Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2017, 05:59 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default Bullets and weatherby freebore?

My brother just picked up a mk v 7mm wby mag that I'll be reloading for. Because of the freebore on the weatherby rifles would I want a longer heavier bullet or in the grand scheme of things does it really matter? I was thinking of loading some 160 gr Barnes but maybe I should go heavier and longer.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2017, 06:04 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,171
Default

A heavier bullet will offer no advantage, because you won't be able to seat them anywhere near the lands anyways. It will just add recoil, and more bullet drop.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2017, 06:10 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
Default

I would shoot it first with the bullet you like like then go from there ,
You may be surprised
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2017, 06:35 PM
Scopithorne Scopithorne is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 102
Default Wetherby

When i first started loading for a wetherby cal i was told they tend to like flat bottomed bullets over boat tails i dont know how much truth there is in that but the 2 i have loaded for i have found that to be the case could just be a coincidence but thats where i would defiantly start on the next one
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2017, 06:44 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Ok thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2017, 07:33 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Would you guys suggest I load to mag length or stay with the book length?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-24-2017, 07:36 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
A heavier bullet will offer no advantage, because you won't be able to seat them anywhere near the lands anyways. It will just add recoil, and more bullet drop.
I was figuring I heavier bullet might stabilize better by being longer and more surface area in the rifling.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-24-2017, 08:28 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
I was figuring I heavier bullet might stabilize better by being longer and more surface area in the rifling.

If anything, a longer bullet is more difficult to stabilize.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-24-2017, 08:41 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,472
Default

With both of the Mark Vs I have had, I did my load development with an oal that comfortably fit within the mag box and posed no feeding issues. It was very easy with both rifles to find an accurate load.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-24-2017, 08:59 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2 View Post
With both of the Mark Vs I have had, I did my load development with an oal that comfortably fit within the mag box and posed no feeding issues. It was very easy with both rifles to find an accurate load.
Ok thanks
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-24-2017, 10:02 PM
Duramaximos Duramaximos is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
My brother just picked up a mk v 7mm wby mag that I'll be reloading for. Because of the freebore on the weatherby rifles would I want a longer heavier bullet or in the grand scheme of things does it really matter? I was thinking of loading some 160 gr Barnes but maybe I should go heavier and longer.
Great cartridge and very underrated in my opinion.
Im somewhat recoil sensitive but I still enjoy hunting moose and elk with the 7mm bee.

I reload 154gr interbonds with H1000. Fast and very hard hitting out to 500 yards IME.
Not sure why but it seems to shoot flatter than the velocity suggests it should.

Have fun!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-24-2017, 10:03 PM
Duramaximos Duramaximos is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2 View Post
With both of the Mark Vs I have had, I did my load development with an oal that comfortably fit within the mag box and posed no feeding issues. It was very easy with both rifles to find an accurate load.
I concur.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-25-2017, 12:19 AM
HuntinGuy HuntinGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
Default Bullets and weatherby freebore?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2 View Post
With both of the Mark Vs I have had, I did my load development with an oal that comfortably fit within the mag box and posed no feeding issues. It was very easy with both rifles to find an accurate load.

I agree with this. As for the Barnes bullets the 160gr TSX will have marginal stability in a 1/10 twist in warm weather, probably insufficient in cold temps, also it does not have a tip, I have read they do not reliably expand with out the polymer tip. (Assuming your Weatherby is a 1/10) There is a 168gr LRX but it calls for a 1/8 twist. So next best with Barnes is a 150gr TTSX. I have them loaded for my 7mm rem mag, not the best BC but good if your not stretching out your shots.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-25-2017, 07:42 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HuntinGuy View Post
I agree with this. As for the Barnes bullets the 160gr TSX will have marginal stability in a 1/10 twist in warm weather, probably insufficient in cold temps, also it does not have a tip, I have read they do not reliably expand with out the polymer tip. (Assuming your Weatherby is a 1/10) There is a 168gr LRX but it calls for a 1/8 twist. So next best with Barnes is a 150gr TTSX. I have them loaded for my 7mm rem mag, not the best BC but good if your not stretching out your shots.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am currently using the 150gr TTSX in my 7mmstw, and I have used the 140gr TTSX in other 7mm stws and in a few 7mmremmags. The B.C. is not great, but they are accurate in my rifles, and they perform very well on game. The 150gr ABLR did not shoot at all well in my 7mmstw. As for my Mark V rifles, I loaded to fit the magazine, and lived with that , even though neither rifle would consistently shoot better than moa. I had the 257wby rebarreled with much less freebore, and it became a 1/2moa shooter.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-25-2017, 03:12 PM
fps plus fps plus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,841
Default

I shoot an old pre 64 Winchester 70 in 300 wby mag (originally a 300 H&H) It has a throat of nearly 1inch and shoot ridiculously well . I shoot either IMR-7828 or IMR 4831 and 180 gr Nosler SB (old solid base .Wish they still made them instead of the ballistic tip)It shoots the Barnes 168 equally as well.

Choose the bullet you want and try it in your particular rifle
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-25-2017, 07:49 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fps plus View Post
I shoot an old pre 64 Winchester 70 in 300 wby mag (originally a 300 H&H) It has a throat of nearly 1inch and shoot ridiculously well . I shoot either IMR-7828 or IMR 4831 and 180 gr Nosler SB (old solid base .Wish they still made them instead of the ballistic tip)It shoots the Barnes 168 equally as well.

Choose the bullet you want and try it in your particular rifle
Those are the powders I was figuring on using to. Might try imr 4350 as well.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-27-2017, 10:54 AM
Huntnut's Avatar
Huntnut Huntnut is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Beaverlodge
Posts: 1,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
Those are the powders I was figuring on using to. Might try imr 4350 as well.
I don't have a 7 but both my 270 and 300 bees like the 7828. My brother has a 7 and shoots rl22 with 150 ballistic tip.
__________________
Hunting isn't a matter of life and death......it's more important than that
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-27-2017, 07:56 PM
roger's Avatar
roger roger is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wmu 222, member #197
Posts: 4,907
Default

im not in favour of using heavy for caliber bullets, i prefer the lightest possible rounds to achieve ultimate velocity and acceptable accuracy
i have a ron smith gain twist pipe on my wby257 without any freebore. i was kinda opposed to it but he talked me into it at the last minute!
when i was reloading with the factory freebore i just measured off of the factory rounds as a starting point and added or deleted from there. the results were obvious and immediate.
i had moderate success with imr 4831 and moved to imr7828ssc and never looked back.
im regularily pushing 100gr barnes triple xxx at 3750fps and have had the chrony to 3900+ as well.
__________________
there are two kinds of people...those with loaded guns and those who dig.
the good, the bad, the ugly

weatherby fans clik here....
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/group.php?groupid=31
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.