Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-18-2021, 09:44 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
Make it $30 a night. Thin out the swine herds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pikergolf View Post
This, it is unfathomable to me that people out there random camping and leaving a pig sty is considered normal behavior in Alberta. Not enough wilderness and to many people. Good gawd, the feces alone is enough to make a guy gag.
Got it right! $30.00 per night would be great!
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-18-2021, 09:56 PM
hilt134 hilt134 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 882
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntwat View Post
The co's travel through regularly, Stop at each spot and pick one licenced vehicle. Tell them they are responsible for clean up. Have them take pics upon departure, for their protection. If the co finds litter, at least he has something to follow up on. Once this process is established, there will be no 'It was already there".
I can’t see 30$ a person raising enough money to cover this sort of enforcement. In order to make a system like that work the CO’s are going to have to pass through these areas at a minimum once a day, otherwise if a more than a day passes it really could be anyone’s trash. It would really take the randomness out of the camping, you can’t expect someone to be held liable for the site for an unspecified amount of time. if the co is rolling through at a set time and inspecting every site before you leave so they know you where clean. I don’t see how that’s much different from a regular campground.

Also the person who is purposing the fee in the article says the money will go toward conservation, not necessarily enforcement. Likely there’s a chance that the officers who currently aren’t managing the level of enforcement needed won’t get the budgetary increase to up the enforcement.
__________________
I seem to really be rather long winded.

Last edited by hilt134; 03-18-2021 at 10:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-18-2021, 10:05 PM
Howard Hutchinson Howard Hutchinson is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Spruce Grove
Posts: 2,986
Default

As stated by a member, re-open existing grounds which have the infrastructure in place. Maybe expand to handle extra flow.
Too much time and money to have it work well if even possible.
If people would act as they should then it might be a different story. Yet, there is simply to much disrespect for not only nature but the authorities.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-18-2021, 10:27 PM
HalfBreed's Avatar
HalfBreed HalfBreed is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Parkland
Posts: 1,659
Default

People need to start camping in their local parks, why should the homeless have all the fun?
__________________
I take everything with a grain of pepper, I'm just different that way.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-18-2021, 11:28 PM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntwat View Post
The co's travel through regularly, Stop at each spot and pick one licenced vehicle. Tell them they are responsible for clean up. Have them take pics upon departure, for their protection. If the co finds litter, at least he has something to follow up on. Once this process is established, there will be no 'It was already there".
This will not work as time between departure and the CO coming to inspect leaves the door open for the defense of someone did it after I left. Was not us.

Sent off a rather long email to my UCP MLA over this and a couple other issues. See how he responds.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-19-2021, 03:17 AM
huntwat huntwat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohninAB View Post
This will not work as time between departure and the CO coming to inspect leaves the door open for the defense of someone did it after I left. Was not us.

Sent off a rather long email to my UCP MLA over this and a couple other issues. See how he responds.
That’s why the camper would take pics upon departure.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-19-2021, 06:28 AM
zabbo's Avatar
zabbo zabbo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,540
Default

Don't think a $30 annual fee will change anything. Been camping in the Oldman /Dutch creek area for the last 8 summers. There are always issues and disagreements. Some people like to shoot, while others are terrified, some people like to quad while others are squawking the land and streams are being destroyed. There has always been way too much TP and feces along the streams in my opinion. Lots of "temporary" out houses that seem to have become permanent. Ya gotta go, ya gotta go, fine, but at least wander well into the weeds and cover your tracks when you are done.

Last year in particular was a complete "crap show"!. Saw lots of things that were really over the top! Pretty sure this year will be even worse! Really have to wonder about the entitlement attitude of people?

I'm thinking some kind of random camping permit on a per night basis. Could be sold on line like fishing a license. Would need to be displayed on the trailer or tent. All monies raised go directly to enforcement. There has been virtually zero in the past. Last year there actually were more CO,s and lo and behold even RCMP? Still nowhere near enough and seldom in the evening or later at night. Fireworks all over, fire bans totally ignored!? It really was the wild west!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-19-2021, 06:41 AM
zabbo's Avatar
zabbo zabbo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntwat View Post
The co's travel through regularly, Stop at each spot and pick one licenced vehicle. Tell them they are responsible for clean up. Have them take pics upon departure, for their protection. If the co finds litter, at least he has something to follow up on. Once this process is established, there will be no 'It was already there".
Judging by this comment I don't think you comprehend the scope of the problem. In the Dutch creek area there are 100's of thousands of acres of forest and people camping everywhere. It would take an army of CO"s to drive through regularly. Even at that some camp sites would be missed. You wouldn't believe some of the places I have seen trailers! I wouldn't even take my truck into some of them. Many sites have multiple groups crowded into them. How can you pick one vehicle and tell them they are responsible for all the rest?

JMHO
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-19-2021, 06:46 AM
JB_AOL JB_AOL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,887
Default

Guys, this annual permit would be teal easy to enforce, simply set up a "checkstop" on one road every Friday. The oanother road on Sat, another on Sunday. Sure it doesn't catch everyone, but keeping it random would force alot of people to buy the permit. Also, it's for camping not day use.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-19-2021, 07:49 AM
liar liar is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ft assiniboine area
Posts: 1,392
Default

Our co's are short handed now . Adding road blocks , site visits , probably isnt going to happen without reducing coverage somewhere else . Also , a lot of these activities happen on the weekends , not evenly spread out over 7 days making coverage even more challenging .
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-19-2021, 08:11 AM
nimrod's Avatar
nimrod nimrod is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Alberta for the most part
Posts: 2,811
Default

I can see it now, at landslide lake, my tent has the permit posted, when nobody from the co's will come and look, this is also a back country campsite, just no vehicle access
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-19-2021, 08:44 AM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,200
Default

In theory it sounds like a good idea - and if it had any hope of addressing the backcountry abusers, then I'd support it.

I think of it this way, though: If they didn't have the resources to police the abusers up until now, how will they find the resources to enforce the fees in an equitable manner?

There will be many that will ignore paying the fees and will chance the fine.

A roadside checkstop has limited effectiveness as well - some will just say, "I'm just going in for the day, sir...", especially if they don't have a camping unit.

I'll have to file this under "cash grab".
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-19-2021, 08:55 AM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,672
Default

They are supposedly hiring 20 new CO’s and extra summer staff I believe.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:07 AM
colroggal colroggal is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,747
Default

Better idea would be to make everyone who wishes to use the outdoors apply for a WIN card and pay for the same annual wildlife certificate every hunter has to buy.

Colin
__________________
Check out my new book on Kindle - After The Flesh.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:09 AM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohninAB View Post
They are supposedly hiring 20 new CO’s and extra summer staff I believe.
Well, that's good news! On one hand, it's too bad that it has come to this due to the abusers, but it's good to see that they are putting more resources into it.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:18 AM
ram crazy ram crazy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zabbo View Post
Don't think a $30 annual fee will change anything. Been camping in the Oldman /Dutch creek area for the last 8 summers. There are always issues and disagreements. Some people like to shoot, while others are terrified, some people like to quad while others are squawking the land and streams are being destroyed. There has always been way too much TP and feces along the streams in my opinion. Lots of "temporary" out houses that seem to have become permanent. Ya gotta go, ya gotta go, fine, but at least wander well into the weeds and cover your tracks when you are done.

Last year in particular was a complete "crap show"!. Saw lots of things that were really over the top! Pretty sure this year will be even worse! Really have to wonder about the entitlement attitude of people?

I'm thinking some kind of random camping permit on a per night basis. Could be sold on line like fishing a license. Would need to be displayed on the trailer or tent. All monies raised go directly to enforcement. There has been virtually zero in the past. Last year there actually were more CO,s and lo and behold even RCMP? Still nowhere near enough and seldom in the evening or later at night. Fireworks all over, fire bans totally ignored!? It really was the wild west!

All you have to do is look where 90% of the people are from in the Oldman/Dutch Creek area. If the CO's would go out and actually fine the guilt ones they would make way more money than they would with a $30 dollar fee. That is if there is as big as problem as everyone let's on! I just can't get over how people bitch and complain about taxes, but yet are ok with paying user fees for everything. You do realize that all money goes into general revenue.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:39 AM
treeroot treeroot is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 396
Default

Money grab.. Does everyone here understand that the 30$ fee goes into the provincial coffers as general revenue and its spent just the same as any other provincial fee?

This 30$ does NOT go directly to maintaining and policing crown land camping. Just more money in the governments pocket.

And the same *****s who abuse crown land will be the same *****s who don't pay the fee.

All this is will be is a money grab out of the pockets of the people who use crown land respectfully.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:40 AM
zabbo's Avatar
zabbo zabbo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ram crazy View Post
All you have to do is look where 90% of the people are from in the Oldman/Dutch Creek area. If the CO's would go out and actually fine the guilt ones they would make way more money than they would with a $30 dollar fee. That is if there is as big as problem as everyone let's on! I just can't get over how people bitch and complain about taxes, but yet are ok with paying user fees for everything. You do realize that all money goes into general revenue.
Where do you think the 90% comes from? I have no issue with dishing out fines and I hope they make them big! Problem is, the CO's or police pretty much have to be there and witness infractions. Otherwise, people just say, it wasn't me. Prove it was. Also, people will plead not guilty and the courts are so backed up, by the time it gets there the case will be thrown out. You are correct when you say $30 probably won't do it. That's why I suggest a nightly fee. Make it $5. These funds go directly to enforcement! Big fines where possible as well.

I really don't know what the answer is, but after last year especially, and even before, something needs to change. We nee to start someplace.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:50 AM
Buckhead Buckhead is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 1,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by treeroot View Post
Money grab.. Does everyone here understand that the 30$ fee goes into the provincial coffers as general revenue and its spent just the same as any other provincial fee?

This 30$ does NOT go directly to maintaining and policing crown land camping. Just more money in the governments pocket.

And the same *****s who abuse crown land will be the same *****s who don't pay the fee.

All this is will be is a money grab out of the pockets of the people who use crown land respectfully.
This ^^^^.

I am not paying a $30 fee to use crown land that I already own.

What next. A fee to breathe mountain air?

Maybe they can start actually fining the abusers.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:53 AM
zabbo's Avatar
zabbo zabbo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by treeroot View Post
Money grab.. Does everyone here understand that the 30$ fee goes into the provincial coffers as general revenue and its spent just the same as any other provincial fee?

This 30$ does NOT go directly to maintaining and policing crown land camping. Just more money in the governments pocket.

And the same *****s who abuse crown land will be the same *****s who don't pay the fee.

All this is will be is a money grab out of the pockets of the people who use crown land respectfully.
I suspect that you are one of those that use crown land respectfully? You also have an issue paying for that use. There are lots of people that are very respectful and that's great. There are also lots that are extremely disrespectful. Last year saw a huge increase of those people. I actually stay in a campground and pay for that. My choice. I have never agreed with a free for all random camping crap show. As stated, these monies go directly to enforcement. I know, governments change the rules all the time. I'm just saying, something needs to change drastically. We have to start somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-19-2021, 09:56 AM
Buckhead Buckhead is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 1,900
Default

Maybe start enforcing the laws that already exist.
That's a good place to start.
It's highly unlike that the abusers are going to pay the $30 in any event.
If they start handing out fines then that will generate the revenue for additional enforcement. No need for any extra permits.

Last edited by Buckhead; 03-19-2021 at 10:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-19-2021, 10:36 AM
urban rednek's Avatar
urban rednek urban rednek is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,450
Angry Many gullible people playing into their hand.

It's only $30. Not a big deal.
"Heck, that's less than a tank of fuel to get out there. It's less than the cost of a small double double every week for a year.
If it saves one life..."

Stop falling for their false narrative and misdirection, that's how we got where we are today. Increase the fines and enforce the existing laws before you create a new license (tax) that will increase every year ad infinitum. Rinse and repeat.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg stop falling for it.jpg (14.8 KB, 27 views)
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.” - Thomas Sowell

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”- Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-19-2021, 10:49 AM
tri777's Avatar
tri777 tri777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by urban rednek View Post
It's only $30. Not a big deal.
"Heck, that's less than a tank of fuel to get out there. It's less than the cost of a small double double
every week for a year. If it saves one life..."

Stop falling for their false narrative and misdirection, that's how we got where we are today. Increase the
fines and enforce the existing laws before you create a new license (tax) that will increase every year ad
infinitum. Rinse and repeat.
I am 100% with this ^^
The new $30 tax is just a sneaky snake way to make all the 'good/law abiders' pay for the sins of the pigs.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-19-2021, 11:02 AM
Outbound Outbound is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 751
Default

Just another tax that won't solve anything. Start with making the fines for abusing the wilderness staggeringly harsh. $2000 for littering, $5000 for cutting down live trees, $10,000 for driving through fish bearing waters etc.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-19-2021, 11:04 AM
huntwat huntwat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zabbo View Post
Judging by this comment I don't think you comprehend the scope of the problem. In the Dutch creek area there are 100's of thousands of acres of forest and people camping everywhere. It would take an army of CO"s to drive through regularly. Even at that some camp sites would be missed. You wouldn't believe some of the places I have seen trailers! I wouldn't even take my truck into some of them. Many sites have multiple groups crowded into them. How can you pick one vehicle and tell them they are responsible for all the rest?

JMHO
I’ve camped at Dutch, old man, racehorse, daisy, white and deep. But only started recently (1975ish) I think I might know a little about the area and the problem. Of course you’re not going to catch everyone. But, if you catch a large number, word gets out.
Multiple groups? Then ask who is in each group. C.O.‘s are paid to do a job. Maybe start doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-19-2021, 11:32 AM
Athabasca1 Athabasca1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by treeroot View Post
Money grab.. Does everyone here understand that the 30$ fee goes into the provincial coffers as general revenue and its spent just the same as any other provincial fee?

This 30$ does NOT go directly to maintaining and policing crown land camping. Just more money in the governments pocket.

And the same *****s who abuse crown land will be the same *****s who don't pay the fee.

All this is will be is a money grab out of the pockets of the people who use crown land respectfully.
I agree with treeroot, just another money grab.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-19-2021, 12:00 PM
birdman86 birdman86 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by treeroot View Post
Money grab.. Does everyone here understand that the 30$ fee goes into the provincial coffers as general revenue and its spent just the same as any other provincial fee?

This 30$ does NOT go directly to maintaining and policing crown land camping. Just more money in the governments pocket.

And the same *****s who abuse crown land will be the same *****s who don't pay the fee.

All this is will be is a money grab out of the pockets of the people who use crown land respectfully.
Yup, this. Kenney needs to come up with taxes wherever he can while leaving personal/corporate rates untouched, all so he can pay his "war room" $30MM to protest a childrens cartoon about Bigfoot.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-19-2021, 12:10 PM
liar liar is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ft assiniboine area
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckhead View Post
This ^^^^.

I am not paying a $30 fee to use crown land that I already own.

What next. A fee to breathe mountain air?

Maybe they can start actually fining the abusers.
Thats crazy talk . What next? Take the guns away from the criminals !!!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-19-2021, 12:29 PM
zabbo's Avatar
zabbo zabbo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntwat View Post
I’ve camped at Dutch, old man, racehorse, daisy, white and deep. But only started recently (1975ish) I think I might know a little about the area and the problem. Of course you’re not going to catch everyone. But, if you catch a large number, word gets out.
Multiple groups? Then ask who is in each group. C.O.‘s are paid to do a job. Maybe start doing it.
I can see this is going south real fast. Quite honestly I'm not looking for a scrap. Just some way to put a cap on the craziness that has slowly been getting worse each year. Last year was a complete gong show! With all the new trailers purchased last year I expect this year will be the same and probably worse. I simply don't care how it happens, an annual fee, daily fee or just flat out through taxes. One way or the other it is going to cost money. If you have spent as much time as you say in the area I can't believe that you honestly believe CO's are regularly going to drive through every campsite. It would take an army and even then places would be missed. The next issue is, to charge a person the officer pretty much has to witness the offence. Those odds are pretty long at the very best. So too are the odds of charging a large number. Then imagine mom and dad take the kids for a weekend camp out and end up with a $1k fine or more. I can see the headlines and news flashes already. I didn't know, they're picking on me. Last summer 3 or 4 weeks into the fire ban a group in the campground has a real nice blazing going one evening. A couple people told them there was a fire ban. Response, well it's just a little fire. We didn't see the 4X8 foot fire ban signs all the way inbound or the 2 or 3 signs in the campground. REALY?? As far as I know the fine in that case is $600. Should be 10k.

Once again, not looking for scrap. Just trying to stop the insanity! Have a great day!
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-19-2021, 01:11 PM
treeroot treeroot is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 396
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zabbo View Post
I suspect that you are one of those that use crown land respectfully? You also have an issue paying for that use. There are lots of people that are very respectful and that's great. There are also lots that are extremely disrespectful. Last year saw a huge increase of those people. I actually stay in a campground and pay for that. My choice. I have never agreed with a free for all random camping crap show. As stated, these monies go directly to enforcement. I know, governments change the rules all the time. I'm just saying, something needs to change drastically. We have to start somewhere.
Not sure why you made that statement, you'd think that would be pretty obvious.. So I'm guessing it's more about the sentence following that one.. So I'll assume this was your point and address it.

Yes I have an issue with the 30$. My issue is that unless the 30$ is given directly to those who can address the issues on CL, its just a money grab.
It's going to the general pot of provincial fees and taxes. NOTHING has been stated about increasing officers to address the issue, increasing money towards convicting offenders etc. So if they are taking 30$ for me because of a known problem, but not giving the 30$ to those who can address the known problem than there is no point in charging 30$.

I'm not sure where your getting that this money is going directly to enforcment unless I missed that part. But in the articles I've read about the 30$ fee, nothing was said about the money going DIRECTLY to enforcment.

If I saw how my crownland camping fee was being spent and it clearly showed they would hire X number of officers for ever X number of fee's collecting and it was a 1 for 1 deal, I'd happily pay 60$
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.