Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:19 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Lightbulb 2013 Archery Mule deer going on Draw

Just kind of curious as to what everyone's thoughts are on the fact that this will be the last year of being able to buy a general Mule buck Tag in Alberta For Archery purposes?

I Know about 3 years ago myself and some buddies thought up this same idea,for a variety of reasons....I even posted\Made A thread on here about the exact same subject! I was laughed at..."Thanks for the Chuckle" I believe Steve or someone said.

Eitherway... now i'm not sure if Putting Archery Mule buck on draw is the right move?I know for sure that Trophy quility will improve,however maybe to cut down on the ever increaseing mule buck archery harvest,the government should be cutting the outfitter and non resident canadian harvest???(just a thought) What do you guys think should be done?

Eitherway enjoy the General 2012 mulebuck season,because it's going to be the last!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:22 PM
steve steve is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AB
Posts: 3,350
Default

A hard winter plus GROSS mis-management has led us to this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:24 PM
Fletch10 Fletch10 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Red Deer Lake
Posts: 307
Default

I've not heard anything of this....what is the source?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:24 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve View Post
A hard winter plus GROSS mis-management has led us to this.
I'll Agree 100% with that statement!!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:56 PM
IR_mike IR_mike is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iron River
Posts: 5,158
Default

Province wide WJ?
Or just the zones close to the population centres that get hammered every year?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:26 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,302
Default

Too bad that Aberta residents get limited before the outfitters do .Like you said Junkie , I saw this coming way back .Looks like if you ever want to get a velvet muley it better be this year .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:43 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IR_mike View Post
Province wide WJ?
Or just the zones close to the population centres that get hammered every year?
Peace river area\All 100 Series Wmu's
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:46 PM
Drop_Tine's Avatar
Drop_Tine Drop_Tine is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 1,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie View Post
Peace river area\All 100 Series Wmu's
Doesnt make sense , the 200 series zones of eastern alberta prob got hit the hardest , so why would those wmu not go on draw if this was the case ??? Just asking??????
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:48 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drop_Tine View Post
Doesnt make sense , the 200 series zones of eastern alberta prob got hit the hardest , so why would those wmu not go on draw if this was the case ??? Just asking??????
thought you called BS on the hard winter thing???.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:57 PM
Drop_Tine's Avatar
Drop_Tine Drop_Tine is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 1,419
Default

Huh??? If 600 buck tags and 600 does in wmu 200 isnt getting hit hard please let me know what is !! All im saying is if the 100 series and the peace country are " going on draw for archery " ( which as far as im cocerned isnt gonna happen in 2013) then why wouldnt the eastern zones of AB go on draw ??
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:01 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drop_Tine View Post
Huh??? If 600 buck tags and 600 does in wmu 200 isnt getting hit hard please let me know what is !! All im saying is if the 100 series and the peace country are " going on draw for archery " ( which as far as im cocerned isnt gonna happen in 2013) then why wouldnt the eastern zones of AB go on draw ??
Sorry misunderstood your earlier post...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:05 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

The paper from SRD said the draw was needed as archers were exceeding the 15% of the deer killed in the zones. If they are then a draw is required.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:13 PM
NBFK NBFK is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In The Zone.......
Posts: 1,686
Default

I can't wait for all the archery bashing guys who wanted this to complain about long wait times now to draw an antlered tag....... If archery harvests went over 15% then there would no longer be a general season. Well if we tack 15% onto all zones the wait times should increase quite a bit.....I can't wait to see our lovely srd roll this great decision out. This was brought up at the last ag mag meeting and its the real deal not a rumour!
A poor decision was made based off non current data.

Well hopefully I can draw an antler-less mule deer tag and get 2 extra ones sent to me. Best deal ever! It's no secret mule deer numbers are down yet there's undersubscribed tags and extra doe tags sent out yearly after several terrible winters where record herd number's perished?

Right on it's Alberta take it while you can!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:15 PM
albertadeer albertadeer is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,945
Default



Im stoked! They better put 357 on draw, the last few years have been disgusting....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:18 PM
Drop_Tine's Avatar
Drop_Tine Drop_Tine is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 1,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
The paper from SRD said the draw was needed as archers were exceeding the 15% of the deer killed in the zones. If they are then a draw is required.
Hmmm so IN every 100 series zones and peace country zones (what zones in peace country ) the archery hunters shot 15% of the deer harvested... But less than 15% in ALL of the 200 series zones .. Still makes no sense since the population is a heck of alot more in central AB than southern AB ,
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:06 PM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
The paper from SRD said the draw was needed as archers were exceeding the 15% of the deer killed in the zones. If they are then a draw is required.
Rich,

Any indication from SRD how they arrive at the numbers? One concern I've always had with % of harvest numbers is the fact that Alberta rarely does very good 'harvest' reports and a 3-4 question online survey hardly could give very accurate results.

It seems like a bit of a pipe dream to think that they get accurate numbers for any species (other than sheep, etc) with what seems like a low hunter survey response that sometimes proves random at the best of times.

Regardless....lots of interesting changes going on the east side of the mountains!!!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:56 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackmastr View Post
Rich,

Any indication from SRD how they arrive at the numbers? One concern I've always had with % of harvest numbers is the fact that Alberta rarely does very good 'harvest' reports and a 3-4 question online survey hardly could give very accurate results.

It seems like a bit of a pipe dream to think that they get accurate numbers for any species (other than sheep, etc) with what seems like a low hunter survey response that sometimes proves random at the best of times.

Regardless....lots of interesting changes going on the east side of the mountains!!!
No idea how or where. They statement backing up the proposed draw said that the archers were exceeding the 15% harvest threshold.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:59 PM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,719
Default

Cool thanks Rich. That was the only part of the thing that I was curious about and wasnt sure if it had been addressed. Appreciate it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:09 PM
-CLM-'s Avatar
-CLM- -CLM- is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 459
Default

Quote:
Im stoked! They better put 357 on draw, the last few years have been disgusting....
You can say that again.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:20 PM
pottymouth's Avatar
pottymouth pottymouth is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In the 400's
Posts: 6,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
The paper from SRD said the draw was needed as archers were exceeding the 15% of the deer killed in the zones. If they are then a draw is required.
Srd is full bullsheet!

How could they even begin to come up with a number, when they don't have a mandatory Harvest report, to actually qualify their statements!

There's no way archers are exceeding the 15% !!

This nothing More than the right people whining because the big bad bowhunters killed a buck in sept, before they could in nov!

More hunting opportunity lost! Sad!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:34 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Does anyone know where the 15% number came from???....I don't Bow Hunt anymore, but with the increase in Bow Hunting licenses is this still a valid number??...just wondering.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:37 PM
Drop_Tine's Avatar
Drop_Tine Drop_Tine is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 1,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pottymouth View Post
Srd is full bullsheet!

How could they even begin to come up with a number, when they don't have a mandatory Harvest report, to actually qualify their statements!

There's no way archers are exceeding the 15% !!

This nothing More than the right people whining because the big bad bowhunters killed a buck in sept, before they could in
nov!

More hunting opportunity lost! Sad!

My thoughts exactly ..yupp take , take , take pretty soon when its only yankes hunting & paid hunting all these a55 clowns will be happy that they whined there way into this !!

Ive said it before and i will say it again heads gotta role out of the SRD office , time for new blood!!!

The rifle guys will be whining when there waiting 8 - 10 years to pull a mulie tag !!
Idiots , its happening already in certain zones , the author of this thread was complaining to me about it the other day , why do( I) have to wait 8 years for a rifle mulie tag ... I think he answered his own question !! I dont see the logic !!

Last edited by Drop_Tine; 06-20-2012 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:48 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Okay, here's a question, instead of a draw, would the bowhunterrs be okay with a 2-3 week season, instead of how it is now????
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:24 PM
Drop_Tine's Avatar
Drop_Tine Drop_Tine is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 1,419
Default

FYI Ty ... I have shot 2 mulie bucks a 180+ and a 199 5/8 in the 7 years you have been waiting to draw the oh so special WMU tag ! I dont understand what your laughing about or happy about lost opportunity for archery guys is gonna mean lost opportunity for the only rifle guys!! Which = lost opportunity for everyone, it just isnt gonna be good for anyone and were all HUNTERS and ALBERTAINS ... You might as well spit into the wind and let it hit you in the face ( your happy now but you aint gonna be in the future)!! So stop complaining about wait times cause there only gonna get longer.... cant wait ... This is gonna be awesome !!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:33 PM
pottymouth's Avatar
pottymouth pottymouth is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In the 400's
Posts: 6,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hal53 View Post
Okay, here's a question, instead of a draw, would the bowhunterrs be okay with a 2-3 week season, instead of how it is now????
Why is there an actual problem with bowhunters harvests , does anyone have factual data to confirm such allegations?

Sorry Hal, but without the info, there's no use in discussing alternatives or other suggestions!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:39 PM
NBFK NBFK is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In The Zone.......
Posts: 1,686
Default

I would be fine with a 1 week season rather than getting rid of the general season. Not all zones will be closed but its like anything the pressure will shift and then those zones too will be lost as well. Just look at the general moose situation in 505 and 510 I guarantee its only a matter of time until they go to draw soon since 338 and 337 did.

I think the thing that gets me really mad this is the absolute doe slaughter that has gone on in the last few years. Everyone puts the blinders on and says archers are the reason. In the past few years I could have gone in the rifle season with 4 buddies and brought 12 does home. How is this game management? There were way better steps in conserving mule deer rather than this. As a bowhunter I have to suck it up and do what's best for the future herd and not let my selfish thoughts interrupt.........But really srd hasn't been doing what's best for the province since the first devastating winter of 2006. It's a poor choice and I can't wait to draw a mulie tag every 8 years because of srd's lack of effort to actually have accurate game counts and harvest surveys.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:42 PM
Kolt30's Avatar
Kolt30 Kolt30 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackmastr View Post
Rich,

Any indication from SRD how they arrive at the numbers? One concern I've always had with % of harvest numbers is the fact that Alberta rarely does very good 'harvest' reports and a 3-4 question online survey hardly could give very accurate results.

It seems like a bit of a pipe dream to think that they get accurate numbers for any species (other than sheep, etc) with what seems like a low hunter survey response that sometimes proves random at the best of times.

Regardless....lots of interesting changes going on the east side of the mountains!!!
X2 on the stats, how many of the email surveys get sent out that no one answers or how many phone surveys do they do when they get screened? are they just counting those as successfull to stack numbers? some sources most definetly need to be shared before they should be passing anything. Would blow goats if they put it on draw, so much time in the woods/fields that would be taken away
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:53 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WJ has part of the story right. There is an SRD proposal to put all WMUs where archery harvest exceeeds 15% on Draw. Nothing really new here. This 15% cap has been in place for a long time, it's just never really been enforced. The WMUs have not been named and it's not limited to some areas and not others...only those that exceeed 15%. While I hate to see hunting opportunity reduced, it has to be reduced somewhere and right now, in many WMus, archers are exceeding their share. Not sure it's really fair to ask rifle hunters to give up more. I would think that all hunters would support a decision based on fair distribution of tags among various user groups.

No decision has been made whether there would be a seperate draw for archers and another for rifle or just one draw for both.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:23 PM
6mmhunter 6mmhunter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drop_Tine View Post
FYI Ty ... I have shot 2 mulie bucks a 180+ and a 199 5/8 in the 7 years you have been waiting to draw the oh so special WMU tag ! I dont understand what your laughing about or happy about lost opportunity for archery guys is gonna mean lost opportunity for the only rifle guys!! Which = lost opportunity for everyone, it just isnt gonna be good for anyone and were all HUNTERS and ALBERTAINS ... You might as well spit into the wind and let it hit you in the face ( your happy now but you aint gonna be in the future)!! So stop complaining about wait times cause there only gonna get longer.... cant wait ... This is gonna be awesome !!
I don't think this is going to be quite as dramatic as you make it out to be. Every bowhunter I know also rifle hunts and enters the draws every year already. The only difference will be for yourself when you'll be waiting 8 years to shoot your next big buck.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:25 PM
Deer Hunter Deer Hunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
Default

These guys sure know how to manage mule deer
ML's gone
Archery on draw
No reduction in outfitter or non resident tags
Cwd slaughter for nothing
Landowner tags unlimited

Someone needs to pull the plug on the decision makers at srd
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.