Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-11-2019, 05:51 PM
220 Swift 220 Swift is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE, Saskatchewan
Posts: 671
Default

Sorry i forgot to write this or take a photo of it but the liver on this deer wasnt hit by the bullet but had they hydrostatic shock and it had the look that
The other deer i have shot lungs where they jellied. This would have been a nearby shot but not direct.
Sorry i didnt take a photo but i know well what the liver is normally like and this one was mush. My Grampa eats it, He is always in there like a coyote. So i always have to cut it off for him.

Thanks for reminding me to write this Prairiewolf.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-12-2019, 07:50 AM
daveyn daveyn is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Near Longview AB
Posts: 546
Default

the problem is the average hunter doesn't understand the difference from one bullet to another or twist rate factors on bullet weights. If you make the .22 centerfire legal for deer hunting tben you get uninformed hunters using varmint bullets or inappropriate bullet weights , normally I would guess those would be exactly the same hunters that don't spend a lot of time on the range and the combination of factors is a mess.
the .22 center fire by itself wouldn't be the problem, as with most things in life, user error would be an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-12-2019, 07:57 AM
kingrat kingrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: prince albert
Posts: 1,838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveyn View Post
the problem is the average hunter doesn't understand the difference from one bullet to another or twist rate factors on bullet weights. If you make the .22 centerfire legal for deer hunting tben you get uninformed hunters using varmint bullets or inappropriate bullet weights , normally I would guess those would be exactly the same hunters that don't spend a lot of time on the range and the combination of factors is a mess.
the .22 center fire by itself wouldn't be the problem, as with most things in life, user error would be an issue.
X2
How many people when you ask what kind of a bullet they shoot say oh 150 grains. No I mean what type, brand, oh federals they have an orange tip. Most people have no idea what the differences are or care.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-12-2019, 08:07 AM
krthegunslinger krthegunslinger is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 548
Default 22-250

I’d love to use my 22-250 for deer instead there are lots of lighter , well constructed bullets that work for deer in .243. My most accurate rifles are my coyote slayers, wish I could use them for deer.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-12-2019, 08:37 AM
kritz's Avatar
kritz kritz is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 371
Default

Funny how you can search some post throughout and when talking 243, 7-08there will be eight pages of that gun is not enough and need a bigger magnum.
This post people are asking to utilize a smaller rifle caliber.

the problem with putting rules for smaller animals like deer, or class the animal would never work as most people will acknowledge how rules work in this world right now. the trouble will start when people see the grey area around each rule and press that grey area, then there is the enforcement of this grey area and added rules. would never work. It has to be a flat line across and it would have to have real good reason for a change. I personally don't see it happening in Alberta.
I don't disagree that these smaller calibers are fine for the smaller bodied animals. And I am also sure that we could have 5 pages of "there was this one time" stories.
JMO
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-15-2019, 12:16 AM
Diesel_wiesel Diesel_wiesel is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 809
Default

A friend of mine shot a nice buck with a 220swift
he said it was a 350 + yard shot
hit the buck in the heart
when I helped him dress out the deer
I was amazed at the devastation that little bullet did to that deer's heart
the heart was almost completely exploded
I don't think the buck ran 50 yards and piled up
the last year Alberta had open tags ( cant remember exactly what year that was )for bull moose in zone 348 I shot a bull moose with a 257 Roberts 89 grain Speer, 150 yards away I neck shot it and 3 vertebrates were totally demolished
sometimes bigger isn't better,
sometimes smaller isn't the route to go either
__________________
If you consider an unsuccessful hunt to be a waste of time,
then the true meaning of the chase Eludes you all together
you only get a second
shoot where their
going not where they been,
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-15-2019, 11:15 AM
daveyn daveyn is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Near Longview AB
Posts: 546
Default

There is no doubt that smaller calibers can be effective killers. One off anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything though. Only that it worked that time. Bella Twin killed a world record grizz with a .22 rimfire, but that doesn't prove a .22 rimfire is an effective Grizzly cartridge, but you go ahead and experiment if you'd like.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-15-2019, 11:40 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default

I’d love to use my .22-250 on deer.
But I also understand that a rifle with a 1 in 14”( typical of most .22-250’s) twist won’t do well stabilizing bullets over 55 grains.
How many hunters/shooters out there get this?
How many hunters/shooters understand the difference in construction between the 55 grain Sierra Gameking’s the OP used and a 55 grain Tipped Blitzking?

The level of inexperience the grave majority of hunter/shooters out there have, makes me say, leave the current cartridge limitations in Alberta alone, part of me would like to see the case length rule come back as there’s wonder children wanting to use 9mm carbines for deer hunting, that for one reason another think it’s cool, to try 100 yd pokes on deer with such firearms, using ammunition designed for rapid expansion.

But I digress.
Kudos to the OP, and enjoy the venison, you did your homework on bullet choice and the results show your due dillegence.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-15-2019, 12:08 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,584
Default

A person has to do their research as Dick284 stated.
Also, comparing Bella Twin and her 22 to hunting deer for recreation with a Swift is a bit of a stretch for me and heree's why.
Bella Twin did not have a heavy rifle wwith her, and when I lived in the bush for extended period of time the .22 was my main rifle, I didn't carry both with me.
Trappers use the .22 out of necessity , not choice, it is the rifle inn their hands and that is what gets used.
There are a pile of States and a few provinces that allow the centerfire .22's for hunting deer and the hunters using them do very well.

Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-15-2019, 12:29 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

The 22 centre fire rifles are lots of rifle for deer. The argument of not allowing people to use them because they could potentially wound more Game / it takes more skill is silly so many places have allowed it to be successfully used for years that argument is just personal opinions. People wound and lose a lot of game with all the classic chambering that everyone flocks to. a poorly placed 300wm shot is just as wounding as a poor 30-06 or a 223 shot.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 12-16-2019, 09:34 AM
NCC NCC is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leslieville
Posts: 2,503
Default

I know a guy in TX who tracks wounded deer with dogs, typically 100-150 calls per season. He tracks what each deer was shot with, and the 7mm Rem mag leads by a mile.
__________________
We talk so much about leaving a better planet to our kids, that we forget to leave better kids to our planet.

Gerry Burnie
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-16-2019, 09:30 PM
220 Swift 220 Swift is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE, Saskatchewan
Posts: 671
Default

Thanks for all the support on my experiment guys. I dont hunt in tree stands for deer but with these smaller calibres i wouldnt be scared as it would allow me time and the deer giving a proper shot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.