Done and done. This should stay at the top.
My answer to several of the issues is that we need a better definition of a resident (physically present in AB for the previous 365 days) and outfitter allocations should be capped at 10% or whatever that are now, whichever is lower.
Monetizing more wildlife runs contrary to the North American model of wildlife conservation, and is a real slippery slope. Pretty soon those guys at 10% "can't make a living"
and need 15, then 20 etc. I don't want to see outfitters go out of business, but we sure don't need any more of them nor do they need a bigger piece of the pie. Any new/additional opportunities should go to residents.