Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:46 PM
V45 sabre V45 sabre is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 553
Smile which aqua view camera to buy for under $400?

Wondering which camera people would suggest in that price range.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:47 PM
Chris88CL Chris88CL is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 132
Default

It really depends what your needs are. Are you wanting small and mobile? Do you often fish in water over 50ft deep?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:52 PM
V45 sabre V45 sabre is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 553
Default

never in water over 25 feet deep and usually for ice fishing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2017, 10:09 PM
FishingNewb FishingNewb is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Vermillion Area
Posts: 26
Default

I like my 715c that i picked up at tfh at the beginning of the ice season.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2017, 10:30 PM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

715c is the only full size camera in that price range.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-31-2017, 12:10 AM
Tcon Tcon is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishingNewb View Post
I like my 715c that i picked up at tfh at the beginning of the ice season.
Thinking of upgrading my camera setup so the kids can watch it together. Is the screen good enough to fish without a shelter in bright sunlight?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2017, 12:13 AM
FishingNewb FishingNewb is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Vermillion Area
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcon View Post
Is the screen good enough to fish without a shelter in bright sunlight?
Yes, I used it in direct sunlight on sunday. I increase the brightness of the screen.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-31-2017, 06:52 AM
Kim473's Avatar
Kim473 Kim473 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,470
Default

Marcum.

http://www.wholesalesports.com/store...VS485C/p/66918
__________________
Kim

Gonna get me a 16" perch.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2017, 07:59 AM
Evan83 Evan83 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South, AB
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim473 View Post
X2!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-31-2017, 10:46 AM
SamSteele's Avatar
SamSteele SamSteele is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,787
Default

715C was $315 at Wholesale last I checked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Princecraft, Humminbird, MinnKota, Cannon, Mack's Lure, & Railblaza Pro Staff

YouTube: Harder Outdoors
Instagram: @harderoutdoors
FB: HarderOutdoors
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-31-2017, 02:51 PM
Brodhead's Avatar
Brodhead Brodhead is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mountain View County
Posts: 231
Default

I'd stay away frim aqua vu cameras if i was you. I have owned a couple of the high end aqua vu cameras and they can't even touch the lower end 385c Marcum I have now. Better quality, picture and brightness IMO.

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-31-2017, 05:53 PM
V45 sabre V45 sabre is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 553
Default

or would a vexilar scout be a better idea.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-31-2017, 06:15 PM
Speckle55's Avatar
Speckle55 Speckle55 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 6,269
Default

I have this one and its works great ..I watch them come in and take the wire worm ..then are fighting but not horizontal so I pulled it back to hole and then up the hole ..5# 15oz ....with out the camera I would not have known that it was not a runner .. saw it coming then it took the hook ..Priceless tool ..with the camera being so small they do not spook .. also I have got the tri-pod remote control to have the camera to look around any time I want ..its color too .. would I recommend ..yes I would

http://www.aquavu.com/Products/Aqua-...ms/AV-Micro-II


http://www.aquavu.com/Products/AV-Mi...ua-Vu-Mo-Pod-3

I fish more than most people and use this a tool ....money ...well invested

David



QUOTE=V45 sabre;3458216]Wondering which camera people would suggest in that price range.[/QUOTE]
__________________
Scientific and Analytical Angler/Hunter
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-31-2017, 06:18 PM
wildwoods wildwoods is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 4,961
Default

Has anyone tried a GoPro? You can view live with the app...
33' depth without a case for my Hero Session...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-31-2017, 06:37 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildwoods View Post
Has anyone tried a GoPro? You can view live with the app...
33' depth without a case for my Hero Session...

Dont think so unless something has changed. but you can modify it. Check on you tube. Might also find on AO with a search.
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-31-2017, 08:05 PM
millsboy79's Avatar
millsboy79 millsboy79 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildwoods View Post
Has anyone tried a GoPro? You can view live with the app...
33' depth without a case for my Hero Session...
Pretty sure "wireless" doesn't work through water after a few feet.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-31-2017, 08:22 PM
calgarygringo calgarygringo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: calgary
Posts: 3,005
Default

They have a better picture without a doubt when they work! If you only knew how many Marcum's I had returned to vendor or refunded money you would at least keep your fingers crossed every time out. They are nice units but QC has been an issue on their product. I will take a lesser quality picture to be sure it works.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Brodhead View Post
I'd stay away frim aqua vu cameras if i was you. I have owned a couple of the high end aqua vu cameras and they can't even touch the lower end 385c Marcum I have now. Better quality, picture and brightness IMO.

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-31-2017, 09:39 PM
astepanuk's Avatar
astepanuk astepanuk is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The North
Posts: 1,312
Default

My wife got me the Marcum VS485 with an Aqua View oslating rig works like amazing I would honestly pay the extra bucks for a Marcum.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-31-2017, 09:48 PM
TylerThomson TylerThomson is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 928
Default

I got the marcum in black and white and it's awesome. Never had a problem other than not being able to use it because my kid wants to watch fish TV.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-01-2017, 05:46 AM
dutchpirate's Avatar
dutchpirate dutchpirate is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 210
Default

I'll add my endorsement for Aqua Vu 715C. Just got it two weeks ago and it has worked exceptionally well. Fun to watch perch take hooks and see schools of whitefish wandering by.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-01-2017, 08:03 PM
Dragless Dragless is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 360
Default

I'm sceptical on how much branding is factored into the prices of these cameras I see other underwater cameras on Amazon for ally cheaper with good reviews from customers flat lcd type displays ..... Anyone have experience with any of these? Seems like the name brand cams are overpriced, I mean cameras are a dime a dozen these days... Some of these fishing cameras look like technology straight out of the 90,s (aqua view lol wtf is this cord business, oh yeah great idea making the camera a fish shape that will fool the fish) if I ever get a camera I think it would be more for scoping out underwater structure than actually watching the fish, that's what dry flies are for old ass tech.. Lol
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-01-2017, 08:18 PM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygringo View Post
They have a better picture without a doubt when they work! If you only knew how many Marcum's I had returned to vendor or refunded money you would at least keep your fingers crossed every time out. They are nice units but QC has been an issue on their product. I will take a lesser quality picture to be sure it works.
From what I understand there was 1 or maybe 2 years with issues related to cameras leaking. It has all been solved now.

Not only is the camera better quality on the Marcum 485 vs 715 but the form and function of the unit is much nicer too imo. The separate coil for the wire instead of having to hold the whole unit to coil up wire. Being one complete unit instead of having to have a separate carry bag. No screws to remove to swap out batteries. The 715 is an ok unit but I would take the 485 any day of the week over it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-01-2017, 08:33 PM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,858
Default

I've seen the Aqua View right next to the cheapest Marcum while in the same ice fishing tent. There is ABSOLUTELY no comparison to low light picture quality, battery life, clarity and normal operating conditions.

The Marcum is a far better camera - and the battery lasted almost twice as long.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-01-2017, 08:46 PM
TylerThomson TylerThomson is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragless View Post
I'm sceptical on how much branding is factored into the prices of these cameras I see other underwater cameras on Amazon for ally cheaper with good reviews from customers flat lcd type displays ..... Anyone have experience with any of these? Seems like the name brand cams are overpriced, I mean cameras are a dime a dozen these days... Some of these fishing cameras look like technology straight out of the 90,s (aqua view lol wtf is this cord business, oh yeah great idea making the camera a fish shape that will fool the fish) if I ever get a camera I think it would be more for scoping out underwater structure than actually watching the fish, that's what dry flies are for old ass tech.. Lol

Don't knock it till you try it. It's pretty cool being able to pick your fish out of a school of perch. Or watching how they react to your technique and lure. Or saving a nice lure tied onto 4lb mono from a hungry pike. Watching the fish is addictive.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-01-2017, 09:18 PM
calgarygringo calgarygringo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: calgary
Posts: 3,005
Default

Hopefully the 1 or 2 years is over. It was still going last year when I had to deal with them so still need some time IMO to prove themselves before I would by one. Picture quality as I mentioned is way better but if it doesn't work it all don't matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavYak View Post
From what I understand there was 1 or maybe 2 years with issues related to cameras leaking. It has all been solved now.

Not only is the camera better quality on the Marcum 485 vs 715 but the form and function of the unit is much nicer too imo. The separate coil for the wire instead of having to hold the whole unit to coil up wire. Being one complete unit instead of having to have a separate carry bag. No screws to remove to swap out batteries. The 715 is an ok unit but I would take the 485 any day of the week over it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-01-2017, 09:22 PM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygringo View Post
Hopefully the 1 or 2 years is over. It was still going last year when I had to deal with them so still need some time IMO to prove themselves before I would by one. Picture quality as I mentioned is way better but if it doesn't work it all don't matter.
I heard of the issue from the guys I am working with at the fishin hole. They said it was really bad and that they always had a pile of warranty/returns. We haven't had 1 while I have been there and it was obviously a wide scale manufacturing defect that has been fixed. Unless you end up with an old stock unit from somewhere you should be good now.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-01-2017, 10:36 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM View Post
I've seen the Aqua View right next to the cheapest Marcum while in the same ice fishing tent. There is ABSOLUTELY no comparison to low light picture quality, battery life, clarity and normal operating conditions.

The Marcum is a far better camera - and the battery lasted almost twice as long.
Glad I picked up a Marcum today
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-02-2017, 06:56 AM
TylerThomson TylerThomson is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 928
Default

Once you got a camera you find more and more uses for it. I bring it out in the summer as well now to pin point structure. Works sweet when you put the trolling fin on then just go slow till you see something interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.