Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:06 PM
Habfan's Avatar
Habfan Habfan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by does it ALL outdoors View Post
That's not true at all, it puts a MASSIVE debt load on host city's that can and will take decades to pay it off. But I understand what you meant.

This is the first time I have ever heard anyone claim hosting Oly's will be good for an economy.

It DESTROYS economy's, each and every one in the past has lost money and the IOC is the ONLY one that makes money on the taxpayers back

There is a reason the IOC is struggling to find host city's, because it is a financial nightmare that will cost billions and billions of taxpayers money, while the IOC sneaks out the back door with burlap sacks with big dollar signs on them.

VOTE NO!!!!!

https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmc...s-infographic/
Every Olympic hosted has Not lost $. There has been successful Olympics. Cost Overruns are not the same as losing money on the Olympics, Cost overruns can be calculated. Success cannot! The Nordic Center in Canmore, Saddladome, COP, NAKISKA to name a few, are still making $. Tourism into a city that the World never heard of before the 88 Olympic Games is still coming to the City and Province. Billions and Billions ! How many are you suggesting ?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:14 PM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traderal View Post
Agree with the majority here who have already stated the reality.
A resounding NO from me.
Time to stop unnecessary spending and start cutbacks in our bloated civil service at all levels.
I'd like to have the Olympics and support civil/government cutbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:15 PM
RandyBoBandy RandyBoBandy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 9,981
Default

I've mentioned before the 88 Olympics were OUTSTANDING!! As HABFAN mentioned, a lot of legacy infrastructures still in use from the 88 Olympics.
The problem for me is the ridiculous amount of security required to host these Games.
For that reason I'm out on this bid
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:15 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,257
Default

Attempting to spend your way out of an economic downturn only gets you further into debt. The temporary employment that hosting the Olympics would bring to Calgary, will not offset the massive costs.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:15 PM
HoytCRX32's Avatar
HoytCRX32 HoytCRX32 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habfan View Post
Every Olympic hosted has Not lost $. There has been successful Olympics. Cost Overruns are not the same as losing money on the Olympics, Cost overruns can be calculated. Success cannot! The Nordic Center in Canmore, Saddladome, COP, NAKISKA to name a few, are still making $. Tourism into a city that the World never heard of before the 88 Olympic Games is still coming to the City and Province. Billions and Billions ! How many are you suggesting ?
You are clearly still living in the '80's. I was part of it, loved it and reveled in it...different times my friend...this is a goat rodeo.
__________________
Common sense is so rare these days, that it should be considered a super power.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:28 PM
Habfan's Avatar
Habfan Habfan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,721
Default

Sounds like your a “ Been there Done that, who cares about about doing it again” person from the 80s.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:28 PM
harv3589's Avatar
harv3589 harv3589 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,645
Default

Absolute no...we r in enough trouble with the loss of tax revenue from the core. This won’t fix anything. Not all this money will be coming to Calgary either, I’m sure the other places hosting events aren’t doing it for free.
__________________
“If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:32 PM
HoytCRX32's Avatar
HoytCRX32 HoytCRX32 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habfan View Post
Sounds like your a “ Been there Done that, who cares about about doing it again” person from the 80s.
There are now potholes that should have been fixed in spring and we're going into the winter!!! This city is falling apart and no amount of Olympic money will fix it...control spending and prioritize!!!
If we had any kind of a real city council we would not even be discussing this!
__________________
Common sense is so rare these days, that it should be considered a super power.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:34 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Attempting to spend your way out of an economic downturn only gets you further into debt. The temporary employment that hosting the Olympics would bring to Calgary, will not offset the massive costs.
Minimum wage jobs don't contribute much to the economy.

Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:45 PM
^v^Tinda wolf^v^ ^v^Tinda wolf^v^ is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,134
Default

I’ll be front row on the half pipe with a pocket full of joints eating me a hotdog with all the fixins while having a grande ol’ Time

https://youtu.be/WvUJdhmPSWQ
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:45 PM
Habfan's Avatar
Habfan Habfan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoytCRX32 View Post
There are now potholes that should have been fixed in spring and we're going into the winter!!! This city is falling apart and no amount of Olympic money will fix it...control spending and prioritize!!!
If we had any kind of a real city council we would not even be discussing this!
I hear you !! I get both sides ! Good luck with your side of the vote !
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-12-2018, 07:48 PM
harv3589's Avatar
harv3589 harv3589 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,645
Default

The bright of of winning the bid is that city is going to have a very hard time convincing the arbitrator they have no money when it comes to giving us, city employees a raise.
__________________
“If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-12-2018, 08:57 PM
JWCalgary JWCalgary is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ^v^Tinda wolf^v^ View Post
I’ll be front row on the half pipe with a pocket full of joints eating me a hotdog with all the fixins while having a grande ol’ Time

https://youtu.be/WvUJdhmPSWQ
Make sure you learn swedish or Italian so they get your order right. The Olympics shouldn't be held in calgary.

Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-12-2018, 09:25 PM
Hawkeye Hawkeye is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 747
Default

I keep thinking that if it was such a great opportunity, there would be a big lineup of cities competing to host it, HOWEVER.........that is simply NOT the case!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-12-2018, 10:02 PM
CaberTosser's Avatar
CaberTosser CaberTosser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 19,420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harv3589 View Post
The bright of of winning the bid is that city is going to have a very hard time convincing the arbitrator they have no money when it comes to giving us, city employees a raise.
They could always fire 4 out of every 7 supervisors standing over the hole watching the one new guy work!
__________________
"The trouble with people idiot-proofing things, is the resulting evolution of the idiot." Me
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-12-2018, 10:39 PM
jrowan jrowan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Calgary
Posts: 361
Default

I am a small business owner too. Short term would it stimulate Calgary, maybe. Will it pay off long term, probably not.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-12-2018, 11:10 PM
YYC338 YYC338 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habfan View Post
Every Olympic hosted has Not lost $. There has been successful Olympics. Cost Overruns are not the same as losing money on the Olympics, Cost overruns can be calculated. Success cannot! The Nordic Center in Canmore, Saddladome, COP, NAKISKA to name a few, are still making $. Tourism into a city that the World never heard of before the 88 Olympic Games is still coming to the City and Province. Billions and Billions ! How many are you suggesting ?
Not sure how you calculate that the Saddledome and and the Nordic Center make money. The Saddledome may allow the Flames owners to make money but how does that help me as a tax payer who paid for it?

By your argument we've already benefited by hosting the Olympics. We've got facilities and worldwide recognition for tourism. Why host it again then? You won't be doubling up on the benefits the 88 event brought but you sure as heck will be spending well over double what was spent in 88.
It won't be deja vous all over again (as Yogi Bera once said) that's for sure.

Vote NO to 88 part deux.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-13-2018, 05:50 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaberTosser View Post
They could always fire 4 out of every 7 supervisors standing over the hole watching the one new guy work!
Yup and when you go back to the office or cubicles terminate all that are farting around on social media and put in one competent person who in an eight hour day does more than four hammerheads cruising social media.....free up some coin and toss it towards the olympics....a few months of this would pay for a new arena too
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-13-2018, 05:56 AM
artie artie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,943
Default

Well you guys in Calgary have enough information to help you make your decision so GET OUT AND VOTE
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-13-2018, 08:34 AM
artie artie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,943
Default

Well I voted at 8:15 in Ranchlands in Calgary. Steady stream of voters but in and out in 2 minutes. The new system works pretty slick just have to hope it does work
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 11-13-2018, 11:56 AM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habfan View Post
Every Olympic hosted has Not lost $. There has been successful Olympics. Cost Overruns are not the same as losing money on the Olympics, Cost overruns can be calculated. Success cannot! The Nordic Center in Canmore, Saddladome, COP, NAKISKA to name a few, are still making $. Tourism into a city that the World never heard of before the 88 Olympic Games is still coming to the City and Province. Billions and Billions ! How many are you suggesting ?
Indisputable fact ever olympics after Calgary has lost money.

Facilities for the most part are out dated but used. I see no evidence of profit.

I see no evidence of billions.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:08 PM
Big Sky's Avatar
Big Sky Big Sky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,312
Default

Voted this morning. The process went smoothly.

Wish we had more plebiscites. Would be pretty easy to do during a civic election. (Sorry for the slight derail)
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:16 PM
reddeerguy2015 reddeerguy2015 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,269
Default

Taxes aren't going away.

Why not spend it on something your family and children can enjoy?? Something to be proud of. National sport.

Way to many Scrooge's trolling here I think.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:21 PM
CranePete CranePete is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Williams Lake, BC
Posts: 307
Default Olympics

Interesting to note that Whistler is a component of the Calgary bid. I wonder how many tax dollars will flow west..... Based solely upon how BC has treated Alberta, if I lived in Calgary, I’d be voting NO.
CranePete
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:27 PM
bobtodrick bobtodrick is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habfan View Post
Every Olympic hosted has Not lost $. There has been successful Olympics. Cost Overruns are not the same as losing money on the Olympics, Cost overruns can be calculated. Success cannot! The Nordic Center in Canmore, Saddladome, COP, NAKISKA to name a few, are still making $. Tourism into a city that the World never heard of before the 88 Olympic Games is still coming to the City and Province. Billions and Billions ! How many are you suggesting ?
Billions!
And Billions!!
Please provide where you got those stats.
You see, your whole argument is worthless when you over exaggerate to a ridiculous extent.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:43 PM
JB_AOL JB_AOL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtodrick View Post
Billions!
And Billions!!
Please provide where you got those stats.
You see, your whole argument is worthless when you over exaggerate to a ridiculous extent.
Ok, I'll play..

Show us that the Olympics DIDN'T stimulate our economy for decades and bring in billions. You can't, can you.

Is it a coincidence that Alberta's economy rebounded right after '88? Maybe.
O&G was (and still kind of is) an "old boys club". It could've been something as simple as a group of CEO's came to Calgary to party in '88 and decided instead of closing shop, and moving HQ out east, they decided to stay here or possibly move here. Who knows. I know one of the big reason's ALOT of people live here (including myself) is because of the proximity to the mountains, ie;lifestyle.

Don't get me wrong, I'm still voting NO (mostly because of the lack of answers), but there's no proof either way.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-13-2018, 02:47 PM
32-40win 32-40win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Near Drumheller
Posts: 6,782
Default

This time, I think the promoters don't have enough backing to get it done and come out ahead overall, like we did in 88. There was opposition to it back then as well, but, we actually were in a position to gain from it at that point, I don't think that same position is there now. That was 30 years ago, the outlook towards travel to Alberta has changed, the city has changed its presence on the world stage already and is pretty well known now, not like it was back before 88 and it has doubled its size since then. This time, I don't think it has the interest of the previously mostly unknown Cowtown Calgary that it was, and isn't anymore.
__________________
You should also be a member;
CCFR
CSSA
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-13-2018, 03:02 PM
Roderek Roderek is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Calgary
Posts: 532
Default

The only thing that would have made me even maybe consider voting yes, is our taxes are going to go up anyway, and at least if it is due to the Olympics the money is going to be spent in Calgary and not Ontario or Quebec. Even then I don't think they are anywhere close on the actual budget numbers so not worth the risk.

They have already wasted enough of my money on this bid process...
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-13-2018, 03:52 PM
Scottmisfits Scottmisfits is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,109
Default

I really don't need my unborn grand kids having to pay the taxes on what it will cost to host these games.

Been there, done that, it was cool but not what this city needs at this time.

Calgary and area will get hit with at least three separate tax hikes if this goes through: municipal, provincial, and federal. Do we really need that?

Talk all you want, if this bleeding heart open wallet mayor really want this, he will find a way to push it through. I will be going to vote with the wife after I pick her up from work, but I have no problems saying that this vote is really a joke to let the citizens feel like they have a say.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-13-2018, 03:56 PM
Nova316 Nova316 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 273
Default

I'm voting no, they say it's a big economical boom, upgrade infrastructure, and helps the city with development etc but if this golden Olympic unicorn was so amazing for countries how come so many countries are dropping out? I'd imagine it'd be a race to win this bid and countries would be tripping all over each to get it, not a participation award to whoever is left.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.