Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-09-2020, 06:03 AM
357Maximum 357Maximum is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton Area/Candle Lake SK
Posts: 208
Default

My go to big game rifle for many years was a .280 Remington Ruger MKII stainless in a semi-custom Fajen laminated lite-weight stock. Leupold 2.5x8. 4 rounds ammo, nylon carrying strap. 8lbs 6oz.

Well balanced it felt lighter then it was.

Personally find Rifles over 9lbs scoped more then I want to carry any distance. While lite-weight rifles in the 6.5 lb range are a joy to carry, they are much harder for me to shot accurately in the field.

357
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-09-2020, 11:43 AM
Athabasca1 Athabasca1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 400
Default

Remington Model 700 ss action, 7mm RM caliber, 24" ss Douglas barrel, Brown Precision Kevlar Pound'r stock with blind magazine, Conetrol bases and rings, Leupold Vari-X 3-9 Compact scope. Total weight for complete rifle, including 3 cartridges and sling is 7lbs 12 oz. Not super light but serves my needs.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-09-2020, 02:10 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,575
Default

Just put 50 rounds through a new 260 barrel on a Highwall.
26" barrel in a medium contour , scope is heavy with heavy steel rings but I will leave it on for now .
The rifles weighs in a 10.2 scoped but feels lighter .
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-09-2020, 04:12 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Batteries died on my digital scale, so here’s the fish scale.

One is about 8lb 4oz with a 30oz scope, a sling and ammo



The other is about 7lb 12oz with a 16oz scope, a sling and ammo




I can shoot more accurately freehand with the lighter rifle, which may surprise some guys who believe a heavier rifle translates to a better shooting platform. That’s a myth, proper fit and balance is what translates to a better shooting platform.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-09-2020, 04:40 PM
Roamer Roamer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 146
Default

Kurt

I couldn’t agree more about fit and balance being the key to accurate shooting in the field!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-09-2020, 05:09 PM
fishnguy fishnguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntinstuff View Post
Love light

My.Sako A7 with a 3x9 Leupold and one round in the chamber weighs 6lbs 14 oz

If I could make it lighter, I would....
Interesting. I got mine with a heavy Leica at over 9:



Not using a rail ended up not being an option with this scope. That’s without a sling and I cannot remember if i put any ammo in (would probably say no if I had to pick one).
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-09-2020, 07:41 PM
cowmanbob cowmanbob is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,573
Default

H+S precision at 6lbs, 1oz with scope and a Barrett at 6lb, 6oz work well for me.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-09-2020, 07:47 PM
JTRED's Avatar
JTRED JTRED is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Central Kootenays BC
Posts: 432
Default

I live and hunt in the Kootenay Rockies of southern BC, so every hunt is a mountain hunt almost exclusively hunt on foot. I like to keep things as light as I can. I have three rifles(Tikka t3 featherlite, Marlin, Savage) that see the most use and all weigh 6.5lbs or less plus scope. So scoped they come in around 7.5lbs slightly less. All are mild recoiling a 270win, a 25-06rem, and a 7mm-08rem so even being on the lighter side not terrible at the range.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-09-2020, 09:33 PM
jednastka jednastka is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stony Plain, AB
Posts: 528
Default

light rifle = easy to carry = heavy recoil = flinch
heavy rifle = hard work to carry = light recoil = meat
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-09-2020, 09:36 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

I wonder if the guys who go ultra light
Target smaller critters
Because ya know....
They are lighter and easier to carry?
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-09-2020, 09:47 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jednastka View Post
light rifle = easy to carry = heavy recoil = flinch
heavy rifle = hard work to carry = light recoil = meat
Shooting practice will help you with your flinch, a well balanced rifle will help with your field accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-10-2020, 07:13 AM
Nyksta Nyksta is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
I wonder if the guys who go ultra light
Target smaller critters
Because ya know....
They are lighter and easier to carry?
Or they shoot bigger because they can carry more meat beside a lighter rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-10-2020, 07:40 AM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyksta View Post
Or they shoot bigger because they can carry more meat beside a lighter rifle.
Or don’t have a guide to carry their lunch.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-10-2020, 02:46 PM
Anomaly85 Anomaly85 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 78
Default

My Macabee Defense SLR in 6.5 Grendel with Proof Research barrel and 3-15x Razor LH is about 7lb 8oz.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-10-2020, 03:32 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyksta View Post
Or they shoot bigger because they can carry more meat beside a lighter rifle.
Basically your rifles weight doesn’t matter once you have an animal on the ground
Don’t lose any sleep over it being 8-9lbs
Buy a lighter tent or sleeping bag
A lighter weight rifle is awesome but don’t shave lbs and compromise it’s shootability
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-10-2020, 03:37 PM
southernman southernman is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fort Mc Murray/ Bell Block New Zealand.
Posts: 860
Default

For a std caliber, say 308, 7x57, 260, 270 class, I like a rifle to be about 7-7.5lbs all up, for me, in the type of hunting I do, this is the best balance between weight and shootablity/ handling,
I've got a very light .260, 5lbs 2 oz scoped, lovely to carry, ***** to shoot consistently, especially at 300m, the ultralight scope, not being all that great, in low light, doesn't help.
I've also got a cooper back country in 300 win, its 7.4 lbs and is also difficult to be consistent with, My 300H&H with the same bullet and powder charge at 8 3/4lbs is easy,
I say the average weight of hunting rifles has gone up, as so many are over scoped, with big heavy optics, difficult to find a 1x4 or 2x7 scope at times.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-10-2020, 03:40 PM
WinefredCommander WinefredCommander is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: WMU 402
Posts: 515
Default

T3x SS .260 w/Z5 3.5-18x44/talley rings/loaded clip = 7.4lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-10-2020, 04:24 PM
Nyksta Nyksta is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
Basically your rifles weight doesn’t matter once you have an animal on the ground
Don’t lose any sleep over it being 8-9lbs
Buy a lighter tent or sleeping bag
A lighter weight rifle is awesome but don’t shave lbs and compromise it’s shootability
It was a joke. I agree, the rifle weight is irrelevant, and an animal successfully hunted is a great trophy.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-10-2020, 04:29 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyksta View Post
It was a joke. I agree, the rifle weight is irrelevant, and an animal successfully hunted is a great trophy.
I know man, my post you were replying too was a joke as well
I know we are on the same page
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-10-2020, 04:38 PM
Nyksta Nyksta is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,542
Default

The important thing is it's only 174 days until September
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-10-2020, 05:33 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyksta View Post
The important thing is it's only 174 days until September
I’m already hitting the gym for my Tur hunt
Looking forward to the journey and adventure
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-10-2020, 06:45 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
I’m already hitting the gym for my Tur hunt
Looking forward to the journey and adventure
Hitting the gym is a good start, next step will be walking in the doors, that’s where the real gains start!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-10-2020, 06:48 PM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,494
Default

Sako A7, 7mm08, McMillan Edge stock, Leupold VXIII 2.5-8X36mm, three rounds in the mag, don't use a sling....use a Kifaru gun bearer on my pack

Last edited by CNP; 03-10-2020 at 07:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-10-2020, 07:19 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt505 View Post
Hitting the gym is a good start, next step will be walking in the doors, that’s where the real gains start!
Lol 😉
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-11-2020, 04:07 PM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinefredCommander View Post
T3x SS .260 w/Z5 3.5-18x44/talley rings/loaded clip = 7.4lbs.
Is this estimated or scaled?

My T3 lite in 7-08, c/w VX3i 4.5-14x40, Talleys, Limbsaver, sling and loaded mag is 8.06 lbs on my Starfrit digital scale...really not so light. A 260 is going to be a fraction heavier than a 7-08, all else being equal.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-11-2020, 04:13 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,575
Default

This rifle has a brand new RKS gain twist on it in .260 rem
barrel is a 26" medium sporter ( same taper as on Ron's favorite big game Highwall)
The scope is monsterous but is only on there for load development, a more practical unit will go on after.
Scope and rings are 2.4 pounds, total weight scoped up is 10.2 pounds, but because it is a single shot it balances very well - and yes it shoots 1/2" or better.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-11-2020, 04:14 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brewster29 View Post
Is this estimated or scaled?

My T3 lite in 7-08, c/w VX3i 4.5-14x40, Talleys, Limbsaver, sling and loaded mag is 8.06 lbs on my Starfrit digital scale...really not so light. A 260 is going to be a fraction heavier than a 7-08, all else being equal.
Difference between u two is 9 ounces. Limbsaver will cost u 3 and the sling could easily add 8 or 9 ounces on it's own. Doesn't take much to add a pound to overall rifle weight.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-11-2020, 04:18 PM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
Difference between u two is 9 ounces. Limbsaver will cost u 3 and the sling could easily add 8 or 9 ounces on it's own. Doesn't take much to add a pound to overall rifle weight.
But it sure costs a pile to take a pound off!

FWIW, sling was 5.1 oz...mag loaded with 3 NAB 140gr.
Ti bolt handle and carbon fiber knob was worth .4 oz!
Guess we’re pretty close.

Last edited by brewster29; 03-11-2020 at 04:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-11-2020, 05:18 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt505 View Post
Hitting the gym is a good start, next step will be walking in the doors, that’s where the real gains start!
Cheapest and easiest way to shave weight is on your waistline
Titanium is way more expensive
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-11-2020, 09:14 PM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
Cheapest and easiest way to shave weight is on your waistline
Titanium is way more expensive
Who you calling fat??

To answer the OP's question: I prefer lighter rifles, but I do find anything with a pencil barrel doesn't point for s**t. My lightest is a 280 Rem scaling 6 lbs 8 oz ready to go, heaviest is a Rem 700 LSS in 300 WM with a big optic at 10-1. Both point and shoot very well, but the 300 is a load to carry. In between are a half dozen others in elk to elephant calibers. Guess which one gets hunted the most (hint- the lightest). The older I get the more I appreciate light weight. In my part of the world we just don't have flat hunting country.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.