Quote:
Originally Posted by leeelmer
The problem here was clearly stated in the court documents.
They lost their sence of privacy
The plaintiff was using the entire pond paddleing right by his house and skating right up to it.
That was the issue. They paid big cash to be secluded with a large pond without being able to see their nabours.
Then people moved in and were using the entire waterway right upto their house.
This ****ed them off and they built a fence.
That inturn ****ed off the nabours as they had thought they could buy their little piece of paradise on a "lake" only owning a fraction of it.
I see both sides. But there must have been a pile of crap go on before spending this kind of cash
|
Agree. Seems like there could have been an easy compromise where both can enjoy but not get in each others space.
Threaded Mode
