Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2019, 07:46 PM
Gammaboy Gammaboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lacombe
Posts: 118
Default Do cows drive off wildlife?

I farm part of a quarter where 90 acres have never been broke. Hills, ponds, beavers, poplars throughout. Beautiful piece of scenery but not real useful to me outside hunting season.
Cows were pastured there till the 80's and its been idle since.

Sandy, hilly land north of Blackfalds where it "always" rains. If it gets refenced and grazed in the spring-fall will the cows drive the deer and moose away or do they co-exist?
(I'm not a cow guy, just looking to answer landowners questions).

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2019, 08:03 PM
RZR RZR is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 838
Default

Deer and moose will co-exist.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2019, 08:03 PM
Sledin Sledin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 87
Default

Cows themselves don’t chase the deer away, I think it’s more that the cows are so intense on the underbrush that the deer don’t have the cover they want for bedding down and the forage is grazed down.
So two factors of what deer want are diminished, add the forage back in the deer will feed there and it could be better, but the deer will be more transient only feeding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2019, 08:24 PM
CaberTosser's Avatar
CaberTosser CaberTosser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 19,416
Default

A place I hunt has cattle as well as lots of horses and the deer and moose don’t seem to particularly wary of their presence.
__________________
"The trouble with people idiot-proofing things, is the resulting evolution of the idiot." Me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2019, 09:16 PM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,627
Default

everyone gets along... not my pics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cows and moose.jpg (63.4 KB, 367 views)
File Type: jpg feed pile.jpg (73.0 KB, 353 views)
File Type: jpg home on the range.jpg (72.4 KB, 365 views)
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-18-2019, 10:01 PM
walking buffalo's Avatar
walking buffalo walking buffalo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,207
Default

Grazing will absolutely effect wildlife on the property.

Sure, deer and moose will likely maintain a presence.
Though I wouldn't count on it. Seen it too many times where cattle have temporarily pushed big game to neighboring properties.

Odds are deer and moose use of this land would be much higher if cattle were not allowed to graze here.

Then there is all the small stuff most people ignore.
Birds, rodents and other small ones. Native plants.

Cows will definitely have an effect on the Wildlife. Depending on the grazing intensity and timing, the effect can be devastating. Yet many will not recognize the apocalypse before them, put up a picture of a cow and deer together and imagine that all is heavenly.


^ This should be enough to give your thread some traction.


Having said that, there can be positives to occasional high intensity grazing.
And Fire, and flood and drought. Nature sometimes needs a kick.

I would reflect on what this property means to you, what you want your role as Steward to be.
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -

"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-18-2019, 11:06 PM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,740
Default

"I would reflect on what this property means to you, what you want your role as Steward to be."

x2.
If it's to be a wildlife sanctuary for all wildlife, then cows should not be part of it.
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-18-2019, 11:49 PM
spoiledsaskhunter spoiledsaskhunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo View Post
Grazing will absolutely effect wildlife on the property.

Sure, deer and moose will likely maintain a presence.
Though I wouldn't count on it. Seen it too many times where cattle have temporarily pushed big game to neighboring properties.

Odds are deer and moose use of this land would be much higher if cattle were not allowed to graze here.

Then there is all the small stuff most people ignore.
Birds, rodents and other small ones. Native plants.

Cows will definitely have an effect on the Wildlife. Depending on the grazing intensity and timing, the effect can be devastating. Yet many will not recognize the apocalypse before them, put up a picture of a cow and deer together and imagine that all is heavenly.


^ This should be enough to give your thread some traction.


Having said that, there can be positives to occasional high intensity grazing.
And Fire, and flood and drought. Nature sometimes needs a kick.

I would reflect on what this property means to you, what you want your role as Steward to be.
....this. if I have the choice I'll hunt where there's been no livestock every time. You'll find wildlife where there's livestock but there'll be more where there's not
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-18-2019, 11:51 PM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thumper View Post
"I would reflect on what this property means to you, what you want your role as Steward to be."

x2.
If it's to be a wildlife sanctuary for all wildlife, then cows should not be part of it.
X2.

Thumper makes a great point. If this land is surrounded by disturbed pasture or farmland disconnected from adjacent natural ecosystems what kind of wildlife sanctuary can that land be?

I will add my 2 cents....

Well said Walking Buffalo. The pics I posted were only to illustrate the grazers can co-exist. In my experience in the parkland area I notice some balances of domestic livestock and wildlife can occur.

If cattle numbers are managed properly most species of wildlife will find their place on the land. Historically, even though there were massive herds of buffalo that seasonally grazed an area the smaller wildlife species still fit in. The prairie dog colonies still grew and red and swift fox, snakes, badgers, birds, etc. all found their places on the bison grazed land. Just the forest dwelling species could not establish themselves because bison (and wildfires) influenced tree growth.

If a piece of land has a balance of uplands, bottom land, bush and riparian areas cattle will only use certain areas. I know of a half section of a parkland farm where a herd/colony of mulies (20-35 animals) have lived alongside of a free ranging herd of grazing cattle (40-60 animals) for the past 40 years. I'm sure the cattle get jealous when the mulies can just hop the fence to chew on the field pea crops next door. And on the same land's treed bottomland there is always a cow moose or two using it as a calving ground. And I have shot and flushed whitetail on all levels of this land too. And now the occasional cougar is roaming through the property on its rounds too. Amphibians, ground birds, yappers and small critters are all intact too. I can think of other properties that are similar too.

This leads me to believe if a piece of land is allowed to develop over time into an ecosystem with cattle incorporated onto it there can be a balance of most species. The role of the land steward is to understand and manage the land according to the land's carrying capacities.

Thanks for letting me share my 2 cents...for what it's worth.
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets

Last edited by Red Bullets; 05-18-2019 at 11:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-19-2019, 12:58 AM
expedition expedition is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledin View Post
Cows themselves don’t chase the deer away, I think it’s more that the cows are so intense on the underbrush that the deer don’t have the cover they want for bedding down and the forage is grazed down.
So two factors of what deer want are diminished, add the forage back in the deer will feed there and it could be better, but the deer will be more transient only feeding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
X2
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-19-2019, 06:05 AM
saskbooknut saskbooknut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,592
Default

As has been stated, it depends on the intensity of cattle pressure on a piece of land and the state of plant succession.

Lack of major grazing species and absence of fire allows a plant succession of increasing bush density, often to the point that it is less attractive land for game birds and deer.

On the other hand, native prairie with small bush clumps is ideal land for Sharptails. With heavy stocking levels of cattle, the bush is demolished and the waterhole becomes a mudhole, making it less attractive for wildlife.

Light grazing pressure can actually improve denser bush as wildlife habitat.

90 acres is quite a small piece of habitat. You should look at that parcel in context of the lands around it.

Last edited by saskbooknut; 05-19-2019 at 06:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-19-2019, 07:20 AM
landowner landowner is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 975
Default

If you want to see what happens when cattle and wildlife coexist? Come down to Waterton. A protected park next to private cattle ranches . The ungulates move out of the old stale grass of Waterton to the lush second growth of the ranchlands. Deer and Elk prefer to graze behind cattle,much like they did for thousands of years behind the bison.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-19-2019, 08:58 AM
coachman coachman is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 349
Default

I have to agree with the comments that grazing improves the use of pasture by wildlife, I have 1 quarter that I grazed heavy for about 4 month a year and it always had elk and deer year round even when the horse were there. Since I cut back on the horses the area does not get used much and I never see the game there. The adjoining quarter with my cows on it is now where I see the elk and deer, and always on the short grass that the cows keep chewed down.
It has to do with the new grass being more nutritious and better energy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-19-2019, 10:26 AM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,740
Default

Deer, elk, perhaps even moose can do well with cattle. But not entire, natural communities. There's a big difference between land and its diversity of creatures that evolved with constantly moving herds of bison, and land and waterbodies that now contains fenced-in cattle.

Visit a few of Alberta's 'Natural Areas' where no cattle are permitted, or a few Nature Conservancy properties, most of which exclude cattle, or even some of those Ducks Unlimited properties where cattle are excluded, and you can see the difference for yourself.

I'm thankful to hunt grazing leases, with their abundance of deer & elk and moose, but if I want to photograph a wide variety of native flowers & plants, birds, small wildlife or insects - I head for areas protected from grazing cattle.

Anecdotally, elk, in particular, do very well in my yard in Canmore, but that doesn't make my land holding much a wildlife sanctuary!
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-19-2019, 11:00 AM
urban rednek's Avatar
urban rednek urban rednek is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,377
Wink food is not the only motivator

Any port in a storm.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg moose cow.jpg (63.1 KB, 142 views)
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.” - Thomas Sowell

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”- Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-20-2019, 02:51 AM
landowner landowner is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thumper View Post
Deer, elk, perhaps even moose can do well with cattle. But not entire, natural communities. There's a big difference between land and its diversity of creatures that evolved with constantly moving herds of bison, and land and waterbodies that now contains fenced-in cattle.

Visit a few of Alberta's 'Natural Areas' where no cattle are permitted, or a few Nature Conservancy properties, most of which exclude cattle, or even some of those Ducks Unlimited properties where cattle are excluded, and you can see the difference for yourself.

I'm thankful to hunt grazing leases, with their abundance of deer & elk and moose, but if I want to photograph a wide variety of native flowers & plants, birds, small wildlife or insects - I head for areas protected from grazing cattle.

Anecdotally, elk, in particular, do very well in my yard in Canmore, but that doesn't make my land holding much a wildlife sanctuary!
Don’t know of any Nature Conservancy properties that excludes grazing.( not in SW AB anyway) they promote grazing to encourage biodiversity, and fire suppression. Their studies show that wildlife benifits from a. Proper grazing plan .
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-20-2019, 06:15 AM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,520
Default

Ungulate numbers are lower with the presence of cattle. In general. The flaura/fauna of your land will be set back at least 20 years if it recovers at all in your lifetime.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-20-2019, 06:36 AM
ram crazy ram crazy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,842
Default

Elk won’t be anywhere near cattle, but the mule deer, whitetail, moose and pronghorns don’t mind the cattle. Once the cattle are out of the pasture the elk will move in. Elk and cattle are like oil and water.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-20-2019, 06:49 AM
PartTimeHunter PartTimeHunter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Drayton Valley
Posts: 1,251
Default

Dunno about that. I've had Elk eating from bale feeders in the field along with the cows. They also jumped the fence into the bale yard and opened up a row of silage bales - what a mess
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-20-2019, 08:30 AM
Habfan's Avatar
Habfan Habfan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,721
Default

Must be a factor involved that creates different situations. I witnessed 2 cows chase a moose out of a pasture near Nanton. They never stopped until the moose jumped the fence, it didn’t look like they were just having fun either. Maybe the amount of feed available has something to do with it.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-20-2019, 09:46 AM
calgarychef calgarychef is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,667
Default

Of course cows don’t drive off wildlife, they can’t drive to begin with
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-20-2019, 10:12 AM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
Of course cows don’t drive off wildlife, they can’t drive to begin with
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-20-2019, 12:09 PM
landowner landowner is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talking moose View Post
Ungulate numbers are lower with the presence of cattle. In general. The flaura/fauna of your land will be set back at least 20 years if it recovers at all in your lifetime.
Please show study that supports this claim ? Or are you an arm chair biologist?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-20-2019, 01:47 PM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by landowner View Post
Please show study that supports this claim ? Or are you an arm chair biologist?
I was wrong. Can’t remember where I got that info as I’ve had it a long time. Doing searches and reading some studies says the opposite in fact. The only negative impacts I can find involve streams. Nothing really on grassland. Not sure if I was told that or read it somewhere. But in the end it would appear beneficial in fact!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-20-2019, 02:36 PM
landowner landowner is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 975
Default

Of course over grazing and poor management is detrimental to both game and livestock. Numerous studies have shown good practices enhance grazing for wildlife. That includes the Nature Conservancy, and AB govt .
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-20-2019, 02:50 PM
MountainTi's Avatar
MountainTi MountainTi is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by landowner View Post
Of course over grazing and poor management is detrimental to both game and livestock. Numerous studies have shown good practices enhance grazing for wildlife. That includes the Nature Conservancy, and AB govt .
It either needs to be grazed or burned off to remain healthy. Nowadays grazing is the popular choice....
Back in the day the Indians burned it off for good reason
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-20-2019, 04:32 PM
Soab Soab is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 346
Default

A quarter I hunt has elk in sept all the time, but when they move the cattle in in oct. the elk move on. But they do tolerate them
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PICT0262.jpg (142.0 KB, 84 views)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-20-2019, 10:35 PM
calgarychef calgarychef is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,667
Default

An area without cattle and especially horses will have more wildlife that those that do. That’s almost a guarantee. Can they coexist? Yup, but they prefer not to. It’s rare to see deer, elk or moose right in with cattle.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-20-2019, 11:07 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
Of course cows don’t drive off wildlife, they can’t drive to begin with


Baha
__________________
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by the speed of light squared... ...then you energy.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-21-2019, 05:35 PM
Joe Black Joe Black is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 997
Default

Deer and moose yes. Elk no.

They stink, make messes of wetland, and are clumsy and noisy. Three thinks elk hate.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.