IPCC admits scientific consensus was WRONG!!

[rugatika]

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/03/2...l-on-biofuels/

The IPCC has admitted that they were wrong on biofuels being more environmentally friendly.

Makes me wonder...if the "scientific consensus" can get it so wrong on this, what else could they have gotten wrong. I wonder.

[Redfrog]

How can that be?? It's just plants? It's organic? It's sustainable?


"“Increasing bioenergy crop cultivation poses risks to ecosystems and biodiversity.”

I can't wait to see how the environment improves now and the cost of food goes down.

Great news that we don't have to destroy the environment to keep from destroying the environment.

[BeeGuy]

The whole point of science is that you can improve your hypothesis based on new data.

Apparently, right-wing conservative fundamentalists can not be wrong because if they are, then they are liberals.

Now that is a winning ideology.

Disclosure: I don't believe the IPCC is a reliable recipient of such voluminous funding. At least they have ackowledged the glaring issues wrt biofuels.

Biofuels are additional energy sources, not alternative, and their implications on a large scale are horrifying.

[rugatika]

Originally Posted by BeeGuy

right-wing conservative fundamentalists can not be wrong because if they are, then they are liberals.

Bingo.

[Redfrog]

"Apparently, right-wing conservative fundamentalists can not be wrong because if they are, then they are liberals."

Eureka!!!! the beginning of knowledge.


Nah it has to be a false positive.