Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 11-30-2011, 10:36 PM
HunterDave HunterDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slivers86 View Post
wow... I dont know what else to say. Congratulations drunk drivers of bc, I hope you hit light poles, trees, brick walls, and other non-human/animal objects and destroy your lives.
Ya see where this has went? Now people that are below .08 BAC are considered drunk drivers by some. Oh boy.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 11-30-2011, 10:42 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
Im a 19 year old whos been caught drunk driving 1 year ago pretty much when they started enforcing the drunk driving laws. yes it was stupid now to the point.

in order for me to get my license back i have to pay a 500 dollar fine, take a 8-16 hour long course that costs 880! thats 110 dollars an hour for a course on how to not drive drunk, and heres the best bit of all.
YOU HAVE to have a breathalyzer installed on a vehicle. this is basically a thing you blow into AS your driving every 15-30 minutes. lets look at the costs of this. The breathalyzer is about 1000 dollars to install. YOU HAVE to be driving that vehicle which means paying for insurance. YOU HAVE to drive during the months which means you cant just park it somewhere if you dont buy gas and drive the car in circles you will have months added onto the time you need the breathalyzer. YOU HAVE to have the breathalyzer "checked" every 2 months meaning you pay for it to basically be looked at by someone to make sure you weren't trying to drive drunk.

overall the drinking and driving law is complete ****. Im a college student that cant afford this bull****. Ive learned my lesson obviously but what people dont realize is now if my friends want to drive themselves home drunk I CANT EVEN DRIVE THEM HOME WHEN IM SOBER. Im locked out of driving and even preventing my friends from drinking and driving until ive eventually graduated college and come up with the money to afford my own vehicle.

so to all you people saying the drunk drivers should be hit harder they should be hit harder for their 2nd and 3rd time because one mistake shouldnt ruin their lives.

It shouldnt be a blood alchohol level thats measured for drinking and driving it should be a cognitive test to determine if someone is fit to drive. By these standards its just giving police biological bull**** evidence to hide behind.
You should have figured all that crap out before you got caught drinking and driving.

Now, maybe you should look at how that move has and will impact you fro the rest of your life.
I suggest you deal with and quit complaining about it.

Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 11-30-2011, 10:45 PM
eastcoast eastcoast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterDave View Post
Ya see where this has went? Now people that are below .08 BAC are considered drunk drivers by some. Oh boy.
and that`s how it happens.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 11-30-2011, 11:08 PM
BGSH BGSH is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 5,385
Default

Please do not hate me, i had half a beer and i drove to the store and back again.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 11-30-2011, 11:45 PM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntinstuff View Post
It just makes no difference

If the penalty for drinking and driving was death, we would be hanging people

Some people just dont think and/or care. Cant change that.
Exactly.
The law does nothing to prevent drinking and driving or deaths.

If there was more emphasis placed on enforcement of the current/previous laws and changing peoples attitudes towards alcohol the deterrent effect would make .08 more effective than it is.

Stop checks... and routine traffic stops...lots of em... the best investment towards curbing drinking and driving there ever was.

Bottom line is that it is relatively cheap to slap together a new law or increase penalties to create the appearance that you are doing something.

It costs a lot more to actually do something like train, hire and fund police so that they can make existing laws more effective through detection and enforcement.

It's just more lip service to a real problem designed to calm the masses and convince everyone that they are doing their part.
When the problem continues.... they can sit back and say they did their part.

Then... they'll claim that more policing is needed but since training and equipping police falls to city and federal government...they will need to form a study group...hold an enquiry and eventually make a half hearted effort to secure funds for more police.... as long as it doesn't come out of their piggy bank.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 12-01-2011, 12:28 AM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
Im a 19 year old whos been caught drunk driving 1 year ago pretty much when they started enforcing the drunk driving laws. yes it was stupid now to the point.

in order for me to get my license back i have to pay a 500 dollar fine, take a 8-16 hour long course that costs 880! thats 110 dollars an hour for a course on how to not drive drunk, and heres the best bit of all.
YOU HAVE to have a breathalyzer installed on a vehicle. this is basically a thing you blow into AS your driving every 15-30 minutes. lets look at the costs of this. The breathalyzer is about 1000 dollars to install. YOU HAVE to be driving that vehicle which means paying for insurance. YOU HAVE to drive during the months which means you cant just park it somewhere if you dont buy gas and drive the car in circles you will have months added onto the time you need the breathalyzer. YOU HAVE to have the breathalyzer "checked" every 2 months meaning you pay for it to basically be looked at by someone to make sure you weren't trying to drive drunk.

overall the drinking and driving law is complete ****. Im a college student that cant afford this bull****. Ive learned my lesson obviously but what people dont realize is now if my friends want to drive themselves home drunk I CANT EVEN DRIVE THEM HOME WHEN IM SOBER. Im locked out of driving and even preventing my friends from drinking and driving until ive eventually graduated college and come up with the money to afford my own vehicle.

so to all you people saying the drunk drivers should be hit harder they should be hit harder for their 2nd and 3rd time because one mistake shouldnt ruin their lives.

It shouldnt be a blood alchohol level thats measured for drinking and driving it should be a cognitive test to determine if someone is fit to drive. By these standards its just giving police biological bull**** evidence to hide behind.

For a college boy... you sure aren't very switched on ... are you?

Welcome to the real world son.
Not everything you do here gets a re-write and a note from Mum gets you squat.

You can choose to do whatever you want to do in this world...
As long as you are prepared to accept the consequences for your actions.


There.
Thats it.
All you really need to know to start being an adult.

It's called life and being a man and it's time for you to get on with it and own your mistakes instead of bleating like some wet whelp.

You made a decision to drink and drive... got caught and now like so many of your generation seem to be un-willing or unable to accept responsibility for your actions.

You are thankfully the only a victim of your own poor choices and you can thank people like yourself that have decided to drink and drive for the severity of your punishment.

The only real tragedy I see is that yet another set of parents have failed to instill a true sense of responsibility in... or adequately prepare their child for the rigors of real life.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:09 AM
HunterDave HunterDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
Im a 19 year old whos been caught drunk driving 1 year ago.............. Im a college student that cant afford this bull****
If you can't do the time then don't do the crime.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:36 AM
Scott N's Avatar
Scott N Scott N is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BGSH View Post
Please do not hate me, i had half a beer and i drove to the store and back again.
According to quite a few people on here, any amount of alcohol in your system makes you a drunk. You bad! How many people did you kill on your accident spree tonight?
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:58 AM
slivers86's Avatar
slivers86 slivers86 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary, Ab
Posts: 2,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterDave View Post
Ya see where this has went? Now people that are below .08 BAC are considered drunk drivers by some. Oh boy.
Eh, not drunk, unless they hit a car full of your family members and wait/delay as much as possible, and blow .079 and are no longer impaired, therefore get a 24hr suspension and a ticket for crossing the center line, oh justice... why aren't these laws federal, rather than provincial...
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 12-01-2011, 06:03 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
Default

Quote:
Eh, not drunk, unless they hit a car full of your family members and wait/delay as much as possible, and blow .079 and are no longer impaired,
Do you not believe that .08 was chosen for a reason, perhaps because normal people are quite capable of driving safely at that level.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:16 AM
BGSH BGSH is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 5,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
According to quite a few people on here, any amount of alcohol in your system makes you a drunk. You bad! How many people did you kill on your accident spree tonight?
thank goodness, i think i drove better then some of these sober losers out there, that cannot see over there windshield that never clean there ice off the windows before they leave there house
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:37 AM
Faststeel Faststeel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
Im a 19 year old whos been caught drunk driving 1 year ago pretty much when they started enforcing the drunk driving laws. yes it was stupid now to the point.

in order for me to get my license back i have to pay a 500 dollar fine, take a 8-16 hour long course that costs 880! thats 110 dollars an hour for a course on how to not drive drunk, and heres the best bit of all.
YOU HAVE to have a breathalyzer installed on a vehicle. this is basically a thing you blow into AS your driving every 15-30 minutes. lets look at the costs of this. The breathalyzer is about 1000 dollars to install. YOU HAVE to be driving that vehicle which means paying for insurance. YOU HAVE to drive during the months which means you cant just park it somewhere if you dont buy gas and drive the car in circles you will have months added onto the time you need the breathalyzer. YOU HAVE to have the breathalyzer "checked" every 2 months meaning you pay for it to basically be looked at by someone to make sure you weren't trying to drive drunk.

overall the drinking and driving law is complete ****. Im a college student that cant afford this bull****. Ive learned my lesson obviously but what people dont realize is now if my friends want to drive themselves home drunk I CANT EVEN DRIVE THEM HOME WHEN IM SOBER. Im locked out of driving and even preventing my friends from drinking and driving until ive eventually graduated college and come up with the money to afford my own vehicle.

so to all you people saying the drunk drivers should be hit harder they should be hit harder for their 2nd and 3rd time because one mistake shouldnt ruin their lives.

It shouldnt be a blood alchohol level thats measured for drinking and driving it should be a cognitive test to determine if someone is fit to drive. By these standards its just giving police biological bull**** evidence to hide behind.

SK

I'm interested to know just how hammered you were when you got caught, what did you blow? FS
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:50 AM
hillbillyreefer's Avatar
hillbillyreefer hillbillyreefer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Element View Post
I'm going to repost a comment I posted on a previous thread about this. Hopefully it starts to click for a few of you. I'm headed down to Texas on Saturday as the trial starts on Monday for the drunk driver that killed my mother. It's going to be painful to have to re-live this event all over again.
--------
Imagine... It's Thanksgiving evening, you're relaxing with your wife after a nice big turkey dinner, all is good in the world and you suddenly get a phone call from a trauma surgeon explaining that your mother has been killed and your father is barely hanging on to life due to a car accident. The next phone call is from the police explaining that a drunk driver may have caused the accident.

This was my 2010 Thanksgiving and I lost my mom in this accident and thankfully my father has made a full recovery. The accident occurred in Houston, TX and it was a 23 year old that hit them head on who had been drinking. Until you've lived it and fully understand the consequences of drinking and driving, I think it's difficult for many of you to have the full perspective of the impact that this has on families around our great province.

I know many of you like to have that one/two beer and it has little impact on your ability to drive, but you must understand that this is not the case with everyone.

Would you be willing to sacrifice your one beer after that round of golf with a client or dinner with friends to save your mother, wife, daughter, son from that one driver who assumed they were also okay to drive with only one or two drinks in their system?

I'm in favor of new legislation.
I'm sorry for your loss.

Could you please explain how punishing people who are not drunk is going to keep drunks off the road. This is feel good, do nothing legislation.
__________________
Upset a Lefty, Fly a Drone!

"I find it interesting that some folk will pay to use a range, use a golf course, use a garage bay but think landowners should have to give permission for free. Do these same people think hookers should be treated like landowners?" pitw
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:53 AM
hillbillyreefer's Avatar
hillbillyreefer hillbillyreefer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
Im a 19 year old whos been caught drunk driving 1 year ago pretty much when they started enforcing the drunk driving laws. yes it was stupid now to the point.

in order for me to get my license back i have to pay a 500 dollar fine, take a 8-16 hour long course that costs 880! thats 110 dollars an hour for a course on how to not drive drunk, and heres the best bit of all.
YOU HAVE to have a breathalyzer installed on a vehicle. this is basically a thing you blow into AS your driving every 15-30 minutes. lets look at the costs of this. The breathalyzer is about 1000 dollars to install. YOU HAVE to be driving that vehicle which means paying for insurance. YOU HAVE to drive during the months which means you cant just park it somewhere if you dont buy gas and drive the car in circles you will have months added onto the time you need the breathalyzer. YOU HAVE to have the breathalyzer "checked" every 2 months meaning you pay for it to basically be looked at by someone to make sure you weren't trying to drive drunk.

overall the drinking and driving law is complete ****. Im a college student that cant afford this bull****. Ive learned my lesson obviously but what people dont realize is now if my friends want to drive themselves home drunk I CANT EVEN DRIVE THEM HOME WHEN IM SOBER. Im locked out of driving and even preventing my friends from drinking and driving until ive eventually graduated college and come up with the money to afford my own vehicle.

so to all you people saying the drunk drivers should be hit harder they should be hit harder for their 2nd and 3rd time because one mistake shouldnt ruin their lives.

It shouldnt be a blood alchohol level thats measured for drinking and driving it should be a cognitive test to determine if someone is fit to drive. By these standards its just giving police biological bull**** evidence to hide behind.

You admit you broke the law, you were convicted, now pay the price. Sympathy is found between ***** and syphilis in the dictionary.
__________________
Upset a Lefty, Fly a Drone!

"I find it interesting that some folk will pay to use a range, use a golf course, use a garage bay but think landowners should have to give permission for free. Do these same people think hookers should be treated like landowners?" pitw
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:04 AM
grunger grunger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD Foothills
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post

so to all you people saying the drunk drivers should be hit harder they should be hit harder for their 2nd and 3rd time because one mistake shouldnt ruin their lives.
There should never be a 2nd or 3rd time. Make the penalty for the 1st impaired driving offence so stiff that people will not want to do it again.

I would rather see stiff drunk driving penalties ruin the life of the drunk offender than have the drunk offender behind the wheel to ruin the lives of innocent victims.

The way you whine like you are a victim makes me think you haven't learned anything.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:09 AM
Ken07AOVette's Avatar
Ken07AOVette Ken07AOVette is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 24,071
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
if my friends want to drive themselves home drunk I CANT EVEN DRIVE THEM HOME WHEN IM SOBER.
Find better friends. College does not mean alcohol is mandatory. You are not their keeper, thankfully.
__________________
Only dead fish go with the flow. The rest use their brains in life.


Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck
I wasn't thinking far enough ahead for an outcome, I was ranting. By definition, a rant doesn't imply much forethought.....
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:54 AM
IR_mike IR_mike is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iron River
Posts: 5,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grunger View Post
There should never be a 2nd or 3rd time. Make the penalty for the 1st impaired driving offence so stiff that people will not want to do it again.
I would rather see stiff drunk driving penalties ruin the life of the drunk offender than have the drunk offender behind the wheel to ruin the lives of innocent victims.

The way you whine like you are a victim makes me think you haven't learned anything.
As posted before we could hang them which would eliminate repeat offenders but would not eliminate first time offenders.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 12-01-2011, 10:27 AM
spaded spaded is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 281
Default

Driving is a privilege and not a right, seems like some of you think you have every right to do what you want and when you want.
I am in favor of the lower limit, and more enforcement.

Bottom line is don't drink and drive, you want to have 2 beers at supper because you have the right. Go right ahead I hope you drive right into a checkstop and lose your driving privilege for the year....
drunk or not that is bull****. Seems like a simple solution don't drink and drive.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 12-01-2011, 11:12 AM
grunger grunger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD Foothills
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IR_mike View Post
As posted before we could hang them which would eliminate repeat offenders but would not eliminate first time offenders.
Until the Minority Report becomes reality the only way to eliminate first time offenders is through education.
Make examples of those who break the law by driving drunk. Make it a hardship on their life so that they will not be eager to repeat offend.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 12-01-2011, 12:26 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

The BC law was not found to be unconstitutional, and it has been upheld.

One specific part has been found unconstitutional, and that is the ability to appeal.

Apparently the AB law is written slightly differently and hopes to avoid this.

Either way, if you have enough $$ and a good lawyer, it won't stick.

Unless of course you killed someone or caused an accident etc while impaired. In that case they should throw away the key.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 12-01-2011, 12:27 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skykevin View Post
Im a 19 year old whos been caught drunk driving 1 year ago pretty much when they started enforcing the drunk driving laws. yes it was stupid now to the point.

in order for me to get my license back i have to pay a 500 dollar fine, take a 8-16 hour long course that costs 880! thats 110 dollars an hour for a course on how to not drive drunk, and heres the best bit of all.
YOU HAVE to have a breathalyzer installed on a vehicle. this is basically a thing you blow into AS your driving every 15-30 minutes. lets look at the costs of this. The breathalyzer is about 1000 dollars to install. YOU HAVE to be driving that vehicle which means paying for insurance. YOU HAVE to drive during the months which means you cant just park it somewhere if you dont buy gas and drive the car in circles you will have months added onto the time you need the breathalyzer. YOU HAVE to have the breathalyzer "checked" every 2 months meaning you pay for it to basically be looked at by someone to make sure you weren't trying to drive drunk.

overall the drinking and driving law is complete ****. Im a college student that cant afford this bull****. Ive learned my lesson obviously but what people dont realize is now if my friends want to drive themselves home drunk I CANT EVEN DRIVE THEM HOME WHEN IM SOBER. Im locked out of driving and even preventing my friends from drinking and driving until ive eventually graduated college and come up with the money to afford my own vehicle.

so to all you people saying the drunk drivers should be hit harder they should be hit harder for their 2nd and 3rd time because one mistake shouldnt ruin their lives.

It shouldnt be a blood alchohol level thats measured for drinking and driving it should be a cognitive test to determine if someone is fit to drive. By these standards its just giving police biological bull**** evidence to hide behind.
If you re-read your own post in about 5-10 years you would see the immaturity in your statements.

Society has put laws and consequences in place for protection of personal rights and value of life.

I wish the laws were much harsher than what you had. Maybe my friend in High School would not of been killed by a guy your age...that felt fine and drove right through a red light into her door.
You broke those laws and in your own mind probably went through all the levels of emotion one goes through when screwing up.

Denial, Regret, Anger, Stupid, Regretful, Self Pity, Nervousness, Blaming, Hatred, Terrified, Ashamed, Intimidated, Abandonment, Embarrassment, Disappointment, Acceptance....etc.

Sounds like you have gone over everything in your head...but on paper...you are not accepting of the consequences of your action.

When I was your age...I did not make the same mistake. I knew better. You took a chance and got caught. Accept that...don't do it again. You have NO ONE to blame but yourself.

You got off extremely lucky. Had you left yourself a parapalegic or killed a child or anyone for that matter, your life would definitely be over.

Show some maturity and own up to it in your own mind and make a concious choice not to drink and drive. Tell others of your mistakes and use that for healy and helping.

TAKE RESPONSIBITY...WITHOUT CAVEATS!

IMHO

Sun
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 12-01-2011, 12:42 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher View Post
If you re-read your own post in about 5-10 years you would see the immaturity in your statements.

Society has put laws and consequences in place for protection of personal rights and value of life.

I wish the laws were much harsher than what you had. Maybe my friend in High School would not of been killed by a guy your age...that felt fine and drove right through a red light into her door.
You broke those laws and in your own mind probably went through all the levels of emotion one goes through when screwing up.

Denial, Regret, Anger, Stupid, Regretful, Self Pity, Nervousness, Blaming, Hatred, Terrified, Ashamed, Intimidated, Abandonment, Embarrassment, Disappointment, Acceptance....etc.

Sounds like you have gone over everything in your head...but on paper...you are not accepting of the consequences of your action.

When I was your age...I did not make the same mistake. I knew better. You took a chance and got caught. Accept that...don't do it again. You have NO ONE to blame but yourself.

You got off extremely lucky. Had you left yourself a parapalegic or killed a child or anyone for that matter, your life would definitely be over.

Show some maturity and own up to it in your own mind and make a concious choice not to drink and drive. Tell others of your mistakes and use that for healy and helping.

TAKE RESPONSIBITY...WITHOUT CAVEATS!

IMHO

Sun
x2

wow. those are some ignorant and shameless comments skykevin. So, it might cost you $5k total?

Seems like the rest of us who are subjected to the hazards of drunk drivers are the ones getting ripped off at that rate.

Drunk drivers should have their names recited on TV and the Radio for a week. Public shaming for publicly shameful acts.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:14 PM
chasingtail chasingtail is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,397
Default

Lowering the legal BAC so low makes it risky to drink at anytime. For example you had 1 or 2 drinks at home and need to leave for some emergency. Half the volunteer fire fighters or sitting around 0.5 on any given night.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 12-01-2011, 03:11 PM
BGSH BGSH is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 5,385
Default

The system is corrupt all around, my mom is a lawyer and tells me how corrupt people from police to the judge, good luck with anything on the drunk driving laws and any other laws for that matter.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 12-01-2011, 04:59 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaded View Post
Driving is a privilege and not a right, seems like some of you think you have every right to do what you want and when you want.
I am in favor of the lower limit, and more enforcement.

Bottom line is don't drink and drive, you want to have 2 beers at supper because you have the right. Go right ahead I hope you drive right into a checkstop and lose your driving privilege for the year....
drunk or not that is bull****. Seems like a simple solution don't drink and drive.
What are you really against? Having a drink and then driving? Or being drunk or impaired and then driving? There's a difference

You want to make something illegal or further take away rights (having a drink) because it MIGHT lead to something else that would be illegal (being drunk while driving, causing an accident, etc). The answer is simple. Harshly punish those who abuse a right, not those who are responsible. There has been no evidence presented to show that .051 alcohol level causes fatal accidents.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:06 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
Default

Quote:
There has been no evidence presented to show that .051 alcohol level causes fatal accidents.
If the experts determined that there was,the allowable limit would be .05, instead of .08.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:08 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
If the experts determined that there was,the allowable limit would be .05, instead of .08.
Exactly, and I'd support it.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:09 PM
eastcoast eastcoast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaded View Post
Driving is a privilege and not a right, seems like some of you think you have every right to do what you want and when you want.
I am in favor of the lower limit, and more enforcement.

Bottom line is don't drink and drive, you want to have 2 beers at supper because you have the right. Go right ahead I hope you drive right into a checkstop and lose your driving privilege for the year....
drunk or not that is bull****. Seems like a simple solution don't drink and drive.
absolutely but you want to know other rights?

section 8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

tell me how taking someone's vehicle without charging them with a crime is not seizure?

section 10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.


how does one get a lawyer on the side of the road after the cops have taken the car already?

Section 11(d) Any person charged with an offence has the right ...
(d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;


innocent til proiven guilty means in a court of law, not a roadside stop by police.

there are a few more that can be used but these are the main ones.
driving is not a right but these are.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:12 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chasingtail View Post
Lowering the legal BAC so low makes it risky to drink at anytime. For example you had 1 or 2 drinks at home and need to leave for some emergency. Half the volunteer fire fighters or sitting around 0.5 on any given night.
That's a pretty inflammatory statement Pal, and Not only myself but several others I know take offence to that remark!
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:24 PM
chasingtail chasingtail is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
That's a pretty inflammatory statement Pal, and Not only myself but several others I know take offence to that remark!
Cat
No need to take offence, it wasn't meant to be offensive, It shouldn't matter that volunter firefighters at least where I grew up have a fairly large liquor selection in the firehall. I have a lot of friends and family that are volunteer firefighters, been to a few good parties. Prior to cell phones in small towns the fire phone was often located in the bar. One of the perks for the important work they do.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.