Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-30-2009, 05:17 PM
surfclod surfclod is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 76
Default

When trying different types of ammo be sure to clean the barrel in between brands. After the barrel is clean it takes approximately 1 round per inch of barrel to coat it with the particular bullet lube that the type of ammo you are testing uses.

In my 20" barrel I clean it with a few passes of the boresnake and then shoot about 25 rounds of the type of ammo I am testing to "season" the barrel for that type of ammo and then fire the remaining 25 round into 5 groups of 5 rounds each. Then clean and try the next box of ammo. The first 25 rounds I just shoot offhand for practice and the remaining rounds are shot from bags to try and remove as much human error as possible.

This is maybe a little bit of overkill for most shooters but I enjoy trying to get the most out of my gun.

Before I knew this method I had purchased some expensive .22 target ammo and have very inconclusive results. Now that I know better I want to redo the test and see if fancy shmancy target ammo can do any better than cheaper stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-30-2009, 05:42 PM
eric2381 eric2381 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClash View Post
cci quik shoks ....as fast as the stingers but boy do they open up a gopher.

I agree, they split them open ear to arse. They shoot pretty accurately in my rifle as well. But, they are expensive. Sort of a treat to use them.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-30-2009, 06:03 PM
graham1's Avatar
graham1 graham1 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Right where I wanna be
Posts: 708
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfclod View Post
When trying different types of ammo be sure to clean the barrel in between brands. After the barrel is clean it takes approximately 1 round per inch of barrel to coat it with the particular bullet lube that the type of ammo you are testing uses.

In my 20" barrel I clean it with a few passes of the boresnake and then shoot about 25 rounds of the type of ammo I am testing to "season" the barrel for that type of ammo and then fire the remaining 25 round into 5 groups of 5 rounds each. Then clean and try the next box of ammo. The first 25 rounds I just shoot offhand for practice and the remaining rounds are shot from bags to try and remove as much human error as possible.

This is maybe a little bit of overkill for most shooters but I enjoy trying to get the most out of my gun.

Before I knew this method I had purchased some expensive .22 target ammo and have very inconclusive results. Now that I know better I want to redo the test and see if fancy shmancy target ammo can do any better than cheaper stuff.
Good advice
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-30-2009, 09:58 PM
sharp_85 sharp_85 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 85
Default

Are you using the Winchester Super X solid tips, or hollowpoints? I've used the Super X hollowpoints for a couple years now and I get pretty decent carnage with them. I mean they don't blow gophers apart like my .22-250, lol, but there's usually guts spilling out wherever I hit them.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-30-2009, 10:16 PM
graham1's Avatar
graham1 graham1 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Right where I wanna be
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sharp_85 View Post
Are you using the Winchester Super X solid tips, or hollowpoints? I've used the Super X hollowpoints for a couple years now and I get pretty decent carnage with them. I mean they don't blow gophers apart like my .22-250, lol, but there's usually guts spilling out wherever I hit them.


Hollowpoints. I shot a few gophers the other day and about half you had to look to see where the bullet hit. They were dead quick but hardly any blood. Maybe I'm to fussy.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-30-2009, 11:28 PM
jackal's Avatar
jackal jackal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 133
Default 22lr

I have had good luck with win wildcats, in all of my 22s,
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-31-2009, 10:24 PM
berjerkin's Avatar
berjerkin berjerkin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Magrath
Posts: 542
Default

i've got nearly everybody i know converted to remington yellow jackets. very rarely a missfire, very accurate and very distructive on gophers.
__________________
Alberta: Liberal government free since 1921!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-01-2009, 08:44 AM
TheClash's Avatar
TheClash TheClash is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by berjerkin View Post
i've got nearly everybody i know converted to remington yellow jackets. very rarely a missfire, very accurate and very distructive on gophers.
these are terrible in my .22 (marlin mod 60)....it is a great choice for sure....but for some reason (i think it is the shape of the nose) my gun does not like them...too bad though.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-02-2009, 07:00 PM
Heckler's Avatar
Heckler Heckler is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raised by wolves View Post
Through several rifles, I have found the CCI Velocitors to be the most consistent for accuracy and velocity.
Ditto for me - like a couple of the other guys were saying I tried several brands of .22 varmint loads, the CCI Velocitors performed the best with my rifle hands down. What I really like about them is that they are a 40 gr bullet coming out at 1435 fps - lots of energy on target, you can really hear the thump when they connect!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-02-2009, 07:53 PM
WayneChristie's Avatar
WayneChristie WayneChristie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,770
Default

my vote is for the Yellowjackets.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-02-2009, 08:32 PM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've been shooting Remington game loads (think i paid $11 for a brick a few years ago) and they work well for small game hunting. We hunted jack rabbits and cottontails a lot down south with them and they seemed to do enough damage the rabbits never made it more that a yard or two. And jackrabbits are a lot of bunny, the big ones weigh 10-12 pounds. Maybe worth trying, my 10-22 had issues digesting the Winchester bullets my Dads 10-22 likes (wildcats). I've never tried 22 ammo that cost more than a couple bucks for 50 bullets but the game loads work well for rabbits, grouse, gophers, starlings, etc. I still haven't had one get caught in the action (Remington 10-22) after going through the first brick so they sure seem to cycle smooth. Only 2 more bricks to go .
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-03-2009, 07:28 PM
Gonehuntin''s Avatar
Gonehuntin' Gonehuntin' is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central AB
Posts: 398
Default

Federal 525 Bulk Pack Plated HP-Very consistent- kills squeaks dead.Plus I'm cheap.....won't part with the $ for Velocitors or Stingers or Yellowjackets, gets pricey @ 500+ rds. per day.....
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-03-2009, 07:30 PM
Gonehuntin''s Avatar
Gonehuntin' Gonehuntin' is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central AB
Posts: 398
Default

Has anybody seen any of those PMC Zapper shells around?They were great, pretty greasy, but accurate and lethal, have't seen them around, like to get some more.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-04-2009, 04:58 PM
Cal Cal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
Default

I agree with gone huntin, those bulk federal hollowpoints mess up a gopher good enough for me and shoot well out of both my 22's, and cost less than 20bucks a brick. Another plus is that the federal solid points shoot to the same point of impact in my 22's so I dont have to re sight my gun when I go grouse hunting. And if BBJ thinks that their good out to 200 yards they must be a hell of a 22 load
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-04-2009, 05:06 PM
joe-nwt joe-nwt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: should be obvious
Posts: 11
Default

Yellowjackets. Sure they cost a bit more than bulk ammo, but the cost is still a tiny fraction of what my annual gopher safari costs. And really, I'd hate like hell to have my evening beer budget surpass my daily rimfire budget anyway.....
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-04-2009, 06:21 PM
EagleEye54 EagleEye54 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 130
Default

I like Yellow Jackets. They kill pasture poodles very effectively and are very accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-01-2010, 10:21 AM
Rantastic Rantastic is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,289
Default

I'm stilla fan of the super X's $16 bucks a brick at Bass pro last time i was down a bought ten bricks. at 3 cents a shot its worth throwing a few extra bullets into each gopher if you wanna see damage.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-01-2010, 11:16 AM
duceman duceman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,831
Default

i've found those cheap american eagle hp's are most accurate in my 541s, from about a dozen different brands tried.
sighting in for the postal match coming up, i put 10 rounds in 1 3/4" over the hood of the truck the other day. lucky they work for me, bought 2 cases last fall when they were on sale at ufa.
for carnge, step to a centerfire. 10 gr of unqiue under a 50 gr tnt in my duce is cheap, quiet, and cool in the summer on the barrel.
and explosive!!
lee.
__________________
220swifty

1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.

2. #1 is true.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.