Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fly-Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2020, 10:05 PM
Don Andersen Don Andersen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,796
Default A worthwhile read from someone who cares!

https://albertaviews.ca/bearing-witn...X4sZjXJqRBPFAs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-17-2020, 01:39 AM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,628
Default

Good write up with sad observations. Thanks for sharing.

Turns out the federal gov't is giving Alberta 5.6 million for a study of our foothill/front range watersheds and fisheries. Hope the money is managed properly. Several interest groups involved. I'm thinking a study like this might halt any coal mining or logging developments until the study is completed in 2023.

https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pm...ies-ecosystems
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-17-2020, 07:34 AM
goldscud goldscud is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,965
Default

Hopefully the federal government will step in with action to protect SARA (species at risk) in these creeks. The provincial government obviously doesn't care with the amount of logging, atv damage, and now the plans to destroy the hillsides with coal extraction. What a sad inheritance we leave the next generation in the Oldman drainage. I don't think the short term jobs and money going to Austrailian owners is worth what we will give up. On top of that, the legacy of Selenium pollution will last forever. It will be interesting to see how long it takes for Selenium levels to rise out on the fields where irrigation water coming from the Oldman gets broadcast.
It is so sad that a retired Bio has to volunteer to collect data rather than the government investing in managing a dwindling natural treasure.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2020, 01:50 PM
millartech millartech is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldscud View Post
Hopefully the federal government will step in with action to protect SARA (species at risk) in these creeks. The provincial government obviously doesn't care with the amount of logging, atv damage, and now the plans to destroy the hillsides with coal extraction. What a sad inheritance we leave the next generation in the Oldman drainage. I don't think the short term jobs and money going to Austrailian owners is worth what we will give up. On top of that, the legacy of Selenium pollution will last forever. It will be interesting to see how long it takes for Selenium levels to rise out on the fields where irrigation water coming from the Oldman gets broadcast.

It is so sad that a retired Bio has to volunteer to collect data rather than the government investing in managing a dwindling natural treasure.
I'm with you here. We need the feds to step in. This provincial government has 0 poops to give. I have mailed my provincial MLA and get nothing but an automated response. I message my federal MP and he says there is nothing he can do as it's provincial jurisdiction. Granted our MP is conservative and the liberals are in power so that plays a part. I'll be messaging/emailing members of the federal liberal party in the next day.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2020, 08:02 PM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,760
Default

Why not stop fishing in the drainages in the south? Close fishing for the next 10 years or longer as it would have a positive effect on the drainage. We all want to do the best for the area right? Stay home if you really truly want to help.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2020, 08:14 PM
osprey osprey is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
Why not stop fishing in the drainages in the south? Close fishing for the next 10 years or longer as it would have a positive effect on the drainage. We all want to do the best for the area right? Stay home if you really truly want to help.
I would gladly do this if all roads were closed and all logging and mining and oil and gas exploration and production were stopped in those drainages. Then those fish might really have a chance.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2020, 11:00 PM
roy9525 roy9525 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Andersen View Post
Anything Lorne Fitch has to say has no relevance to any of the foothill areas I have been involved with. He has an agenda and it is well known.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2020, 07:07 AM
goldscud goldscud is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,965
Default

Lannie, I have absolutely limited my angling days in the foothills for over 20 years. Angling pressure is one of the issues stressing the fish populations....but the issues related to habitat degradation due to ATV use and resource extraction far outweigh what a fishing rod does.
The effect of culverts and sedimentation that come after logging are well established.
The sedimentation and selenium pollution from coal mines are also well known.

The time to reign in angling pressure on species of concern is quickly approaching. Hopefully more people can make better decisions about how they want to enjoy/respect the resource.
As far a coal mining goes, the cost/benefit picture doesn't look good in the long run. I am sure the foreign companies are excited to take the profit and leave the mess. I hope people can see past 10 years
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2020, 09:18 AM
Don Andersen Don Andersen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
Why not stop fishing in the drainages in the south? Close fishing for the next 10 years or longer as it would have a positive effect on the drainage. We all want to do the best for the area right? Stay home if you really truly want to help.
Or cut out the poaching, recreational land destruction, logging, mining, cattle grazing, WD transmission, damn building and on and on.
They have a by far a larger effect.
Just thinking outside of the box.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-18-2020, 11:33 AM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,760
Default

What i see in this thread is people pointing their finger at other users and stating how the other user does much more damage. Everyone who steps foot in the habitat is damaging the eco system but the little damage each individual does is always justified by their personal agenda.
The area in the drainage has been mining coal and logging for generations and people have been coming down to recreate for the same amount of time.
What about the people who live in the S.W.? I think 95% of the people I talk to are pro industry. The amount of cash realized locally from tourism is a pittance.
People on here also routinely bring up the selenium in the Elk River but also spend a lot of time fishing the Elk and it is world class. If you really want to help you need to stay home if you want to do the best for the habitat in the south west. What i see being displayed in the fly fishing section is very hypocritical.

We have the thread against the gravel industry comprised of fly fisherman for the large part wanting to protect the area. Great but they are trying to protect fish that they planted that are not indigenous to the area? They are also trying to kill off the same brookies in other drainages? Then "Marshall" the area creating buffer zones on private land they don't have any stake in? WTH?
Fisherman on the Crowsnest River leave more garbage along the river than any industry will. We need to clean up our own back yard before pointing our fingers at the other users....This is why access for fishing and hunting is tightening up so much.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-18-2020, 12:42 PM
crazy_davey crazy_davey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Foothills
Posts: 2,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
What i see in this thread is people pointing their finger at other users and stating how the other user does much more damage. Everyone who steps foot in the habitat is damaging the eco system but the little damage each individual does is always justified by their personal agenda.
The area in the drainage has been mining coal and logging for generations and people have been coming down to recreate for the same amount of time.
What about the people who live in the S.W.? I think 95% of the people I talk to are pro industry. The amount of cash realized locally from tourism is a pittance.
People on here also routinely bring up the selenium in the Elk River but also spend a lot of time fishing the Elk and it is world class. If you really want to help you need to stay home if you want to do the best for the habitat in the south west. What i see being displayed in the fly fishing section is very hypocritical.

We have the thread against the gravel industry comprised of fly fisherman for the large part wanting to protect the area. Great but they are trying to protect fish that they planted that are not indigenous to the area? They are also trying to kill off the same brookies in other drainages? Then "Marshall" the area creating buffer zones on private land they don't have any stake in? WTH?
Fisherman on the Crowsnest River leave more garbage along the river than any industry will. We need to clean up our own back yard before pointing our fingers at the other users....This is why access for fishing and hunting is tightening up so much.
Bang on 100%!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-18-2020, 06:08 PM
Don Andersen Don Andersen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_davey View Post
Bang on 100%!
Placing your head where the sun don’t shine makes damn sure you’ll never write an article like Lorne.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-18-2020, 07:37 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by osprey View Post
I would gladly do this if all roads were closed and all logging and mining and oil and gas exploration and production were stopped in those drainages. Then those fish might really have a chance.
Good response. No response from "lannie" on that one.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-19-2020, 01:10 AM
goldscud goldscud is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,965
Default

The adult population of genetically unique westslope cutthroat trout in a river in B.C.’s Kootenay region dropped by 93 per cent this past fall compared with 2017 levels, according to a monitoring report from Teck Resources.

https://thenarwhal.ca/teck-resources...mines-bc-fish/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.