Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2017, 08:25 PM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,755
Default Minnewanka & Banff Nat'l Park regulation changes

Interesting 2017 National Park regulation changes! New in 2017:

0 Possession Limit of all fish caught in Banff, Yoho or Kootenay Parks, with the exception of a daily limit of 2 Lake trout from Lake Minnewanka.
--- this is to reduce the chance of cross contamination of whirling disease between waters. Apparently, Lake trout are "less susceptible to whirling disease" so a harvest is still permitted.

And Johnson Lake and tributaries in Banff National Park (where Whirling disease was first found in Canada) is Closed.

Felt-soled wading boots are prohibited in all mountain national parks.
--- again, to reduce the possibility of cross contamination of Whirling disease.

"Motor boats launching in Banff National Park require an Alberta Inspection Certificate if they have been in waters outside of Alberta or British Columbia in the past 30 days"
--- in Banff, the only place where motor boats are permitted is Lake Minnewanka. This is reduce the possibility of introducing invasive species like Quagga mussels. No mention of where one obtains an Alberta Inspection Certificate, (because that would be too helpful) but there's the threat that "Launching without a required permit is subject to fines up to $25,000".

Coupled with the new Alberta provincial regulations, new this year, you are not permitted to keep any fish from the Bow River - from it's birthplace along the Great Divide, high in the Rockies at Bow Lake, all the way to the Bassano Dam.
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2017, 08:28 PM
MathewsArcher MathewsArcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary,Alberta
Posts: 1,058
Default

You get an inspection certificate when you go through an inspection station.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2017, 08:56 PM
depolloc depolloc is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 69
Default

Asking out of ignorance, but how does reduced retention limits on Minnewanka (for all but lake trout) mitigate the risk of whirling disease?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2017, 09:08 PM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,755
Default

According to the Parks Canada notice: "The movement of fish is the leading cause of spread for whirling disease".

Why an angler would 'move' a fish he/she caught and retained from one waterbody to another is a mystery to me.

My suspicion? They have to be seen to be doing 'something', and further restricting anglers is the easiest 'something' to do!
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2017, 08:27 AM
TROLLER TROLLER is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rocky View County AB.
Posts: 3,561
Default

I thought the limit on Minnewanka always was 2.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2017, 08:32 AM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Where did you get this from, I can't find this information and would like to check changes in Jasper.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:02 AM
deschambault deschambault is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 387
Default

I haven't fished it for a lot of years but am pretty sure the limit was 2 back then as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:08 AM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deschambault View Post
I haven't fished it for a lot of years but am pretty sure the limit was 2 back then as well.
Definitely only 2 last year, the regs are still up on their website. The change would be the closure of all the other water bodies not a change in Minnewanka.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:37 AM
Safety D Safety D is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

The fishing at willy wanka has been so dead lately
__________________
Safety D !!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:38 AM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,755
Default

Exactly right RavYak, - no changes for Minnewanka, except the requirement for an Inspection Certificate if your boat has been outside of AB/BC.

I bought my license yesterday in Banff and the mountain NP information was in the 'regs' they hand out, and in a paper insert.

I don't see any changes to Jasper NP regs, except that 'Felt-Soled Wading Boots Prohibited in all Mountain National Parks'.

* I hope to be in Home Bay in my Hobie the day the ice goes out!
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-01-2017, 01:28 PM
TROLLER TROLLER is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rocky View County AB.
Posts: 3,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Safety D View Post
The fishing at willy wanka has been so dead lately
Only open 4 months out of the year and you can call it dead

I spend a fair amount of time fishing Minnewanka and have never once felt it was as you say dead. Maybe you should spend a little more time checking it out. It is a big lake and the fish are not always in the same spot.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-01-2017, 03:30 PM
depolloc depolloc is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 69
Default

Yes, the limit was 2 in previous years, but the limit of 2 included other species (such as whitefish). The way I read the original post (but I do need to find the new regs for myself) is that retention would be closed to all but lake trout. Thus my question. If the OP is verbatim, than I wonder how reduced retention is linked to whirling disease, I just don't fully understand the basis.

That being said, still need to do some fact checking.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-01-2017, 04:48 PM
depolloc depolloc is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 69
Default

Sorry, should have read Thumpers post (no changes to minne). I'm just going to wait to see the new regs for myself.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-04-2017, 09:15 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Interesting because at the Jasper information center they have the new regs and there was NO insert.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-04-2017, 09:20 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thumper View Post
According to the Parks Canada notice: "The movement of fish is the leading cause of spread for whirling disease".

Why an angler would 'move' a fish he/she caught and retained from one waterbody to another is a mystery to me.

My suspicion? They have to be seen to be doing 'something', and further restricting anglers is the easiest 'something' to do!
Yes it make no sense.. but then again there aren't alot of waters in Banff where you can harvest fish from anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-04-2017, 09:20 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

No changes in Jasper.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-04-2017, 10:37 AM
Big Bull's Avatar
Big Bull Big Bull is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jasper
Posts: 2,004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McLeod View Post
No changes in Jasper.
My understanding is that felt soled waders/boots are prohibited.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-04-2017, 11:54 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bull View Post
My understanding is that felt soled waders/boots are prohibited.
Yes that is true. For all Mountain National Parks
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-05-2017, 07:50 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bull View Post
My understanding is that felt soled waders/boots are prohibited.
I checked the regus again and there is no mention of this . It may only apply to
Banff on an insert someone said there is. Also nothing in the regs about changes to fish limits in Banff.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-05-2017, 09:28 AM
Big Bull's Avatar
Big Bull Big Bull is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jasper
Posts: 2,004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McLeod View Post
I checked the regus again and there is no mention of this . It may only apply to
Banff on an insert someone said there is. Also nothing in the regs about changes to fish limits in Banff.
There should eventually be an insert regarding the waders in Jasper, once the dust settles. It's a long story.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-05-2017, 09:43 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bull View Post
There should eventually be an insert regarding the waders in Jasper, once the dust settles. It's a long story.
Good stuff. Thanks for the info.It will at least keep them out of Medicine.

I would like to hear that story over a couple of Brews someday ! Lol
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-05-2017, 10:05 AM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,755
Default

Here y'all go. From the new regs and insert provided at the Banff info centre ...

P4050559 by Andrew Whittick, on Flickr

P4050557 by Andrew Whittick, on Flickr

P4050554 by Andrew Whittick, on Flickr
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-05-2017, 10:07 AM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,755
Default

'Easier on the eyes' shots of the insert:

P4050555 by Andrew Whittick, on Flickr

P4050556 by Andrew Whittick, on Flickr
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-05-2017, 10:22 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Thanks for this. I wonder if the birds will read the regs too !
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-05-2017, 11:49 AM
Big Bull's Avatar
Big Bull Big Bull is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jasper
Posts: 2,004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McLeod View Post
Good stuff. Thanks for the info.It will at least keep them out of Medicine.

I would like to hear that story over a couple of Brews someday ! Lol
Sure, give me shout when you are in town.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-05-2017, 03:35 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Yeah, thanks indeed. Very helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-05-2017, 03:52 PM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,755
Default

Thank you for thanking me! Oft-times people on this forum go through considerable effort to pass information along for others to use, without so much as a 'Thanks'. In this case, it meant getting out the camera, photographing the regs, downloading them onto my computer, then uploading them to my Flickr account, and then posting them on this forum.

This, not to 'prove a point', 'win an argument' or in any way benefit me.

Knowing that others appreciate these efforts will ensure that many of us may continue to take the time to post accurate information for others to make use of.
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-05-2017, 04:00 PM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thumper View Post
Thank you for thanking me! Oft-times people on this forum go through considerable effort to pass information along for others to use, without so much as a 'Thanks'. In this case, it meant getting out the camera, photographing the regs, downloading them onto my computer, then uploading them to my Flickr account, and then posting them on this forum.

This, not to 'prove a point', 'win an argument' or in any way benefit me.

Knowing that others appreciate these efforts will ensure that many of us may continue to take the time to post accurate information for others to make use of.
Well said and again thank you so much !
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-06-2017, 08:25 PM
Mountain Guy Mountain Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In the Rockies
Posts: 2,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McLeod View Post
Good stuff. Thanks for the info.It will at least keep them out of Medicine.

I would like to hear that story over a couple of Brews someday ! Lol
Keep felts out of medicine? Why would anybody want to use felts in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-07-2017, 08:10 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountain Guy View Post
Keep felts out of medicine? Why would anybody want to use felts in the first place.
Good question but I am sure there are some.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.