Quote:
Originally Posted by edmhunter
It shouldn't seem like a surprise that you don't believe me. You seem to struggle with basic reading skills. I corrected you already with the expert part, I asked you first about your "data" and now what is it that you disagree with?
I know there is one less MD in 200 as I saw one get hit on the highway coming back from hockey. We also saw 30 at the cabin...so here I will throw you a bone. 31+ on Sunday...30+ on Monday.
I am starting to think you have CWD.
|
Well Shedcrazy. I found out who you are, what you do and where you work but unlike you I will not disclose your name.
Since I have discovered who you are, I know understand your inability to answer my question and it just goes to show how inept our government is as it pertains to intelligent game management of our wild deer that aren’t fenced in.
I asked you how many remaining deer there are in 200, and after proclaiming you know everything, all you can say is that you saw 30+ deer while on a drive, most likely the same 30+ that you see on that drive every time. Quite the indepth survey by the way.
Because of your inability to give us an actual number, I think you are clueless as to how many deer are remaining in the 200 zone. Instead of answering my question, you say “I am starting to think you have CWD”. Well I won’t be calling you any names; nor will I belittle you or make a stupid comment like the one you made, I’ll just assume that you don’t know what you’re talking about, just like your employers don’t either, as it pertains to the 200 zone.[/QUOTE]
I think the answer is in the info available to the public. The last areial count I could find online for DMU 4 (parkland) was 2004.
I garuntee they are doing the counts they just are not letting joe public have acsess to the info. This is less about managing the resource as it is managing the people.