Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:22 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default Carrying a Handgun

I was wondering if anyone knows where in the Laws of either Canada or Alberta that it reads that people are not allowed to carry handguns with them
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:26 AM
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,639
Default

The Firearms Act and the Criminal Code have sections for such.

You can legally transport a handgun to and from the range from your home. You can transport it from your home or the range to a gunsmith. You need an ATT but will probably have one already.

You can apply for a wilderness carry permit, unlikely you will get one in Alberta tho.

There are certain special conditions where a person can carry a handgun in Canada but, like I said, it's pretty specific and special circumstances. (ie: guarding the Premier, etc)

As far as carrying it around with you, in your car or in a holster, best to kiss the wife because you won't be seeing her for a few years.

Is that what you meant?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:27 AM
onedayaway onedayaway is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8
Default

It's a illegal.
There is a CCW permit, but you'll be dead before you ever get it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:41 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

i'm trying to find the law stating that it is illegal to carry a handgun so i can produce it to the local RCMP to inform them it IS ILLEGAL because they seem to think it is LEGAL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:51 AM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monstermulie View Post
i'm trying to find the law stating that it is illegal to carry a handgun so i can produce it to the local RCMP to inform them it IS ILLEGAL because they seem to think it is LEGAL
Are you trying to say it's Illegal for law enforcement (RCMP) to carry handguns?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:54 AM
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monstermulie View Post
i'm trying to find the law stating that it is illegal to carry a handgun so i can produce it to the local RCMP to inform them it IS ILLEGAL because they seem to think it is LEGAL
Give us the whole story so this thread doesn't wind up being 18 pages of crap.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:56 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

no because they have a ATC (authorization to carry), unless you have that you are unable to carry a handgun.

why i'm asking is:

I was out hunting on a piece of property with my hunting partner that we had permission on, when we ran into an individual who DID NOT own the land we were on, and he told us that it was in our best interest to get off the land immediatly, then he proceded to pull his jacket aside revieling a hand gun and the local RCMP believe that he has broken no laws once so ever, and are willing to do nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:58 AM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,197
Default

Was this on certain lands just south of Calgary? That start with an 'M'?Where roughly were you?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:12 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

no it was not, it was directly west of calgary, a ways north of that land
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:15 AM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,197
Default

I'd maybe get in touch with a different detachment than Cochrane. Maybe call up Airdrie and report it there with your statement?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:20 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

this was actually still in the MD of Foothills so I'll be dealing with Okotoks
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:21 AM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,197
Default

Hmmm.... I was just thinking that if you're not getting anywhere with the Okotoks detachment, try other ones.

I did a bunch of research on ATT's a while ago in this thread if that helps.

http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...uthority+Carry

Another link to the government site....

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm...ber=SOR-98-207
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:34 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

Thanks for your help. The officer was getting quite mad when I was informing them that with out a permit that general public is not allowed to carry a handgun and the officer informed me that I should print off a copy of the law and produce it to her and the matter will be disgussed further from there. The officer also informed me that he/she had 7 yrs of service under he/she belt and knows the law quite will. I feel that he/she should know the law a little better than he/she does if he/she is getting paid to enforce it!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:36 AM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,197
Default

No problem, print that gov't link out and give it to her, and politely request that you speak with a supervisor with her present.

let us know how it goes. Sounds like you had quite a scary encounter!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:40 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

ya it was most definatly a rexlaing encounter. I thought that the RCMP would have treated a threat with a restricted weapon a little more seriously. The weapon was concealed as well, and she informed me that because of the number of cougars in the area, they tend not to inforce the law when it comes to farmes and ranchers being out in the bush. I politely replied with "well its nice to know that the rules don't apply to farmers and ranchers, but they do to the rest of us", her responce was "thats not what I mean", then I ask "then what do you mean?" didn't have too much to say after that except "I'm not going to argue with you"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-30-2009, 09:24 AM
Private Ear Private Ear is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 499
Default

Are you sure it was a restricted firearm. I carry a webly tepest pellet gun for birds while big game hunting and, holstered, it looks like a firearm.

Just asking.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-30-2009, 09:33 AM
BowhuntAB BowhuntAB is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Foothills
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monstermulie View Post
no because they have a ATC (authorization to carry), unless you have that you are unable to carry a handgun.

why i'm asking is:

I was out hunting on a piece of property with my hunting partner that we had permission on, when we ran into an individual who DID NOT own the land we were on, and he told us that it was in our best interest to get off the land immediatly, then he proceded to pull his jacket aside revieling a hand gun and the local RCMP believe that he has broken no laws once so ever, and are willing to do nothing.
So who was the guy? A hunter? Someone who runs the land? Or just some crazy dude who confronted you for no reason?

Why did he come after you?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:09 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

He lives on the south half of the section, we have permission on the NE 1/4, I assume he just doesn't want us hunting there because he informed us that he feeds the deer oats every day and has salt blocks put out for them ( i assume on his property because I never did see any on the 1/4 that we hunt) I also assume that he was trying to scare us off so we wouldn't shoot the deer, and I also assume that he thought we'd just let it go
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:11 AM
monstermulie monstermulie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Private Ear View Post
Are you sure it was a restricted firearm. I carry a webly tepest pellet gun for birds while big game hunting and, holstered, it looks like a firearm.

Just asking.
yes it was a restricted hand gun, he show the RCMP the gun, his registration for it, and his PAL
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:17 AM
BowhuntAB BowhuntAB is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Foothills
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monstermulie View Post
He lives on the south half of the section, we have permission on the NE 1/4, I assume he just doesn't want us hunting there because he informed us that he feeds the deer oats every day and has salt blocks put out for them ( i assume on his property because I never did see any on the 1/4 that we hunt) I also assume that he was trying to scare us off so we wouldn't shoot the deer, and I also assume that he thought we'd just let it go
Was this in the 212?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:19 AM
Private Ear Private Ear is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monstermulie View Post
yes it was a restricted hand gun, he show the RCMP the gun, his registration for it, and his PAL
Then as far as I'm concerned the police are not doing their job at all. That could be considered assault with a deadly weapon could it not. He showed you the handgun as a threat.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:21 AM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,197
Default

I guess a guy could personally file charges against him if you wanted to take it that far.

There is usually always two sides to the story, so it would be interesting to see how this plays out.

Last edited by Albertadiver; 09-30-2009 at 10:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-30-2009, 11:44 AM
flygirrl's Avatar
flygirrl flygirrl is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,491
Default

Boy would I be talking to her superiors, like today. I have rcmp friends and this is not allowed.
__________________
Yup, I know I'm getting old now, just heard my favorite song in the elevator.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-30-2009, 12:49 PM
mtylerb's Avatar
mtylerb mtylerb is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Warburg, AB
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onedayaway View Post
It's a illegal.
There is a CCW permit, but you'll be dead before you ever get it.
There are 3 different ATC's (Authorization to Carry).
  1. Work Purposes (Armed Guard) - Unconcealed holster, any gun registered to the company
  2. Work Purposes (Trapper) - Unconcealed holster, only guns registered with CFO for such purpose
  3. Personal Protection - Concealed at all times, only guns registered with CFO for such purpose

Quote:
Originally Posted by Private Ear View Post
Then as far as I'm concerned the police are not doing their job at all. That could be considered assault with a deadly weapon could it not. He showed you the handgun as a threat.
It's not assault unless the person touched, spit, hit, slapped, pushed, or applied any other form of unwanted force to the OP. Blinking at a person while displaying a gun is not assault.
__________________
Tyler

"Here's how you have to figure it in Canada: The NDP are communists, the Liberals are socialists, the Conservatives are liberal, and the media is totally left-wing" -- Don Cherry, March 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by lindy rig View Post
... i didnt know if i should shoot, yell, or throw my bow at him and run. ...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-30-2009, 12:59 PM
deerassassin deerassassin is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new sarepta alberta
Posts: 289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monstermulie View Post
no because they have a ATC (authorization to carry), unless you have that you are unable to carry a handgun.

why i'm asking is:

I was out hunting on a piece of property with my hunting partner that we had permission on, when we ran into an individual who DID NOT own the land we were on, and he told us that it was in our best interest to get off the land immediatly, then he proceded to pull his jacket aside revieling a hand gun and the local RCMP believe that he has broken no laws once so ever, and are willing to do nothing.
you shoulda shot em. but when you get caught you dont know me
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-30-2009, 01:06 PM
Jim Jim is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 274
Default carrying handgun

You can legally carry an antique status handgun nothing illegal against it no ATT required. Fewer rules regarding them than carrying a non restricted rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-30-2009, 01:09 PM
CaberTosser's Avatar
CaberTosser CaberTosser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 19,420
Default

Revealing the concealed firearm could easily be interpreted as "brandishing a weapon/firearm". Sounds to me like the occupant of this piece of land has a bit of a John Wayne complex. (No offence intended to Huntinstuff )
__________________
"The trouble with people idiot-proofing things, is the resulting evolution of the idiot." Me
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-30-2009, 06:17 PM
Taylor-Made's Avatar
Taylor-Made Taylor-Made is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26
Default Don't matter, still threats

The Pistol and it's carrier can be completely legal with all the registration, pal's, carry and conceal permits and god knows what other supporting documentation, however, all the licences in the world do not allow the 'gentleman' to walk around confronting people and implying threats of violence. If he made a statement and physically implied the sidearm as a repercussion than that is a threat. If you felt threatened than you certainly have a beef and I wouldn't stop with the lip service you received from the RCMP. Push on!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:22 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,263
Default

You could call the cfc to report a firearms threat.Every time I call to register a firearm,I hear this type of option mentioned on the menu.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-30-2009, 09:03 PM
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaberTosser View Post
Revealing the concealed firearm could easily be interpreted as "brandishing a weapon/firearm". Sounds to me like the occupant of this piece of land has a bit of a John Wayne complex. (No offence intended to Huntinstuff )
No offense takenJohn Wayne is God. John Wayne is God.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.