Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott h
No need to sell it. Let the lease holders continue to graze their cattle BUT not to collect oil/gas revenue OR restrict public from walking/hunting access.
That then would truly be "leasing for grazing purposes".
If the current lease holders don't want to re-lease then put it up for someone else to take over with the same rules.
Win-Win.... The lease holder gets grazing property to graze their cattle. The province gets revenue from grazer and oil/gas. The public gets millions of extra acres to hunt, picnic or berry pick. No more arguing over a publicly owned property.
This may upset a few thousand people but it would benefit a few million.
|
Win-Win ... Just as it should be !
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
Linear Mode
