Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:29 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hunt Farms (Cervid Harvest Preserves)

(Edmonton December 9, 2009)... Alberta's largest conservation group, the
Alberta Fish & Game Association (AFGA), is gravely concerned about news that
the Alberta Provincial Government is once again discussing behind closed
doors and without public consultation the re-structuring of government
departments in a last ditch effort to save the struggling game farm industry
in Alberta. By removing any responsibility from Alberta Sustainable Resource
Development via the Wildlife Act and moving it all to the Agriculture
Department the door is open to the introduction of hunt farms. The way these
operations work is that an interested customer pays a fee to the farmer and
is then allowed to shoot an animal of their choice at a negotiated price.

Hunt farms, also known as "cervid harvest preserves" at the time, were most
recently defeated in 2001 after a public uproar initiated by the AFGA in
concert with other conservation groups convinced the government of the day
not to proceed. Since then the farmed elk and deer industry has been on a
steady decline.

Game farms have been linked to the introduction and spreading of Chronic
Wasting Disease (CWD) the ungulate equivalent of mad cow which is a
contagious, fatal prion disease of deer and elk that continues to spread
throughout North America.

The Hunt Farm program is viewed as a last gasp at making some money as
non-resident hunters have been known to pay over ten thousand dollars to
shoot a tame elk in those jurisdictions where these operations are legal.


"This is an outrage," said Quentin Bochar, AFGA President, "and really hope
it's not true that the Government is going behind everyone's back to try and
bail out a few individuals who made bad business decisions in the first
place when they got into the game farm business. Game farms are just a bad
idea as other jurisdictions are finding out and are indeed closing them
down."


He went on to encourage all AFGA members and the general public to get in
contact with their local MLAs to get the truth behind this concern.


The Alberta Fish and Game Association is a not-for-profit volunteer
organization proud to serve Albertans in the promotion of the wise use of
our fish and wildlife resources and the conservation of their habitats. The
AFGA has been active since 1908 in working towards these goals and has a
province-wide membership of more than 19,000 individuals spread among 100+
Clubs.
Link to MLA contact info:

http://www.assembly.ab.ca/net/index.aspx?p=mla_home
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:42 AM
Rustynuts Rustynuts is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 167
Default

Not to stir the pot... but what is the differance wether a person is raising them for slaughter/velvet etc, or for someone to pay to shoot it? The animals are there now,just a different way of "thinning" the herd.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:45 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustynuts View Post
Not to stir the pot... but what is the differance wether a person is raising them for slaughter/velvet etc, or for someone to pay to shoot it? The animals are there now,just a different way of "thinning" the herd.
The danger I see with allowing hunt farms is that the number of these operations will increase dramatically, taking away critical habitat from wild ungulates and the potential for disease transmission is the biggest factor. The velvet/meat market has pretty well evaporated and many farms are no longer raising cervids. I'd hate to see them and a bunch of new ones start again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:49 AM
Rustynuts Rustynuts is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 167
Default

I suppose there would be an increase of interest in that area. I could see regular cattle farmers changing over since cattle prices aren't the best.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:53 AM
Erik's Avatar
Erik Erik is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Edm
Posts: 1,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
The danger I see with allowing hunt farms is that the number of these operations will increase dramatically, taking away critical habitat from wild ungulates and the potential for disease transmission is the biggest factor. The velvet/meat market has pretty well evaporated and many farms are no longer raising cervids. I'd hate to see them and a bunch of new ones start again.
Not that I agree with hunt farms, but wouldn't these be on private land anyway? How would this take away from naturaly habitat, necessarily?

Also, if what you are suggesting is true, and the hunt farms would be under the jurisdiction of the department of Agriculture, then would we not expect that the domestic game would be subject to similar regulations that are currently in place for cattle. There are heavy regulations to make sure that mad cow never happens again. One would hope that Dept of Ag would make game farms subject to the same laws, or at least could be convinced to do so.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:55 AM
bruceba bruceba is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
Default

I've heard this 4 or 5 years ago and when I posted the info I was looked at as a bit of a nut case.[there are days I'd agree] Maybe the sane ones are behind the fence.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:07 AM
gman1978 gman1978 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,248
Default

On one side hunt/game farms are proven to contribute to the spread of CWD, and on the other side the SRD has conducted deer culls to stop the spread of CWD. Isn't it very two sided that the government is even considering the establishment of hunt farms again. I understand there there are very weathy individuals that have polictial pull that are in favor of hunt farms but the SRD has been telling the public that the cull will help stop the spread so why would something that is suppose to spread the disease be allowed?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:15 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik View Post
Not that I agree with hunt farms, but wouldn't these be on private land anyway? How would this take away from naturaly habitat, necessarily?

Also, if what you are suggesting is true, and the hunt farms would be under the jurisdiction of the department of Agriculture, then would we not expect that the domestic game would be subject to similar regulations that are currently in place for cattle. There are heavy regulations to make sure that mad cow never happens again. One would hope that Dept of Ag would make game farms subject to the same laws, or at least could be convinced to do so.
Yes but most cattle farms are not high fenced....hunt farms are surrounded by game-proof fence that prevent natural movement by ungulates.

You'd hope regulations would be in place but game farming has a very long history of nasty diseases. The big difference is that most diseases that domestic cattle carry do not readily tranfer to wild ungulates. A disease that a tame elk or deer has transfers easily to wild populations. Also, rounding up a bunch of cows that break through a fence is a fairly easy task but you lose tame ungulates into the wild population and the door is opened for disaster. That's what keeps me awake at night anyhow.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:17 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gman1978 View Post
On one side hunt/game farms are proven to contribute to the spread of CWD, and on the other side the SRD has conducted deer culls to stop the spread of CWD. Isn't it very two sided that the government is even considering the establishment of hunt farms again. I understand there there are very weathy individuals that have polictial pull that are in favor of hunt farms but the SRD has been telling the public that the cull will help stop the spread so why would something that is suppose to spread the disease be allowed?
The cull has stopped. There was no no cull nor additional CWD tags this year. Many are speculating they stopped the cull for the exact reasons you outlined.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:20 AM
buddyhunter buddyhunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 51
Default

hopefully ted the avid woodsman can shut this down
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:34 AM
outlaw'd's Avatar
outlaw'd outlaw'd is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Westlock, Ab
Posts: 530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyhunter View Post
hopefully ted the avid woodsman can shut this down
sure he will................
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-09-2009, 12:05 PM
Reeves1's Avatar
Reeves1 Reeves1 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Westlock
Posts: 5,533
Default

Might make it easier to get my Fallow Deer permit
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-09-2009, 03:42 PM
gunslinger's Avatar
gunslinger gunslinger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeves View Post
Might make it easier to get my Fallow Deer permit

you know what we were just talking about this and how alot of stuff is changing in the old world nowadays, so a couple guys were stating that there dead against the hunt farms and how much land would be enough to actually have one so that u would have to actually hunt them. I listened for a bit then i asked them.

If i was to go up to north of red earth 100 miles and bought 4 sections of land, fenced it with 8 foot, and had a established game farm in there where i seriously managed the elk,deer, bison, and you knew there was potential for a great fun week of hunting would you go. One guy said depends on the price, one guy said well if it was 4 sections or 16 quarters of land you would never see the fence anyway so why not. and the third guy told me that i would never be able to do it so i wont have to worry about it.

Now i will admit i owned and raised domestic elk, ive had 380 class bulls in the fatherinlaws farm, i owned 4 bull calfes off mr twister, i had the time of my life raiseing the elk and watching them grow from calves to full mature bulls.

So if it was in no mans land and the perimeter was this big would you still have the same thoughts about game farming.

I of course being one to try anything have hunted inside a perimeter, i hunted red stag with archery in argentina , i have hunted africa and to tell you the truth never seen the fence and had a great hunt, so im on both sides of the fence here.

It is legal in saskatchewan and i know there successful in operating these farms.
And if i could seriously manage the herds and ungulates of each specie to where you had a serious trophy farm would it not be worth it.

I am totally opening myself up for alot of discussion here and will probly take a blasting for this but i bet alot of people have a different outlook on it if it didnt affect rural communities and didnt take away anybodys land to hunt on.
I just love to be around trophy animals and have a huge passion for hunting that i actually would love to have a huge ranch full of game. I know move to saskatchewan right, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-09-2009, 03:47 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey Pat, I'm not opposed to it on the ethics of hunting but on the habitat and disease issues. The ethics of hunting in enclosures can be debated forever but the fact that game farms have had a poor track record in Canada in regards to disease is not so easily debated. Why put our wild populations at such risk.

Hunting in fences is not for me but I can see arguements for it....just not in my backyard.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-09-2009, 03:58 PM
buddyhunter buddyhunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 51
Default

gunslinger, what would you do with the wildlife that currently lives on the 4 sections that you would do this on?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-09-2009, 03:58 PM
gunslinger's Avatar
gunslinger gunslinger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
Hey Pat, I'm not opposed to it on the ethics of hunting but on the habitat and disease issues. The ethics of hunting in enclosures can be debated forever but the fact that game farms have had a poor track record in Canada in regards to disease is not so easily debated. Why put our wild populations at such risk.

Hunting in fences is not for me but I can see arguements for it....just not in my backyard.

Yup this is exactly the problem is the disease transfer ,and i fully agree it will never open up to where you can have a game farm with the old regulations TJ but what im willing to bet is if and a big if, this discussion went to a new level a guy would deffintly have to have a 8 foot high barrier fence 4 feet from your ranch fence for sure to eliminate the spread of saliva with outside animals. along with numerious other regulations.

Now if that was a regulation and law would it change the debate.Becasue you wouldnt have to worry about the disease exchange.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-09-2009, 04:00 PM
gunslinger's Avatar
gunslinger gunslinger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyhunter View Post
gunslinger, what would you do with the wildlife that currently lives on the 4 sections that you would do this on?
Yea exactly that is the other issue, I should of just kept my mouth shut on this debate i can already see this. but very valid point. along with many others.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-09-2009, 04:03 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunslinger View Post
Yup this is exactly the problem is the disease transfer ,and i fully agree it will never open up to where you can have a game farm with the old regulations TJ but what im willing to bet is if and a big if, this discussion went to a new level a guy would deffintly have to have a 8 foot high barrier fence 4 feet from your ranch fence for sure to eliminate the spread of saliva with outside animals. along with numerious other regulations.

Now if that was a regulation and law would it change the debate.Becasue you wouldnt have to worry about the disease exchange.
Escaped animals are a huge concern too and I'm not sure you can ever 100% prevent that. It just seems to big of a risk for me.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-09-2009, 04:35 PM
packhuntr's Avatar
packhuntr packhuntr is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: rooster heaven
Posts: 4,066
Default

Shocking,, to put it politely. No matter how many oppose with better than good objections, these people will consistently find a way of succumbing to the complete stupidity that is thier second nature. Who lets these idiots run the show anyways? There is a very large problem. If a government in any other country attempted the things that ours does on a regular basis, they would over throw the gov. and shoot them all. If you dont believe it, turn on the news tonight at 6...... Self centered ba*tards,,, the whole works of them. All I will say is please dont drop the ball now AFGA.
__________________
MULEY MULISHA

It's just Alberta boys... Take what you can while you can,, if ya cant beat em join em.

Keep a strain on er
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-09-2009, 04:47 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

I think the needs of these hunters/consumers can be met without creating all the problems noted above.

Solution: If it isn't already legal, allow ranchers to tie a cow to a stake in the ground and charge a "sportsman" $5,000 to shoot the animal. The meat would then be federally inspected and an export permit issued, the cost of course being borne by that same "sportman". Simple.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-09-2009, 04:49 PM
redneck posse's Avatar
redneck posse redneck posse is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: third tree from the left second one over
Posts: 1,404
Default

im not sure how to phrase the question i want to ask with out starting a fight but here goes....

if hunt farms did get approved would it not mean better hunting and more draw chances for albertans? my reasons being if i was a american hunter and paying say $10,000 to a outfitter for a chance at a elk. or pay $10.000 to a hunt farm for a sure thing my money goes to the hunt farm opening up a possible tag for someone else. or am i way off base?
__________________
you have the right to remain silent, anything you say will be misquoted and used against you.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:06 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck posse View Post
im not sure how to phrase the question i want to ask with out starting a fight but here goes....

if hunt farms did get approved would it not mean better hunting and more draw chances for albertans? my reasons being if i was a american hunter and paying say $10,000 to a outfitter for a chance at a elk. or pay $10.000 to a hunt farm for a sure thing my money goes to the hunt farm opening up a possible tag for someone else. or am i way off base?
Guessing it's two different clientel. I doubt it would lessen the numbers of non-residents booking with outfitters for free-range hunts. There are definitely some killers out there but most guys booking hunts are booking for the experience and the possibility of a kill....at least from those I've met. Not all Americans are wealthy, some just don't have opportunity to hunt where they live and save for years for a dream hunt in Alberta. Those guys could kill an elk on a farm t home so I can't see them travelling here to do it but they will travel here to hunt wild animals.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:12 PM
redneck posse's Avatar
redneck posse redneck posse is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: third tree from the left second one over
Posts: 1,404
Default

thanks sheephunter never thought about it that way. just dont know enough about penned hunts. can see them being bad things in way of spreading CWD and such. but thought maybe they might open up more chances for draws. but i see your point its more about the experience than the kill for most.
__________________
you have the right to remain silent, anything you say will be misquoted and used against you.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:16 PM
kcountry's Avatar
kcountry kcountry is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 28
Default

From a Disease perspective.....The government of the day when game Ranching first came to fruition backed down from forcing the Ranches to Double Fence the Animals......Not sure if this would of stopped it but just goes to show you how the Government tends to be in bed with the Industry!!!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:39 PM
gunslinger's Avatar
gunslinger gunslinger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck posse View Post
thanks sheephunter never thought about it that way. just dont know enough about penned hunts. can see them being bad things in way of spreading CWD and such. but thought maybe they might open up more chances for draws. but i see your point its more about the experience than the kill for most.

Red dont just take TJs opinion and make it yours, he has never hunted a ranch so he has no experience as to what its all about, this is his Personal opinon. he doesnt hunt behind fences...

Your not considered a killer just becasue you hunt 100000 acres of fenced ranch. Your still on a adventure that you have no idea is going to turn out. The food, the language,the tracking.

The experience on a ranch is the exact same as a free range outfitted hunt also. whether your in south africa hunting plains game or argentina for Red Stag, new zealand for Fallow deer ,Audad in texas, Wild Boar in alberta its still an adventure and extremely fun hunt.
You make it what you want.

I would never give any kid or adult the perception that hes not on a true hunt or adventure just because hes hunting a ranch. These are huge areas and alot of hunting experience and fun can be had on there.

I strongly suggest not giving up a experience just because someone says thats a penned hunt,becasue you might have the hunt of a lifetime.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:45 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunslinger View Post
Red dont just take TJs opinion and make it yours, he has never hunted a ranch so he has no experience as to what its all about, this is his Personal opinon. he doesnt hunt behind fences...
Your not considered a killer just becasue you hunt 100000 acres of fenced ranch. Your still on a adventure that you have no idea is going to turn out. The food, the language,the tracking.
The experience is the exact same as a free range outfitted hunt also. whether your in south africa hunting plains game or argentina for Red Stag, new zealand for Fallow deer ,Audad in texas, Wild Boar in alberta its still an adventure and extremely fun hunt.
You make it what you want.

I would never give any kid or adult the perception that hes not on a true hunt or adventure just because hes hunting a ranch. These are huge areas and alot of hunting experience and fun can be had on there.
I strongly suggest not giving up a experience just because someone says thats a penned hunt,becasue you might have the hunt of a lifetime.
Pat, I wasn't knocking the guys that hunt behind fences or saying that a fenced hunt couldn't be an adventure to some, just explaining that in my experience, if the option exists to hunt free range.....many hunters prefer that option versus fences and that's why fenced elk farms wouldn't cut down on non-resident hunters. I have shot behind fences a few times...enough to know that it's not an adventure for me but can see how some consider it to be. Sadly, if you want to hunt some species in the world, there are no options. With that said, I don't knock those that do it and that's why I stay out of the debates about ethics and fences. The disease issue is enough for me. .
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:53 PM
gunslinger's Avatar
gunslinger gunslinger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
Pat, I wasn't knocking the guys that hunt behind fences or saying that a fenced hunt couldn't be an adventure to some, just explaining that in my experience, if the option exists to hunt free range.....many hunters prefer that option versus fences and that's why fenced elk farms wouldn't cut down on non-resident hunters. I have shot behind fences a few times...enough to know that it's not an adventure for me but can see how some consider it to be. Sadly, if you want to hunt some species in the world, there are no options. With that said, I don't knock those that do it and that's why I stay out of the debates about ethics and fences. The disease issue is enough for me. .

Hunting in fences is not for me but I can see arguements for it......



oooohhh i have to apoligize TJ i took this comment as u havent hunted them.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-09-2009, 06:02 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunslinger View Post
Hunting in fences is not for me but I can see arguements for it......



oooohhh i have to apoligize TJ i took this comment as u havent hunted them.
No problem!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-09-2009, 06:04 PM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The habitat and fragmentation issues are the killer on this one for most guys i hunt with. We've discussed this issue many many times and can't see how this could possibly be a good thing for wildlife. The disease spread issues are just a given. Most guys who hunt adjacent to game farms have seen the natural animals interacting with the farmed ones through the fence. No doubt in my mind that's a bad thing.
Another reason why every hunter should have a membership with the AFGA. Even if they can't stop some of these initiatives they can at least lead a good battle/ debate.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-09-2009, 06:05 PM
Reeves1's Avatar
Reeves1 Reeves1 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Westlock
Posts: 5,533
Default

Not good at wording things....

I see piles of dead cows at the two near by stock yards. Often head still on, so not sent for testing.
Alberta used to collect these, and testing was done. To save money, they quite this service.
Now farmers have pits, or tuck them into the bush for the Coyotes to clean up.
Dairy farm up the road does the same thing.

Yet on an Elk farm, every animal has to be accounted for. Every one.

The disease part of this topic, in my eyes, just don't float.

I'll shut up now....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.