Quote:
Originally Posted by canadiantdi
I was basing that comment on the trial and the evidence provided. I couldn't see how he could be convicted except if it was a compromise verdict swayed by emotion.
Many different sceneries could have taken place, he could have been guilty. I think it was common sense that he was acquitted.
|
To be fair... we weren't in that court room...looking at all the evidence or listening to the testimony.
It would seem that he was saved by reasonable doubt and a system that favours the accused.
Had the burden been otherwise or had the prosecution been able to produce a little more.... I think he would have been convisted of manslaughter.
Who knows?
It could have been a matter of the jury prefering one witness over another... and nothiong more than that.
Anyway... old news and the important thing is that now justice has been served. I'm glad there was a trail.
I don't think the death of one person at the hands of another should be accepted so easily that no enquiry beyond a terse police investigation is made.