View Poll Results: Would you get a supressor if they were legal
|
Yes
|
|
164 |
88.17% |
No
|
|
22 |
11.83% |
|
|
05-09-2018, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 0
|
|
Supressors
If supressors were legal would you get one/want one?
|
05-09-2018, 03:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,511
|
|
I would consider one for hunting - especially in some of the more populated areas. At the range I don't think I would get as much use for one.
|
05-09-2018, 03:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,247
|
|
In a heart beat
__________________
Never celebrate till you got your knife stuck in it !
Some times you catch the Big fish, some times you get stuck in Chip
|
05-09-2018, 03:20 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: calgary
Posts: 691
|
|
Absolutely they are great for varmint hunting and target practice and shooting and not annoying Niebours. The novelty of carriying that giant can where’s off quickly while you are hunting on foot though.
Shot numerous animals with my 284win in NZ while it had a Can connected.
|
05-09-2018, 04:02 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here, not there
Posts: 589
|
|
noise
Safe for hunting, number one. Who needs to wear ears and not be able to hear game or fellow hunters? If you don't wear them....rrrrrrringgggggg
Great for noise pollution(neighbours), number two.
Plain silly why our country is dead-set against them.
__________________
The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why. ~Mark Twain
|
05-09-2018, 04:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GP AB
Posts: 16,250
|
|
As someone who has already sustained permanent hearing loss (work related) over the years, and now wears hearing aids (sometimes, hate those things!)....I would love to legally be able to use a suppressor. I can no longer shoot indoors with my pistols, even using foam plugs under my MSA muffs. It's just too painful, and my chronic tinitus gets too severe for about 3 or 4 days after. Outside is ok, but I have to use plugs and muffs always. The ability to reduce the db while shooting would make one of my favorite past times much more pleasant.
I don't think I would use it for hunting, if I use my MSA muffs with long guns I don't have much problems. I wouldn't want the extra weight on the end, I think it might affect balance? Not that I would know as I've never used one.
__________________
'Once the monkeys learn they can vote themselves a banana, they'll never climb another tree.'. Robert Heinlein
'You can accomplish a lot more with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.' Al Capone
Last edited by Twisted Canuck; 05-09-2018 at 04:17 PM.
|
05-09-2018, 04:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
|
|
Stupid question... I am assuming it is so that guns could not be used as easily for crime? Are suppressors for hunting rifles illegal for the same reason (crime) or because they could then be used on handguns so you have to ban them across the board?
That being said, I would buy one for sure if legal for hearing protection.
Matt
|
05-09-2018, 04:32 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
|
|
I would purchase one for all of my firearms.
|
05-09-2018, 04:47 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 227
|
|
Yup for sure
|
05-09-2018, 04:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kananaskis
Posts: 2,612
|
|
In a lot of "liberal" countries (such as Norway) suppressors are actually encouraged for hearing protection and noise pollution reduction
__________________
the bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of a low price is forgotten
instagram: @schrodo_of_the_shire
|
05-09-2018, 08:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: East
Posts: 2,065
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattthegorby
Stupid question... I am assuming it is so that guns could not be used as easily for crime? Are suppressors for hunting rifles illegal for the same reason (crime) or because they could then be used on handguns so you have to ban them across the board?
That being said, I would buy one for sure if legal for hearing protection.
Matt
|
My guess is they are ilegal for the same reason blowguns are ilegal. Someone saw it on a movie and it's an assasins tool so it must be bad.
__________________
HOLD ON FUR!
For my coyote pics @trophy_country_coyotes on instagram
life's too short to fish nymphs
|
05-09-2018, 08:39 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattthegorby
Stupid question... I am assuming it is so that guns could not be used as easily for crime? Are suppressors for hunting rifles illegal for the same reason (crime) or because they could then be used on handguns so you have to ban them across the board?
That being said, I would buy one for sure if legal for hearing protection.
Matt
|
Suppressors are used in a tiny fraction of crime in countries where they are legal.
|
05-09-2018, 09:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 214
Posts: 1,817
|
|
NP
Im sure my neighbours would all pitch in and pay for them.
|
05-09-2018, 10:17 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
Suppressors are used in a tiny fraction of crime in countries where they are legal.
|
I thought they they were only used by the CIA, KGB, Secret Service type guys to do hits? Like not even illegal stuff....
|
05-09-2018, 10:30 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,381
|
|
Too many movies
I think the Liberals have seen to many James Bond Movies and think it makes firearms "silent". They just reduce the sound to levels that are not damaging.
|
05-10-2018, 08:37 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: W5
Posts: 1,093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattthegorby
Stupid question... I am assuming it is so that guns could not be used as easily for crime? Are suppressors for hunting rifles illegal for the same reason (crime) or because they could then be used on handguns so you have to ban them across the board?
That being said, I would buy one for sure if legal for hearing protection.
Matt
|
Short answer.....yes,that is why they they are illegal.
Now for the REALITY CHECK....suppressor are NOT "silencers".The ban on suppressors is yet ANOTHER rediculous law based on unfounded fear,emotion,misinformation,and the Hollywood perpetrated myth that portrays suppressed firearms as the silent weapon of choice for assassins.Truth is,they are nowhere near silent,they only reduce the noise associated with discharging a firearm to a more tolerable level,and in fact are not only encouraged,but must be used by law for hunting in some parts of Europe.
__________________
The toughest thing about waiting for the zombie apocalypse is pretending that I'm not excited.
|
05-10-2018, 08:56 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: On the border in Lloydminster
Posts: 8,370
|
|
Suppressors being illegal is just more paranoid Hollywood Liberal thinking anybody that wants to use them should be able however they are not the answer to NOT WEARING HEARING PROTECTION unless you are shooting subsonic rounds.
|
05-10-2018, 09:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario~looking west
Posts: 1,171
|
|
It's not like I'm pining for one...but I 100% resent the fact that I can't own one. For that reason, I signed the petition...and plan on getting more active in the efforts to make them legal in Canada.
It's not like we need another issue that sheds light on the government's lack of rational, fair, reasonable thought on gun issues in Canada..but this is one for sure.
|
05-11-2018, 09:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 19,420
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattthegorby
Stupid question... I am assuming it is so that guns could not be used as easily for crime? Are suppressors for hunting rifles illegal for the same reason (crime) or because they could then be used on handguns so you have to ban them across the board?
That being said, I would buy one for sure if legal for hearing protection.
Matt
|
Yes, this would be due to the crime wave of bad guys using suppressed firearms that happened before they were outlawed. Oh wait, that never ever happened, its just that some people who are in charge of making laws saw some movies once, movies with special effects that diverge significantly from real life, such a shotguns that throw a person back 10' when they're hit by a blast and people who can levitate during Kung Fu fights.
I fully support legalizing them, it should be achievable when one notes that they are safety devices that also reduce noise pollution (think of the shooting ranges that are being encroached by development where the new residents complain about the pre-existing residents)
__________________
"The trouble with people idiot-proofing things, is the resulting evolution of the idiot." Me
|
05-09-2018, 05:06 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 207
|
|
I am guessin majority non gun voters think suppressors make guns 99% more likely to kill on their own. Personally id not have one on my hunting rifle but i support the ability for everyone to have the choice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
05-09-2018, 05:29 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 743
|
|
Absolutely if it was legal. Would love to have one on my hunting rifle instead of wearing muffs all the time.
|
05-09-2018, 05:31 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
|
|
Imagine shooting without the boom? It would be so nice for load development and barrel break in. Hunting I guess it wouldn't matter much for what I do. One or two shots without ear protection don't kill a guy but even then it would be nice. I would be on board.
|
05-09-2018, 05:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,250
|
|
On my varmint guns for sure.....
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
|
05-09-2018, 06:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: On the border in Lloydminster
Posts: 8,370
|
|
Personally I like short rifles however for sitting and shooting a varmint rifle I can see a definite advantage. The down side I see is that people would stop wearing hearing protection thinking the suppressor will go "pfft" "pfft" like on James Bond anything that breaks the sound barrier will still produce a loud crack enough to damage unprotected ears.
|
05-09-2018, 06:09 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
Hmmm does the brake go ahead of the suppresser or after?
|
05-10-2018, 06:54 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,623
|
|
Yup, would screw on an oil can to my 22..... phhhht....dead squirrel.
__________________
Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
|
05-11-2018, 05:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 799
|
|
And to think the prediction was made that 99% of us wouldn't be interested in this.
|
05-15-2018, 02:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4
|
|
Definitely.
|
05-15-2018, 07:14 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
archery is pretty quiet and i'm betting landowners appreciate the heck out of that
i would totally get behind the suppressor movement, for personal hearing, to be less disruptive to the landowners and other hunters even, and a big one would be for more doubles on coyote stands! anything over a .204 seems to send the rest running like mad no matter what
i agree i wouldn't pack one for mountain hunts but everything else is a great idea for everyone really, don't see the downside at all, even from a leftist point of view
|
05-15-2018, 09:17 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,050
|
|
I want 1, no 2, no I want one for pretty much each rifle, but I'd love to have one on my BCL 102, I think an over barrel suppressor would look awesome tucked inside my hand guard
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.
|