Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2016, 08:11 PM
Newview01 Newview01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
Default Liberals Reviewing Chinese Ban on Oilsands Ownership

I am sure this has nothing to do with a pay to play scheme.

http://calgaryherald.com/news/politi...ands-ownership
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-01-2016, 08:30 PM
CBintheNorth's Avatar
CBintheNorth CBintheNorth is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Communist Capital of Alberta
Posts: 3,770
Default

Excellent. So they don't want us to sell our resources because they want to sell us out. Got it.

And it will have only cost China $1500 per plate to get a piece of Fort Mac.
Fantastic news all around.
__________________
Social acceptance is NOT effective therapy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2016, 08:45 PM
honeycut.a7's Avatar
honeycut.a7 honeycut.a7 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: PARKLAND COUNTY
Posts: 115
Default

1500 bucks for supper 50,000 for a statue . All of a sudden investment is now opened up....nah I don't see anything wrong . It's just the way liberals do things.

Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2016, 09:00 PM
Newview01 Newview01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
Default

There is mention of a free trade agreement with China in the article as well. That is the last thing we need.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2016, 09:33 PM
Fur Fur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 592
Default

Canadians keep getting sold out. When will enough be enough? Unfortunately I think the average stupid Canadian wont want to protest or do anything about it until its way too late. Sad really when the younger generation only thinks of the present day and instant reward rather than looking how the present will affect their future and future generations.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2016, 11:11 PM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

Probably a good thing. The Chinese know how to grease the wheels of socialist governments to get business moving. Should fit right in here in Canada. They'll make adscam look like a lemonade stand.


Loved this quote:
Wenran Jiang, director of the Canada-China Energy and Environment Forum, said he didn’t think lifting the restrictions would result in a rush of new dollars from China because previous investments by companies such as CNOOC have not paid off as originally envisioned.

It would be a gesture of “goodwill,” however, said Jiang.



The old reverse psychology trick. Usually doesn't work, but I think they got a better than not chance of pulling it off in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2016, 11:49 PM
New Hunter Okotoks New Hunter Okotoks is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Okotoks
Posts: 3,033
Default

We all know that Little Potato has a lot of respect for the Chinese Government and that he also had a love for Fidel Castro, maybe he can use their models and tactics to create a new Canada, it is 2016 afterall!!

The Chinese must really take their social license and environmental responsibilities seriously. Why else would our federal government even consider such a thing if it were not the case?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2016, 12:42 AM
bigskinner bigskinner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 413
Default .

Remove

Last edited by bigskinner; 12-02-2016 at 12:44 AM. Reason: remove
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2016, 02:04 AM
Gray Wolf Gray Wolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,217
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigskinner View Post
Remove
X2 ^
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-02-2016, 06:51 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,136
Default

I remember people being upset when the federal government allowed the Chinese to purchase the Long Lake operation. They blamed Harper for selling out the country. I wonder what those people are saying now?
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-02-2016, 08:10 AM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
I remember people being upset when the federal government allowed the Chinese to purchase the Long Lake operation. They blamed Harper for selling out the country. I wonder what those people are saying now?
They're saying "Look how inclusive our PM is!"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-02-2016, 08:16 AM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
I remember people being upset when the federal government allowed the Chinese to purchase the Long Lake operation. They blamed Harper for selling out the country. I wonder what those people are saying now?
My buddy who worked for a company under contract by Nexxen at Long Lake said just got worse and worse after the Chinese took over.
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-02-2016, 08:25 AM
Bitumen Bullet Bitumen Bullet is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 418
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fur View Post
Canadians keep getting sold out. When will enough be enough? Unfortunately I think the average stupid Canadian wont want to protest or do anything about it until its way too late. Sad really when the younger generation only thinks of the present day and instant reward rather than looking how the present will affect their future and future generations.

I would say it has been almost every generation since Confederation and before in the case of Canada and the Charter colonies.

The younger generations have been told that the status quo is good, or good enough, so the sell out continues. Which makes sense if the family has moved to Canada within a generation or so. After all who moves to a country and then wants to change the very things that allowed them to move and improve their situation?

But why do those few who see Canada as their homeland, who have no other homeland to return to, or who have been on the land for hundred years or more, continue generation after generation to sell out?

It's been 150yrs since Canada took the West by noose and bayonet and yet we are still satisfied with being treated as a colony, with Canada having a 1st stage resource based economy exporting to a single market.

It hasn't been the younger generation that got us here, but they are making it clear they see no reason to do better. IMO we can do much better. Canada, even Alberta, has more valuable and varied natural wealth per capita than almost any other county, we should be doing very much better in many ways. But obviously that isn't what we tell our children, the younger generations.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-02-2016, 08:30 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstubbs View Post
My buddy who worked for a company under contract by Nexxen at Long Lake said just got worse and worse after the Chinese took over.
I know several people that worked there after the takeover, and some of those people were the ones complaining about the government allowing the purchase to take place. If the government changes the regulations, the Chinese will likely be looking at buying more oilsands operations in the future.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-02-2016, 08:32 AM
Big Grey Wolf Big Grey Wolf is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,266
Default

What difference does it make if American $$ or Chinese own our corporate world.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-02-2016, 08:58 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Grey Wolf View Post
What difference does it make if American $$ or Chinese own our corporate world.
Talking to the people that worked at Long Lake after the takeover, the Chinese apparently view the health and safety of their workers much differently than the Americans.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-02-2016, 09:19 AM
Newview01 Newview01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Grey Wolf View Post
What difference does it make if American $$ or Chinese own our corporate world.
Think, quality of goods coming out of America vs quality of goods coming out of China. I would also rather have American minded folks looking over the safety as opposed to the Chinese.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-02-2016, 09:26 AM
CBintheNorth's Avatar
CBintheNorth CBintheNorth is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Communist Capital of Alberta
Posts: 3,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Grey Wolf View Post
What difference does it make if American $$ or Chinese own our corporate world.
Neither is good.

We have the resources and technological advancements to operate as a world super power, but seem to be stuck with the mind set of being a third world country because we can't run it ourselves it seems. We have poor leaders.

One day we will have a leader that shows the rest of the world that we are not selling out. The people that built this country didn't do it for the benefit of countries like China. This clown we have now ain't the guy to do that.
__________________
Social acceptance is NOT effective therapy.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-02-2016, 09:53 AM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01 View Post
Think, quality of goods coming out of America vs quality of goods coming out of China. I would also rather have American minded folks looking over the safety as opposed to the Chinese.
Not to mention the environment. If people think the Americans are bad they haven't seen the Chinese.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-02-2016, 10:59 AM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,815
Default

It's because we sell out for foreign money quick to support the social programs we demand today.

The Libs made extravagant promises they have to pay for right now. So they sell Alberta's assists to pay for it.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
- Sir Winston Churchill

A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.
-Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-02-2016, 12:13 PM
Peace Meal Farm Peace Meal Farm is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tagish, Yukon Terr & Peace River, Alberta
Posts: 378
Default

well isn't that just peachy. yet another arrow bullseye from our liberal overlords.

if the Chinese want in (and are likely coming in full bore with liberal support) then let's at least make it worth our while. no raw material being shipped to the coast. keep the value added here in Canada, so that means foreign purchase involves the Chinese providing capital as minority partners for upgraders and refineries.

while we're at it please no more pipelines south for unrefined bitumen.

I can grow cucumbers and sell them for $0.50/lb. Or I can sell a jar of pickles or relish with $0.25 worth of the things for $5.

I like keeping my money working at home.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-02-2016, 02:19 PM
79ford 79ford is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,169
Default

Liberals are probably looking at the billions that could be spent in alberta.... why borrow billions for government make work programs when you can approve a few prjects and get a private company to spend billions and create jobs.

Alberta bc and sask... mostly alberta have been the only real bright spots in the countries economy for years now, everything else has pretty much been tossed to the wayside in the last 15 years. Forestry and whatever else goes up and down tourism doesnt provide any jobs, fishing is always declining, the economy outside oil and gas doesnt grow it just goes up and down. Oil and gas production can increase for the most part and put incremental new dollarsinto the system.


China is the last sucker who seems willing to blow lots of money on the oilsands.... mind you they may have puckered up alittle after their last few forays i to the oilsands,haha! Overall they do spend money like it grows on trees when it comes to investing. They bought the company that owns long lake! Jeebers lol, the biggest disaster of an oilsands project in alberta history and they paid a hefty premium to boot. That was almost like a friend taking one for the team kinda service.


I think as long as the chinese build from the ground up it should be okay... they should not be allowed to buy things that are already running, they have been proven to destroy (in some cases quite literally destroy) decent projects/equipment that did have some value. While long lake was a disaster the upgrader itself supposedly did run okay untill it was blown up...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-02-2016, 05:03 PM
From The Hip From The Hip is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,052
Default The chinese may want to buy......but who wants to sell?

When it comes down to it the Federal government has no assets in the oil sands since Suncor swallowed up Petro Canada some years back.

Does anybody think Suncor is going to sell Syncrude after recently taking it over completely by snapping up Canadian Oilsands when the companies stock was low?Syncrude produces 90,000 barrels of refined synthetic oil a day with access to pipelines.This is not bitumen this is refined synthetic oil which gets a better price and all the upgrades have been done.Cant see them selling it.

Same goes for the other big players.

FTH
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-02-2016, 07:31 PM
TBD TBD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,881
Default 'cmon this is a good thing boys ...

it means AB's oil sands are once again open for business, and we need an infusion of foreign capital.

... what do you think the Chinese told Justin last month when he was out there ?

Get some pipelines built to tidewater !!

V 2.0 of northern Gateway is coming ...

TBD

PS ... it'll be fun watching Justin deal with the greenies for a change (they might have to bring Herb out of retirement) and see his mentor Suzuki's reaction

Last edited by TBD; 12-02-2016 at 07:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-02-2016, 07:38 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by From The Hip View Post
When it comes down to it the Federal government has no assets in the oil sands since Suncor swallowed up Petro Canada some years back.

Does anybody think Suncor is going to sell Syncrude after recently taking it over completely by snapping up Canadian Oilsands when the companies stock was low?Syncrude produces 90,000 barrels of refined synthetic oil a day with access to pipelines.This is not bitumen this is refined synthetic oil which gets a better price and all the upgrades have been done.Cant see them selling it.

Same goes for the other big players.

FTH
Syncrude can produce a lot more than 90,000 barrels per day, but they need to get rid of the Exxon management team to get production to anywhere near it's potential. Hopefully Suncor will ditch Exxon and put someone in charge that has the experience and common sense to run the plant properly.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-03-2016, 08:11 AM
CBintheNorth's Avatar
CBintheNorth CBintheNorth is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Communist Capital of Alberta
Posts: 3,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBD View Post
it means AB's oil sands are once again open for business, and we need an infusion of foreign capital.

... what do you think the Chinese told Justin last month when he was out there ?

Get some pipelines built to tidewater !!

V 2.0 of northern Gateway is coming ...

TBD

PS ... it'll be fun watching Justin deal with the greenies for a change (they might have to bring Herb out of retirement) and see his mentor Suzuki's reaction
I don't have a problem with selling the products, I have a problem with selling the assets.....fixed assets on our soil.
Pipelines-good.
Selling the oil in the pipelines-good.
Producing the oil to put in the pipelines-good.
Selling the companies responsible for taking the oil out of the ground-bad.
Selling the land that the oil exists in-bad.
__________________
Social acceptance is NOT effective therapy.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-03-2016, 08:38 AM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

Now when progressives protest the oil sands we can shout Racist, Biggot, and Xenophobe at them.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-03-2016, 08:54 AM
Bitumen Bullet Bitumen Bullet is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 418
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBintheNorth View Post
....
Pipelines-good.
Selling the oil in the pipelines-good.
Producing the oil to put in the pipelines-good.
Selling the companies responsible for taking the oil out of the ground-bad.
Selling the land that the oil exists in-bad.

So true but our media rarely points out why such things matter, why assets like land and resources should be used to advance our interests, our economy, enrich our people, our business, our government programs.

There will always be large powerful foreign interests wanting to "help" exploit limited resources and to export resources to fuel other economies making yet more profit for those outside the country.

That is why resource rich countries need to look out for themselves. If they do not they will find themselves stuck with an economy based on the export of resources, in the case of Canada for more than 150yrs now, until the resources run out.

At that point they will be abandoned and have little left for future generations to build on.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-03-2016, 09:18 AM
Newview01 Newview01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Syncrude can produce a lot more than 90,000 barrels per day, but they need to get rid of the Exxon management team to get production to anywhere near it's potential. Hopefully Suncor will ditch Exxon and put someone in charge that has the experience and common sense to run the plant properly.
I've heard this from someone who worked for Suncor. He said Exxon sends people from Texas who are clueless and end up going back but not before throwing the system for a loop.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-03-2016, 04:57 PM
TBD TBD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,881
Default what I was alluding to ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBintheNorth View Post
I don't have a problem with selling the products, I have a problem with selling the assets.....fixed assets on our soil.
Pipelines-good.
Selling the oil in the pipelines-good.
Producing the oil to put in the pipelines-good.
Selling the companies responsible for taking the oil out of the ground-bad.
Selling the land that the oil exists in-bad.

... is that China already has billions invested in AB's oil sands, and they'll be a strong partner in applying pressure to our liberal gov't so that these pipelines get built.

win - win

I don't see the problem here.

Last edited by TBD; 12-03-2016 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.