Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-26-2013, 02:54 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck12 View Post
That science is predicated on theories. To be a fact you have to prove your theories. Man made climate change is a theory. It's a theory that a lot of politicians and people have hysterically and with little critical thought jumped on the bandwagon.
By your use if the word 'theory' it sounds like you really mean ' hypothesis'.

Huge difference in science.

E=MC2 is a theory.

Not many disputing it.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-26-2013, 02:56 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishtank View Post
AL Gore is making killing out of this climate change thing.
He did. He is a despicable hypocrite.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-26-2013, 03:59 PM
Wild&Free Wild&Free is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
By your use if the word 'theory' it sounds like you really mean ' hypothesis'.

Huge difference in science.

E=MC2 is a theory.

Not many disputing it.
Most people like to think they understand the English language but forget that it is the bastard child of at least a half a dozen other languages.

Theory in common use is different then Theory in scientific use which is different then Theory in legal terminology.
__________________
Respond, not react. - Saskatchewan proverb

We learn from history that we do not learn from history. - Hegel

Your obligation to fight has not been relieved because the battle is fierce and difficult. Ben Shapiro
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-26-2013, 04:03 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild&Free View Post
Most people like to think they understand the English language but forget that it is the bastard child of at least a half a dozen other languages.

Theory in common use is different then Theory in scientific use which is different then Theory in legal terminology.
But if we are talking about science, let's use the term properly the way it is understood in science. Not the way it is thought of in the street. Words have specific meanings and it behooves us to understand that.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-26-2013, 05:04 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
Both the Wild Rose party and Daneille Smith now agreed that climate change is real.

http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjourn...866846ca19&p=1

Less and less deniers left out there as science studies keep confirming the facts.

I look forward to saying Premier Smith after the next election.
She is pandering to the gullible and the biggest gullible group is your climate make believers.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-26-2013, 05:07 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

She is slowly learning what it takes to get votes....calm down AVB, she didn't exactly go the extent of your endless posts.......
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-26-2013, 05:25 PM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

Good for her. Hope she puts it in the WildRose RedBook.

The people that believe in AGW will of course believe anything someone says.

The rest of us know precisely what she is going to do about AGW when elected. (Stick a pin in it)

Please continue to drum up votes for her amongst the members of your church.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-26-2013, 05:25 PM
smartypants's Avatar
smartypants smartypants is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
By your use if the word 'theory' it sounds like you really mean ' hypothesis'.

Huge difference in science.

E=MC2 is a theory.

Not many disputing it.

How did Albert get to relativity....go around the room for a simple show of hands or?...'Ja, looks like vee got ein konsensus....gut enough!'
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:03 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher View Post
She is pandering to the gullible and the biggest gullible group is your climate make believers.
Is she pandering to the gay activists also? What about those that are anti racist?

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/canada/edm...tory/1.2252867
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:04 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hal53 View Post
She is slowly learning what it takes to get votes....calm down AVB, she didn't exactly go the extent of your endless posts.......
True, but then she's a pretty quick learner
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:05 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
Is she pandering to the gay activists also? What about those that are anti racist?

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/canada/edm...tory/1.2252867
she is learning,
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:07 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smartypants View Post
How did Albert get to relativity....go around the room for a simple show of hands or?...'Ja, looks like vee got ein konsensus....gut enough!'
You really don't know how science gets from a hypotheses to a theory do you? Nor really care do you? It's more fun to be flippant and sound interesting on the internet isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:15 PM
smartypants's Avatar
smartypants smartypants is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
You really don't know how science gets from a hypotheses to a theory do you? Nor really care do you? It's more fun to be flippant and sound interesting on the internet isn't it?
....actually I do buddy.....look in the mirror...when you 'looked at the science' didn't that twisty bulb in your knoggin turn a slighlty brighter shade of amber for a second or two when you heard things like 'settled science' & alleged 'debates being over'....didn't any alarm bells go off??...no?........am i sounding all iintersting & such on the internets???
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:43 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
He did. He is a despicable hypocrite.
Wow. I am confused. You are insulting the God of global warming. The global warming science fiction motion picture movie actor Nobel prize winner.

Going against him is like saying you don't believe in your greatest cult leader of all times.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:46 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smartypants View Post
....actually I do buddy.....look in the mirror...when you 'looked at the science' didn't that twisty bulb in your knoggin turn a slighlty brighter shade of amber for a second or two when you heard things like 'settled science' & alleged 'debates being over'....didn't any alarm bells go off??...no?........am i sounding all iintersting & such on the internets???
Don't change the subject and try and show him that all studies proving global warming are based upon computer models that always fail and "what if" statements that never materialize.

Most studies over the last 16 years were based upon the Earth warming. Since that did not happen you would think such a major flaw would of created a need to revisit each "what if" statement/stud.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:48 PM
Nester Nester is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Innisfail
Posts: 2,022
Default

Everybody has an opinion. Some get made into movies.



The earth was flat once. Truth hurts.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-26-2013, 07:45 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher View Post
Don't change the subject and try and show him that all studies proving global warming are based upon computer models that always fail and "what if" statements that never materialize.

Most studies over the last 16 years were based upon the Earth warming. Since that did not happen you would think such a major flaw would of created a need to revisit each "what if" statement/stud.

Actually that is incorrect. Land based temperature has not increases rapidly, but it has not decreased. The scary part is a significant increase in deep ocean temperatures recently. One has to look at the entire picture and not cherry pick.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics...telli_Fig1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-26-2013, 07:47 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher View Post
Wow. I am confused. You are insulting the God of global warming. The global warming science fiction motion picture movie actor Nobel prize winner.

Going against him is like saying you don't believe in your greatest cult leader of all times.
Don't be confused. Gore is a PR seeking hypocrite. He's not a scientist either.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-26-2013, 08:19 PM
Don Andersen Don Andersen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,796
Default

At what point does the Wildrose policy changes require the membership realize that they are now a small c Conservative partY. The Wildrose selling out it's principles for political gain - who'd thought that would ever happen.
Can't wait to see the chameleon change yet again.
But politics ain't about principles, it's about power.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-26-2013, 08:26 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Andersen View Post
At what point does the Wildrose policy changes require the membership realize that they are now a small c Conservative partY. The Wildrose selling out it's principles for political gain - who'd thought that would ever happen.
Can't wait to see the chameleon change yet again.
But politics ain't about principles, it's about power.

Don
did they not always sell themselves as a conservative party?......
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 10-26-2013, 10:09 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

In order for the WR to have a chance in the next election, they will need to convince a majority of Albertans that they have changed more than just their policy...but their will to actually work towards these new found goals. That will be a tough job if the same old players are trying to sound like a new band.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-26-2013, 11:35 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
Actually that is incorrect. Land based temperature has not increases rapidly, but it has not decreased. The scary part is a significant increase in deep ocean temperatures recently. One has to look at the entire picture and not cherry pick.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics...telli_Fig1.jpg
When global warming theorists fail miserably at making straight guesses and predictions their fall back is more guesses and predictions. Common sense dictates if he ocean surface is cooler and at great depths deeper it has to be subsurface heating effects... Tectonic type stuff as heat transference through water would heat said water.


But who am I to argue with scientists panicking over potentially losing lucrative research grants.

One has to not cherry pick a few ok guesses and look at the big picture of constantly failing computer models.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-26-2013, 11:37 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
Don't be confused. Gore is a PR seeking hypocrite. He's not a scientist either.
Your right again. His constant sell job of failed computer models, exaggerated theories and fail "what if" logic was very hypocritical of him... Not to mention using this fear to make millions like Suzuki.

IMHO
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-27-2013, 09:11 AM
JimPS JimPS is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West of North South
Posts: 2,367
Default

Smith should be replaced immediately, she's done.

People with independent thought recognize the fraud that "climate change" is.

She can't possibly hope to represent true freedom while at the same time, believing in junk science.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-27-2013, 09:27 AM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimPS View Post
Smith should be replaced immediately, she's done.

People with independent thought recognize the fraud that "climate change" is.

She can't possibly hope to represent true freedom while at the same time, believing in junk science.
She got a 90.2% approval rating at the conference. Apparently the Wildrose delegates support her with a significant majority.

I guess some are going to have to go find the Social Credit. You would probably feel comfortable there.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-27-2013, 10:47 AM
Fac Fac is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 44
Default

Let's hope for a better showing in the next election. After the High-River incident I'm a bit concerned over how the current PC party respects individuals
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-27-2013, 11:26 AM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

Danielle Smith knows there are some taboo subjects that left wing hack media types like to crucify conservatives on. Sadly, there are enough voters that can't think on their own, so they plod along doing what the media tells them to do. She's a very smart lady, and no more believes in AGW than any other intelligent thinking person does. She just knows that most of the electorate needs to hear certain touchstones in order to be given the go ahead by their like minded peers and the media. It took Harper a while to learn to play the game as well.

If all the voters were intelligent and took the time to educate themselves, she would have gotten in last election.


Like Hal says, she is learning.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-27-2013, 11:29 AM
Wild&Free Wild&Free is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugatika View Post
Danielle Smith knows there are some taboo subjects that left wing hack media types like to crucify conservatives on. Sadly, there are enough voters that can't think on their own, so they plod along doing what the media tells them to do. She's a very smart lady, and no more believes in AGW than any other intelligent thinking person does. She just knows that most of the electorate needs to hear certain touchstones in order to be given the go ahead by their like minded peers and the media. It took Harper a while to learn to play the game as well.

If all the voters were intelligent and took the time to educate themselves, she would have gotten in last election.


Like Hal says, she is learning.
Oh, for that perfect world...
__________________
Respond, not react. - Saskatchewan proverb

We learn from history that we do not learn from history. - Hegel

Your obligation to fight has not been relieved because the battle is fierce and difficult. Ben Shapiro
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.