Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2018, 12:59 PM
CMichaud's Avatar
CMichaud CMichaud is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Beijing, Canada
Posts: 1,470
Default Touchwood and Seibert

Looking at the regs looks like they are 0/0 for Walleye and Pike this year? (less Siebert has tags/draw)

I was looking them up on the regs for a buddy and he was shocked.

Are these lakes not doing well?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2018, 01:21 PM
FlyTheory's Avatar
FlyTheory FlyTheory is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,482
Default

Seibert is great, they must be trying to preserve its trophy-lake status and prevent overfishing. I can’t speak about touchwood, I’ve never been.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2018, 01:38 PM
Pikebreath Pikebreath is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,257
Default

Purely anecdotal,,,, We have fished Touchwood for a weekend in June for the past 15 or so years,, but our catch rate for pike has dropped off in Touchwood in recent years, certainly was getting harder to catch a legal pike in the last couple years. We used to get decent numbers of large pike (8 -15 lb with the odd one up to 20lb plus) prior to 2012.

Suspect the drop off may have been related to spawning failures in the dry years prior to 2010 ( spawning creeks were not always flowing fully). Since then, angling pressure may be just enough to keep the pike population from recovering fully to former levels.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2018, 02:14 PM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

I haven't fished either enough for an opinion but I can tell you that netting data is the main thing bios are using to make decisions now.

The netting data for Siebert look like the typical recovered walleye lake. Used to be known as a great pike lake but numbers are down now replaced by significant numbers of walleye. Still a few big pike but almost no smaller pike in their data(that could be in part due to the netting procedure but it doesn't look good, the previous netting data looked similar too).

Touchwood shows low to average numbers for both pike and walleye. What I call average is nowhere near what fisheries wants to see in these lakes though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2018, 07:46 AM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavYak View Post
I haven't fished either enough for an opinion but I can tell you that netting data is the main thing bios are using to make decisions now.

The netting data for Siebert look like the typical recovered walleye lake. Used to be known as a great pike lake but numbers are down now replaced by significant numbers of walleye. Still a few big pike but almost no smaller pike in their data(that could be in part due to the netting procedure but it doesn't look good, the previous netting data looked similar too).

Touchwood shows low to average numbers for both pike and walleye. What I call average is nowhere near what fisheries wants to see in these lakes though.
Has nothing to do with the Walleye. Unfortunately regulations have had keep 1 over 100cm for Pike for ever on Siebert which has essentially removed most of the big breeding hens out of the lake. It will take many years for it to recover.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2018, 08:38 AM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penner View Post
Has nothing to do with the Walleye. Unfortunately regulations have had keep 1 over 100cm for Pike for ever on Siebert which has essentially removed most of the big breeding hens out of the lake. It will take many years for it to recover.
I agree. I stopped fishing it about 5 years ago and even then the big ones were becoming a challenge to find.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2018, 09:38 AM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penner View Post
Has nothing to do with the Walleye. Unfortunately regulations have had keep 1 over 100cm for Pike for ever on Siebert which has essentially removed most of the big breeding hens out of the lake. It will take many years for it to recover.
A pike will have already bred multiple times before it is 100 cm. Something else was at play as well.

The netting data for both 2010 and 2015 show populations of fish 65-100 cm(all breeders) and almost nothing smaller.

Either that netting data was missing the smaller pike population due to net placement, the fish aren't reproducing successfully, there is a poaching issue, something is eating all the young pike(walleye?) or the small fish aren't able to compete with walleye.

I am not sure what the ultimate reason is(likely some combination of the above) but I am betting the walleye are having an effect. We have seen a similar pike reduction on a large number of other lakes now including Wabamun, Pigeon, Ste. Anne, Gull, Buck, Sylvan etc. The small pike are in direct competition with the walleye and the large walleye populations clean out the forage base to the point where the pike no longer do well. All these lakes have seen reductions in pike numbers and failure to recover even with C&R regs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.