Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2018, 07:42 AM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default Rail cars and oil?

Can someone explain to me how rail cars full of oil going to the US is going to increase the price of Canadian crude? Seems to me it'll still be sold at a discounted rate or are the rail cars going to get it to a different market?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-01-2018, 07:49 AM
curtz curtz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Half Moon Lake ( North )
Posts: 1,454
Default

I'm not positive but I think they want to ship it to the west coast.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2018, 07:59 AM
Deer Hunter Deer Hunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
Default

When it's in a rail car it has a different and sometimes better market.
It cost 20-25$/bbl give or take to get it in a railcar to the gulf coast where it sees real world oil pricing.
Whereas that same oil in a Canada is seeing differentials of $40+/bbl because of lack of pipeline capacity.
Rail will help add capacity and provide immediate price improvements.
But how the government is going to manage this remains to be seen.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2018, 08:38 AM
blgoodbrand1's Avatar
blgoodbrand1 blgoodbrand1 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Beaverlodge
Posts: 1,859
Default

Not to derail....(that’s punny) but does anyone know the cost of this runaway train wreck?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2018, 08:41 AM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Nice to own rail cars, but the railways still own the tracks. Just ask the farmers how that is working out.

Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2018, 08:45 AM
Weedy1 Weedy1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blgoodbrand1 View Post
Not to derail....(that’s punny) but does anyone know the cost of this runaway train wreck?
I would think if Alberta ordered them from Bombardier Trudeau could come up with a plan to make them for free.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2018, 10:36 AM
big zeke big zeke is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,076
Default For heavy oils at least

Diluent is not required for shipment, this dil costs more than WTI and gets the same pricing as the deeply discounted heavy. Likewise once it's in a rail car it (theoretically) can be shipped to a port for offshore shipping at world prices.

The 7000 cars mentioned in media equates to like 68 unit trains, not sure there is that much open capacity on rails esp against seasonal shipments like grains.

A bigger concern is why are folks chasing a solution that will be many months away and full of logistical issues. A pipeline, a new one, should remain Plan A and we should stop chasing our tail cooking up this Plan B.

Has everyone forgotten that we now control TMX?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2018, 11:00 AM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,384
Default

The current depressed price of WCS is largely due to pipeline capacity restraints. Crude production in Alberta is more than they can move out of Hardisty and down the pipes to the south. This is causing a supply glut, which drops the price as producers compete to sell their oil. With rail cars moving crude, it’ll reduce the supply glut, and alleviate the downward pressure on the price.

Rail does cost 2-3x more (or higher, depending on what is currently being paid for tanker rail contracts, I’m sure there is so arbitrage going on) than using a pipeline, but when the differential is $40+, the economics of it make a ton of sense.

Have to realize WCS is a spot price. It’s the price of a certain blend of crude at a certain location. Move that crude elsewhere, and it’ll fetch a different spot price (ideally a lot more).
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2018, 11:14 AM
Scott h Scott h is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big zeke View Post
Diluent is not required for shipment, this dil costs more than WTI and gets the same pricing as the deeply discounted heavy. Likewise once it's in a rail car it (theoretically) can be shipped to a port for offshore shipping at world prices.

The 7000 cars mentioned in media equates to like 68 unit trains, not sure there is that much open capacity on rails esp against seasonal shipments like grains.

A bigger concern is why are folks chasing a solution that will be many months away and full of logistical issues. A pipeline, a new one, should remain Plan A and we should stop chasing our tail cooking up this Plan B.

Has everyone forgotten that we now control TMX?
How is plan A going so far??? People can whine and bitch and complain that there should be a pipeline built but the fact remains that it isn't and it might not be.
Kinda like the guy behind building the sturgeon refinery pointed out one time, that it might be cheaper to refine some where else, but if you can't get your product there it really doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2018, 11:21 AM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,384
Default

AFAIK, as soon as the NEB conducts a proper environmental impact assessment and respects the Duty to Consult with affected Indigenous nations, the pipeline expansion will be full steam ahead. Who knows how long that will take, however.
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-01-2018, 11:31 AM
Rastus Rastus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 396
Default

And "GUESS" who owns the rail cars? A friend of mine once said, the answer is money, now what is your question?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:11 PM
calgarychef calgarychef is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,699
Default

It wouldn’t surprise me one bit to see Trudeau with a stroke of the pen declare that it’s illegal to ship oil by rail.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:19 PM
big zeke big zeke is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,076
Default Not Great

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott h View Post
How is plan A going so far??? People can whine and bitch and complain that there should be a pipeline built but the fact remains that it isn't and it might not be.
Kinda like the guy behind building the sturgeon refinery pointed out one time, that it might be cheaper to refine some where else, but if you can't get your product there it really doesn't matter.
Rumor has it there might be some folks getting paid to obstruct the process, just a rumor mind you.

My point is, pipelines within Canada are something we control and all can benefit from. We currently forego like 15 bil/yr and yet there seems to be no appetite to fix this. The 3000 jobs lost by GM closing a plant in Ontario required swift action...Western Canada has lost like 20X as many jobs and the remedy is moving in slow motion.

Is the only way this can gain attention is by shutting off the taps east & west. I'm guessing Vancouver will be out of fuel in a day or so, no way to heat a latte!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:24 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,160
Default

It would likely take a year to build the cars and get them into service, but if the price doesn't go up a great deal , our oilsands plants will be shut down by then. They are selling oil for less than it costs to produce it, and I doubt they will continue doing that for another year.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:26 PM
1899b's Avatar
1899b 1899b is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sherwood Park Ab
Posts: 6,283
Default

Yeah let’s ship that stuff via rail. What could go wrong?? Lol
__________________
An awful lot of big game was killed with the .30-06 including the big bears before everyone became affluent enough to own a rifle for every species of game they might hunt.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:34 PM
NCC NCC is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leslieville
Posts: 2,503
Default

Not too much to go wrong railing heavy oil unless it details in a river or lake. I’m sure the flashpoint is considerably higher than the light oil which burned down Lac Magnetic (sp?)

According to one analyst who’s name I can’t recall, many of the gulf coast refineries have retooled for heavy Venezuelan oil, which is not getting delivered. Because of this, the price at the coast for heavy oil is higher than the WTI price. We just need to get it to those refineries.
__________________
We talk so much about leaving a better planet to our kids, that we forget to leave better kids to our planet.

Gerry Burnie
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:48 PM
bobcatguy bobcatguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 275
Default

I think if the current government thinks buying rail cars is right thing to do it probably isn't. Wasn't it just last year rail shipments of grain weren't able to keep up to demand?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-01-2018, 01:58 PM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Last year grain traffic was parked because of oil trains.

So the solution was more oil trains.....

Yeah. That should help the farmers!!!

INSTEAD there was a "NORTHERN GATEWAY LINE" all pre approved by First Nations groups, straight up to the relatively CALM and uncrowded waters of Prince Rupert. (Once you out of Chatam Sound, its open ocean. )

The advantage of Rupert is it is 56 hours closer to the Asian Markets who would buy the Crude.

But WAIT!!! There is a Great Northern Rain Forest that BM Trudeau once kayaked in so no OIL DELIVERIES FOR YOU!!!

You see, the obvious route that bypassed the busy port of Vancouver was in a region where there are few Liberal seats anyway, so lets blow 4.5 Billion fighting an uphill battle instead!!!

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-01-2018, 02:05 PM
jungleboy's Avatar
jungleboy jungleboy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 6,643
Default

7000 rail cars at a cost of a billion dollars is designed to do one thing, Make Notley look like she is somehow a champion of the oil industry .Listening to her chastise the "pipeline protesters" is laughable at best. The amount of oil that can be shipped by these magic NDP cars is a drop in the barrel compared to what a pipeline can achieve. Assuming they actually get the cars they still need the Track capacity to ship them ,along with car maintenance car storage fees, CN and CP don't do charity work.
If it costs 3 times the $$$ to get a barrel of oil to market on a train, along with the huge overhead to keep these cars ,what have we gained ? We have a Premier that is desperate for any glimmer of hope of re election and will spend any amount of money to get there This will be The NDP's very own billion dollar boondoggle

But hey what's another billion, right?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-01-2018, 02:10 PM
fishtank fishtank is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: edmonton
Posts: 3,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1899b View Post
Yeah let’s ship that stuff via rail. What could go wrong?? Lol
..Lac-Mégantic rail disaster
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-01-2018, 02:20 PM
220 Swift 220 Swift is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE, Saskatchewan
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blgoodbrand1 View Post
Not to derail....(that’s punny) but does anyone know the cost of this runaway train wreck?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unfortunately as bad as it sounds not as much as a hospital a day in lost Canadian revenue. Sure i know its not as safe as PL but short term.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2018, 02:36 PM
220 Swift 220 Swift is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE, Saskatchewan
Posts: 671
Default

Maybe it would make sense to dump the grains in the St lawrence, use the grains we need in Canada and toss the rest. This country is dependant on oil to control its economy as it Has become very obvious in the past 4 years. If the price of grain goes up or down no one even notices except the cbc and the lending institutions.

I am not here to cause a scrap. I was born and raised on mixed cattle farming operation. One thing i learned there as a young kid some times you whack things on the head that wont survive on their own. You can help them out but in the end they need to pull their own.

If Grains can compete with oil for trains , fine. The poorer grain commodities will sort them selves out by simple economics. Sadly to say, It could actually help the farmers pricing out with shortages of food in the world. I am also being seriously that some farmers shouldnt be in business either and some of the land that is farmed should not be farmed but left as grasslands.

Keep in mind oil companies are shutting in their marginal wells and fields too. So essentially oil guys are doing the whacking on the head of their potential salable product.

If its for the better of Canada every Canadian should be helping out.

Last edited by 220 Swift; 12-01-2018 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2018, 02:36 PM
GMX's Avatar
GMX GMX is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 533
Default

Oil has been flowing west on rail for awhile they’ve spent over four years upgrading the bridges out to prince Rupert for heavier loads. I’m assuming it’s for oil cars heading that way their also working on storage and Terminal upgrades on Ridley island . I’ve been told the railway has different laws for transporting oil witch makes it an easy option to ship it that way.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-01-2018, 03:00 PM
Scott h Scott h is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,518
Default

It wouldn't take to many trains loaded with bitumen going through Burnaby to get on the news (and it would very quickly) and people would be clamoring for a safer way to move it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2018, 04:03 PM
.257Weatherby .257Weatherby is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Near YVR
Posts: 1,237
Default

Some of the Farmers in the flat lands are having a hard time getting their crops to the waiting ships.
How does one propose to get the bitumen to the waiting ships when the rail lines are screwing regular waiting customers?
I say fill your boots Ms.Notley and build a refinery.
Rob
__________________
We sleep safe in our beds because rough men & women stand ready in the day/night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
RIP Pte Terry J Street 2nd Battalion, PPCLI, Shilo, Man. EOT, April 4 2008 Panjwayi District Afghanistan,Constable Jimmy Ng,RCMP EOW,Sunday, September 15, 2002
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2018, 04:16 PM
sjr sjr is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 675
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
It wouldn’t surprise me one bit to see Trudeau with a stroke of the pen declare that it’s illegal to ship oil by rail.
Nothing would surprise me what that Drama Queen Justin our dear PM would do or say these days
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-01-2018, 04:36 PM
Scott h Scott h is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by .257Weatherby View Post
Some of the Farmers in the flat lands are having a hard time getting their crops to the waiting ships.
How does one propose to get the bitumen to the waiting ships when the rail lines are screwing regular waiting customers?
I say fill your boots Ms.Notley and build a refinery.
Rob
From what I understand the new Northwest Refinery seems to be doing pretty darn good.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-01-2018, 06:57 PM
cdmc cdmc is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 384
Default

Alberta can build and ship as many cars as they want but the railcar mafia does what they please.
I work in an industry that CN is continuinly 1 week late for either a spot or pull service.
CN is better than CP.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-01-2018, 07:58 PM
dgrimard dgrimard is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 94
Default the answer is north

The answer is north for both rail and pipelines, to Norman Wells or Hay River even. then out from there. N.W.T. got the short end of the stick with the diamond mines when they split with Nunavut. Think of the good it would do for the territory and the jobs and people. Every one is hung up on B.C. but we have many other miles of coast line to build ports.

I say fine take your ball and go we will figure it out, with out you.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-02-2018, 05:47 AM
Kim473's Avatar
Kim473 Kim473 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weedy1 View Post
I would think if Alberta ordered them from Bombardier Trudeau could come up with a plan to make them for free.
I hear that a old car plant is going to be available soon. Comes with 2500 workers. They should be able to run a couple hundred train cars a day through it.
__________________
Kim

Gonna get me a 16" perch.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.