Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-22-2007, 07:14 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default Bighorn report from September 16

Another shift at the Horn, and finally come Sunday evening I made it out with rod in hand. Quite the night I had, I managed to land, 1 bull, 1 brown, and 1 brook. Also hooked 4 others but had one heck of a time keeping them hooked, 2 made it to shore but with no waterproof boots, or waders the landing sometimes gets a bit dicey.
All fish were Caught and released.


__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-22-2007, 08:53 AM
MB1 MB1 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: AB
Posts: 530
Default

I think those are two bulls and a brown. I don't see any black on them? Nice fish none the less.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:59 AM
Lethalconnection's Avatar
Lethalconnection Lethalconnection is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 883
Default

Thats good to hear, but the first is a bull, second a brown and third a laker
__________________
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c72/lethalconnection/sig-1.jpg

AKA MAVERICK

Last edited by Lethalconnection; 09-22-2007 at 03:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-22-2007, 02:32 PM
Wazzy Wazzy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 87
Default

That third fish is a lake trout...Must have made its way up from Abraham Lake...weird.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-22-2007, 03:14 PM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cool catch. Lakers are showing up everywhere over the past few years. A friend of mine caught one fairly low down on the Crowsnest River and i know of another being caught below the Oldman River Reservoir. The only lakers i've ever caught came from a lake with lots of them. They don't concentrate on guys needing to see the difference between lakers and bullies as there rarely found in the same spots. Good eye wazzy, i just scrolled through quickly the first time and missed it myself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-22-2007, 09:50 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default

Well well, If I did'nt learn something new today, I thought something was diffrent with the last one, but dismissed the laker theory on some un sound logic.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:31 PM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The guy i know who caught one on the Crowsnest River thought it was a bully until just after he released it, it weighed about 10lbs (he was fishing bullies with big streamers when he caught it). He handled hundreds of fish a year and it still threw him off. If you don't handle certain fish very often it can be easy to overlook the differences. Pretty neat fish though. I have some pictures kicking around somewhere of some interesting brookies i saw this fall, when i come accross them i'll throw them up on here, i had to look twice before deciding what they were. Better save something for winter i guess. I think one was a brookie/bull hybrid and the others, well thats something for this winter when the forum seems a bit slow. Still a cool catch dick284.

jrs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:30 AM
-NDN-
 
Posts: n/a
Default

hey Dick, another way of telling laker apart from bullies is Lakers have a deeper forked tail. just in case you run into two of them that have weak coloring
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.