Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2018, 11:55 AM
Mad Caddy Mad Caddy is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 23
Default Regs Clarification

Just wondering if I’m interpreting the Reg’s properly. The other day I caught a walleye that was pretty badly injured by the way it was hooked and the fight it put up. The lake was 0 limit for walleye. I ended up putting it back in the water where it surely was going to die. Seemed like such a waste but the Reg’s seem to say restricted fish must be released even if injured or dead. Does that make sense to anyone? I suppose it would prevent people arguing a walleye for dinner out of sylvan lake because it was mortally injured...just seemed strange.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2018, 12:11 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

If it wasnt that way, mortality rates would jump in Alberta by about 1000%.

And we all know what would happen next.
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2018, 12:14 PM
smith88's Avatar
smith88 smith88 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 883
Default

0 rentention means 0 fish taken. If they start letting people take injured fish, there will be a lot more "injured" fish.
__________________
"I'll give you my gun when you take it from my cold, dead hands" - Charlton Heston, 1923-2008
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.