|
|
01-07-2021, 12:39 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 282
|
|
Optics for old guys
So I’m getting old the eyes don’t work like the used to, going to switch out a scope, was thinking of going 50 mm as it would likely gather the most light in first and last light situations any recommendations on something good that won’t break the bank?
|
01-07-2021, 05:36 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: onoway, Ab
Posts: 6,997
|
|
For the money a swaro Z3 is pretty tough to beat. I’m in the same boat and just switched to a NF SHV.
|
01-07-2021, 09:28 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 306
|
|
This
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokinyotes
For the money a swaro Z3 is pretty tough to beat. I’m in the same boat and just switched to a NF SHV.
|
Buy a high end scope...the clarity will help. a big objective will help with light as well. Higher magnification will make things appear more clearly as well
Hoopi
|
01-07-2021, 09:35 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton Area/Candle Lake SK
Posts: 208
|
|
From Leupold
I'm 62 and find my Sawvorski Z# 3x9x36 are as bright to my eyes as my Z3 4x12x50
Reardless if the scope is 36mm or 50mm the quality of the optic will provide a better view then anything else.
A LARGER OBJECTIVE LENS MEANS THE SCOPE WILL BE BRIGHTER
Again, this seems like common sense. But the size of the objective lens is directly tied to the magnification range of the scope. Have you ever noticed how lower-magnification scopes usually have a small diameter objective lens, while high-magnification scopes have larger ones? That's because the combination of these specs is what creates the scope's exit pupil size.
The exit pupil is the disc of light that actually hits your eye. This disc needs to be the right size in order to have a bright, clear image all the way through the magnification range. You can visualize this by taking an un-mounted scope, holding it in your hand with the objective lens facing up. Put a white piece of paper on a table below it and shine a flashlight through the scope. Make sure the scope is the same distance away from the paper as it would be from your eye if you were shooting. With the light shining through the scope, you should see a disc of light hit the paper on the other side. Move the scope up and down to see how the disc goes in and out of focus. Adjust the magnification, and you’ll see the disc get bigger and smaller.
There’s also a very ease mathematical formula to figure out what size your exit pupil will be. It’s the diameter of the objective lens divided by the magnification. This will give you the exit pupil diameter in millimeters.
FOR EXAMPLE:
If you have a 1-4x20mm scope that's on 1x, the equation looks like 1/20 = 20mm exit pupil. If it’s on 4x, it would be 4/20 = 5mm exit pupil
Now let’s say you have a 3-18x44mm scope. If it were on 8x, the equation would be 8/44 = 5.5mm exit pupil. Almost the same as if the 1-4x scope was on 4x.
The other thing to consider is how much light your eye can physically use. It actually varies by age. When you’re young and your eyes are fresh and new, your pupils can dilate quite large, maybe to 7 or 8mm’s. But as you age, your eyes age, as well. Your average 35-year-old eye may only be able to dilate to 4 or 5mm’s. So yes, we could definitely create a scope that gives you a 30mm exit pupil, but your body wouldn’t actually be able to absorb all the light.
https://www.leupold.com/leupold-core...yths-explained
Like Reactions:BeeMaa, Opposite Pole and Standard Velocity
|
01-07-2021, 10:19 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,429
|
|
Leica er are nice as are s&b...for some reason I have never liked any ziess optic product except the hi end offerings
|
01-07-2021, 10:57 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,252
|
|
50 MM objective will do you no good. As we age out eyes are unable to use as much light as when we were younger. A 42MM objective is a much more user friendly alternative, not to mention weight savings and lower mounting on your rifle. and generally less expensive.
Good glass is by far a better choice and I don't mean spending over a $1000. bucks or more, most mid priced scopes in the $600 plus range are fine.
There are a ton of video's etc. online which will explain to you the ins and outs of buying Quality scopes and how as we age our eyes are less effective.
Hope it helps.
A quick search: not saying the guy knows all but it may help.
The Straight Scope: On Riflescopes
By Randy Wakeman
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
Last edited by 6.5 shooter; 01-07-2021 at 11:03 AM.
|
01-07-2021, 02:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,612
|
|
After 23 years, i swapped my Leupold 3x9 for a Leupold 6x18......
Both are 40mm. But now i can zoom in and really pick my spot.
Both have great glass
__________________
When you are born, you get a ticket to the Freak Show.
If you are born in Canada, you get a front row seat.
|
01-07-2021, 03:12 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Near Drumheller
Posts: 6,765
|
|
Went for a Z3 2.5-10x42 BRH for my #1 a couple of yrs ago, it ticked all the boxes. They have gone up a bit now, looks like they are around 1100.00 these days. Never had any complaints about the 2010 era Zeiss Conquests either. Seems as though a scope has to be Japanese made or European to get good glass and turrets in it, nothing against Leupold either, just didn't like what they offered in reticles. And you do get what you pay for, up to a point, then it's all about the features and mechanics inside. Bit of new stuff around, but, being as there is no SHOT show, have to search for press releases.
__________________
You should also be a member;
CCFR
CSSA
|
01-07-2021, 04:21 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,714
|
|
Well I have been shopping around and in town not much for selection and on the net lots of out of stock. There is one scope I am interested as far as "high end" a Swaro Z3 3-9 x36 for $860.00. The most I have paid was for Leupold FX3 6x42 about 8-10 yrs ago. Are 5-6 hundred dollar scopes really that bad or will the 8-1000. dollar ones blow me away.
I as well have 60 year old eyes.
|
01-07-2021, 05:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 323
|
|
I'm very happy with my Zeiss Conquest scopes. The optics clarity is a big game changer for me.
|
01-07-2021, 05:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
BIG Leupold fanboy here!
Love their FXR series,, the one I use on my hunting rifle is a 1.5 -4X and it is super clear. The red dot is variable so you can turn it down soo it doesn't blind you, and the best part? It turns off if not used!
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 08:06 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
BIG Leupold fanboy here!
Love their FXR series,, the one I use on my hunting rifle is a 1.5 -4X and it is super clear. The red dot is variable so you can turn it down soo it doesn't blind you, and the best part? It turns off if not used!
Cat
|
FXR ?
Could you please post a link for FXR ?
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 08:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
FXR ?
Could you please post a link for FXR ?
|
Here ya go!
Sorry, it's a VXR!
Cat
https://www.korthgroup.com/Products/Leupold/Scopes
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 08:14 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
|
Thanks Cat- I spent half an hour looking for a “fixed” but not quite / with some zoom
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 08:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
Thanks Cat- I spent half an hour looking for a “fixed” but not quite / with some zoom
|
I usually use fixed power scopes but this one was a gift so I decided to try it out, it's been on the rifle for several years now
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 08:21 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
I usually use fixed power scopes but this one was a gift so I decided to try it out, it's been on the rifle for several years now
Cat
|
Better than fixed? Seriously? How about price compare to x4 or x6 ?
And - is it really better smaller objective for us old farts?
Ps. Peep sights are working amassingly for bad eyes too, aren’t they?
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 08:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
Better than fixed? Seriously? How about price compare to x4 or x6 ?
And - is it really better smaller objective for us old farts?
Ps. Peep sights are working amazingly for bad eyes too, aren’t they?
|
To be honest I never really turn the scope down off 4X, it is the variable aiming dot that I really like.
Fixed power scopes are generally less expensive than variables .
As far as peep sights go, I use them more than anything at the range, II much prefer shooting with them on my match rifles as opposed to a scope even though they are harder to use. The Vbull is half the diameter for Fclass shooters scopes as opposed to Palma match shooters.
I can't use open sights very well, but the peep ( receiver or tang) work well for me still even with my bifocals. I am 66 now and plan on using the irons for as long as I can .
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 09:07 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
To be honest I never really turn the scope down off 4X, it is the variable aiming dot that I really like.
Fixed power scopes are generally less expensive than variables .
As far as peep sights go, I use them more than anything at the range, II much prefer shooting with them on my match rifles as opposed to a scope even though they are harder to use. The Vbull is half the diameter for Fclass shooters scopes as opposed to Palma match shooters.
I can't use open sights very well, but the peep ( receiver or tang) work well for me still even with my bifocals. I am 66 now and plan on using the irons for as long as I can .
Cat
|
I know they are les comlicated and are better manufactured...
Did I get it right - you shooting with peep sights wearing glasses?
Ps. Me 2- there is no scope better than good peep sights- same as no digital calliper can compare to good mechanical one made in Germany in approximate price range
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
Last edited by sailor; 01-07-2021 at 09:15 PM.
|
01-07-2021, 09:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,252
|
|
ALL my hunting rifles now wear fixed 6x scopes (older Leupolds if at all possible) all of my varmint .22 rimfires wear fixed 6x (various brands ). .17 HMR and .17 Hornet, target rigs and my flatter shooting varmint rigs (.204 etc.) wear variables. Not that I like them better it is just for mirage, the widely varied distances or that eye ball sticking out of the grass, then higher mag scopes/variable scopes have a more meaningful purpose.
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
|
01-07-2021, 09:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.5 shooter
ALL my hunting rifles now wear fixed 6x scopes (older Leupolds if at all possible) all of my varmint .22 rimfires wear fixed 6x (various brands ). .17 HMR and .17 Hornet, target rigs and my flatter shooting varmint rigs (.204 etc.) wear variables. Not that I like them better it is just for mirage, the widely varied distances or that eye ball sticking out of the grass, then higher mag scopes/variable scopes have a more meaningful purpose.
|
And you didn’t even mention what scopes are on your favourite rifles : 6.5 ...and 338 lapua
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 09:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
I know they are les comlicated and are better manufactured...
Did I get it right - you shooting with peep sights wearing glasses?
Ps. Me 2- there is no scope better than good peep sights- same as no digital calliper can compare to good mechanical one made in Germany in approximate price range
|
Yup, irons and sling with glasses out to 1K!
Pay no atention to the spotting scope !!
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 10:01 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
Yup, irons and sling with glasses out to 1K!
Pay no atention to the spotting scope !!
Cat
|
What glasses- for reading or distance?
I tried glasses for pistol competitions and ended up with no glasses ...I see pistol sights clearly and target ( not very clear) but don’t see holes even at 15m
Ps. Are you shooting stars ?
Pps. Best peep sights I ever seen...
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
Last edited by sailor; 01-07-2021 at 10:09 PM.
|
01-07-2021, 10:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
I have the smallest bifocal window for reading, and the rest for distance, with astigmatism correction as well.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 10:14 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
I have the smallest bifocal window for reading, and the rest for distance, with astigmatism correction as well.
Cat
|
Thanks I don’t understand anything in glasses ...
Will ask doctor.
Ps. So That spotting scope isn’t mounted on your rifle? On the phone it looks like on top - lol
Pps. Actually it looks like telescope
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 10:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
Thanks I don’t understand anything in glasses ...
Will ask doctor.
Ps. So That spotting scope isn’t mounted on your rifle? On the phone it looks like on top - lol
|
the spotter is on its own bipod but when you look fast , yupit looks like it is mounted on the rifle!! LOL
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 10:22 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
the spotter is on its own bipod but when you look fast , yupit looks like it is mounted on the rifle!! LOL
Cat
|
Whoever took that picture was standing far away and was taking photo with at least 200mm lens so it flattened everything
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 10:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
Whoever took that picture was standing far away and was using lens with at least 200mm lens so it flattened everything
|
Iphone camera.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
01-07-2021, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
Iphone camera.
Cat
|
That’s why I don’t like pinhole cameras- pictures like this should be taken with good SLR camera where you have full control
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
|
01-07-2021, 10:53 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 3,749
|
|
That’s a cool funny pic, cat. I also had to “zoom in” to see what is going there with the “set up”.
|
01-07-2021, 11:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,252
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor
And you didn’t even mention what scopes are on your favourite rifles : 6.5 ...and 338 lapua
|
Which 6.5? I have 5. Sorry don't own a Lapua.... but I do shoot their brass. Any other questions?
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:15 AM.
|