Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2019, 12:26 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,523
Default Quick load velocity way off

can any of the guys that have quick load have a look at a load for me I have entered all my data and its saying my velocity should be 3133fps I fired the test load at the range and it cam out at 3422 measured by Labradar. my load details are

bullet 100 gr Speer BTSP #1408
cartridge .25-06 ack imp
cartridge length is 3.180
barrel length 26"
case capacity in h20 72.4
powder h4831sc
charge weight is 58.0 gr

I hear the program is pretty accurate but 269fps seems a bit extreme what data am I putting in wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2019, 01:08 PM
Davey Boy's Avatar
Davey Boy Davey Boy is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SW Calgary
Posts: 1,271
Default

My QL computes to 3160 MV.
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2019, 01:20 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
Default

It's a calculation, not an actual measuring tool. I will trust my Magnetospeed over any calculation.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2019, 07:28 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
It's a calculation, not an actual measuring tool. I will trust my Magnetospeed over any calculation.
Just curious as to why you would state that. A combiation of QL and a good chronograph trumps guessing your pressures off a chronograph alone.

Can you accurately guess the pressures from velocity, or just come close? Can you accurately guesstimate the pressure difference between two different powders with the same MV ?
For a man of your apparent reloading status, you should give it a try before dismissing it as an off-the-wall ballistic calculator. The guy that wrote the program is far more knowledgable regarding internal and external ballistics than all of us on this forum combined. Try it and find out for yourself.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2019, 07:35 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
Just curious as to why you would state that. A combiation of QL and a good chronograph trumps guessing your pressures off a chronograph alone.

Can you accurately guess the pressures from velocity, or just come close? Can you accurately guesstimate the pressure difference between two different powders with the same MV ?
For a man of your apparent reloading status, you should give it a try before dismissing it as an off-the-wall ballistic calculator. The guy that wrote the program is far more knowledgable regarding internal and external ballistics than all of us on this forum combined. Try it and find out for yourself.
Using the OPs example, if Quickload calculated a velocity of 3133fps, and a proven chronograph such as a magnetospeed was reading an average of 3422fps, what would you estimate the actual velocity to be? Don't try and deflect the question or change the topic, just answer the question.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2019, 08:02 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Using the OPs example, if Quickload calculated a velocity of 3133fps, and a proven chronograph such as a magnetospeed was reading an average of 3422fps, what would you estimate the actual velocity to be? Don't try and deflect the question or change the topic, just answer the question.
The anwser is simple. If QL burn rates for a specific powder are modified to coincide with actual chronograph results for a specific load and rifle and kept for future reference they will be be almost dead- on for future loads and similar temperatures. You have the sequence backwards.

I think the OP showed that example for three different charge weights.

Fair 'nuff?
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2019, 01:25 PM
Davey Boy's Avatar
Davey Boy Davey Boy is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SW Calgary
Posts: 1,271
Default

here is the screenshot for it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Clipboard-1.jpg (71.7 KB, 43 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2019, 01:29 PM
Davey Boy's Avatar
Davey Boy Davey Boy is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SW Calgary
Posts: 1,271
Default

Any Pressure signs as your velocity puts you over the safety limit, but who knows. No PS might be good to go.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2019, 01:41 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,061
Default

That load is is probably at max or over based on the load and velocity. An AI will usually get 100-200 fps over published non AI loads, you are almost 250 fps and 4 grains over published regular 25-06 load/speeds. That is very close to 257 Weatherby speed using a 26" barrel 100 grain bullet and H4831. I would be checking case head and rim expansion really close with that load.

Quick load is a great program but it is an approximation. The Chronograph is still far and away the best indicator of pressure. For an AI I start at 2 grains below published max for the non AI and work up till I get to 150-200 fps faster than max speed for the non-AI, adjusted for barrel length. You can push them faster but there is a real good reason Ackley blew up so many guns trying to get the last 50 FPS out of his cartridges.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-14-2019, 01:41 PM
huntingfamily huntingfamily is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davey Boy View Post
My QL computes to 3160 MV.
Dave
Mine as well. This is a low pressure/low velocity round.
I'd have a look at the labradar troubleshooting guide in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-14-2019, 03:07 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntingfamily View Post
Mine as well. This is a low pressure/low velocity round.
I'd have a look at the labradar troubleshooting guide in this case.
The burn rates in QL are simply approximations. You have to adjust them for your particular load. That can only be done with a chronograph. Once the burn rate is adjusted to your MV average you will find QL to be extremely accurate for that load combo rifle and temperature.
As with any other Loading Manual predictions , start low and work up.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-14-2019, 03:29 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
The burn rates in QL are simply approximations. You have to adjust them for your particular load. That can only be done with a chronograph. Once the burn rate is adjusted to your MV average you will find QL to be extremely accurate for that load combo rifle and temperature.
As with any other Loading Manual predictions , start low and work up.
Adjusting the burn rate for H4831sc (ba) up to 4500 (Default is 4300) I show a MV of 3244. Pressure at 52139 psi. Probably very close.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-14-2019, 03:58 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
Adjusting the burn rate for H4831sc (ba) up to 4500 (Default is 4300) I show a MV of 3244. Pressure at 52139 psi. Probably very close.
you nailed it adjusting the burn rate of h4831sc to .5040 matches my recorded data for other charges I fired very closely.

58.0gr avg 3422, QL 3418
58.5gr avg 3456, QL 3443
59.0gr avg 3469, QL 3468

this must be a variation in lot to lot burn rates?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-16-2019, 07:14 AM
gunluvr's Avatar
gunluvr gunluvr is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubious View Post
can any of the guys that have quick load have a look at a load for me I have entered all my data and its saying my velocity should be 3133fps I fired the test load at the range and it cam out at 3422 measured by Labradar. my load details are

bullet 100 gr Speer BTSP #1408
cartridge .25-06 ack imp
cartridge length is 3.180
barrel length 26"
case capacity in h20 72.4
powder h4831sc
charge weight is 58.0 gr

I hear the program is pretty accurate but 269fps seems a bit extreme what data am I putting in wrong?
Changing from one brass manufacturer to another can lead to a large discrepancy in velocity. With one of my 308 rifles I see a difference of well over 100 fps between Win brass and RP brass. So your results may be due to choice of brass (or size of your chamber if you're fireforming your AI from regular 25-06 brass).
__________________
Some days you're a bullet; some days you're a gopher.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.