Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2020, 09:49 AM
20shadow05 20shadow05 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Posts: 166
Default If you had to choose one caliber between 6mm and 6.5 for deer and paper punching.

Hi all,

If you had to choose one short action cartridge between 6mm and 6.5 for deer 400 yards max and paper at 500 yards max, what would you choose and why? Has to be non-magnum and short action only.

Thanks in advance

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2020, 09:57 AM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Do you reload or just buy ammo?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:10 AM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,494
Default

.243
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:23 AM
20shadow05 20shadow05 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Posts: 166
Default

Sorry,

I do reload
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:32 AM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

6.5 Creedmoor is hard to beat
6.5 prc if your looking for a little more zip
I like the 6.5x284 but it’s tight in a short action but do able
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:41 AM
Jerry D's Avatar
Jerry D Jerry D is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,405
Default

Just for deer, maybe a 6x47 or 6mm cm if you want different.

.243 for commercial availability but lack of target ammo on the shelves.

6.5cm will have everything and is growing.

All of these can handle what your asking at twice the distance.

Sent from my SM-A530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:44 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,585
Default

6-284
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:46 AM
Nyksta Nyksta is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,542
Default

the 6.5 creedmoor is doing well for popularity
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:48 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,576
Default

No question , 6.5, either a 260, Creedmoor a 6.5x55.
The case capacity between the three is very little and the barrel life -(that matters to some ) is better than the 6's with the same capacity .
Throw in bullet wright and there simply is no contest .
Keep in mind that this is coming from someone who owns and shoots match rifles in 6mmBr, and three different 6.5 cartridges out to 1 k and has two of them in rifles that can hunt. Not just an opinion based on what I have read !
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-22-2020, 10:51 AM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,490
Default

6.5 PRC I love mine
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-22-2020, 11:10 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waldedw View Post
6.5 PRC I love mine
The 6.5 PRC is about as big a case as I want to go these days - have inveigh those sitting in the rack as well, it is very similar to the 6.5 Badcat and the 6.5 SAUM we were messing with in the early days of the short mag craze .
I no longer take what I consider long range hunting shots so for me there is no need for the extra case capacity , but it is a fun cartridge to shoot, for sure!
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-22-2020, 11:18 AM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,381
Default Where is the Love?

Where is the love for the 6.5x 47? I wouldnt recommend this to anyone who is not a reloader though.

I have a 6.5 X47 and I have a 6.5 Creed they are both great. Tough to choose between them. I will admit its nice to be able to buy ammo off the shelf.

The 6.5 x 47 is just such a great cartridge. So easy to make good loads for and the recoil is so mild.

Either is great.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-22-2020, 01:17 PM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

I’d be choosing between the 6.5 Grendel (2004 release) or the new 6mm version just release by Hornady called the 6mm-ARC (2020 release).

Efficiency would be my favorite reasons why, they both have more than enough hp for deer/sheep/antelope/black bear out to 400 yards but super fun to shoot for any reason including paper and varmints/predators or taking people shooting.

They both will have the best barrel life of all the 6mm/6.5mm variants as they only burn about 29-30 grains of powder. Edge should go to 6.5 here as it will run 170-220 fps slower with it’s 15-20 gr heavier bullets. Budget 5000+ rounds barrel life on the 6.5 Grendel. They get that out of AR rifles in the US where 20 round magazine dumps are part of life. Bolt actions with some care in general barrel cooling…could be a lifetime trying to wear a barrel out? In saami spec it's a low pressure cartridge at 52,000 psi, also good for barrel life, but it's for operation in semi-auto's, in bolt actions you can run it up to regular pressures and gain another 100 fps reloading.

Recoil energy ft/lbs in the single digits for all day shooting comfort and anyone can drive them well. Also spotting impacts, edge going to 6mm for that just due to lighter bullets for a little less muzzle jump.
Reloading stuff for either won’t be an issue, the 6mm-ARC will be as popular in a couple years as the 6.5 Grendel is now and then it will likely supersede the Grendel and eventually start taking on the .223 for popularity by the time it hits the same age as the Grendel is now. But getting into the 6-ARC in year one will be a challenge up here in Canada.

Overall efficiency to 400 yards I’d choose the Grendel but I am far more hunt biased and will occasionally go after 3rd class game such as moose or elk and rather have over 120 grains of bullet going down range despite the slight sd advantage of the 108 gr 6mm, even on class 2 game like deer/sheep. I feel you’re going to get a little more for the powder burned in the Grendel than the ARC as you usually do when you slow things down on same case. If I shot more paper, targets, varmints…then I’d be inclined to look at the 6mm. It will have a little shorter time of flight, little flatter pbr and to all distances, little less wind drift too, but splitting hairs inside 400. I’d definitely choose the 6mm if wanted to paper/steel punch out to 1000. Most Grendel target peeps struggle to get good grouping past 800, the extra speed and sd of the ARC will easily add 150 yards effective range to the Grendel, both go well beyond your asks.

Downside will be these are both micro-action length cartridges, based of the 7.62x39(220 russian) case, limited range of rifles currently. CZ 527, Howa Mini, Ruger American as the most common choices. And most haven’t started chambering the new 6mm-ARC but I’d bet the Ruger will be the first with Howa 2nd and CZ 3rd.

The easy buttons however might be 6 or 6.5 creedmoor in a normal short action. Overkill for your needs but easier to find equipment, ammo, reloading supplies. Low double digit recoil energies and barrel life edge to the 6.5 again, good but not Grendel good.

6mm seems to have best rep as a combo deer/target bullet diameter choice.

I've had zero issues shooting the same size groups at 500-550 yards with at least 3 of my 6.5 Grendels as anything else i've shot. Very easy to dial in and get on target and shoot my usual 1/2 moa then 1 moa 3 shot groups.

Last edited by Stinky Coyote; 10-22-2020 at 01:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-22-2020, 04:46 PM
raised by wolves raised by wolves is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,279
Default

6mm Remington or a 260 Remington.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-22-2020, 05:02 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,459
Default

Cat kinda nailed it in my opinion. For a dedicated deer gun, it really is hard to beat the 6.5 Creed. Reams have been written about its efficiency / ease of finding an accurate load, but for me it is just such a sweet shooting little cartridge recoil wise that it really is hard to beat. My next gun will be another 6.5 Creed.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-22-2020, 05:08 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,116
Default

If it's more for target, the 6.5CM, if it's more for hunting, the 6.5PRC.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-22-2020, 06:44 PM
huntingfamily huntingfamily is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
No question , 6.5, either a 260, Creedmoor a 6.5x55.
The case capacity between the three is very little and the barrel life -(that matters to some ) is better than the 6's with the same capacity .
Throw in bullet wright and there simply is no contest .
Keep in mind that this is coming from someone who owns and shoots match rifles in 6mmBr, and three different 6.5 cartridges out to 1 k and has two of them in rifles that can hunt. Not just an opinion based on what I have read !
Cat
Couldn't have said it better Cat.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-22-2020, 06:59 PM
Redneck 7 Redneck 7 is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The best place on earth.
Posts: 1,653
Default

.243 or a .260. No need to get into the bigger hyped crazed ammo fads. Stick to what’s been around the longest and enjoy shooting!
__________________
Life’s a garden, Dig it! - Joe Dirt
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-22-2020, 07:07 PM
.264 Win Mag .264 Win Mag is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 220
Default

6.5 PRC I would say or it’s close cousin the 6.5x284. They offer a very nice balance between barrel life, speed, and energy. That being said I do love my .264 win mag.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-22-2020, 07:10 PM
Jeron Kahyar Jeron Kahyar is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,313
Default

Can I put a vote in for the 257 Roberts (AI if you reload)? It fits the between 6 and 6.5mm. Seems to be little love for the quarter bores these days.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-22-2020, 07:40 PM
blackburbot blackburbot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 141
Default

6 dasher. Damn near no recoil, super cheap to reload for, less powder than any others mentioned except for maybe the grendel. Designed for target shooting and with a 27" barrel sending a 105gr pill over 3000fps. The competent smiths in this province regularly spin these up that do incredibly small groups at distance.

I would venture to say they are way more accurate than the 6.5creedy.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-22-2020, 07:41 PM
stob stob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,420
Default

I have a custom 6.5 x 55 and 243win...I reach for the 243 more often than not...but used the 6.5 for everything for 20 years mostly with 156gr vulcans or 95gr vmax
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-23-2020, 09:49 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

260 rem or 260imp, have both and they do both.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-23-2020, 06:20 PM
kujoseto's Avatar
kujoseto kujoseto is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 2,170
Default

My vote goes to the 6.5 over 6

Short action you can’t go wrong with 260 or (I can’t believe I’m saying it) 6.5 creedmoor aka manbun.
I went with what I call the 6.5 manbun magnum which has long been referred to as the 6.5mm Swede
I think manbun magnum is what the mm has always stood for but we never knew for over 100 years
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-23-2020, 09:25 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackburbot View Post
6 dasher.

I would venture to say they are way more accurate than the 6.5creedy.
Until the wind picks up!
I have two match rifles in 6MM BR, one an F/O rifle and another that I use as a training rifle for Palma match . When the wind picks up at 1K they can't compete with my bigger 6.5's
As far as hunting goes, there are far better cartridges out there with factory ammo or brass readily available .
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!

Last edited by catnthehat; 10-23-2020 at 09:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-23-2020, 11:08 PM
prarie_boy1 prarie_boy1 is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 20shadow05 View Post
Hi all,

If you had to choose one short action cartridge between 6mm and 6.5 for deer 400 yards max and paper at 500 yards max, what would you choose and why? Has to be non-magnum and short action only.

Thanks in advance

Mark
I faced this same dilemma about 9 months ago and as I had a old rem 700 .30-06 and a 6.5mm 1-8” benchmark blank collecting dust I decided to have a 6.5x55 spun up. If it were a short action I had I would have likely went with the .260 rem
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-24-2020, 08:20 AM
antmai antmai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here, not there
Posts: 589
Default Vote

6.5cm is my vote. Seeing the energy at distance has made me ‘almost’ regret my 308 rig.
__________________
The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why. ~Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-24-2020, 08:42 AM
Jerry D's Avatar
Jerry D Jerry D is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antmai View Post
6.5cm is my vote. Seeing the energy at distance has made me ‘almost’ regret my 308 rig.
Im in this dilemma as well, considering a 7mm08 as a good middle ground.

For closer ranges, the .308 will make a larger wound cavity if that means anything to you, while penetrating deeply enough!

Sent from my SM-A530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-24-2020, 01:50 PM
helluvahunter helluvahunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Turin, AB
Posts: 371
Default

25-06 with 80gr or 100gr TTSX very hard to beat.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-24-2020, 03:37 PM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kujoseto View Post
My vote goes to the 6.5 over 6

Short action you can’t go wrong with 260 or (I can’t believe I’m saying it) 6.5 creedmoor aka manbun.
I went with what I call the 6.5 manbun magnum which has long been referred to as the 6.5mm Swede
I think manbun magnum is what the mm has always stood for but we never knew for over 100 years
"manbun" ........ a perfect reason why, despite it excellent reputation and top mark performance - I just can't get on board with the CM crowd.

It's the non fat vanilla frapapuchino of the 6.5's

They are great, but you don't want your friends seeing you drink one
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.