Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2018, 07:33 AM
mattthegorby mattthegorby is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
Default Sako A7 in 7mm-08 or Kimber Hunter in 6.5CM?

Crap... deciding on a first centerfire rifle is hard. Thought I would run this by you good folks to see what input you may have.

I am a new shooter/hunter and right now I own a CZ 452 that I love to hike with and practice shooting. This new rifle will be bought for backpack hunting mule deer and elk with dreams of sheep (some truck hunting as well, but that will not be primary use). After the season, it will still be strapped to my pack as I go scouting and shooting in the mountain WMU's.

Both the Sako A7 in 7mm-08 or Kimber Hunter in 6.5CM will meet my needs/wants I am sure - low recoil, light with true short action that feels great in the store, stainless, just fall within my budget, can order them within a week, magazine for when truck hunting and getting in/out vehicles, and they feel like quality units.

Strengths of Sako - 7mm-08 may be more flexible as I can apparently run a heavier bullet for larger game and the rifle itself feels more substantial in my hand.

Strengths of Kimber - 6.5CM seems to be the hot thing and more ammo choices down the road may be available, it also may have a slight edge for target shooting. The Kimber is also reaaaaly light.

When I shoulder both rifles it is hard for me to tell which is better for fit without a scope. My line of vision is definitely higher on the Kimber and feels like I may need taller rings - the Sako nestles in nicely but may need a cheekrest.

Thanks for any opinions... serious and otherwise.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2018, 07:50 AM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,445
Default

kimber
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:31 AM
mattthegorby mattthegorby is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2 View Post
kimber
OK, maybe I am over thinking this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:33 AM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2 View Post
kimber
^^^I'm with him^^^
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:43 AM
Ice Fishing Maniac's Avatar
Ice Fishing Maniac Ice Fishing Maniac is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,171
Default

Why not consider a Sako Roughtech Pro in the 6.5 CM ??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:51 AM
mattthegorby mattthegorby is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice Fishing Maniac View Post
Why not consider a Sako Roughtech Pro in the 6.5 CM ??
Cost. About $400 more. I am tempted, but hard sell to the other interested party.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:53 AM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

No contest, Sako A7 and don't think twice. I used to own an A7 soft touch stainless in 30-06 and it was a good shooter and I felt the stock was a lot stiffer and better designed than those on cheaper rifles.
Mine came with a cheap burris scope and rings mounted on weaver bases, but I replaced the scope and bought one piece Talley lightweight rings (browning a-bolt rings fit the A7) and threw out the weaver bases. It's a very friendly rifle for scope mounting, with a low bolt lift and no need to deal with inflexible proprietary rings and bases like its big brother Sako 85.
I'm not sure if you have a scope picked out, but with the 90 degree bolt lift of the Kimber, many scopes with larger diameter eyepieces simply will not mount low enough to be comfortable, this might sound trivial, but if you end up finding a scope that you love, and it doesn't work right with your rifle, you'll end up changing rifles.... been there more than once myself.
I've never fired a Kimber hunter, but I've played with them in store, the stock is far inferior to the A7, especially if you buy the roughtech version, the barrel is a thinner profile which will make range time less fun for sure, and I hate the blocky plastic magazine with its cheezy plastic release tab.
In short, scopes will mount lower on the A7, the stock is superior, the magazine is way better, it has a slightly heavier, but still sporter weight barrel, and you can expect better accuracy from the A7.

I sold mine because I have too many rifles and synthetic stocks don't really excite me so it never got used much.

I will say, Kimber makes several rifles I would definitely own, but they are priced much higher than the Hunter, which is a budget gun along the lines of a Ruger American, or Winchester XPR, but without the budget price.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:56 AM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

I see people recommending Kimber, are you guys familiar with the Hunter model? It's not the same as a mountain ascent or Montana, the magazine alone is a deal breaker in that price point, not to mention the stock.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-26-2018, 09:18 AM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice Fishing Maniac View Post
Why not consider a Sako Roughtech Pro in the 6.5 CM ??
^^^^^I'm with him

or the A7 708 like this with some mods...this is one gun I'll never sell.


Last edited by CNP; 05-26-2018 at 09:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-26-2018, 09:39 AM
hogie hogie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Millet
Posts: 854
Default

I have the A7 roughtech pro in 308. Very accurate rifle. Trigger is decent. I like the mag function on these. You can load from top without dropping mag. To release the mag have to push up on it. Makes it harder to accidentally drop out. Another feature is 3 position safety, remove a loaded round with safety on if needed. Short bolt lift is a bonus as well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-26-2018, 11:44 AM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,445
Default

I've had multiple A7s and many, many Kimbers. Get the Kimber. IMO, the best value in a pure hunting rifle. Better trigger. Lighter. Same accuracy guarantee.

A plastic stock is a plastic stock.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-26-2018, 03:44 PM
mattthegorby mattthegorby is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakoShooter View Post
No contest, Sako A7 and don't think twice. I used to own an A7 soft touch stainless in 30-06 and it was a good shooter and I felt the stock was a lot stiffer and better designed than those on cheaper rifles.
Mine came with a cheap burris scope and rings mounted on weaver bases, but I replaced the scope and bought one piece Talley lightweight rings (browning a-bolt rings fit the A7) and threw out the weaver bases. It's a very friendly rifle for scope mounting, with a low bolt lift and no need to deal with inflexible proprietary rings and bases like its big brother Sako 85.
I'm not sure if you have a scope picked out, but with the 90 degree bolt lift of the Kimber, many scopes with larger diameter eyepieces simply will not mount low enough to be comfortable, this might sound trivial, but if you end up finding a scope that you love, and it doesn't work right with your rifle, you'll end up changing rifles.... been there more than once myself.
I've never fired a Kimber hunter, but I've played with them in store, the stock is far inferior to the A7, especially if you buy the roughtech version, the barrel is a thinner profile which will make range time less fun for sure, and I hate the blocky plastic magazine with its cheezy plastic release tab.
In short, scopes will mount lower on the A7, the stock is superior, the magazine is way better, it has a slightly heavier, but still sporter weight barrel, and you can expect better accuracy from the A7.

I sold mine because I have too many rifles and synthetic stocks don't really excite me so it never got used much.

I will say, Kimber makes several rifles I would definitely own, but they are priced much higher than the Hunter, which is a budget gun along the lines of a Ruger American, or Winchester XPR, but without the budget price.
This actually resonates with me quite a bit. I have gone through these challenges with my CZ 452 and it was a chore getting a scope and ring combo that would work due to the high bolt throw.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-26-2018, 03:48 PM
mattthegorby mattthegorby is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
Default

Thanks all, almost didn't post this as I realize that many of these choices are apples and oranges, but I have a bunch to consider with mags, bolt throw, stocks, etc... when I go look at them one last time before committing.

It is hard not to get swept into the cartridge craziness and debates, but I think either of these will serve me well for my purposes.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-26-2018, 03:56 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakoShooter View Post
No contest, Sako A7 and don't think twice. I used to own an A7 soft touch stainless in 30-06 and it was a good shooter and I felt the stock was a lot stiffer and better designed than those on cheaper rifles.
Mine came with a cheap burris scope and rings mounted on weaver bases, but I replaced the scope and bought one piece Talley lightweight rings (browning a-bolt rings fit the A7) and threw out the weaver bases. It's a very friendly rifle for scope mounting, with a low bolt lift and no need to deal with inflexible proprietary rings and bases like its big brother Sako 85.
I'm not sure if you have a scope picked out, but with the 90 degree bolt lift of the Kimber, many scopes with larger diameter eyepieces simply will not mount low enough to be comfortable, this might sound trivial, but if you end up finding a scope that you love, and it doesn't work right with your rifle, you'll end up changing rifles.... been there more than once myself.
I've never fired a Kimber hunter, but I've played with them in store, the stock is far inferior to the A7, especially if you buy the roughtech version, the barrel is a thinner profile which will make range time less fun for sure, and I hate the blocky plastic magazine with its cheezy plastic release tab.
In short, scopes will mount lower on the A7, the stock is superior, the magazine is way better, it has a slightly heavier, but still sporter weight barrel, and you can expect better accuracy from the A7.

I sold mine because I have too many rifles and synthetic stocks don't really excite me so it never got used much.

I will say, Kimber makes several rifles I would definitely own, but they are priced much higher than the Hunter, which is a budget gun along the lines of a Ruger American, or Winchester XPR, but without the budget price.
How is the Kimber Hunter stock inferior to the A7 stock?
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-26-2018, 04:38 PM
vcmm's Avatar
vcmm vcmm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Vulcan Ab
Posts: 3,871
Default

A7 for me. Mines accurate and well built.
__________________
"It's like bragging that it's 10 CENTIMETERS LONG! (when really, it's 4" dude, settle down)"
Huntinstuff


"Me neither but it's all in the eye of the beer holder"
norwestalta

.....out of bounds.....but funny none the less!

LC

"Funny how when a bear eats another bear, no one bats an eye, but......

when a human eats another human, people act like it's the end if the friggin world. News coverage, tweets, blogs, outrage, Piers Morgan etcetc.

Go figure." -Huntinstuff
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-26-2018, 06:06 PM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
How is the Kimber Hunter stock inferior to the A7 stock?
It's not as stiff, uglier, and has a less "grippy" finish to it. Of course this is somewhat subjective, but I think if you put them side by side, most would choose the Sako stock easily.

Just my opinion, and I do like Kimber rifles, except for the bolt lift.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-26-2018, 08:06 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,769
Default

You are right. It is subjective.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-26-2018, 09:13 PM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

Yes, some people possibly prefer a shiny, slippery, flexible plastic feeling stock. ��
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-26-2018, 09:31 PM
Coiloil37's Avatar
Coiloil37 Coiloil37 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oz
Posts: 2,109
Default

If it were my money I would find a used montana for about the same price. In fact I’ve done just that a few times now. I would also keep my eyes open for an 84m or 84l in the classic or classic select but you didn’t say you were interested in wood. If I had to choose between the two options you gave, I would take the kimber.
If you do buy the hunter check the canadian tire in rocky. Last time I was in there they were $999 brand new. That said, the last time I was in there was this time last year.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-26-2018, 09:37 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakoShooter View Post
Yes, some people possibly prefer a shiny, slippery, flexible plastic feeling stock. ��
Out of curiosity how many Kimbers have you owned?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-26-2018, 10:05 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakoShooter View Post
Yes, some people possibly prefer a shiny, slippery, flexible plastic feeling stock. ��
News flash. Your A7 stock is plastic.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-26-2018, 10:06 PM
mattthegorby mattthegorby is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coiloil37 View Post
If it were my money I would find a used montana for about the same price. In fact I’ve done just that a few times now. I would also keep my eyes open for an 84m or 84l in the classic or classic select but you didn’t say you were interested in wood. If I had to choose between the two options you gave, I would take the kimber.
If you do buy the hunter check the canadian tire in rocky. Last time I was in there they were $999 brand new. That said, the last time I was in there was this time last year.
That is a great price. Locally, ordering in would be somewhere over $1100. I will likely buy locally just because I have been tire kicking at this same small store for awhile.

I should look used though, I am always telling others to do that for other gear. Guess I am a bit gun shy at buying someone else's problem if I do not know the seller.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-26-2018, 10:23 PM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
News flash. Your A7 stock is plastic.
Um, thanks for the information? I no longer have an A7 actually, and what I said was that the Kimber Hunter stock had a more plastic look and feel compared with the Sako A7 soft touch stock. Feel free to disagree, though I'm not sure if you're disagreeing, or just being snarky?

I'm sure the original poster can make up his own mind, and in the end will be the one to live with his choice.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-27-2018, 09:17 PM
birdslayer birdslayer is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: leduc
Posts: 104
Default kimber or A - 7

own them both and I find the A-7 IN 25-06 A little fussy what I put down the barrel and the kimber 8400 is a smooth as silk beautiful rifle that is better balanced for a 30-06 . kimber is a little bit heavier but does it ever shoot nice , my choice is the kimber .
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-27-2018, 11:40 PM
Zuludog's Avatar
Zuludog Zuludog is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Beaumont
Posts: 3,385
Default

I wonder if people are reading the post? It seems like some of you are comparing the A7 to the Montana. There is a big difference in the stocks between the Hunter model and the Kimber Montana or Mountain Ascent.

I have an original not soft touch stock A7 and I have handled a few Kimbers and while the actions were smooth I would hesitate to say that they were smoother than the A7. Accuracy is probably a wash, although with a slightly thicker barrel and overall weight I would give a slight edge to the Sako. Also there are reports of Kimber roulette and I hear many many reports of the A7 being a laser. Do some searching and confirm for yourself if you want. 😀

Weight advantage goes to the Kimber.

The Kimber stock is definitely inferior to the Sako, when comparing the Hunter model to the A7. The A7 is much more rigid and doesn't have big seams like some cheap plastic injection molded toy. The fore end is also to thin but that's subjective.

The 3 position safety is nice, the magazine is nicer with a better release and the lower bolt throw make it an easy choice.

If it was the A7 vs the Montana I'd probably go for the Kimber especially for a mountain rifle.
__________________
The kill is the satisfying, indeed essential, conclusion to a successful hunt. But, I take no pleasure in the act itself. One does not hunt in order to kill, but kills in order to have hunted. Then why do I hunt? I hunt for the same reason my well-fed cat hunts...because I must, because it is in the blood, because I am the decendent of a thousand generations of hunters. I hunt because I am a hunter.- Finn Aagard
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-28-2018, 05:32 AM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,445
Default

Zulu... There is an accuracy guarantee with the Kimber the exact same as the Sako. They even include a test target.

I don't see anyone confusing a Hunter for a Montana.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-28-2018, 07:46 AM
West O'5 West O'5 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: W5
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coiloil37 View Post
If it were my money I would find a used montana for about the same price. In fact I’ve done just that a few times now.
Sooooooo....are you saying you currently own a few Kimbers,or you get rid of them as fast as you buy them?
__________________
The toughest thing about waiting for the zombie apocalypse is pretending that I'm not excited.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-28-2018, 08:22 AM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice Fishing Maniac View Post
Why not consider a Sako Roughtech Pro in the 6.5 CM ??
exactly what i was thinking!

browning has one like it too, xbolt pro, it may be a bit more expensive though as it has a carbon fiber stock!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-28-2018, 08:25 AM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

The Browning with the carbonfibre stock is $2,300. The A7 roughtec is definitely a cut above the Kimber Hunter which is a high priced cheapo rifle

Not to be confused with the Kimber Montana which is a very nice rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-28-2018, 08:45 AM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakoShooter View Post
The Browning with the carbonfibre stock is $2,300. The A7 roughtec is definitely a cut above the Kimber Hunter which is a high priced cheapo rifle

Not to be confused with the Kimber Montana which is a very nice rifle.
I’ve owned, shot, and used both Kimbers. You?
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.