Quote:
Originally Posted by The Elkster
That just isn't true and its needlessly divisive. Some just have different beliefs in what constitutes prosperity and long term good. Some people are happy to give up some creature comforts and stay closer to home to reduce their footprint others want to travel and have the big house. Neither is wrong per say. Should we only measure societies success in terms of money? What if we have lots of money and good paid medical and balance budget but the environment is unlivable in future? What if we have lots of money while pumping hard on oil but then the oil runs out and we're left with nothing in the future? What if the PL goes through and there is a major bitumen spill in the LM in the future? I may not always agree with the opposing view but I can understand many of the concerns and I always try to consider them rather than laugh them off. Compromise is a thing. Lets not go down the American political road.
|
Sounds like you've been listening to David Suzuki!
I'm out of this discussion, thanks for the entertainment.