|
|
12-18-2009, 01:20 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 273
|
|
17 hmr OR 22 wmr??!!
need advice... which is a better calibre for rabbits?
|
12-18-2009, 01:32 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,076
|
|
|
12-18-2009, 08:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,297
|
|
Get the 17hmr, I have seen shows from the states that they are used for anything from ground squirles to yotes...
g
|
12-18-2009, 09:28 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prosperous Lake, NT
Posts: 5,633
|
|
Got a buddy up here that kills a ton of wolves with his 17......says he never his 22mag anymore.
tm
|
12-18-2009, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
|
|
I have a .22WMR. and I like it. But if you are OK with the ammo cost and availability I'd go with the .17. More range for smacking rabbits, gophers, things of that size at long range, and a bit more accurate. I know some might disagree but I wouldn't feel comfortable using either on coyotes. So if we restrict it to the small stuff the .17 is a bit better, IMHO.
Here is a summary from a good Chuck Hawks article on the subject:
" Summary and conclusion
The .17 HMR and .22 WMR are both useful varmint and small game cartridges. Ammunition and rifles for both are widely distributed and commonly available. Recoil and muzzle blast are low for both, particularly from a rifle. They are good cartridges for use in semi-populated areas.
.17 HMR ammunition is generally more expensive than .22 WMR ammunition, but the difference will not be an unbearable burden to most small game and varmint hunters. For inexpensive practice at the range, neither is in the price class of the .22 Long Rifle.
Used with proper ammunition, the .17 HMR has an advantage in velocity, trajectory, and accuracy. The .22 WMR has an advantage in energy, bullet frontal area, sectional density, and consequently killing power.
After researching and writing this article, I have reached a conclusion about these two cartridges. I would favor the .22 WMR for shooting small game and varmints within 100 yards, and the .17 HMR if shots often run much beyond that distance. "
The article itself can be found at: http://www.chuckhawks.com/compared_17HMR_22WMR.htm
|
12-18-2009, 01:04 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 4,279
|
|
I had a 17HMR for a few years, and killed a handful of coyotes, and lots of gophers with it. It was cool and I enjoyed it.... if you intend to shoot mostly little stuff (rabbits/gophers/grouse) go for it. If I was picking today, for my uses I would go the 22mag hands down.
|
12-18-2009, 01:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Morinville, AB
Posts: 270
|
|
Keepin mind the differences in bullet weight between the 2.
The .17 is commonly produced with a 17 grain bullet, while the 22wmr provides options from 25 grain up to 45....
That may be partially the reason for increased velocity with the .17 when compared to the 22wmr.
|
12-18-2009, 05:43 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mons Lake
Posts: 2,262
|
|
Wind affects the 17 a lot more than the 22 mag.
|
12-18-2009, 06:34 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Carstairs
Posts: 648
|
|
lately the ammo for the 22 mag is much more reasonable than the 17hmr. I have both, and the 17 mach - I think the 22 mag is the better value and shoots a heavier bullet....
|
12-18-2009, 06:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 11,576
|
|
Another vote for the .22mag here.
Tree
|
12-21-2009, 01:25 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 273
|
|
thanks a lot to all of you... i really appreciate all your tips...
|
12-21-2009, 04:56 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,063
|
|
If you handload you may want to seriously consider the 22 Hornet. Handloads are about the same price as 22 Mag (1$11/50 for reloads) and cheaper than 17 HMR. (Factory loads are $29/50 for PRVI at Pro-line in Calgary).
They will push a 40 grain Sierra Blitzking at 3100 fps and will easily out perform either of the two you asked about, while making about the same amount of noise as a 17 HMR. For those of us who reload it is a great choice. I rarely use my 17 much after getting the Hornets.
|
12-21-2009, 06:02 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
|
|
How about the .17 Mach 2?Ammunition costs about half of what the 17hmr ammunition costs.
|
12-21-2009, 07:38 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 57
|
|
|
12-21-2009, 12:26 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 4,279
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
How about the .17 Mach 2?Ammunition costs about half of what the 17hmr ammunition costs.
|
I was going to try one out, but chickened out when I couldnt find ammo locally and only at one store in Edmonton. I think it would be great for gophers. Since then I have seen ammo in a few stores - if its still around in a few years I may still have to rebarrel my 77/22.
|
12-21-2009, 08:29 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
|
|
Quote:
I was going to try one out, but chickened out when I couldnt find ammo locally and only at one store in Edmonton. I think it would be great for gophers. Since then I have seen ammo in a few stores - if its still around in a few years I may still have to rebarrel my 77/22.
|
I am going about it the other way around.I bought a 17 Mach 2,and if the ammunition ever disappears,the gun will be rebarreled to 22lr.In the meantime I will buy a substantial amount of 17mach2 ammunition this spring.
|
12-21-2009, 08:50 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 4,279
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
I am going about it the other way around.I bought a 17 Mach 2,and if the ammunition ever disappears,the gun will be rebarreled to 22lr.In the meantime I will buy a substantial amount of 17mach2 ammunition this spring.
|
I would like to see how it performs on gophers. The 17HMR was pretty good at "poping" them - not what a hornet does, but not bad for a rimfire. If the 17M2 can pop or toss them - I may have to pursue the round.
|
12-21-2009, 09:10 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 476
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaMeR
|
X2 - 22 mag nice clean kill, 17 hmr what a mess but did you see it fly through the air?
|
12-21-2009, 10:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 174
|
|
22 mag or 17hmr
I have had the 17hmr, bought it new; a marlin with laminated stock and varmint barrel, found it deadly acurate at 80yrds but after that it didnt seem to like accuracy very much with a little bit of wind. It tends to drift bad, and with the windy days seemingly being more nowadays was no good for me. I shot the 22mag and found it to be more my likeing for fox at 150yrds. Its all in your preferance. If you can best way is to try each one. Ask your local gun store to take you to a range, I did and now prefer the 22mag. Jus my opinion.
|
12-22-2009, 07:03 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
|
|
What range do you think you are going to be hunting rabbits at? IF it's not that far might want to consider the old .22lr and all that super-cheap ammo. Also messes up the meat the least if you are planning to eat it. Just a thought.
|
12-22-2009, 02:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,112
|
|
Ahh I have not been hanging around the forms for a while and look what disscussion comes up, fits like an old pair of jeans.
Depends on the rabbits jacks or bush if bush then neither. If jacks I would lean towards 17 because of more reliable long range expansion.
But the last experience I have with jacks was with a 22 hornet which is the cats pajamas for the job.
Now what I need to find is a good 30-06 vs 270 thread
|
12-22-2009, 03:30 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 101
|
|
.17 HMR Devastation warning graphic!
v
v
v
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
v
V
V
Warning still graphic
.17HMR is a good round and you will not be dissapointed. The .22 mag is great as well and you can't go wrong with either
|
12-22-2009, 07:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prosperous Lake, NT
Posts: 5,633
|
|
I doesn't do that to a wolf
Nice little holes
tm
|
12-24-2009, 11:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,279
|
|
I wish I had never bought the 17HMR. I finally got mine shooting a decent grouping, but that is under perfect conditions. Just the slightest breeze will cause 4 inches of drift on a target under 50 metres. Kickin myself for not going with the 22WinMag or even the 22LR.
|
12-25-2009, 08:19 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Carstairs
Posts: 648
|
|
also agree on the Hornet, if you reload. I have a 22, 22mag, 17mach and 17hmr and they all have their good and bad points...right now, the price of 17hmr ammo has me concerned. I love my marlin and it is an amazing shooter...however, my cheapie 17mach groups pretty nice....the 22mag is a old Rem 597 which has operated flawlessy...ammo is cheaper than the 17 and it chews up the gophers nicely. For rabbits, it would be my choice...however you can load a variety of bullets with the Hornet..
so many choices......shooting is similar to golf....you can't just hit the field with one club!
|
12-25-2009, 01:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,586
|
|
The biggest difference between the two, is accuracy at the longer ranges.
The 17 is much more accurate, simply because the 22WMR has crimped bullets
that are heeled, the 17 has conventional crimped jacketed bullets, which are much more accurate a system.
I'm not sure which is cheaper, but I would assume the 22WMR, because of the bullets.
I have a 22mag that I used for beavers for a time, but use a loaded down 22Khornet for the last number of years as I found it to be super accurate with lower noise levels.....
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
12-25-2009, 06:30 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 273
|
|
well... first i wish you all a merry x-mas & a wonderful 2010....
then i'd like to genuinely thank each and every one of you for their valuable advice... i started with the 22mag, and i guess i'll add the hmr down the line...
now the bigger dilemma is to find the small buggers... i need to justify my cz's existence and more importantly my existence and bag some rabbits :-)
if any of you have any advice or need a partner, please let me know...
again, thank you all
|
12-26-2009, 06:53 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 57
|
|
Whatdja get?? Whatdja get?? Whatdja get man?? We need pics!!
Those CZ's are nice. Which one is it.
|
12-26-2009, 09:16 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,164
|
|
Quote:
I'm not sure which is cheaper, but I would assume the 22WMR, because of the bullets.
|
The 17hmr ammunition costs significantly more than the 22mag,and the 17mach2 costs about 1/2 the price of 17hmr.
|
12-26-2009, 03:53 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 273
|
|
got the 452 lux... beautiful.. love the european stock... shot it a couple times but yet to attach a dinner to its name :-))
i'm a lazy ***** and know it'll take me ages to post the pix, but i'll do my best to put them up ASAP,,,
actually i need to put the rest of my guns as well... maybe they'll find a significant other on this forum :-))
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.
|