Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:33 PM
greylynx greylynx is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,078
Default Shot placement question

Shot placement is very important with large and potentially dangerous game.

Should the shot be in the shoulders to knock the animal down?

Shot the shot be in the heart lung area to shut down the animal's metabolic functions?

Both shot placement methods are considered acceptable.

Which one do you prefer, if at all?


BB416 and Huntinstuff, please do not think I am stealing an argument from you guys. You two brought up a very good question I thought should be shared with the rest of the forum.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:34 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Shoulders.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:35 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,842
Default

I almost always choose the heart/lung shot,although that often results in striking one shoulder.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:41 PM
1shotwade 1shotwade is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Live tohunt,hunt to live
Posts: 1,176
Thumbs up

I prefer the 1/4 away heart lung far shoulder exit!! Every animal I have shot with this method never took 1 step towards me!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:48 PM
BrownBear416 BrownBear416 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slave Lake
Posts: 5,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greylynx View Post
Shot placement is very important with large and potentially dangerous game.

Should the shot be in the shoulders to knock the animal down?

Shot the shot be in the heart lung area to shut down the animal's metabolic functions?

Both shot placement methods are considered acceptable.

Which one do you prefer, if at all?


BB416 and Huntinstuff, please do not think I am stealing an argument from you guys. You two brought up a very good question I thought should be shared with the rest of the forum.
I would never argue with Randy ...


All depends

Sometimes I want to anchor an animal and other times a lung shot is perfectly fine.For bears or dangerous game I try for shoulder...

High shoulder shots like TJ recommends do offer the best result for a killing shot as you can miss quite a bit in either direction and skill have a good result..

All depends on the hunter and situation and if the animal dies quickly then thats a perfect shot in my mind
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:50 PM
equanuck equanuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 117
Default

Depends upon the situation. If you're stand hunting or baiting or what not to allow a broadside shot, then heart / lungs. IMO the only Nth American animals that classify as both large and dangerous are the big bears - Alaskan, polar or grizzly. Moose or Elk?? Sure they could rough you up but why would you break the front shoulders and lose the meat? If you're head hunting then shoulders.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2011, 04:56 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Texas heart shot....all the way!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2011, 11:10 PM
moosehunter3-0's Avatar
moosehunter3-0 moosehunter3-0 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun View Post
Texas heart shot....all the way!
X2, 1 in the chest running towards you, 2 in the ass running away.
__________________

save a tree kill a beaver
Chuck Norris can bump fire a bolt action
"A predators heart knows no remorse. It lives for the hunt, a natural force."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-15-2011, 06:02 AM
Lonnie Lonnie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by equanuck View Post
Depends upon the situation. If you're stand hunting or baiting or what not to allow a broadside shot, then heart / lungs. IMO the only Nth American animals that classify as both large and dangerous are the big bears - Alaskan, polar or grizzly. Moose or Elk?? Sure they could rough you up but why would you break the front shoulders and lose the meat? If you're head hunting then shoulders.
x2 any bear if I'm on the ground shoulders.elk or moose lungs/hart and I try not to get the off shoulder.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-15-2011, 09:06 AM
pseelk's Avatar
pseelk pseelk is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,680
Default

Lungs every time.If I was too close to a grizzly than high shoulder.Shot 20+ blacks all lungs never an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-15-2011, 10:51 AM
saltwater cowboy saltwater cowboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Near Drayton valley
Posts: 515
Default

Last light shoulders,first light and day time heart/lungs if at all possible.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-15-2011, 12:26 PM
flyguyd's Avatar
flyguyd flyguyd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 3,659
Default

Everything in the shoulder , except antlerless , they get it in the head. I dont like haveing to chase anything.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-16-2011, 10:39 AM
300magman's Avatar
300magman 300magman is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moosehunter3-0 View Post
X2, 1 in the chest running towards you, 2 in the ass running away.
hahahahahaha! I got a good laugh outta that one....i'll have to try that placement next year!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-16-2011, 11:45 AM
KegRiver's Avatar
KegRiver KegRiver is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North of Peace River
Posts: 11,346
Default

I shoot them wherever the bullet strikes.

Truth is most hunters will tell you they can hit the eye of a sparrow at 1,000 yards, while the best they can do is hope to hit somewhere on the body at ranges under 200 yards.

I can hit the kill zone, Heart Lung area, 99% of the time at ranges under 200 yards. Since that is the easiest target to hit, that is what I aim for.
I avoid shots at longer ranges. I'm simply not that good.
I haven't been hunting all that long, only 47 years now. Besides, I don't own one of those super guns. I use old fashioned equipment, like 30-06 and 30-30.
Such guns are only capable of hitting a one inch target at 100 yards under the very best of circumstances. (Good steady rest, lots of time to aim, ext.) For each additional 100 yards the target doubles in size. Many, if not most, hunting guns are doing good to hit a 2 inch target at 100 yards. Do the math.
Factor in an offhand shot, much less a hurried off hand shot, and mathematics tells me that a 14 inch target is a poor bet past 200 yards, at least for the typical hunter.

Think about it. If you aim for the shoulder, what you are actually aiming for is the upper leg bone. You are trying to hit a two inch wide target you can't even see. Or you could try for the shoulder Blade. That's a much bigger target, it's also a fools target. It will knock an animal flat. But the animal WILL get up again and they WILL be twice as hard to stop when they do.
I have done it, unintentionally, and I have watched others do it far too many times to try that shot intentionally.
Now some would argue that they are not trying to hit the leg bone, only the leg mussel. No kidding! So why not dump out half of your powder first and then shoot for the heart?
Or you could try for the back bone. It's a bigger target. But it's also hidden, and a miss would most likely result in a fatally wounded animal that will go for a very long way.

Now if you are one of those remarkable folks that can hit the eye of a sparrow at 1,000 yards, by all means go for the shoulder shot. Better still shoot them in the ear. If you're that good, it's the shot for you.
That was the shot of choice for us when we butchered a cow or other domestic animal. Instant death every time, and no loss of meat.

If you are an average hunter, I would suggest that the heart/lung shot is a better choice for you.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-16-2011, 11:54 AM
3Dshooter 3Dshooter is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1shotwade View Post
I prefer the 1/4 away heart lung far shoulder exit!! Every animal I have shot with this method never took 1 step towards me!
Absolutely the ideal situation! And just to clarify, the far shoulder meaning breaking the offside leg.
__________________
Fernie Rod & Gun Club, log on to;

http://www.ferniergc.com/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-16-2011, 12:25 PM
roger's Avatar
roger roger is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wmu 222, member #197
Posts: 4,907
Default

this is hard to describe...
if an animal is standing broadside, chances are one of the front two legs will be positioned between the lead leg and the two rears. it can be the critters drivers side or passenger side leg, as long as its in the 'middle'.
put the vertical crosshair on the 'center' front leg find the center mass (and below) then trip.
this works at almost every angle and has a great chance of hitting something important and like 3D said it takes out the opposite shoudler and everything in the middle
__________________
there are two kinds of people...those with loaded guns and those who dig.
the good, the bad, the ugly

weatherby fans clik here....
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/group.php?groupid=31
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-16-2011, 01:14 PM
HunterDan's Avatar
HunterDan HunterDan is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bonnyville
Posts: 285
Default

heart/lungs or head only.
no need to waste any meat with a shoulder shot, unless your not keeping the meat.
__________________
Keep your stick on the ice.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-16-2011, 04:31 PM
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,586
Default

Blasting the shoulders out is a great way to anchor an animal for sure. Good bullet.

I tend to shoot behind the shoulder because i know it works every time. Yes i might have to track the animal but i tend to take my time so to me, tracking is just part of it all

Mostly, my animal is dead within 100yds of where it was shot, but i dont pursue right away so really i just delay getting my animal
__________________
When you are born, you get a ticket to the Freak Show.
If you are born in Canada, you get a front row seat.

Last edited by huntinstuff; 02-16-2011 at 04:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-16-2011, 04:57 PM
coyotekiller's Avatar
coyotekiller coyotekiller is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central AB
Posts: 1,705
Default

shoulder usually
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-16-2011, 05:18 PM
u_cant_rope_the_wind u_cant_rope_the_wind is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: grew up in Alberta moved to SK, sure miss Alberta
Posts: 2,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moosehunter3-0 View Post
X2, 1 in the chest running towards you, 2 in the ass running away.
Gotta agree its the only sportmans way of fair chase
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-16-2011, 05:39 PM
sheepguide sheepguide is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rimbey
Posts: 5,908
Default

Slightly quartering away, taking vitals and off shoulder. Or Broadside waiting for onside leg to step forward tucking bullet in close behind shoulder. I Dont like hitting lots of bone on entry unless I can be posative it will anchor the animal. An animal can go along ways with a smashed shoulder but there time is very limited with a hole in a vital organ.

The situation dictates my choice in shot, all situations are different. I shoot to kill immediately on any animal dangerous/large or not. I dont shoot worrying if im gunna waste a steak or not. I shoot for a clean humane kill.

SG
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-16-2011, 05:43 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepguide View Post
Slightly quartering away, taking vitals and off shoulder. Or Broadside waiting for onside leg to step forward tucking bullet in close behind shoulder.
Man you guys are good! Me? I'm just thinking "Stop shaking and try to hit it in the middle..." LOL
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-16-2011, 05:45 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I guess one thing that bears discussing here is the distance being shot. I became a huge fan of the high shoulder shot after I started extending the ranges I shoot. The first advantage is that it allows for a fairly wide margain of error. In fact, it's a hard shot to screw up, other than completely missing which is much preferable to a non fatal hit. Second, the results are typically a drop on the spot response. This is important when shooting long ranges as it can take a fair amount of time to get to the scene of a hit when you have to walk a 1/2 kilometer or more. Even finding exactly where the animal was standing can be a challenge if there is no snow so walking to an animal that dropped on the spot is preferable. Anyhow, that's why I'm a fan of the high shoulder.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-16-2011, 08:29 PM
Nait Hadya's Avatar
Nait Hadya Nait Hadya is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,163
Default

2500 dollar question. you did not indicate at what distance.a shoulder shot may not anchor a dangerous critter and they may still be able to cover a bit of ground before expiring. so, four very close quarters dangerous game,behind the ear,between eyes,neck,spine.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-16-2011, 08:47 PM
sheepguide sheepguide is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rimbey
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
I guess one thing that bears discussing here is the distance being shot. I became a huge fan of the high shoulder shot after I started extending the ranges I shoot. The first advantage is that it allows for a fairly wide margain of error. In fact, it's a hard shot to screw up, other than completely missing which is much preferable to a non fatal hit. Second, the results are typically a drop on the spot response. This is important when shooting long ranges as it can take a fair amount of time to get to the scene of a hit when you have to walk a 1/2 kilometer or more. Even finding exactly where the animal was standing can be a challenge if there is no snow so walking to an animal that dropped on the spot is preferable. Anyhow, that's why I'm a fan of the high shoulder.
Must have copied that down from a Best of The West episode LOL sounds word for word from one of their speeches!

SG
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-16-2011, 11:05 PM
HunterDave HunterDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntinstuff View Post
Blasting the shoulders out is a great way to anchor an animal for sure. Good bullet.

I tend to shoot behind the shoulder because i know it works every time. Yes i might have to track the animal but i tend to take my time so to me, tracking is just part of it all

Mostly, my animal is dead within 100yds of where it was shot, but i dont pursue right away so really i just delay getting my animal
x2 If you aren't concerned about ruining meat then blast away at the shoulders and put a second round into it when it goes down. I almost always wait for a nice broadside shot and put a round behind the shoulder through both lungs. I don't mind tracking the animal because it's part of hunting IMHO. Besides, if they don't drop they usually run straight and not very far.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-17-2011, 09:54 AM
PJT PJT is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 396
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KegRiver View Post
I shoot them wherever the bullet strikes.

Truth is most hunters will tell you they can hit the eye of a sparrow at 1,000 yards, while the best they can do is hope to hit somewhere on the body at ranges under 200 yards.

I can hit the kill zone, Heart Lung area, 99% of the time at ranges under 200 yards. Since that is the easiest target to hit, that is what I aim for.
I avoid shots at longer ranges. I'm simply not that good.
I haven't been hunting all that long, only 47 years now. Besides, I don't own one of those super guns. I use old fashioned equipment, like 30-06 and 30-30.
Such guns are only capable of hitting a one inch target at 100 yards under the very best of circumstances. (Good steady rest, lots of time to aim, ext.) For each additional 100 yards the target doubles in size. Many, if not most, hunting guns are doing good to hit a 2 inch target at 100 yards. Do the math.
Factor in an offhand shot, much less a hurried off hand shot, and mathematics tells me that a 14 inch target is a poor bet past 200 yards, at least for the typical hunter.

Think about it. If you aim for the shoulder, what you are actually aiming for is the upper leg bone. You are trying to hit a two inch wide target you can't even see. Or you could try for the shoulder Blade. That's a much bigger target, it's also a fools target. It will knock an animal flat. But the animal WILL get up again and they WILL be twice as hard to stop when they do.
I have done it, unintentionally, and I have watched others do it far too many times to try that shot intentionally.
Now some would argue that they are not trying to hit the leg bone, only the leg mussel. No kidding! So why not dump out half of your powder first and then shoot for the heart?
Or you could try for the back bone. It's a bigger target. But it's also hidden, and a miss would most likely result in a fatally wounded animal that will go for a very long way.

Now if you are one of those remarkable folks that can hit the eye of a sparrow at 1,000 yards, by all means go for the shoulder shot. Better still shoot them in the ear. If you're that good, it's the shot for you.
That was the shot of choice for us when we butchered a cow or other domestic animal. Instant death every time, and no loss of meat.

If you are an average hunter, I would suggest that the heart/lung shot is a better choice for you.
Great answer
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-17-2011, 03:22 PM
equanuck equanuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KegRiver View Post
I shoot them wherever the bullet strikes.

Truth is most hunters will tell you they can hit the eye of a sparrow at 1,000 yards, while the best they can do is hope to hit somewhere on the body at ranges under 200 yards.

I can hit the kill zone, Heart Lung area, 99% of the time at ranges under 200 yards. Since that is the easiest target to hit, that is what I aim for.
I avoid shots at longer ranges. I'm simply not that good.
I haven't been hunting all that long, only 47 years now. Besides, I don't own one of those super guns. I use old fashioned equipment, like 30-06 and 30-30.
Such guns are only capable of hitting a one inch target at 100 yards under the very best of circumstances. (Good steady rest, lots of time to aim, ext.) For each additional 100 yards the target doubles in size. Many, if not most, hunting guns are doing good to hit a 2 inch target at 100 yards. Do the math.
Factor in an offhand shot, much less a hurried off hand shot, and mathematics tells me that a 14 inch target is a poor bet past 200 yards, at least for the typical hunter.

Think about it. If you aim for the shoulder, what you are actually aiming for is the upper leg bone. You are trying to hit a two inch wide target you can't even see. Or you could try for the shoulder Blade. That's a much bigger target, it's also a fools target. It will knock an animal flat. But the animal WILL get up again and they WILL be twice as hard to stop when they do.
I have done it, unintentionally, and I have watched others do it far too many times to try that shot intentionally.
Now some would argue that they are not trying to hit the leg bone, only the leg mussel. No kidding! So why not dump out half of your powder first and then shoot for the heart?
Or you could try for the back bone. It's a bigger target. But it's also hidden, and a miss would most likely result in a fatally wounded animal that will go for a very long way.

Now if you are one of those remarkable folks that can hit the eye of a sparrow at 1,000 yards, by all means go for the shoulder shot. Better still shoot them in the ear. If you're that good, it's the shot for you.
That was the shot of choice for us when we butchered a cow or other domestic animal. Instant death every time, and no loss of meat.

If you are an average hunter, I would suggest that the heart/lung shot is a better choice for you.
FTIW the OP asked for opinions of shot placement based upon "large & dangerous" game. You go on & on about about shots at or beyond 200yds... At 200yds nothings really dangerous, if it's moving don't shoot. If it's in the open there's probably no reason that you can't set up to have a stable shooting platform, whether that's prone, sitting down or resting against a tree. Shooting beyond 200yds is not all that difficult. The 2 basics are practice and patience.
Also BTW, I am a heart/lung shooter on animals I intend to eat. Bears get shot according to their distance, how they are positioned and what happens to be in my hands at the time.
Lastly, I disagree with your statement of what "WILL" happen with a shoulder shot animal. If you have enough gun and a good bullet a shoulder shot animal will not get up. There may be nothing left to eat but if I shoot a moose thru both front shoulders with any of my Weatherby's it will not be getting up.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-17-2011, 03:31 PM
5575's Avatar
5575 5575 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
I guess one thing that bears discussing here is the distance being shot. I became a huge fan of the high shoulder shot after I started extending the ranges I shoot. The first advantage is that it allows for a fairly wide margain of error. In fact, it's a hard shot to screw up, other than completely missing which is much preferable to a non fatal hit. Second, the results are typically a drop on the spot response. This is important when shooting long ranges as it can take a fair amount of time to get to the scene of a hit when you have to walk a 1/2 kilometer or more. Even finding exactly where the animal was standing can be a challenge if there is no snow so walking to an animal that dropped on the spot is preferable. Anyhow, that's why I'm a fan of the high shoulder.

I couldn't agree more, high shoulder with a magnum powered rifle and thier head has to catch up with thier ars most of the time they drop that fast in thier tracks.I think the hydrostatic shock on the spinal cord system just shuts everything down like a light switch. At least that what happens when I hit them high with my STW. And no I'm not talking spine shot, just under it or where the spine meets the neck is good also. I get a kick out of the guys shooting those little southern deer and they run off almost every time.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-17-2011, 04:28 PM
KegRiver's Avatar
KegRiver KegRiver is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North of Peace River
Posts: 11,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by equanuck View Post
FTIW If you have enough gun and a good bullet a shoulder shot animal will not get up. There may be nothing left to eat but if I shoot a moose thru both front shoulders with any of my Weatherby's it will not be getting up.
I had a client tell me that, almost word for word. The next day I watched as he fired three shots at a Black Bear. Broke both front legs, blew out one shoulder blade and drilled a huge hole through the upper neck.
I had to finish that Bear off. I carried a 30-06, he a 375 H&H Magnum.

It seems to me that a lot of folks put a lot of faith in one shot based on one or two lucky shots. While others put their faith in hand held cannons.
I put my faith in close range and careful shot placement.

But as I said, I'm not a professional.

How about you?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.