found out this year there are 3500 head of cattle now grazing the area, this will only create more future problems IMO.
I'm all for opportunity, but this situation is an utter failure and worst case of mismanagement and finger pointing I have ever seen in our province...
When the Southern part of our province experiences a bad winter and heavy snow fall, well there will be dead elk everywhere.....
|
Not likely. We just had some nasty winters in 10,11,12. Decimated the antelope and pheasant. Did not slow the elk herd apparently.
Looper
|
10-14-2014, 04:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Claresholm AB.
Posts: 455
|
|
Maybe we could take all the free oil lease money from the cheap lease land out there and have a funded study on the problem!
|
10-14-2014, 04:53 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,650
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Looper
Not likely. We just had some nasty winters in 10,11,12. Decimated the antelope and pheasant. Did not slow the elk herd apparently.
Looper
|
You never read into my post, mother nature can be brutal and so can those protecting their lively hoods and herds as well
|
10-14-2014, 05:05 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 407
|
|
Historical Elk range
Quote:
Originally Posted by cacty
They are RATS and they do not belong. Ofcourse this is just my ******* opinion.
|
Maybe you should do a little research before you post. The historical range for Elk much like buffalo covered most of North America ..... if you know where that is on the planet
|
10-14-2014, 05:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,490
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilgoretrout
Maybe you should do a little research before you post. The historical range for Elk much like buffalo covered most of North America ..... if you know where that is on the planet
|
Pretty sure Cacty lives in the area of the problem. When the elk used to be there so were the predators that are not there anymore. Historical ranges dont really apply, dont think a couple million bison would go over very good there either. The issue is man is messing with nature again and is shocked by the results. Eventually the herd may find a balance but how that happens (disease?), who knows. In the meantime people are just trying to figure out how to control the growth of the herd through hunting.
There are a few really good threads on the subject, try searching Suffield/wild horses/etc.etc.etc
Last edited by Flatlandliver; 10-14-2014 at 05:19 PM.
|
10-14-2014, 05:26 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 407
|
|
Suffield Elk
If thats the case I feel for him and the crop damage etc... that goes on, just a shame that do not allow more tags, longer seasons, base access to deal with the problem that has been created I guess they should have left the horses alone
|
10-14-2014, 05:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,784
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBHunter
So, out of the 200 or so originally transplanted to Suffield, how many died during the process? How many of the 150 or so elk annually removed from Elk Island die during transport / relocation process?
|
Not sure wasn't there and wasn't involved but the odd domestic one dies too, so I imagine the wild ones fair a little worse unless tranquilizers are used.
LC
__________________
|
10-14-2014, 06:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,490
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilgoretrout
If thats the case I feel for him and the crop damage etc... that goes on, just a shame that do not allow more tags, longer seasons, base access to deal with the problem that has been created I guess they should have left the horses alone
|
Lots of stakeholders there. They have added more tags and seasons over the years both in and out of the base but they are playing catchup big time. IMO, more base / protected area access is needed as just increasing the number of hunters outside the base will only decrease the harvest. Its been discussed a ton here and other sites, no easy solution to a complete lack of foresight. I feel for the ranchers who now have to deal with the damage from elk and fielding hundreds of calls from hunters. That said they are a great bunch out there. Cant believe I just said I feel bad for a rancher.
|
10-15-2014, 01:27 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,289
|
|
lol i can guarantee that there is 20 000 elk hunters who would drive to the base for any elk. cow, spike and otherwise. That would seriously curb the problem if they opened up a mass tag blowout and 6 month season just for 1 or 2 years.
90% of my elk hunting buddies hang up empty tags every year due to low populations in our zones. The easy solution is the ranchers having the problems hand over hunting permission control and monitoring to the local f and w or other form of local govt(which i have seen done successfully before) then for one year they "deal" with hundreds of hunters on their property yet save tens of thousands of dollars on fence repairs and lost grazing revenue. And the herd gets decimated while hunters families get fed and very little expense to anyone.
I realize the organization of this and the ranchers will have a little extra stress in their lives for one season but after the numbers are back under 1 thousand then things return to "normal"....
What do you guys think? Pro's Con's?
BTW Many ranchers I know do not allow hunting permission yet whine and complain to get reparations money from the govt to cover their fence and crop damage due to elk herds of 200 in the area. I have heard that most of this money comes from our hunting tags costs.... How messed up is that?
|
10-15-2014, 07:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,314
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilgoretrout
Maybe you should do a little research before you post. The historical range for Elk much like buffalo covered most of North America ..... if you know where that is on the planet
|
Here we go again on the historical range BS .. why not include grizzlies in this part of the discussion like all those that point out that it was part of their historical range too .. Not singling you out kilgore ,but those of us that live in the areas affected by an increasing elk and grizz population aren't really thrilled with the problems that go along with them . How many of you that live in cities or rural acreages want a couple hundred elk or a mamma grizz with cubs setting up shop in your back yard ?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.
|