Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2017, 09:17 PM
pa_of_6 pa_of_6 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 467
Default Which insulation Roxul or Pink

Roxul or fiberglass pink.
Gotta insulate my barn and wondering which I should use...and where to get it cheap.

Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2017, 09:29 PM
owlhoot's Avatar
owlhoot owlhoot is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: southeast alberta
Posts: 1,183
Default

I looked into Roxul once, they stated they where rodent resistant but had no proof only that there were no reported cases of mouse infestation.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2017, 09:31 PM
skoalzie skoalzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: lacombe
Posts: 136
Default

Will it be getting covered with any tin or plywood? How old is the barn? Worried about fires at all from tools or anything else? Roxul will be better for fire.... what is the spacing of the studs? Roxul is great but it's a real pain to cut.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2017, 09:45 PM
wildbill wildbill is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gods Country
Posts: 1,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pa_of_6 View Post
Roxul or fiberglass pink.
Gotta insulate my barn and wondering which I should use...and where to get it cheap.

Thanks in advance
I've been doing industrial insulating and cladding for 18 yrs, anytime I have encountered mouse infestations it has always been fiberglass, and I have seen some, that still make me gag to this day, they love that stuff as do pack rats, if you are living rurally which I assume you are as you said you were insulating your barn, it would be a no brainer if I was in your shoes, I can't seem to ever recall seeing signs of vermin in mineral wool (roxul), hope that helps
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2017, 09:52 PM
wildbill wildbill is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gods Country
Posts: 1,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skoalzie View Post
Will it be getting covered with any tin or plywood? How old is the barn? Worried about fires at all from tools or anything else? Roxul will be better for fire.... what is the spacing of the studs? Roxul is great but it's a real pain to cut.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
its easy to work with, get a sharp serrated knife, straight edge at tape and go.....anyone has actually worked with the stuff knows this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2017, 10:04 PM
skoalzie skoalzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: lacombe
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill View Post
its easy to work with, get a sharp serrated knife, straight edge at tape and go.....anyone has actually worked with the stuff knows this.


Absolutely I agree with you that it can be done properly but lots of people get "lazy" and eyeball it and this is when roxul becomes the issue.

Are the studs 2x4 or 2x6?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2017, 10:07 PM
CaberTosser's Avatar
CaberTosser CaberTosser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 19,420
Default

I've insulated two homes with roxul and find it way better than fibreglass. It is vastly less itchy but I also find it much easier to cut. It also retains shape and its bulk better. Being a bit more dense/heavier I think it is probably superior in terms of acoustic muffling too.

I guess someone who can't measure and cut accurately might prefer fibreglass as it can be cut slightly big and compressed in to fit, but Roxul doesn't compress as easily so one simply has to be more accurate with it.
__________________
"The trouble with people idiot-proofing things, is the resulting evolution of the idiot." Me
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-28-2017, 10:16 PM
pa_of_6 pa_of_6 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 467
Default

It will be covered with tin on the inside and wood/tin on exterior walls

2x4 and 2x6 studs

Vapor barrier on the warm side.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2017, 04:47 AM
mediumrare mediumrare is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 220
Default

Roxul.dries out better too if it happens to get wet.whereas pink is like wet toast.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2017, 12:47 PM
wildbill wildbill is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gods Country
Posts: 1,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaberTosser View Post
I've insulated two homes with roxul and find it way better than fibreglass. It is vastly less itchy but I also find it much easier to cut. It also retains shape and its bulk better. Being a bit more dense/heavier I think it is probably superior in terms of acoustic muffling too.

I guess someone who can't measure and cut accurately might prefer fibreglass as it can be cut slightly big and compressed in to fit, but Roxul doesn't compress as easily so one simply has to be more accurate with it.
Not trying to be a smart ass ( because I’d actually have to be smart) but when you compress insulation it totally defeats the purpose of what it is and will loose its R value and is not very good work practice,if you squish lets say 4” to 1” it ain’t gonna insulate worth a fiddlers fart. And yes it is a better acoustic insulation. They only time customers use fibre glass is to keep costs down, wether it be piping, vessels, tanks, ducting, buildings etc. As far as I’m concerned fibreglass is garbage. And one last thing, mineral fibre is water resistant as well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-29-2017, 03:32 PM
Gray Wolf Gray Wolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,217
Thumbs up Roxul

Quote:
Originally Posted by pa_of_6 View Post
Roxul or fiberglass pink.
Gotta insulate my barn and wondering which I should use...and where to get it cheap.

Thanks in advance
Professor Google says - https://www.google.ca/search?source=....0.NDo2E3re1PE

Another vote for Roxul
.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-29-2017, 03:38 PM
Rock&Ice Rock&Ice is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canmore
Posts: 33
Default

I literally just did a ceiling on a cold room below our sun room. I found lots of mouse evidence in the old fiberglass. I found the Roxul super easy to work with and can absolutely say the accoustic property is there. I'm no install expert but this fit perfectly in between joists. I will be using it going forward. I did a double layer (thick then thin) so there is no space between the floor and drywall.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2017, 03:58 PM
calgarychef calgarychef is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,699
Default

Roxul here too.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-29-2017, 04:27 PM
coastalhunter coastalhunter is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Peace River, BC
Posts: 630
Default

Roxul hands down. All we use at work.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-29-2017, 09:02 PM
Night hawk Night hawk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brazeau County
Posts: 22
Default

Ok I'm sold on the roxul for walls but is it acceptable for increasing the R value in the attic over top of the existing fibreglass stuff ?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-29-2017, 10:36 PM
mmhmmmm mmhmmmm is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 121
Default

Hey, I am a residential general contractor and have dealt with both kinds of insulation many many times. I would tell you to price them both out, and if the roxull is going to cost much more I wouldn’t bother. Unless sound is a worry for you. But otherwise I don’t think it’s worth the different in this application. As for your attic I would say the same thing. Might be best to just have someone blow more insulation in the attic for you. Up there the most important thing you can look for is proper ventilation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-29-2017, 11:31 PM
crazy_davey crazy_davey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Foothills
Posts: 2,337
Default

What R value should a guy purchase for a shop/barn? Just wondering how high to go and still be somewhat cost effective?

Is Roxul quite a bit more expensive?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-30-2017, 07:17 AM
coastalhunter coastalhunter is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Peace River, BC
Posts: 630
Default

Is flame retardant important?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-30-2017, 08:57 AM
skoalzie skoalzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: lacombe
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Night hawk View Post
Ok I'm sold on the roxul for walls but is it acceptable for increasing the R value in the attic over top of the existing fibreglass stuff ?


As stated before as soon as you compress fibreglass you decrease the r value. Roxul is fairly heavy and dense and would compress the blow in.

If the ceiling is completely batted it will not compress as much so then it will help. Just make sure in either situation you don't block off airflow


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-04-2018, 09:34 PM
John d John d is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 20
Default

Roxul here Too better for sound as well
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-05-2018, 01:45 PM
KinAlberta KinAlberta is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,058
Default

Convection is a problem with fibreglass. Apparently the colder it gets the worse its performance. Anyone know how mineral wool performs?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-05-2018, 05:11 PM
KinAlberta KinAlberta is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skoalzie View Post
As stated before as soon as you compress fibreglass you decrease the r value. Roxul is fairly heavy and dense and would compress the blow in.

If the ceiling is completely batted it will not compress as much so then it will help. Just make sure in either situation you don't block off airflow


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Per my last comment (above), fibreglass allows for a lot of convection (blown in, not sure about batts) but one site I saw said bliwnin fibreglass can be topped off with another insulation. So I’m guessing that even with compression, performance might still improve.

BTW, after completing some renos in the early 2000s, we had our house really topped up with blown in fibreglass. Naturally it was just months after that that I picked up a Fine Homdbuilding magazine and read about ‘fibreglass’s dirty little secret’. :-( That is; the more you need it, the worse it is. Maybe someday I’ll top our fluff with some cellulose or mineral wool or something.



Here’s a rebuttal. So I may be wrong or behind the times. However, why aren’t there definitive studies and results on all this by now? For example the quote below uses 1992 dollars! What the heck is that about?

More info at the link:
Quote:

Loose Fill Insulation Performance and Convection

. In addition, further analysis showed two things – first when loose-fill insulation is installed at the proper density the R-value does not decrease (in fact, the R-value increases at lower temperature) and even in the case where the insulation is not installed properly, the increased heat loss for a typical attic is fairly small.[1] Researchers estimate that even at the lighter/improper density the added heating cost for a home in the northern United States would only be $20 (1992 dollars) per year. ...”

http://information.insulationinstitu...nd-convection/

Last edited by KinAlberta; 01-05-2018 at 05:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.