Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-05-2015, 10:44 AM
Battery's Avatar
Battery Battery is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 920
Default RAM 1500 vs Ford F150

Im torn. I love the engine in the RAM and I am in love with the rambox addition (not worried about lost box space), however I am absolutely in love with the body style and interior on an F150. What would you choose and why?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2015, 10:49 AM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Some people are "Posseurs" and need to look the look. Some are not.

This is a truck, in Alberta, and will presumably be used hard and put away wet.

Beauty is only tin deep.

Look at what it will be used for, how long you want to keep it, and what it MIGHT be used for. That is the wild card, as we always end up doing extreme things with our vehicles at some point in the future, like towing a big boat or trailer.

These days, vehicles are pretty reliable, and cost competitive. Get all the truck you can and play one dealer off the other.

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-05-2015, 10:49 AM
Big pete's Avatar
Big pete Big pete is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Millarville,alberta
Posts: 494
Default

I would take the f150 because I am in love with the Eco boost motor, it's great on fuel and still has tons of giddy up n go
__________________
Ya just go out n ya give'r
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-05-2015, 10:53 AM
jayboots jayboots is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 175
Default

Drive both and pick the one that you like. Im bias to Ford, as you said I feel the interior is the nicest as is the comfort.. If looking at F150 go 5.0. the "eco"boost has been found to have the same mileage or worse the the 5.0's in Alberta, and if you put any kind of level lift or different tires then what comes on from the dealership. the 5.0 wont be as effected in the mileage department. Plus less things to worry about.... like turbo's breaking.....

Don't have much knowledge on Dodge so I'm not going to say anything on it
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2015, 11:07 AM
Battery's Avatar
Battery Battery is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewski Canuck View Post
Some people are "Posseurs" and need to look the look. Some are not.

This is a truck, in Alberta, and will presumably be used hard and put away wet.

Beauty is only tin deep.

Look at what it will be used for, how long you want to keep it, and what it MIGHT be used for. That is the wild card, as we always end up doing extreme things with our vehicles at some point in the future, like towing a big boat or trailer.

These days, vehicles are pretty reliable, and cost competitive. Get all the truck you can and play one dealer off the other.

Drewski
It will be pulling a 19' boat around in the summer time and mostly used for getting in to town from Airdrie daily and camping/fishing/hunting. I wont be using it for work or anything like that. More of a family truck.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2015, 11:17 AM
stob stob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,428
Default

My neighbors are ford guys and one just sold off his fleet of 150's at auction because of a design flaw in the cam phasers i think he said. Ford knows of it and it is current in the pre eco boost trucks yet they won't honour fixing their design flaw(s) ... I drive a RAm and it does it all on and off roads read hemi here. Some young ranchers i know are buying ford only because they are the cheapest $$$.... .02
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2015, 11:17 AM
abhunter8's Avatar
abhunter8 abhunter8 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Drayton Valley, AB
Posts: 693
Default

I am a ford man but have drove 2 Dodge 1500's for the past 10 years. The Ford in my opinion may be a little better built truck but I have not had any issues with the Dodges. The fords on our fleet at work have had nothing but problems. This is what it boils down to for me... If you want to spend $10,000 more buy the Ford... if not buy the Dodge!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2015, 11:26 AM
BobNewton's Avatar
BobNewton BobNewton is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Morinville
Posts: 898
Default

Drive em both and pick the one you liked the best.

I drove the Dodge about 4 blocks. Back to the dealer and walked away.

It drove like a big bad ram. Some like that. I didn't. I bought the Ford. Drives like a luxury car and is just as capable.

My opinion.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2015, 11:27 AM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

If you are keeping it for a long time, get the FIAT / Mercedes 3.0 Diesel. It is a good engine and will last and last. ALOT of Jeep Grand Cherokee owners with the 3.0 diesel have over 500 k on theirs.

I expect that a chip after warranty will give the 3.0 diesel in these trucks a lot more performance.

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2015, 11:55 AM
Mistagin Mistagin is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ft. McMurray and Kingston
Posts: 1,764
Default

I can hardly wait to get a look at and drive the proposed rumoured new Nissan Frontier. I know, it's not a full size, but if ya don't need a full size it might be worth the wait. It's rumoured that Nissan is thinking about putting a Cummins diesel in them.

Meanwhile, I really like my 2012 F-150. It's only got the 3.7 V-6, thus rated to tow 7,000 lbs, but it gets good mileage. I just did an ice road trip from Fort McMurray to Fort Smith, NWT and averaged 12.7 litres per 100 km. Next week I'm doing a run down to Red Deer and will be monitoring fuel consumption then too ( I always do). The best mileage I've gotten with it is just under 9.7 litres per 100 km - highway speeds in the summer, that was towing my small 14.5 foot fishing boat and loaded with camping gear . Can't get that engine in them anymore though.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-05-2015, 12:41 PM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,163
Default

I'd be torn between the two... Both are great trucks!

But chances are the F150 would win out. The main reason is that we like having the bench seat in the front.

The F150 and the Tundra are the only ones with a shoulder belt in that position, plus, they are the only ones that have a proper center position in the rear (Dodge and the new GM's notch out the seat in the rear bench for some reason).

The Dodge's dash also protrudes more in the center. Even with a small person in that position, their knees would be bumping the dash buttons.

Not a big fan of the EcoBoost, I'm one of the ones that had a bad experience. Loved how it pulled, though! We have quite a few in our company's fleet and according to our equipment manager, they are running well and economically. For fuel economy, the 5.0 is pretty close. That being said, someone with mechanical experience posted on this forum recently that the 5.0 also has issues with heads etc. and recommended the 6.2l instead.

Stob, the cam phaser issue is with the 5.4l engine - I think they only vehicle they put that in anymore is the Expedition, if at all. Just did mine on my '05 last Summer at 300K km.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-05-2015, 12:42 PM
Battery's Avatar
Battery Battery is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistagin View Post
I can hardly wait to get a look at and drive the proposed rumoured new Nissan Frontier. I know, it's not a full size, but if ya don't need a full size it might be worth the wait. It's rumoured that Nissan is thinking about putting a Cummins diesel in them.

Meanwhile, I really like my 2012 F-150. It's only got the 3.7 V-6, thus rated to tow 7,000 lbs, but it gets good mileage. I just did an ice road trip from Fort McMurray to Fort Smith, NWT and averaged 12.7 litres per 100 km. Next week I'm doing a run down to Red Deer and will be monitoring fuel consumption then too ( I always do). The best mileage I've gotten with it is just under 9.7 litres per 100 km - highway speeds in the summer, that was towing my small 14.5 foot fishing boat and loaded with camping gear . Can't get that engine in them anymore though.
100km for $10 in gas, I could get behind that pricing!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-05-2015, 12:55 PM
Positrac Positrac is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,281
Default

It really comes down to whether you want your new truck made out of recycled beer cans or recycled Spaghetti Os cans.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:04 PM
Xbolt7mm Xbolt7mm is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: south calgary
Posts: 2,281
Default

It's like a gun everyone likes a different fit. To me, a trucks a truck, you can get a lemon in anything. I went on price alone and the dodge dealer was much hungrier than the ford or chev dealer for similar price models.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:29 PM
elkdump elkdump is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Owned my own auto repair business for 20 years, without Dodge trucks I would have starved to death, my kids would have been without shoes,, lmao

Without General Motors/Chev trucks I wouldn't have had the money to hunt and fish on weekends , lol

Ford F Series trucks did not make the shop a constant reliable income compared to the other Big 2,,


So buy a DODGE,

SUPPORT A COUPLE OF MECHANICS AND SEND THIER KIDS TO COLLEDGE !
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:30 PM
dumoulin dumoulin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,368
Default

Once you get own a Ram with Ramboxes and an airtime, you'll never go back...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:35 PM
Battery's Avatar
Battery Battery is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dumoulin View Post
Once you get own a Ram with Ramboxes and an airtime, you'll never go back...
That Rambox is amazing. I was really not considering a RAM until I seen one with that add on haha I would love to have a permanent fishing rod holder!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:36 PM
elkdump elkdump is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Buffalo View Post
I'd be torn between the two... Both are great trucks!

But chances are the F150 would win out. The main reason is that we like having the bench seat in the front.

The F150 and the Tundra are the only ones with a shoulder belt in that position, plus, they are the only ones that have a proper center position in the rear (Dodge and the new GM's notch out the seat in the rear bench for some reason).

The Dodge's dash also protrudes more in the center. Even with a small person in that position, their knees would be bumping the dash buttons.

Not a big fan of the EcoBoost, I'm one of the ones that had a bad experience. Loved how it pulled, though! We have quite a few in our company's fleet and according to our equipment manager, they are running well and economically. For fuel economy, the 5.0 is pretty close. That being said, someone with mechanical experience posted on this forum recently that the 5.0 also has issues with heads etc. and recommended the 6.2l instead.

Stob, the cam phaser issue is with the 5.4l engine - I think they only vehicle they put that in anymore is the Expedition, if at all. Just did mine on my '05 last Summer at 300K km.
I also had a 2012 F150 Eco-Boast piece of s$it, gas guzzling piece of crap, death trap on the highway,
A $30,000 kick in the balls to own that lemon for about a Year,,,,

Bought a2014 F150 5.0 ltr V8, runs like a new vehicle SHOULD and gets damm near twice the gas Milage the the Eco-boast could do,,
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:42 PM
450Marlin 450Marlin is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Drayton Valley
Posts: 260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkdump View Post
Owned my own auto repair business for 20 years, without Dodge trucks I would have starved to death, my kids would have been without shoes,, lmao

Without General Motors/Chev trucks I wouldn't have had the money to hunt and fish on weekends , lol

Ford F Series trucks did not make the shop a constant reliable income compared to the other Big 2,,


So buy a DODGE,

SUPPORT A COUPLE OF MECHANICS AND SEND THIER KIDS TO COLLEDGE !
My mechanic buddy says the same thing, basically Dodge are his bread and butter.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-05-2015, 02:44 PM
Xbolt7mm Xbolt7mm is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: south calgary
Posts: 2,281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 450Marlin View Post
My mechanic buddy says the same thing, basically Dodge are his bread and butter.
If they last twice as long then there's twice as many which would in turn mean more in the shop,,,,jus sayin
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-05-2015, 02:46 PM
Xbolt7mm Xbolt7mm is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: south calgary
Posts: 2,281
Default

My dodge would pull my ford to lethbridge an back cheaper than if the ford drove on its own. They are both dependable trucks. The ford with 31,000 km on it averages 13 mpg highway, the dodge get a consistent 19, it's got 18,000 km on it.both are half tons,apples to apples
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-05-2015, 03:19 PM
elkdump elkdump is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xbolt7mm View Post
If they last twice as long then there's twice as many which would in turn mean more in the shop,,,,jus sayin
OH NO, I had regular customers for 20 years, over, and over and over, steering,brakes,suspension ,trans, trans case, I love Dodge owners, lol

Same old,same old

The best thing DODGE put out of the factory were the 12 valve cummins and the 318/360 v8 Gas engine lines, and those were abandoned long ago because they were basically indestructible ,,

And even back then the Dodge steering,suspension,running gear and body was of poor design engineering defects and sub standard body metal, etc,etc
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-05-2015, 03:27 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkdump View Post
I also had a 2012 F150 Eco-Boast piece of s$it, gas guzzling piece of crap, death trap on the highway,
A $30,000 kick in the balls to own that lemon for about a Year,,,,

Bought a2014 F150 5.0 ltr V8, runs like a new vehicle SHOULD and gets damm near twice the gas Milage the the Eco-boast could do,,

Odd. If I bought a lemon of a vehicle that cost me an arm and a leg, I wouldn't go back to the same manufacturer. I'm just getting rid of a Honda that needs it's third new engine at 165,000 K, with the manufacturer telling me "that's too bad". I'm sure not buying another
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-05-2015, 03:33 PM
elkdump elkdump is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Odd. If I bought a lemon of a vehicle that cost me an arm and a leg, I wouldn't go back to the same manufacturer. I'm just getting rid of a Honda that needs it's third new engine at 165,000 K, with the manufacturer telling me "that's too bad". I'm sure not buying another
The EcoBoast pee six is a lemon, the F150 is the best truck on the market dollar for dollar as long as it does not have an EcoBoast excuse for a motor
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-05-2015, 04:12 PM
dumoulin dumoulin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battery View Post
That Rambox is amazing. I was really not considering a RAM until I seen one with that add on haha I would love to have a permanent fishing rod holder!
Fits guns and also turn into an instant bar too!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-05-2015, 04:14 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dumoulin View Post
Fits guns and also turn into an instant bar too!
Though you're screwed if your a guy who likes a canopy on the back, right? good idea but wouldn't work for me.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-05-2015, 04:25 PM
Battery's Avatar
Battery Battery is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 920
Default


this is what dreams are made of boys
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-05-2015, 08:09 PM
Jon 2011 Jon 2011 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 18
Default

I've had my ecoboost since May 2013 and love it. The engine has tons of power, have 30000 km with no issues
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-05-2015, 08:24 PM
Bolete Bolete is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xbolt7mm View Post
If they last twice as long then there's twice as many which would in turn mean more in the shop,,,,jus sayin
The only problem with that logic is that they don't last twice as long.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-05-2015, 08:35 PM
reelhooker reelhooker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: i have a home in calgary however i live as much of my life as possible in the woods
Posts: 968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battery View Post

this is what dreams are made of boys
Like hell my guns with glass would go in there
__________________
I was once told to beware the Head of the Dragon. I asked why, as I have already married the Tail!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.