Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2011, 05:50 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,887
Default CCI 400 vs 450 for the 223

Does anyone have a preference? Is there enough difference between them to keep from using one over the other? Thanks.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2011, 09:03 PM
fatboyz fatboyz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: rocky Mountain House
Posts: 1,538
Default

I was using just 400's but was having some vertical stringing issues in cold weather. A benchrest shooter in BC suggested the 450's to get hotter ignition. I have had trouble sourceing 450's consistently, but have found that the Remington 7 1/2 Bench Rest primers have a little hotter spark and do the trick, plus they're more readilly available.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2011, 09:44 PM
sako1 sako1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 714
Default

I have learned everything I know from the old man,he always used 450's so I use 450's.Kind of one of those deals..lol.I currently reload for 4 223's and have always had great results but I would not hesitate to use a 400 if I was out of stock.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2011, 05:36 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,119
Default

450 has a thicker cup and slightly hotter spark. If you are loading for an AR 450 definitely. Even loading hot for the bolt guns, I would use the 450. Normal loads, no problem using the 400s.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.