Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2017, 06:16 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,307
Default Disgusted

So yesterday I find a small dead whitetail laying in the ditch, looks like a doe from the size of it but after closer examination it has 6" spikes with some velvet still attached .Appears to be a doe with antlers to me , must have been roadkilled .....until I turn it over to determine gender and it has been field dressed !! So looks like some one figured they would be in trouble because of gender ( no doe tag) and they pitch it. Only way I can explain it..If they thought it was a buck they should know enough about the regs to know that they just tag it as antlered. Some one on here may very well know the story and if they do they should read the regs and know the rules .

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2017, 06:23 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Last Saturday my hunting partner and I came across two doe carcasses, one dressed and skinned, one dressed and cut in half, left to rot just off the road.

No idea what possesses people to do this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2017, 06:36 PM
blueice123's Avatar
blueice123 blueice123 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 326
Default

Sick , even if mess up not leave the meat to rot


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2017, 06:43 PM
Scott N's Avatar
Scott N Scott N is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,510
Default

What a waste of an animal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2017, 06:43 PM
2 Tollers 2 Tollers is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,943
Default

Sad in both cases and no reason for a total waste.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-25-2017, 06:46 PM
Reaver Reaver is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 127
Default

Last weekend I found a does head in the ditch. This WMU is a mandatory head submission unit too. I'm not sure why someone would do that, but it's disrespectful to the animal and the property owner.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:03 PM
covey ridge's Avatar
covey ridge covey ridge is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: N. E. of High River
Posts: 4,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H380 View Post
So looks like some one figured they would be in trouble because of gender ( no doe tag) and they pitch it.
More probable that they had antlerless tags and did not know this was antlered until after they shot it.

What a waste
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:09 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by covey ridge View Post
More probable that they had antlerless tags and did not know this was antlered until after they shot it.

What a waste

In cases like that the supplemental tags are the issue. Shoot one just over the max length allowed, by mistake, and walk away from it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:21 PM
Bassett's Avatar
Bassett Bassett is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
In cases like that the supplemental tags are the issue. Shoot one just over the max length allowed, by mistake, and walk away from it.


Shouldn't blame the tag system for poor wildlife identification from said person who shot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:31 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
In cases like that the supplemental tags are the issue. Shoot one just over the max length allowed, by mistake, and walk away from it.
. If you shoot an animal that doesn't meet the requirements, it's 100% your fault. If you aren't sure, don't shoot, it's that simple
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:51 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
. If you shoot an animal that doesn't meet the requirements, it's 100% your fault. If you aren't sure, don't shoot, it's that simple
Exactly .
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-25-2017, 09:36 PM
Full Curl Earl Full Curl Earl is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern Alberta
Posts: 1,704
Default Alberta

Alberta is a lawless province that really doesn't care much about wildlife. I am at 42 days of hunting, from Manning, to South of Medicine Hat and West to the Livingstone. I have seen exactly one Fish and Wildlife vehicle on the highway in that time. I personally have not been stopped and checked in 4 years.
I've logged over 15,000 Km's since September this season! (And I'm not much of a truck hunter, most has been to and from location)
That right there is the problem.
Maybe if there was an enforcement presence maybe poachers would think twice, and land owners wouldn't be getting fed up and closing access.
It's high time we start demanding change.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-25-2017, 09:47 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
. If you shoot an animal that doesn't meet the requirements, it's 100% your fault. If you aren't sure, don't shoot, it's that simple

I get that. Just makes things too tempting for those that don't follow the law is all I'm saying.

Not a big stretch to have small bucks, 4" and a bit, mistakenly shot as does and people that walk the legal line leave them behind. That small an antler can be hidden by ears, OR, the deer may only have one. Seen it happen lots where guys think they've shot a doe only to walk up on it an see it just became their antlered specimen for the year.

One deer should be lots anyways. Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-25-2017, 10:11 PM
PartTimeHunter PartTimeHunter is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Drayton Valley
Posts: 1,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
I get that. Just makes things too tempting for those that don't follow the law is all I'm saying.

Not a big stretch to have small bucks, 4" and a bit, mistakenly shot as does and people that walk the legal line leave them behind. That small an antler can be hidden by ears, OR, the deer may only have one. Seen it happen lots where guys think they've shot a doe only to walk up on it an see it just became their antlered specimen for the year.

One deer should be lots anyways. Just my opinion.
One deer should lots for what?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-25-2017, 10:35 PM
J.B.'s Avatar
J.B. J.B. is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Curl Earl View Post
Alberta is a lawless province that really doesn't care much about wildlife. I am at 42 days of hunting, from Manning, to South of Medicine Hat and West to the Livingstone. I have seen exactly one Fish and Wildlife vehicle on the highway in that time. I personally have not been stopped and checked in 4 years.
I've logged over 15,000 Km's since September this season! (And I'm not much of a truck hunter, most has been to and from location)
That right there is the problem.
Maybe if there was an enforcement presence maybe poachers would think twice, and land owners wouldn't be getting fed up and closing access.
It's high time we start demanding change.
This. We could use 5x the number of enforcement officers...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-26-2017, 06:44 AM
Don K's Avatar
Don K Don K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Curl Earl View Post
Alberta is a lawless province that really doesn't care much about wildlife. I am at 42 days of hunting, from Manning, to South of Medicine Hat and West to the Livingstone. I have seen exactly one Fish and Wildlife vehicle on the highway in that time. I personally have not been stopped and checked in 4 years.
I've logged over 15,000 Km's since September this season! (And I'm not much of a truck hunter, most has been to and from location)
That right there is the problem.
Maybe if there was an enforcement presence maybe poachers would think twice, and land owners wouldn't be getting fed up and closing access.
It's high time we start demanding change.
You should swing by our place... There hasn't been a day this seasoning haven't seen a F&W truck go by. We sat in the blind one night and saw trucks 3 times. It's nice knowing they are patrolling but I'd agree they need to spread their wings abut and expand their range a bit further from town.

On the flip side I the last 5 years we've had 1 deer shot and drug off our place without permission. If they weren't around there'd be a lot more as there's a lot of traffic around here. Personally appreciate their presence.
__________________
Life's too short to sweat the small stuff.
Aim Small = Miss Small
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-26-2017, 06:58 AM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PartTimeHunter View Post
One deer should lots for what?

Per hunter.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:05 AM
Full Curl Earl Full Curl Earl is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern Alberta
Posts: 1,704
Default Nice

Sounds like maybe that officer hunts in that area, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don K View Post
You should swing by our place... There hasn't been a day this seasoning haven't seen a F&W truck go by. We sat in the blind one night and saw trucks 3 times. It's nice knowing they are patrolling but I'd agree they need to spread their wings abut and expand their range a bit further from town.

On the flip side I the last 5 years we've had 1 deer shot and drug off our place without permission. If they weren't around there'd be a lot more as there's a lot of traffic around here. Personally appreciate their presence.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:25 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Curl Earl View Post
Alberta is a lawless province that really doesn't care much about wildlife. I am at 42 days of hunting, from Manning, to South of Medicine Hat and West to the Livingstone. I have seen exactly one Fish and Wildlife vehicle on the highway in that time. I personally have not been stopped and checked in 4 years.
I've logged over 15,000 Km's since September this season! (And I'm not much of a truck hunter, most has been to and from location)
That right there is the problem.
Maybe if there was an enforcement presence maybe poachers would think twice, and land owners wouldn't be getting fed up and closing access.
It's high time we start demanding change.
Nope, the province is far from lawless,few Fish cops out and about because they are always getting calls and chasing down leads etc on call ins. Just because you don't get stopped does not mean they are not watching you in your areas.
I spoke to a few over the years and the smart ones hunker down and watch from a distance...this I know because I was muzzleloading many moons ago and came out of a long draw, walked a road then was going to scoot back up into another draw...did not take the cap of the nipple of my muzzleloader..fish cop showed up, made conversation and I decided to pack it in and go back to camp, he offered me a ride but asked me to remove the cap off the nipple...crap..he said he was watching my and others in this area from 2 clicks away with his spotting scope...

I know we want change but in the mean time we have to be the eyes and ears out there to report poachers or suspicious activities.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:36 AM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,670
Default

Sad to see the waste. Came across a decent 4x4 whitetail shot and gutted then left behind a couple of years back. Why someone would do that baffles me.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:49 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
I get that. Just makes things too tempting for those that don't follow the law is all I'm saying.

Not a big stretch to have small bucks, 4" and a bit, mistakenly shot as does and people that walk the legal line leave them behind. That small an antler can be hidden by ears, OR, the deer may only have one. Seen it happen lots where guys think they've shot a doe only to walk up on it an see it just became their antlered specimen for the year.

One deer should be lots anyways. Just my opinion.
One deer sure doesn't make many meals. If you are single and don't eat much meat a deer goes a little further.... for a family a deer doesn't last long at all.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:52 AM
PartTimeHunter PartTimeHunter is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Drayton Valley
Posts: 1,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
Per hunter.
How do you figure that? One deer wouldn't last two months at my place.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-26-2017, 08:24 AM
ram crazy ram crazy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
What a waste of an animal.
There are a lot of idiots out there, but it's not a total waste. The predators are getting fed and in the end it may save the life of a live animal that the predators wouldn't take down. I don't let that ***** bother me, if you did you'd go crazy.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-26-2017, 08:45 AM
walking buffalo's Avatar
walking buffalo walking buffalo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
Per hunter.

You do realize that we would have to significantly increase hunter numbers just to manage deer populations if we limited everyone to one deer?


Didn't think so.
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -

"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-26-2017, 08:56 AM
HIGHLANDER HUNTING HIGHLANDER HUNTING is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Curl Earl View Post
Alberta is a lawless province that really doesn't care much about wildlife. I am at 42 days of hunting, from Manning, to South of Medicine Hat and West to the Livingstone. I have seen exactly one Fish and Wildlife vehicle on the highway in that time. I personally have not been stopped and checked in 4 years.
I've logged over 15,000 Km's since September this season! (And I'm not much of a truck hunter, most has been to and from location)
That right there is the problem.
Maybe if there was an enforcement presence maybe poachers would think twice, and land owners wouldn't be getting fed up and closing access.
It's high time we start demanding change.
Our system seems to rely on "hunter ethics" for the laws to be adhered to.
I spoke to a ranch manager in the 212 bow zone who said he stopped calling F&W about poaching because he knows it's ineffective and they're spread too thin.
I hunted over 20 days in the field this year, almost all on crown land/grazing lease. I saw one Conservation officer, as he drove past me while I walked along the ditch carrying a bow, obviously hunting, he never stopped.

So you're experience isn't unique, unfortunately.

Boone and Crocket is making hunter ethics something they want people to think more about. I agree it's needed here in Alberta, but I wouldn't mind seeing more officers on patrol too.

John
Highlander Hunting Podcast
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-26-2017, 09:39 AM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGHLANDER HUNTING View Post

Boone and Crocket is making hunter ethics something they want people to think more about. I agree it's needed here in Alberta, but I wouldn't mind seeing more officers on patrol too.

John
Highlander Hunting Podcast
Unfortunately on the other hand the bad part of B&C is that it has inadvertently spawned a cult of conscienceless lawbreakers who will do anything and break any law seeking the notoriety from killing trophies that will put their name in that book.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-26-2017, 10:04 AM
bb356 bb356 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rycroft
Posts: 21,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
What a waste of an animal.
No ... raven's ... magpie's ect eat to ... the only waste is if the critter is burry'ed in a landfill !!!


See the big picture boy's ...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-26-2017, 10:11 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb356 View Post
No ... raven's ... magpie's ect eat to ... the only waste is if the critter is burry'ed in a landfill !!!
No then the maggots etc have a go....I think people are just saying hey you shot it, gutted it so why not tag it and take it home...fine line between hunting and poaching but you know when it is crossed...slobs,criminals,poachers not hunters.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-26-2017, 10:25 AM
covey ridge's Avatar
covey ridge covey ridge is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: N. E. of High River
Posts: 4,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGHLANDER HUNTING View Post
Our system seems to rely on "hunter ethics" for the laws to be adhered to.
The success of any system, not just hunting laws does rely on good ethical people who know the law and obey the law because it is the right thing to do.

There is not enough enforcement people that can be put in the field to enforce against just the very few that will deliberately violate the law.

If there were no enforcement people out there the good ethical people would still be good ethical people and not turn into poachers.

That said, I wish there was a bit more supervision in the field to remove the poachers who call themselves hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-26-2017, 10:28 AM
bb356 bb356 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rycroft
Posts: 21,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 58thecat View Post
No then the maggots etc have a go....I think people are just saying hey you shot it, gutted it so why not tag it and take it home...fine line between hunting and poaching but you know when it is crossed...slobs,criminals,poachers not hunters.
Oh ... I forgot that a person has to be an up standing human to voice an opinion on AO ... sorry !!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.