Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2018, 07:42 PM
ssyd ssyd is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 752
Default Field sobriety tests

https://globalnews.ca/news/4739507/e...stop-campaign/

Saw this story on the news tonight and we got talking about checkstops and field sobriety tests.

First off, I don't care about the new mandatory testing without probable cause. It's never taken much for an officer to claim probable cause to give a field test so this news doesn't concern me one bit.

My real question for the LEOs here is this: If I know I am sober and I know I have crappy balance, can I (politely) ask to go straight to a breathalyzer instead of dancing a newfie jig while touching my nose on the side of the road?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2018, 08:00 PM
spoiledsaskhunter spoiledsaskhunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,701
Default

you can explain and ask, and probably be accommodated, but it's not your call in the end...….may as well try the field sobriety test and go in if you fail.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2018, 08:03 PM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyd View Post
https://globalnews.ca/news/4739507/e...stop-campaign/

Saw this story on the news tonight and we got talking about checkstops and field sobriety tests.

First off, I don't care about the new mandatory testing without probable cause. It's never taken much for an officer to claim probable cause to give a field test so this news doesn't concern me one bit.

My real question for the LEOs here is this: If I know I am sober and I know I have crappy balance, can I (politely) ask to go straight to a breathalyzer instead of dancing a newfie jig while touching my nose on the side of the road?
If they say no, just exaggerate your actions. Instead of your nose, stick it in your belly button. Do the moon walk for the straight line walk and finish off with a wet Willy. You’ll likely make good money on YouTube if recorded...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2018, 09:58 PM
Au revoir, Gopher's Avatar
Au revoir, Gopher Au revoir, Gopher is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Westerose
Posts: 4,030
Default

Beware of the Scottish sobriety test...

https://youtu.be/2FxEI45o5nQ

ARG
__________________
In the immortal words of Jean Paul Sartre, 'Au revoir, gopher'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjemac View Post
It has been scientifically proven that a 308 round will not leave your property -- they essentially fall dead at the fence line. But a 38 round, when fired from a handgun, will of its own accord leave your property and destroy any small schools nearby.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2018, 10:03 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

This could really extend the lines at Check Stops. ? First threshold is evidence of apparent impairment, why take it past that ?

Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2018, 10:16 PM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,520
Default

This is the best.... lmao
https://youtu.be/9tXREbvXKeA
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2018, 05:55 AM
WSMLEO WSMLEO is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 17
Default

Field sobriety tests in Alberta are only used for drug impaired driving, not alcohol. With alcohol it stays the same in that if an officer has reasonable and probable grounds to arrest you for impaired driving by alcohol, they will and then you are taken to give breath samples. If officers have reasonable suspicion that you are driving and that you have alcohol in your body (pretty low threshold to meet), they can demand a breath sample into a screening device. Based on the results of the screening device, they may develop grounds to believe you are impaired and arrest you and take you to get evidentiary breath samples. The only thing changing with this is that after December 18, officers no longer need to develop reasonable suspicion and can demand a sample into a screening device from anyone driving.


As far as any fears of getting charged with impaired for having bad balance, this would not happen. Like with alcohol screening devices, in order to conduct field sobriety tests on somebody, Police need reasonable suspicion that a person is driving after consuming a drug. This is not changing after December 18 and Police will continue to have to meet this threshold prior to doing field sobriety tests. As a result, Police will already have a nexus of some sort to a drug prior to doing a sobriety test ( person is driving and was observed smoking a joint or maybe a person is stopped and police find a crack pipe with indicia of recent use in the driver's pocket.


If a person fails the field sobriety test, they are then evaluated by a drug recognition expert. If after this evaluation, the DRE believes the person is impaired by a drug, Police may demand blood. The blood is drawn and the person is released without charges. Once the blood tests come back, if the results confirm the presence of the drug suspected by the DRE, the person is then charged with drug impaired driving.

As you can see, there is no way you could get charged for simply having bad balance or simply doing poorly on the field sobriety tests.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:33 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyd View Post
https://globalnews.ca/news/4739507/e...stop-campaign/

Saw this story on the news tonight and we got talking about checkstops and field sobriety tests.

First off, I don't care about the new mandatory testing without probable cause. It's never taken much for an officer to claim probable cause to give a field test so this news doesn't concern me one bit.

My real question for the LEOs here is this: If I know I am sober and I know I have crappy balance, can I (politely) ask to go straight to a breathalyzer instead of dancing a newfie jig while touching my nose on the side of the road?

Absolutely all you got to say is that you have a health/medical concern ref balance and that you could possibly get hurt so over to the breathalyzer.
Your not being difficult and safety is all involved concern.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:48 AM
Dewey Cox's Avatar
Dewey Cox Dewey Cox is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 204
Posts: 5,397
Default

Do they actually ask you to say the alphabet backwards?
I'm quite sure I can't do that.
Many years ago I was pulled over late at night and he asked me to say the months of the year backwards.
I said "Well, I guess I'm going to jail."
He said "Just give it a try"
And to my surprise I did it.
But I can't do the alphabet backwards.
But maybe if you can, it means you're on performance enhancing drugs?
__________________
"I like to quote my own quotes" ~ Dewey Cox
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2018, 09:00 AM
Savage Bacon's Avatar
Savage Bacon Savage Bacon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Calgary-Red Deer area
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey Cox View Post
Do they actually ask you to say the alphabet backwards?
I'm quite sure I can't do that.
Many years ago I was pulled over late at night and he asked me to say the months of the year backwards.
I said "Well, I guess I'm going to jail."
He said "Just give it a try"
And to my surprise I did it.
But I can't do the alphabet backwards.
But maybe if you can, it means you're on performance enhancing drugs?
Ya I'd be in trouble. The only way I know how to say the alphabet the proper way is by singing it in my head.
LMNOP
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-08-2018, 10:37 AM
fordtruckin's Avatar
fordtruckin fordtruckin is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In the woods
Posts: 8,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey Cox View Post
Do they actually ask you to say the alphabet backwards?
I'm quite sure I can't do that.
Many years ago I was pulled over late at night and he asked me to say the months of the year backwards.
I said "Well, I guess I'm going to jail."
He said "Just give it a try"
And to my surprise I did it.
But I can't do the alphabet backwards.
But maybe if you can, it means you're on performance enhancing drugs?
SFST’s are standardized and I never received any training asking people to recite the alphabet backwards. If they ask my guess is it’s part of a divided attention task something done to get you trying to do 2-3 simple tasks at once. If your intoxicated you have a real hard time divinding your attention to complete them. For example asking someone for their drivers license and how their day is going or where they are off too. Usually they can’t concentrate enough to carry on the conversation while looking for the license or vice versa.

I WAS trained before any SFST task to ask is there any medical condition that would prevent you from ..... if there is then I would ask if you wish to proceed or opt out of that test. Last thing I want is someone eating the curb while I’m out with them. Hell many times if people were failing I’d tell them to stop, take a deep breath and relax. Many people just get real nervous and can’t give clues to intoxication when they aren’t.
__________________
I feel I was denied, critical, need to know Information!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-08-2018, 12:29 PM
tri777's Avatar
tri777 tri777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSMLEO View Post
"...As you can see, there is no way you could get charged for simply
having bad balance or simply doing poorly on the field sobriety tests.."
Nope..I would not be so sure about that..
(Start vid @26:10)

https://www.cbc.ca/fifth/episodes/20...8/driving-high
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-08-2018, 01:32 PM
bat119's Avatar
bat119 bat119 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: On the border in Lloydminster
Posts: 8,342
Default

what is the field test for pot?

My buddy says they put you in the back seat of a cop car with an open bag of Dorito's it must be more complicated than that.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-08-2018, 07:56 PM
icehunter's Avatar
icehunter icehunter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bat119 View Post
what is the field test for pot?

My buddy says they put you in the back seat of a cop car with an open bag of Dorito's it must be more complicated than that.
McDonalds fries on the other side of you.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:10 PM
Ken07AOVette's Avatar
Ken07AOVette Ken07AOVette is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 24,072
Default

Double the number of checkstops Canada wide, then triple it and double it again.
__________________
Only dead fish go with the flow. The rest use their brains in life.


Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck
I wasn't thinking far enough ahead for an outcome, I was ranting. By definition, a rant doesn't imply much forethought.....
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-09-2018, 05:33 AM
makin tracks makin tracks is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 403
Default

https://youtu.be/SOoL1V6vCk4
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-09-2018, 07:12 AM
Weedy1 Weedy1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSMLEO View Post
Field sobriety tests in Alberta are only used for drug impaired driving, not alcohol. With alcohol it stays the same in that if an officer has reasonable and probable grounds to arrest you for impaired driving by alcohol, they will and then you are taken to give breath samples. If officers have reasonable suspicion that you are driving and that you have alcohol in your body (pretty low threshold to meet), they can demand a breath sample into a screening device. Based on the results of the screening device, they may develop grounds to believe you are impaired and arrest you and take you to get evidentiary breath samples. The only thing changing with this is that after December 18, officers no longer need to develop reasonable suspicion and can demand a sample into a screening device from anyone driving.


As far as any fears of getting charged with impaired for having bad balance, this would not happen. Like with alcohol screening devices, in order to conduct field sobriety tests on somebody, Police need reasonable suspicion that a person is driving after consuming a drug. This is not changing after December 18 and Police will continue to have to meet this threshold prior to doing field sobriety tests. As a result, Police will already have a nexus of some sort to a drug prior to doing a sobriety test ( person is driving and was observed smoking a joint or maybe a person is stopped and police find a crack pipe with indicia of recent use in the driver's pocket.


If a person fails the field sobriety test, they are then evaluated by a drug recognition expert. If after this evaluation, the DRE believes the person is impaired by a drug, Police may demand blood. The blood is drawn and the person is released without charges. Once the blood tests come back, if the results confirm the presence of the drug suspected by the DRE, the person is then charged with drug impaired driving.

As you can see, there is no way you could get charged for simply having bad balance or simply doing poorly on the field sobriety tests.
As of December 18 will people be legally required to perform a field sobriety test or blow into an roadside alcohol screening device or could they just opt out and ask to be tested at a police station?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-09-2018, 10:55 PM
WSMLEO WSMLEO is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 17
Default

If you are stopped and an ASD or SFST demand is read to you, you are required to participate in either a roadside breath screening or SFST exam. If you refuse you will be charged with refusal which carries the same penalty as impaired driving. The only thing changing is that police officers no longer need reasonable suspicion to demand a roadside breath sample of you after December 18. We still require reasonable suspicion to demand a Field Sobriety Test.

If you fail a roadside screening device you are then taken to a station for further evidentiary breath testing. Similarly, if you fail an SFST, you are taken to a station for a DRE exam. Either way, you are lawfully required to participate in the roadside test.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-10-2018, 03:51 AM
BCSteel BCSteel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: edmonton
Posts: 210
Default

So basically everyone is guilty of impaired driving until they prove themselves innocent.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-10-2018, 04:38 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCSteel View Post
So basically everyone is guilty of impaired driving until they prove themselves innocent.
It has been that way for far more than 30 years she re have you been?
You can refuse to blow but you will be charged with refusing to blow a breathylizer .
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-10-2018, 05:18 AM
Unregistered user Unregistered user is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
Double the number of checkstops Canada wide, then triple it and double it again.
But who would be left to catch the bank robbers?
__________________
Former Ford Fan
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-10-2018, 05:39 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,497
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCSteel View Post
So basically everyone is guilty of impaired driving until they prove themselves innocent.
Basically they are taking back the roads from idiots who think it is there right to drive impaired. Which is a good thing.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-10-2018, 08:09 AM
BCSteel BCSteel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: edmonton
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
It has been that way for far more than 30 years she re have you been?
You can refuse to blow but you will be charged with refusing to blow a breathylizer .
Cat
The difference now will be that there is not even the veil of your constitutionally protected right of assumed innocence because there is no longer any "suspicion" of guilt necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-10-2018, 09:20 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCSteel View Post
The difference now will be that there is not even the veil of your constitutionally protected right of assumed innocence because there is no longer any "suspicion" of guilt necessary.
They really didn’t need any before “ the suspect was swerving / had swerved “etc.......
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-10-2018, 09:39 AM
6.5 shooter's Avatar
6.5 shooter 6.5 shooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,205
Default

Chip, Chip, chip one freedom at a time welcome to Canada.
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-10-2018, 09:56 AM
Ricki Bobby Ricki Bobby is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 447
Default

Don't drive impaired.....no problem
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-10-2018, 11:49 AM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCSteel View Post
So basically everyone is guilty of impaired driving until they prove themselves innocent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCSteel View Post
The difference now will be that there is not even the veil of your constitutionally protected right of assumed innocence because there is no longer any "suspicion" of guilt necessary.
People need to think first.

Driving is a privilege. Liberty doesn't allow one to tread on others rights.

The right for everyone to be safe on the roads trumps your piddly idea of "how dare you stop me".....

LEO's have had the authority to stop anyone operating on a highway at anytime to check documentation, mechanical safety and sobriety.

Nothing is changing here. What is changing is the ability to make sure everyone is compliant.

The government loses money everytime someone is charged with impaired driving. There is no reward for them other than public safety.

So is it your paranoid desire to believe you are important enough to have a vendetta against you?

Its minutes out of your life to use an ASD roadside. It will get more unpaired drivers off the road.

I don't think people understand the epidemic drunk driving is actually.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
- Sir Winston Churchill

A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.
-Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-10-2018, 01:06 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,526
Default

Interesting thing about check stops and me personally
I quit drinking quite a few years ago (1987)
Gone through lots of check stops since .
NOT ONCE have been asked to do a sobriety test or blow in a breathylizer since I quit drinking!
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-10-2018, 02:45 PM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win View Post
People need to think first.

Driving is a privilege. Liberty doesn't allow one to tread on others rights.

The right for everyone to be safe on the roads trumps your piddly idea of "how dare you stop me".....

LEO's have had the authority to stop anyone operating on a highway at anytime to check documentation, mechanical safety and sobriety.

Nothing is changing here. What is changing is the ability to make sure everyone is compliant.

The government loses money everytime someone is charged with impaired driving. There is no reward for them other than public safety.

So is it your paranoid desire to believe you are important enough to have a vendetta against you?

Its minutes out of your life to use an ASD roadside. It will get more unpaired drivers off the road.

I don't think people understand the epidemic drunk driving is actually.
I understand your point Rem but for myself it is the gradual erosion of all my rights which has become a very slippery slope that I struggle with. The loss in personal freedoms is getting worse with every turn. If it is about public safety why do they allow part of the population to ride motorcycles without helmets?
Having speed traps at the bottom of hills etc. is not about safety either.....There is a very long list of the abuses of power that results in many losses of personal freedom the people of this country suffer from and it is getting worse. The RCMP and firearms? Where will that one end?
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-10-2018, 02:54 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
I understand your point Rem but for myself it is the gradual erosion of all my rights which has become a very slippery slope that I struggle with. The loss in personal freedoms is getting worse with every turn. If it is about public safety why do they allow part of the population to ride motorcycles without helmets?
Having speed traps at the bottom of hills etc. is not about safety either.....There is a very long list of the abuses of power that results in many losses of personal freedom the people of this country suffer from and it is getting worse. The RCMP and firearms? Where will that one end?
The issue that I have, is that your vehicle can be towed and held at considerable expense, with no proof of guilt, and no opportunity to prove your innocence and be compensated if you are innocent. In effect, a financial sentence is being handed out without ever being proven guilty.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.