Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2017, 01:41 AM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,628
Default Past studies on several Alberta lakes

So I was surfed on the interweb and found this page with past provincial studies of our fisheries, from 2010 to 2014, and thought I would share the page as the reports are a good read. The reports talk about age groups, sizes and populations of the various species of fish in that lake. A person can use the tables for reference to apply the older stats to what 2017's fishing potential of a lake might be.

http://aep.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/...t-archive.aspx
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2017, 10:26 PM
wind drift wind drift is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 719
Default

Good info. Interestingly, you skipped past the 2015 reports in what looks to be an updated and much better format.
http://aep.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/...s/default.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2017, 11:34 PM
ddddd05 ddddd05 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 236
Default

Great posts! Thank You!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2017, 09:34 AM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift View Post
Good info. Interestingly, you skipped past the 2015 reports in what looks to be an updated and much better format.
http://aep.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/...s/default.aspx
Unless I'm missing something, not much for useful information in this format...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2017, 09:38 AM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bullets View Post
So I was surfed on the interweb and found this page with past provincial studies of our fisheries, from 2010 to 2014, and thought I would share the page as the reports are a good read. The reports talk about age groups, sizes and populations of the various species of fish in that lake. A person can use the tables for reference to apply the older stats to what 2017's fishing potential of a lake might be.

http://aep.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/...t-archive.aspx
Thanks again.

Reading some of the 2012 reports has changed my plans a bit. I had my eye on Battle for tank whites. At 5% of the total catch...that sounds like just a lot of white fishless days to me. What was also interesting was the biggest they netted was 25+ inches. No bigger than what they got from Pigeon but Pigeon averaged 35%. ....I think I'll stick with Pigeon and forget about Battle whites.

Sylvan, 73%! Wow. Whites are doing well in that lake. Interesting to see that the largest was around 22 inches. Most were much smaller like I'm seeing, and, some of these are actually older fish. So these whites are genetically smaller. All stuff confirmed in my catches as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2017, 09:44 AM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Hmm, also had Buck Lake white tanks on my mind but the netting there also showed dismal results for whites.

I think I'll stick to Pigeon, Gull and Sylvan for whites.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2017, 09:48 AM
Bemoredog Bemoredog is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 365
Default

What I found really curious is that most of these reports don't have any Burbot (or very few) caught in the nets. Any theories on why this is when we know a number of these lakes have healthy populations?

Is it because Burbot move very little? Because they swim so low to the bottom? Thoughts?!?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2017, 10:47 AM
facultoad facultoad is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 17
Default

I've long wondered this. If you look at netting reports from almost any lake you are familiar with- there will be a very low number of burbs compared to what you expect. I think they avoid the nets by sitting right on bottom in deep water during the times of years they do these surveys.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2017, 12:21 PM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNAPFisher View Post
Thanks again.

Reading some of the 2012 reports has changed my plans a bit. I had my eye on Battle for tank whites. At 5% of the total catch...that sounds like just a lot of white fishless days to me. What was also interesting was the biggest they netted was 25+ inches. No bigger than what they got from Pigeon but Pigeon averaged 35%. ....I think I'll stick with Pigeon and forget about Battle whites.

Sylvan, 73%! Wow. Whites are doing well in that lake. Interesting to see that the largest was around 22 inches. Most were much smaller like I'm seeing, and, some of these are actually older fish. So these whites are genetically smaller. All stuff confirmed in my catches as well.
Good observation. Actually the original whitefish that were in Pigeon lake were a smaller whitefish that grew to 2 lbs. In the 20's or 30's a fellow initiated having a larger strain of whitefish introduced, which are the bigger whitefish you see now a days. The whites you find in Gull were stocked there in the 30's with the stock coming from Pigeon lake . Gull never had whites before then. Sylvan has the same strain of whites as the original whites from Pigeon.
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-02-2017, 12:36 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bullets View Post
Good observation. Actually the original whitefish that were in Pigeon lake were a smaller whitefish that grew to 2 lbs. In the 20's or 30's a fellow initiated having a larger strain of whitefish introduced, which are the bigger whitefish you see now a days. The whites you find in Gull were stocked there in the 30's with the stock coming from Pigeon lake . Gull never had whites before then. Sylvan has the same strain of whites as the original whites from Pigeon.
That is very interesting. thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-02-2017, 04:43 PM
wind drift wind drift is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNAPFisher View Post
Unless I'm missing something, not much for useful information in this format...
If you click on the lake names in the left column, a report opens. The graphs showing fish sizes are very useful.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-02-2017, 06:24 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift View Post
If you click on the lake names in the left column, a report opens. The graphs showing fish sizes are very useful.
Yep! that helped. But the amount of info is not as good. Great to present it nicely but lower on substance than the previous years that I read. The other one had sizes and ages. This pretty much offers walleye and pike data mostly. meh.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.