Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-21-2018, 12:15 AM
MooseRiverTrapper MooseRiverTrapper is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
I'm not a fisherman but I'm a tax payer and a candian citizen. Where does DND actually get off telling the citizens that they can't have ONE weekend of fishing on a lake in our own damned country?
Damn rights!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-21-2018, 08:58 AM
Lowrance Fishburn Lowrance Fishburn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
I'm not a fisherman but I'm a tax payer and a candian citizen. Where does DND actually get off telling the citizens that they can't have ONE weekend of fishing on a lake in our own damned country?
Same reason they wont let you fish the tailing ponds at Chernobyl, safety lol. Of course we dont have Chernobyl levels of harmful radiation at Primrose but it is still on an active weapons range. One weekend a season should be fine, in theory, but if the government has nothing to gain financially from doing that, I don't see them doing any favors either.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-21-2018, 09:54 AM
CMichaud's Avatar
CMichaud CMichaud is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Beijing, Canada
Posts: 1,470
Default

If they already allow commercial there is no real reason not to allow a restricted non-commercial opportunity.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-21-2018, 10:22 AM
Bigwoodsman Bigwoodsman is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
I'm not a fisherman but I'm a tax payer and a candian citizen. Where does DND actually get off telling the citizens that they can't have ONE weekend of fishing on a lake in our own damned country?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMichaud View Post
If they already allow commercial there is no real reason not to allow a restricted non-commercial opportunity.
Agree with both of these statements. I grew up in the region and spent a few days fishing this great lake back in the '70's and early to mid '80's. The weekends are a perfect time to fish this lake, just as long at there are no exercises going on. The walleye fishing on this lake is fabulous.

Back then the commercial guys would fish from just after Christmas to after the New year. I hauled many loads of fish from the Beacon Hill fish plant to Winnipeg for Fresh Water Fish.

If the Commercial guys can fish it, Civilians should have a chance as well on a long weekend too. You can bet there are military guys fishing this lake on the QT.
BW
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-21-2018, 04:17 PM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,107
Default

As a civilians easy for us to say open it up for fishing however it only takes one bonehead civilian to walk-a-shore step on an unexploded munition and the lawsuits will be a flying along with body parts. Seems like to me there are a few too many bonehead civilians who unfortunately like to hunt and fish these days.

They don't drop tank shells on the bombing range. I've felt the blast shock waves from many miles away on several occasions from what they drop and its no joke. Too much of a liability in this day and age.

You could control a handful of commercial guys. Can you imagine if it opened up to the general public on a weekend...there would be a line-up from Hwy 55 all they way to the base entrance.

It would be awesome but suspect just a pipe dream boys...
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-21-2018, 07:10 PM
schleprock schleprock is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bonnyville
Posts: 397
Default

Hope that I got this right. Earlier today, I spoke to a friend today that has put a fair amount of time and energy into trying to get public access back for us and the problem is not with the local air weapons base personal, as they are actually all for it. It is with the provincial government. There is currently a list of approximately 1,500 people that are allowed through the security gate and are able to fish the lake. They are not air weapons range personal either. The surprising thing is that the vast majority of these fisherman are not using gill nets for sustenance fishing during the winter months, they are sport fishing out of their boats using rods, reels and tackle. Therefore, the fore mentioned safety concerns do not seem to be a problem. A while back, there was apparently a deal between the Alberta and Saskatchewan provincial governments where Alberta was given Saskatchewan's part of Cold Lake to regulate and Alberta gave Saskatchewan their rights to the Alberta side of Primrose lake. I put this information out there in hopes that someone with way better connections than I have can use it to help with the cause.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-21-2018, 07:29 PM
MountainTi's Avatar
MountainTi MountainTi is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penner View Post
As a civilians easy for us to say open it up for fishing however it only takes one bonehead civilian to walk-a-shore step on an unexploded munition and the lawsuits will be a flying along with body parts. Seems like to me there are a few too many bonehead civilians who unfortunately like to hunt and fish these days.

They don't drop tank shells on the bombing range. I've felt the blast shock waves from many miles away on several occasions from what they drop and its no joke. Too much of a liability in this day and age.

You could control a handful of commercial guys. Can you imagine if it opened up to the general public on a weekend...there would be a line-up from Hwy 55 all they way to the base entrance.

It would be awesome but suspect just a pipe dream boys...
I've worked all over the CLAWR. Not that scary. I'm sure the odd weekend of ice fishing could be controlled quite easily

Saw a cranker of a whitetail one winter in there as well.....
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-22-2018, 01:24 AM
ctd ctd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,380
Default

When I was up there in 2006, only people allowed to fish on the lake were commercial fishermen using nets. They were controlled going on and off the lake and the range.

The liability of being on the range is of concern.

I would love to be able to hunt and fish up there.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-22-2018, 08:46 AM
splake0 splake0 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cold Lake
Posts: 525
Default

Most of the lake is in Saskatchewan.
So you would need them to reintroduced legislation to have angling allowed on the lake. They took angling off the books years ago.
If you wanted to fish only on the Alberta side you probably wouldn't do very well.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-22-2018, 10:44 AM
7mmremmag 7mmremmag is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 1,539
Default

Spencer is on the Air Weapons range and it is open for ice fishing. Cant see why they wouldnt let people fish Primrose.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-22-2018, 11:04 AM
LCCFisherman LCCFisherman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 932
Default

Petition happened 5 years ago.. it didn't work...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-22-2018, 01:27 PM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7mmremmag View Post
Spencer is on the Air Weapons range and it is open for ice fishing. Cant see why they wouldnt let people fish Primrose.
Spencer is on the SW corner of the range were much of the bombing runs do not occur. Apples and Bowling balls they are both round but....
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-22-2018, 02:27 PM
Bigwoodsman Bigwoodsman is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctd View Post
When I was up there in 2006, only people allowed to fish on the lake were commercial fishermen using nets. They were controlled going on and off the lake and the range.

The liability of being on the range is of concern.

I would love to be able to hunt and fish up there.


My dad was a fur buyer back in the late 1940's and early 1950's, he'd tell stories of the amount of fur he would by off the local natives who trapped the area that is now the Primrose Bombing Range. He said he loaded rail cars full of fur in the spring brought to him from the area north of present day Cold Lake.

He said many trappers had lines that would run from Cold Lake to Grist, Winnifred, and the Christina lake area. When the government created the range these trappers received a lump payment to give up their lines.

Back then the railroad ended at Legoff AKA the Y.




BW
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-22-2018, 02:53 PM
The Spruce's Avatar
The Spruce The Spruce is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Eastern Alberta
Posts: 891
Default

Indians net Primose every weekend all winter long. Not sure why us squatters can't fish it one weekend a year. The Sask guys get to net their side until quotas are met as well annually. Just Our government gave into the lawyers treaties.

Spruce
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.