Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2014, 12:57 PM
bang_on_sk bang_on_sk is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The City that rhymes with fun...
Posts: 391
Default Damascus barrel shotgun.

So here's another thread about whether you can shoot modern shells in a Damascus barrel, the twist is, it's a Remington.

I'm pretty sure it's a model 1889, external hammers, serial number 74405.


Any info would be appreciated, thanks.
__________________
Dear NASA, your mom thought I was big enough. -Pluto
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2014, 02:35 PM
densa44 densa44 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North of Cochrane
Posts: 6,681
Default

No
__________________
"The well meaning have done more damage than all the criminals in the world" Great grand father "Never impute planning where incompetence will predict the phenomenon equally well" Father
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2014, 04:12 PM
topher32 topher32 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 27
Default

Yes... Assuming you want the barrell to blow up in your face...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2014, 04:55 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,056
Default

I get really tired of seeing these kinds of of truly dumb questions. You know, or aught to, already know the answer if you are buying these kinds of guns.

Do whatever you like, there will be lots of "Internet" experts who will be happy to agree with you. Remember though, they are not the ones on the end of the gun when it blows.

Even with low pressure or black powder loads there is no easy way to tell if a Damascus steel barrel is still shootable. Expert inspection by a well qualified practitioner and a proper proofing should come before shooting any gun of this type from the shoulder.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2014, 06:10 PM
ward ward is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
I get really tired of seeing these kinds of of truly dumb questions. You know, or aught to, already know the answer if you are buying these kinds of guns.

Do whatever you like, there will be lots of "Internet" experts who will be happy to agree with you. Remember though, they are not the ones on the end of the gun when it blows.

Even with low pressure or black powder loads there is no easy way to tell if a Damascus steel barrel is still shootable. Expert inspection by a well qualified practitioner and a proper proofing should come before shooting any gun of this type from the shoulder.
1) That is a little harsh.

2) If you have been paying attention, a lot of posts on AO are of the same variety.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2014, 06:46 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Ease up guys. Given the age, chambers are probably too short for modern shells as well. Clean it up and hang it over the fireplace.

Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2014, 08:02 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bang_on_sk View Post
So here's another thread about whether you can shoot modern shells in a Damascus barrel, the twist is, it's a Remington.

I'm pretty sure it's a model 1889, external hammers, serial number 74405.


Any info would be appreciated, thanks.
Unless a gun is proofed for modern high pressure smokeless loads I would stay away from them- Damascus steel or drawn steel , it doesn't matter .
There dare low pressure smokeless loads available for Damascus guns but get it checked through first if you do not know what to look for.
Cat
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2014, 08:32 PM
bang_on_sk bang_on_sk is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The City that rhymes with fun...
Posts: 391
Default

Thanks for all of the helpful and polite replies. I should have worded my question a little better. I understand that many Damascus barrels are unsafe, I even understand why.

I was under the impression, however, that many Damascus, fluid steel, twist, etc barrels were made by manufacturers of lesser quality. I was really interested in whether a Remington shotgun would have the same issues as a Belgian gun of the same type.

If the barrels are, as stAted above, unsafe, is loading black powder shells for it an option?

Thanks
__________________
Dear NASA, your mom thought I was big enough. -Pluto
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-20-2014, 08:37 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bang_on_sk View Post
Thanks for all of the helpful and polite replies. I should have worded my question a little better. I understand that many Damascus barrels are unsafe, I even understand why.

I was under the impression, however, that many Damascus, fluid steel, twist, etc barrels were made by manufacturers of lesser quality. I was really interested in whether a Remington shotgun would have the same issues as a Belgian gun of the same type.

If the barrels are, as stAted above, unsafe, is loading black powder shells for it an option?

Thanks
Loading black powder cartridges is always an option and the Remington were well made guns BTW, I've owned several.
For a statement to be mad e that Damascus barrelled guns should not be shot because they "will blow up" is far too broad , there are far more factors involved with older guns than simply the barrel type.
Read this and PM me.
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=187787
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=146411
Cat
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:32 PM
oldgutpile oldgutpile is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brooks
Posts: 2,245
Default damascus

Sure glad that the whole world runs when I bring out the damascus barreled shotguns. Makes more cheap opportunities for me to buy them!
This blanket statement that everybody has about them blowing up in my face, is getting really old.
Would I load 3 1/2" shells into an old damascus gun....NO! I would probably leave the Prairie Storm at home as well. But, many damascus guns have been, or can be proofed for modern nitro loads. Not to say that just ANY gun should be tried. Take it to a gunsmith who knows something about them! Check for pitting in the bores. If there is any doubt, due to obvious signs of wear, then yes I would avoid using those barrels.
This blanket statement to avoid using damascus is unfounded. I own a handfull of them and shoot them. Some of them show minor signs of pitting from the corrosive blackpowder , and therefore, I resign myself to using low-pressure blackpowder loads in them. Some are in fantastic condition, and I use a low-pressure nitro load in them
A gun is a tool and I am determined to use them as such! It has to be extremely rough before it is deemed a wall-hanger!!
__________________
"a gun without hammers is like a spaniel without ears!"
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:56 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams View Post
Ease up guys. Given the age, chambers are probably too short for modern shells as well. Clean it up and hang it over the fireplace.

Grizz
They make 2 " and 2 1/2" ammo these days, in smokeless and black powder.
Cat
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-21-2014, 05:12 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
They make 2 " and 2 1/2" ammo these days, in smokeless and black powder.
Cat
My thoughts are, if you're a handloader, you can shoot just anything.

Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.