|
11-02-2010, 12:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Devon, AB
Posts: 572
|
|
Question for you 7mm users
I shot a bull elk back in september an my first shot was taking at 40 yards with m tikka 7mm and 160 grain winchster nosler. When i skinned the animal i found the bullet which penetrated both lungs and the rib cage but didnt go through the skin/fur on the other side. Is this because i was too close? Is my grain too light? Its not a huge concern i just thought a bigger caliber gun would have ripped right through the elk at that range.
Please let me know your thoughts or similar experiences.
Thanks
|
11-02-2010, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 1,539
|
|
I had the exact results from my 7mm rem mag, this year on a cow elk. I shot her with a nosler ballistic tip 150 grain bullet from 324 yards and found the bullet on the opposite side, against the skin. I know why mine didnt pass through is because of the distance she was takin at. But 40 yards theres no reason why you shouldnt have had an exit wound?
|
11-02-2010, 12:30 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Peace River
Posts: 1,264
|
|
Because it didn't....impact velocity was really high so it did more expanding than penetrating perhaps....either way the bullet performed flawlessly...continue on with the 7 RM and 160 partitions or accubonds...whichever it was you were using..
congrats on the bull!
|
11-02-2010, 12:32 PM
|
|
Much more to do with bullet than calibre.
|
11-02-2010, 12:33 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,380
|
|
That is why ballistics is not an exact science. Next time it may go through.
What did the projectile look like when found it?
|
11-02-2010, 12:54 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 452
|
|
Put 3 180 grains from my 300 win mag into the boiler room of a bull moose this year found all 3 bullets under the skin on the other side
|
11-02-2010, 01:08 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gr Pr / 357 / ES4
Posts: 1,053
|
|
The only bullets I've found are noslers, the x bullets and a frames go through, those are the 3 I use in my 7 RM, all 160gr.
The good thing is it left all it's energy in the animal.
|
11-02-2010, 01:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Devon, AB
Posts: 572
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctd
That is why ballistics is not an exact science. Next time it may go through.
What did the projectile look like when found it?
|
it expanded beautifully, looked like a mushroom. I was just puzzled because last year my muley and whitey were taking over 200 yards and both whent through and through. My guess was not enough velocity gain over just 40 yards but what do i no? it dropped thats all the matters
|
11-02-2010, 01:54 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonecollector10
it expanded beautifully, looked like a mushroom. I was just puzzled because last year my muley and whitey were taking over 200 yards and both whent through and through. My guess was not enough velocity gain over just 40 yards but what do i no? it dropped thats all the matters
|
You are never going to have more velocity than at the muzzle. Bullets that strike at high velocities (close range) typically expand violently and rapidly creating more frontal area virtually upon impact and penetration is actually reduced (more friction). The only TSX I've ever recovered was from a kudu shot at 20 yards. The first one from 406 was a pass through. What you experienced is pretty typical of a close range shot.
|
11-02-2010, 02:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Stony Plain, AB
Posts: 187
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
You are never going to have more velocity than at the muzzle. Bullets that strike at high velocities (close range) typically expand violently and rapidly creating more frontal area virtually upon impact and penetration is actually reduced (more friction). The only TSX I've ever recovered was from a kudu shot at 20 yards. The first one from 406 was a pass through. What you experienced is pretty typical of a close range shot.
|
I agree with sheep hunter on this one, I shot a large bull elk at 30 yards and it never made a complete pass through. I think at that close of a range the velocity is the greatest therefore you have more expansion on the bullet. When you are shooting out at longer distances the bullet becomes like a steel rod and more so punches through the animal as opposed to expanding as it would at a close distance.
|
11-02-2010, 03:02 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
Much more to do with bullet than calibre.
|
X2 I once shot a bull moose at somewhere around 100 yards, I had no exit wound but the bullet went through both shoulder blades and was under the hide on the far side. My kill shot was in the neck and taken from about 15 yards, no exit wound. I shot a deer at 200 yards a few years back and ran him through end to end so somthing like 5-6 feet of penetration, once again my kill shot taken from close range did not pass through. Like TJ's second post said, very typical short range performance.
Another odd thing I've noticed on close range shots is that bullets have tendancy to change directions after hitting the animal while still in it. Bullets are designed to perform well at a certain velocity. Muzzle velocity often exceeds the intended velocity at which the bullet is designed to perform well, therefore close range performance is often erratic.
Last edited by Cal; 11-02-2010 at 03:15 PM.
|
11-02-2010, 09:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 483
|
|
Yup!!!
I shot a bull elk in the neck while he was standing broadside at 17 steps - with my 375 H&H. The bullet was sitting under the hide on the far side!!! It tipped over and traveled along a couple vertebrae but never exited.
|
11-03-2010, 12:57 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Near Drumheller
Posts: 6,765
|
|
I've used Partitions for 30 yrs now, only ever recovered 3 bullets, one on a moose from a 7-08 @ 100yds, one on a whitey at 40 yds head-on from a 338wimag that travelled about a foot down the center of the spine, and another one from a moose thru the hoop at about 150yds out of a 7mm rem mag.
|
11-03-2010, 08:41 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Eldon
Yup!!!
I shot a bull elk in the neck while he was standing broadside at 17 steps - with my 375 H&H. The bullet was sitting under the hide on the far side!!! It tipped over and traveled along a couple vertebrae but never exited.
|
That hide is tough. Saw a video once, that claimed you could see the hide bouncing out and back, as the bullet impacted it, from the inside. I use Hornady 160grn. in my 7 mm and usually find them just under the hide on the far side. This is a good thing.
Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
|
11-03-2010, 09:14 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams
That hide is tough. Saw a video once, that claimed you could see the hide bouncing out and back, as the bullet impacted it, from the inside. I use Hornady 160grn. in my 7 mm and usually find them just under the hide on the far side. This is a good thing.
Grizz
|
That hide sure is tough, especily if its got mud all over it like moose sometimes do in the early season. I read Mr Nosler was inspired to create his partition bullet because on several ocasions he had his 300 wby mag bullets completely explode when dealing with moose covered with mud at close ranges. I tend to think that if he shot a 30-06 instead of a 300 wby the partition bullet might have been invented by someone else though, more velolocity doesnt always mean more penetration.
|
11-03-2010, 10:21 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,333
|
|
bullet failure
At which point of the animals death did the bullet fail? That's what they are designed to do.A 6.5x55 with 160gr handloads always exited moose I shot but then again they are drills...............your bullet selection is fine .........Harold
|
11-03-2010, 10:45 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal
That hide sure is tough, especily if its got mud all over it like moose sometimes do in the early season. I read Mr Nosler was inspired to create his partition bullet because on several ocasions he had his 300 wby mag bullets completely explode when dealing with moose covered with mud at close ranges. I tend to think that if he shot a 30-06 instead of a 300 wby the partition bullet might have been invented by someone else though, more velolocity doesnt always mean more penetration.
|
In fact the partition is simply a brand name - the H mantel bullet design, which the partition basicley is, was being used in Europe long before Nosler started making them.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
11-03-2010, 08:06 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
Most bullets have maximum penetration at the velocity that just causes deformation - usually 1800-2000 fps. The faster you drive the bullet or in this case the closer you are the more the bullet deforms. When the bullet deforms and for this excercise I'll assume its a perfect mushroom the frontal area increases exponentially. (area of a circle is 0.25 x pi x radius x radius)
This exponentially large frontal area meets exponentially higher resistance causing much less penetration.
|
11-03-2010, 08:15 PM
|
|
Possibly with some bullets but with other bullets there is a maximum diameter they can expand to. The TSX is a good example. In that case it's the rapid expansion that causes the rapid deceleration...not the size. Even with cup and core bullets, shedding starts to happen at a certain point so frontal area may actually be reduced.
|
11-03-2010, 10:33 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
The TSX will exhibit the same penetration characteristics upto a certain threshold velocity, then they lose their petals and much of its surface area, resistance goes down and they pencil hole from there on. At high speeds that don't reach that threshold velocity where the petals shed the TSX will rapidly decelerate because of its rapid expansion, they go hand in hand.
On a cup and core bullet in order to shed weight it expands, shards, flattens, and rolls back, peeling off in plastic flow and if there is enough plastic flow chunks come off to expose the shank of the bullet. Its during this expansion
that most resitance occurs and by that point its already lost most of its poop.
|
11-04-2010, 09:47 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
In that case it's the rapid expansion that causes the rapid deceleration...not the size.
|
If a bullet rapidly expands it increases in size.....rapid expansion is larger size.
|
11-05-2010, 09:02 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traps
If a bullet rapidly expands it increases in size.....rapid expansion is larger size.
|
Yup but my point was is that there is a maximum size it can expand to and that maximum size can be reached through a wide velocity envelope. The frontal area has some impact on penetration depth but at close range, it's the speed at which that frontal area is achieved that thwarts penetration.
|
11-05-2010, 09:18 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,161
|
|
Penetration is determined by a combination of the rate of expansion,and the amount of expansion.As for the TSX,I have had the .308" TSX expand to .800",and no petals were lost.Many people believe that the TSX will not expand that much,and that it will not retain all of the petals with impact velocities above 3000fps.The TSX below was fired at 3380fps with an impact velocity of over 3000 fps.
|
11-05-2010, 09:58 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 4,279
|
|
This is a pre-TSX barnes after connecting with a whitetail at about 50yrds. It was a 338 - 160gr with a muzzel velocity just under 3300 fps. As you can see 2 petals are gone, and the third one was very close to leaving aswell. However it messed up a lot of bone and at high velocity.
Last edited by double gun; 11-05-2010 at 10:00 AM.
Reason: correction
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37 AM.
|