|
|
09-11-2019, 09:45 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Mauser feeding problem
I have a late 50's BSA that is in almost unused condition but will not "grab" a cartridge out of the magazine. It will push the cartridge out of the magazine, but due to the extractor it will not allow the bolt to close. Any mauser action people out there ?????
|
09-11-2019, 09:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 14,966
|
|
The rim of the cartridge needs to slide between the extract and the bolt face while being pushed into place. If you sit a cartridge on top of the magazine follower loose, not pushed down into the mad well, will it feed that properly? If not, is the extractor free, or won't move?
|
09-11-2019, 12:28 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,815
|
|
The face of the extractor needs to be beveled properly to jump the rim of the cartridge
|
09-11-2019, 01:14 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2
The rim of the cartridge needs to slide between the extract and the bolt face while being pushed into place. If you sit a cartridge on top of the magazine follower loose, not pushed down into the mad well, will it feed that properly? If not, is the extractor free, or won't move?
|
No it won't. It will just push the shell forward into the chamber but the extractor doesn't go over the rim of the cartridge there by preventing the bolt from closing. The extractor does move but it seems quite tight. I have the identical rifle in 222 and it feels a similiar tightness. The difference is with the 222 by the time the cartridge gets into the chamber, the rim has moved up in between the extractor and the bolt face. The 30-06 fails to move into that position.
Last edited by Scott h; 09-11-2019 at 01:29 PM.
|
09-11-2019, 01:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fps plus
The face of the extractor needs to be beveled properly to jump the rim of the cartridge
|
Does the beveled edge of the extractor pop over the cartridge base?
|
09-11-2019, 01:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 14,966
|
|
Really hard to diagnose over email. Are u anywhere near edmonton, I would be happy to take a look at it for you.
The beveled edge will pop over a cartridge but that isn't the way a Mauser was designed to feed normally.
|
09-11-2019, 01:45 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,815
|
|
Most of the Mauser style extractors are not a true control feed anymore . Most are now designed so that the extractor can jump the rim if a cartridge runs ahead of the extractor.
|
09-11-2019, 01:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 14,966
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fps plus
Most of the Mauser style extractors are not a true control feed anymore . Most are now designed so that the extractor can jump the rim if a cartridge runs ahead of the extractor.
|
Agree but a late 50s BSA I am thinking would likely be either a redone 98 or a true control feed. It may also be a reworked Enfield. They made quite a few models so hard to know unless there is a picture or model posted.
Last edited by Dean2; 09-11-2019 at 01:54 PM.
|
09-11-2019, 01:49 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,815
|
|
Nope
|
09-11-2019, 01:55 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,815
|
|
Has the extractor been change ?
|
09-11-2019, 02:10 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fps plus
Has the extractor been change ?
|
I would really be surprised if it had, but I can't say for sure
|
09-11-2019, 02:15 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
|
09-11-2019, 02:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2
Really hard to diagnose over email. Are u anywhere near edmonton, I would be happy to take a look at it for you.
The beveled edge will pop over a cartridge but that isn't the way a Mauser was designed to feed normally.
|
Thanks, I appreciate your offer of help but unfortunately I'm in the Okanagan.
|
09-11-2019, 02:26 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,815
|
|
The underside of the extractor needs to be reworked slightly. The area where the cartridge first contacts the cartridge needs relief and a slight bevel . If unsure of what your doing don’t mess with it or can mess up extraction and possibly ejection . Chances of finding a new extractor will be slim
|
09-11-2019, 02:32 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
|
|
I agree with what fps is saying
Also, try it with a different brass manufacturer. Might change the way it slips under the extractor. Not all brass is the same dimensions as there are +/- tolerances.
|
09-11-2019, 03:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,527
|
|
That is a picture of a BSA Royal, my son has the same rifle in 257 Roberts.
he has never had any feeding issues with it, however.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
09-11-2019, 03:41 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
|
|
The BSA Royal Featherweights are great rifles.
Scotth's rifle looks like new. Very nice!
A bunch of them had that intergrated muzzle break though which was too bad...
|
09-11-2019, 03:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,527
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deer Hunter
The BSA Royal Featherweights are great rifles.
Scotth's rifle looks like new. Very nice!
A bunch of them had that intergrated muzzle break though which was too bad...
|
They are fantastic rifles for sure!I have seen CF2's and monarchs with brakes but never a Royal.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
09-11-2019, 07:19 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
They are fantastic rifles for sure!I have seen CF2's and monarchs with brakes but never a Royal.
Cat
|
My 30-06 has a brake, the 222 doesn't.
|
09-11-2019, 07:40 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
A shell fits under the extractor, but it sorta "snaps" into position. The 222 slides into position much easier without the "snap"
|
09-11-2019, 08:18 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,815
|
|
It is Normal to take a little effort to have the cartridge move up under the extractor. It is basically a big spring
|
09-11-2019, 09:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,205
|
|
I wonder if the extractor has been bent back a little from someone trying to single feed the rifle and forcing it over the case??? judging from the picture It looks like the "claw" has a death grip on the case??? if so, that maybe your problem.
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
|
09-11-2019, 09:45 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
|
|
Try Remington brass. Case heads are smaller. 0.464"
Winchester 0.466"
Norma 0.468"
|
09-11-2019, 10:33 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deer Hunter
Try Remington brass. Case heads are smaller. 0.464"
Winchester 0.466"
Norma 0.468"
|
I'll give that a try
|
09-12-2019, 06:43 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,768
|
|
I would not modify the nose of the extractor. Extractor tension which is controlled by the extractor tail/body is where I would start. The other thing I’d say is that with brass, the case head diameter is far less important to extractor fit than the leading angle of the extractor groove itself. That angle interfaces with the face of the extractor creating tension between the two.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
09-12-2019, 07:20 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,768
|
|
I would not rule out magazine box or feed rails either. In short, I’d be very careful who I sent it to for any modifications.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
09-12-2019, 08:14 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
I would not rule out magazine box or feed rails either. In short, I’d be very careful who I sent it to for any modifications.
|
That's what I worry about, after it sitting for 60 years I'd hate to ruin it by sending it to someone that starts grinding down something only to find out that they guessed wrong.
|
09-12-2019, 08:17 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,543
|
|
Are you reloading your own ammo? Check that you are not making your rounds too long. The round could be jumping out of the magazine box too early if it the nose of the bullet is hitting the feed ramp to early by being extra length.
|
09-12-2019, 09:06 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyksta
Are you reloading your own ammo? Check that you are not making your rounds too long. The round could be jumping out of the magazine box too early if it the nose of the bullet is hitting the feed ramp to early by being extra length.
|
I hadn't ever shot the rifle so I reloaded up some shells for it and on my first try I found out about the problem (probably why it's seen so little use). I have tried to get it to feed at home with empty cases with the same result.
|
09-12-2019, 09:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott h
A shell fits under the extractor, but it sorta "snaps" into position. The 222 slides into position much easier without the "snap"
|
That's a wicked looking extractor .
Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:35 AM.
|