So, i bought a pair of Timberland Pro Boondocks last night.
Same price as RW, felt pretty good on my feet, nice width. Would be nice to have more support for the arches, but nothing some insoles can't fix.
Checked out the HHs, and Keens. Only one model of HHs out of 3 was made out of leather, other two were made of something that looked like woven fiber, so it did raise questions about waterproofing. In the end i didn't even consider them, though do have to admit that those were lightest boots i every held in my hands.
Keens, IMO had a major flaw in the design. The tongue stitching to the sides of the boots (if you understand what i mean) stopped at ankle level, so from that point up the tongue would slide to one side after 30 seconds walking around the store. And if i were to fall into the pot hole filled with water i'd be soaked if it was deeper than ankle level. Why was it a concern? Because it had happen to me. Another problem with Keens - top part of the boot is really bulky.
RWs have the longest stitching be tongue, basically it's a tube pretty much from the opening. Timberlands start about 2" from the top.
At the moment of writing this message i have been wearing new boots for 3 hours, another observation - they are pretty warm. One of the guys in the crew mentioned he's wearing same boots hunting in the dead of winter and they are realllly warm.
I guess I'll report the longevity in 3-6-12 months.
|