Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2018, 05:15 PM
YYC338 YYC338 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,447
Default Federal Trophy Bonded Tip Bullets

Has anyone done any reloading with these bullets from Federal? They're a new component bullet on the market although Federal has loaded them for awhile now.
Federal's information contact line has been less than helpful.

I'm curious on how far off the lands they should be seated. Are they like a mono-metal bullet and require about 0.050" (Barnes) or are they more like a standard cup and core bullet?
The bullet design appears to be a bit of a hybrid and also nickel plated.

I'm looking at their .284 160gr specifically.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-15-2018, 09:46 PM
TUFFBUFF TUFFBUFF is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gr Pr / 357 / ES4
Posts: 1,053
Default

I believe they are harder type kinda like a swift S2 but probably less than tsx/ttsx. Think ya got the right idea to start a 50 off, I wouldn't want to go closer than 30 maybe.
I read an arcicle from a federal guy that said they are very forgiving and can be loaded up to 100 off if that helps.
I haven't loaded any but like em and have some 7mag 160 factory here and 280 140's. I can measure ogive and compare it to some other 7mag factory rounds to see what federal did if ya want.
Sorry haven't reloaded any yet, be nice if they'd make a 130 6.5, or wishful thinking a 200 8mm.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2018, 10:21 PM
YYC338 YYC338 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUFFBUFF View Post
I believe they are harder type kinda like a swift S2 but probably less than tsx/ttsx. Think ya got the right idea to start a 50 off, I wouldn't want to go closer than 30 maybe.
I read an arcicle from a federal guy that said they are very forgiving and can be loaded up to 100 off if that helps.
I haven't loaded any but like em and have some 7mag 160 factory here and 280 140's. I can measure ogive and compare it to some other 7mag factory rounds to see what federal did if ya want.
Sorry haven't reloaded any yet, be nice if they'd make a 130 6.5, or wishful thinking a 200 8mm.
Thanks for the info. Any possibility of a link to the article?
Yes, a 200 or 220 would be a great bullet for an 8mm Rem mag. There's not a lot out there to choose from.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2018, 05:16 PM
Buckhorn2 Buckhorn2 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 207
Default

For liability reasons they cant give you a lands or jump measurement. Same as reloading manuals. Its different for every rifle. They will only give you saami measurements for overall length etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2018, 05:39 PM
YYC338 YYC338 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckhorn2 View Post
For liability reasons they cant give you a lands or jump measurement. Same as reloading manuals. Its different for every rifle. They will only give you saami measurements for overall length etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Barnes does it. They recommend 0.050 off the lands. Bullet distance from the lands doesn't vary rifle to rifle. For example you can have four different manufacturers of 7mm Rem Mag rifles and you can seat the bullet 0.050" (same measurement) off the lands for each rifle.

Granted the cartridge overall length could and would most likely be different for each rifle. But the 0.050" distance would remain the same.

I'm not looking for cartridge overall length here, just distance from the lands.

No liability issues here that I can see from giving out that measurement.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2018, 05:56 PM
dogslayer403's Avatar
dogslayer403 dogslayer403 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rocky Mt. House
Posts: 1,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckhorn2 View Post
For liability reasons they cant give you a lands or jump measurement. Same as reloading manuals. Its different for every rifle. They will only give you saami measurements for overall length etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not true look at a berger manual
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2018, 06:03 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YYC338 View Post
Barnes does it. They recommend 0.050 off the lands. Bullet distance from the lands doesn't vary rifle to rifle. For example you can have four different manufacturers of 7mm Rem Mag rifles and you can seat the bullet 0.050" (same measurement) off the lands for each rifle.

Granted the cartridge overall length could and would most likely be different for each rifle. But the 0.050" distance would remain the same.

I'm not looking for cartridge overall length here, just distance from the lands.

No liability issues here that I can see from giving out that measurement.

.050" is the starting point for Barnes bullets, but I have found the ideal jump to the lands to vary from .040" to .070", depending n the rifle.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2018, 06:41 PM
YYC338 YYC338 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
.050" is the starting point for Barnes bullets, but I have found the ideal jump to the lands to vary from .040" to .070", depending n the rifle.
I agree that 0.050" is just a starting point for the Barnes and you work from there.

What I'm looking for is Federal's recommended starting point. I can be safe and start at 0.050" but I just wanted to narrow it down a bit. Most cup and core bullets I use, I start at 0.020".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.