Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2020, 04:43 PM
thorne's Avatar
thorne thorne is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 1,085
Default Why Rainbows????

Just curious if anyone knows WTF the Gov spends all this money on stocking rainbows? Honestly in the ponds they stock them in, they don't taste very good or do very well...more of a moving water variety. How ever Brookies or Cut Throats would do much better, and are VERY tasty...any thoughts??
__________________
NO BAD WEATHER, JUST BAD GEAR!!
Remember 99.8% of fishin gear is ment to catch fishermen....not fish!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2020, 04:59 PM
WinefredCommander WinefredCommander is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: WMU 402
Posts: 515
Default

Rainbows are cheap. Cutts are not. And brookies don’t bite all the time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2020, 05:09 PM
Mr Flyguy Mr Flyguy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thorne View Post
Just curious if anyone knows WTF the Gov spends all this money on stocking rainbows? Honestly in the ponds they stock them in, they don't taste very good or do very well...more of a moving water variety. How ever Brookies or Cut Throats would do much better, and are VERY tasty...any thoughts??
I think, make that know, that that they do very well indeed in the ponds. It's not the trout's fault that they don't taste very good, it's the water and diet. If you don't like the taste, don't kill them and just buy your fish at Costco!
__________________
I fish, therefore I am.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-13-2020, 05:25 PM
the local angler the local angler is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,593
Default

i also wish they would stock brookies and or cutts but these two species of trout maybe prefer colder waters? are stocked ponds too warm for them and maybe rainbows adapt better??
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-13-2020, 05:30 PM
pikergolf's Avatar
pikergolf pikergolf is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,358
Default

Brookies and Cutts would not do better. Rainbows are tough enough, easy to raise and people like them. Perfect for put and take. Browns might do better, but are harder to catch. Any fish out of a pond will not taste good in July and August, unless maybe a Sunfish which we don't have in Ab.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-13-2020, 05:42 PM
thorne's Avatar
thorne thorne is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 1,085
Default

K...fair enough, was curious and now have some good answers...THANKS! They are just not my thing, guess thats why I dont fish em...lol.
__________________
NO BAD WEATHER, JUST BAD GEAR!!
Remember 99.8% of fishin gear is ment to catch fishermen....not fish!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-13-2020, 05:44 PM
tallieho tallieho is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,217
Default

Rainbows are cheaper to grow from our stocks.They tend not to eat there young,are more tolerant to warmer waters.Brooks are notorious for stunting/over populating.Need cooler water to live,are hard to catch.Tend to eat ,there young & not much on adapting to a bug type diet[winter].Cuts.Easier to catch,grow slow,hard to aquire eggs.Not very many stocks that have adapted to lakes,unless crossing with rainbows.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-13-2020, 09:35 PM
4extreme 4extreme is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 248
Default

I`ve wondered why not stock walleye, there seems to be a short supply of them and you always need a tag.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-13-2020, 10:16 PM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,108
Default

The trout will taste like the lake no matter the species. Rainbows are great fighters usually get air borne and will make great runs once the get a over few pounds and larger, cutties not to far behind. Browns and brookies pull not bad but generally just bulldog. Rainbows are tough to beat pound for pound. BC stocks mostly rainbows as well for reasons others have already mentioned.

I’d like to see more variety just to mix things up. Seems like current minster is doing just that. Different fish require different techniques that challenges ones skills. Some of the others species are more eye catching than bows in my opinion too.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-13-2020, 10:19 PM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4extreme View Post
I`ve wondered why not stock walleye, there seems to be a short supply of them and you always need a tag.
Walleye are quite costly to produce. They also need a large forage base to survive. Most stocked ponds could not support a Walleye population because of that.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-13-2020, 10:40 PM
flyrodfisher flyrodfisher is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4extreme View Post
I`ve wondered why not stock walleye, there seems to be a short supply of them and you always need a tag.
Sheesh....have you seen the historical walleye stockings in this province....massive numbers stocked...for years...

For example...in 2009 SRD stocked 52,080,000 walleye into Alberta lakes!
YES...that is 52 MILLION

That same year only 2,900,000 rainbow were stocked...
In 2010...18 Million walleye
In 2011...28 million walleye
In 2012....6.5 million walleye

ETC


INFO directly from the SRD annual stocking reports online.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-13-2020, 11:43 PM
wind drift wind drift is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 719
Default

Really can’t compare trout and walleye stocking numbers. Totally different reproductive strategies. Walleye go for quantity over quality. Walleye eggs are wee and the fry hatch out basically as plankton and drift about eating microscopic critters and getting eaten by slightly bigger critters for a week or two before actin good like real fish. Trout eggs are quite big and the fry hatch out larger, with yolk sacs and avoidance behaviour (ducking into the gravel). I had a bio tell me once, maybe exaggerating to make a point, that you could put 1 million walleye fry in a 5 gallon bucket.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-14-2020, 02:03 AM
flyrodfisher flyrodfisher is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift View Post
Really can’t compare trout and walleye stocking numbers. Totally different reproductive strategies. Walleye go for quantity over quality. Walleye eggs are wee and the fry hatch out basically as plankton and drift about eating microscopic critters and getting eaten by slightly bigger critters for a week or two before actin good like real fish. Trout eggs are quite big and the fry hatch out larger, with yolk sacs and avoidance behaviour (ducking into the gravel). I had a bio tell me once, maybe exaggerating to make a point, that you could put 1 million walleye fry in a 5 gallon bucket.
True...just pointing out that massive amounts of Walleye stocking have taken place.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-14-2020, 02:10 AM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,628
Default

Don't think all pothole trout taste bad. If the pothole lake or reservoir has springs and/or inlet & outlet streams and lots of freshwater shrimp and minnows the trout taste a bit better.
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-14-2020, 05:43 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bullets View Post
Don't think all pothole trout taste bad. If the pothole lake or reservoir has springs and/or inlet & outlet streams and lots of freshwater shrimp and minnows the trout taste a bit better.
Depth is a key factor too.....they get a muddy earthy like taste and thier bodies turn really soft.....head to the mountains I say!
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-14-2020, 10:23 AM
CardiacCowboy CardiacCowboy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 243
Default

Rainbow stocking has been going on for over 100 years all over north america. It is a know science with the best strains well studied. The stocked ponds I fish are all in the foothills so spring or creek feed and taste good after 2 weeks in water body.

I think if you are thinking of put and take ponds rainbows are the best. For water bodies with natural reproducing fish variety would be nice but tampering with a health system to add fish rarely goes well.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-14-2020, 11:24 AM
CranePete CranePete is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Williams Lake, BC
Posts: 307
Default

Here in BC, rainbow strains like Blackwater and Gerard are stocked in some lakes that have populations of coarse fish such as shiners. They’ll not be able to completely eradicate them, but can help keep the numbers down. Bonus: triploids don’t take time out for spawning, they just get bigger and bigger. Ask anyone who’s fished Sheridan Lake.
Tight lines.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-15-2020, 11:34 AM
Jokey75 Jokey75 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penner View Post

I’d like to see more variety just to mix things up. Seems like current minster is doing just that. .
This actually has nothing to do with the current govt minister.
Surveys started 3-4 years ago and most anglers were wanting more fish variety. The Bios answered with proposals for multi species lakes where they felt they would work best. 2 years ago more species like tigers and browns were added to the usual mix of rainbows.

This is all a result of angler feedback so if you filled out a survey (i know I've filled out several over the years) the new species variety is, in part, thanks to you.

J
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-15-2020, 02:57 PM
Bushleague Bushleague is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jokey75 View Post
This actually has nothing to do with the current govt minister.
Surveys started 3-4 years ago and most anglers were wanting more fish variety. The Bios answered with proposals for multi species lakes where they felt they would work best. 2 years ago more species like tigers and browns were added to the usual mix of rainbows.

This is all a result of angler feedback so if you filled out a survey (i know I've filled out several over the years) the new species variety is, in part, thanks to you.

J
Since the trout arent supposed to be re-producing anyway, does anyone know what would be the downside of stocking smallmouth bass or channel cats? Just always wondered.
__________________
If the good lord didnt want me to ride a four wheeler with no shirt on, then how come my nipples grow back after every wipeout?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-15-2020, 03:27 PM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushleague View Post
Since the trout arent supposed to be re-producing anyway, does anyone know what would be the downside of stocking smallmouth bass or channel cats? Just always wondered.
Smallies were stocked in several lakes unsuccessfully. Island lake by hanmore being most recent. They don’t reproduce.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:08 PM
Bushleague Bushleague is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talking moose View Post
Smallies were stocked in several lakes unsuccessfully. Island lake by hanmore being most recent. They don’t reproduce.
I understand that, my point was, in most cases the trout are not supposed to reproduce either... same difference.
__________________
If the good lord didnt want me to ride a four wheeler with no shirt on, then how come my nipples grow back after every wipeout?

Last edited by Bushleague; 07-15-2020 at 04:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:18 PM
Smoky buck Smoky buck is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 7,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushleague View Post
I understand that, my point was, in most cases the trout are not supposed to be reproduce either... same difference.
Cost and availability is the only advantage to rainbows over the species you suggested. There is also the whole regulatory issues that arise from bringing in stock from out of province too but I don’t know Alberta’s rules regarding this

Personally I basically hate fishing for rainbows after working with them for years and would prefer more non trout stocking programs
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:30 PM
NoodlesTM NoodlesTM is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Default

Slightly off topic but the book An Entirely Synthetic Fish: How Rainbow Trout Beguiled America and Overran the World is worth a read.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-15-2020, 09:19 PM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,922
Default

Rainbows are the timex watch of the hatchery trout world, they are cheaper than the others, take a licking and keep on ticking.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-15-2020, 11:13 PM
goldscud goldscud is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,965
Default

The bad taste comes from the type of algae in the water....not the species of trout/char
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-15-2020, 11:25 PM
Smoky buck Smoky buck is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 7,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldscud View Post
The bad taste comes from the type of algae in the water....not the species of trout/char
Correct the bad taste is not do to the species but it is a lot more than just algae that effects the flavor. Water temp, quality, and forage are the factors that all have a role

Some of the waters that are stocked with rainbows will always produce muddy fish do to the conditions. But if you stocked a species(not trout) better suited for the conditions you would see better eating fish
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-16-2020, 05:55 AM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,108
Default

Caught trout and Perch from same lake back in the day. One bite of the trout and it was not edible, Perch tasted perfectly fine.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-16-2020, 08:36 AM
Smoky buck Smoky buck is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 7,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penner View Post
Caught trout and Perch from same lake back in the day. One bite of the trout and it was not edible, Perch tasted perfectly fine.
No surprise perch are way more tolerant to poor water quality and warm temps
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-16-2020, 09:09 AM
pinelakeperch's Avatar
pinelakeperch pinelakeperch is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,445
Default

I've found that putting trout in a saltwater brine for an hour before cooking helps to remove any muddiness.

Man, I'd love to see some crappie and/or bluegill put into some of the prairie lakes.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-16-2020, 09:12 AM
aulrich's Avatar
aulrich aulrich is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,112
Default

I don't know if this is fully applicable but a while ago I read an aussy article about getting better tasting prussan carp (I guess they have that problem too) but the article said that if you are fishing at the upper limits of water temp for a fish it's best to bleed and ice the fish right off, vs having them die slowly on a stringer. the hormones produce by a heat stressed fish either magnify or actually produce the "muddy flavor".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.